First it was an "editing" error, not it's a "fact checking" error. She can't get her story straight. Once she wants to pick one, let me know.
Miriam Goderich certainly picked one:
"You're undoubtedly aware of the brouhaha stirred up by Breitbart about the erroneous statement in a client list Acton & Dystel published in 1991 (for circulation within the publishing industry only) that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me — an agency assistant at the time," Goderich wrote. "There was never any information given to us by Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii. I hope you can communicate to your readers that this was a simple mistake and nothing more."
Miriam Goderich
Do you have a source better than Miriam Goderich on the content of that pamphlet? If so, present it. Otherwise, the world's leading authority has spoken.
Someone who writes a blurb, makes up where he was born and it slips her mind to ask anyone, where he was born in a blurb with like three things that could even be checked, she is trustworthy to you. Someone who lied or just doesn't care about the truth. His being born in Kenya just appeared out of no where. No one made it up. It just appeared and honorable, truthful people didn't catch that slip.
On the other hand, the PM of the UK and British intelligence corroborating W and sticking behind him? They are liars.
Your only consistency is you believe what you want no matter how unreliable the source, and you don't believe what you don't want to believe no matter how reliable. You're a partisan shill.