Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Voter Fraud Trial May Demonstrate Obama Never Qualified In 2008
April 22, 2013
Questions will soon be answered as to whether or not Barack Hussein Obama actually qualified to be on the 2008 Presidential ballot as the trial gets underway for a former Democrat Party official and a Board of Elections worker who are accused of submitting illegitimate signatures on petitions that enabled both Obama and Hillary Clinton to qualify for the race in Indiana.
Under state law presidential candidates must obtain 500 signatures from each of the states nine congressional districts. In the Second Congressional District, which is St. Joseph County, Obamas campaign only got 534 signatures, while campaign rival Hillary Clinton got 704.
Prosecutors in the case claim that nine of the petition pages of signatures for Obama were forged. Each of the pages contain ten names which makes it possible that up to 90 names were forged. This means Barack Obama would have been ineligible (not that he isnt ineligible on other grounds) should he fall under the legal limit required to qualify. Clinton on the other hand still had a significant amount of petition signatures to meet the threshold of 500.
One Indiana State Police investigator, who investigated the petitions, said in court papers that selected names at random from each of the petition pages and contacted those people directly. We found at least one person (and often multiple people) from each page who confirmed that they had not signed petitions or given consent for their name and/or signature to appear.
If you recall, this is the very thing that tripped up Newt Gingrich up in the Republican primaries when he failed to get on the ballot in Virginia because authorities claimed that hundreds of signatures on his campaigns petitions were fraudulent. One campaign worker pleaded guilty and another is still facing charges.
Obama won the state of IN in 2008 but it only has 11 electors so it appears this can't change the election results. But a defeat for obama might start people asking "what else has he lied about".
Questions will soon be answered as to whether or not Barack Hussein Obama
It won't have much effect, if any. The libs have managed to get half the country dependent on govermnent, and the freeloaders won't give that up, whether their supplier is a fraud or not. Unfortunately, and tragically, the U.S. is going down.
Yeah, until your welfare runs out and your messiah makes you start working for your keep.It won't have much effect, if any. The libs have managed to get half the country dependent on govermnent, and the freeloaders won't give that up, whether their supplier is a fraud or not. Unfortunately, and tragically, the U.S. is going down.
Nah, just you fruitloops too lazy to clean the beer cans from in front of your single wides. The rest of us are doing rather well.
It won't have much effect, if any. The libs have managed to get half the country dependent on govermnent, and the freeloaders won't give that up, whether their supplier is a fraud or not. Unfortunately, and tragically, the U.S. is going down.
But a defeat for obama might start people asking "what else has he lied about".
This was from the 2008 democratic primary, not the general election.
Obama didn't win the Indiana primary.
This case is against a few members of the Indiana Democratic Party, not Obama.
It won't have much effect, if any. The libs have managed to get half the country dependent on govermnent, and the freeloaders won't give that up, whether their supplier is a fraud or not. Unfortunately, and tragically, the U.S. is going down.
It won't have much effect, if any. The libs have managed to get half the country dependent on govermnent, and the freeloaders won't give that up, whether their supplier is a fraud or not. Unfortunately, and tragically, the U.S. is going down.
besides the fact the "half the country is dependent on government" canard. (I would argue the whole country is, otherwise, we'd all be riding round like a Mad Max movie.)
I agree, we have too many people dependent on government.
but whose fault is that.
The Democrats for offering help, or the Republicans for supporting economic policies that required it?
I would like to see every able bodied American have a renumerative job and be paying taxes.
We actually got close to that in the 1990's, and the wealthy couldn't get BUsh in fast enough to fuck that up. I mean, we actually have to PAY them.
This was from the 2008 democratic primary, not the general election.
Obama didn't win the Indiana primary.
This case is against a few members of the Indiana Democratic Party, not Obama.
glad to see there is Some court ducumented evidence you will accpet.
Does that mean you will now accept the mountians of court documents that prove the republican party cheats in elections?
Do you NOW accpet court records like these?
Obama won the state of IN in 2008 but it only has 11 electors so it appears this can't change the election results. But a defeat for obama might start people asking "what else has he lied about".
Questions will soon be answered as to whether or not Barack Hussein Obama
That's as far as I had to read before recognizing this as inconsequential partisan nonsense.
This was from the 2008 democratic primary, not the general election.
Obama didn't win the Indiana primary.
This case is against a few members of the Indiana Democratic Party, not Obama.
Your butt was thourghly kicked in 2008 and 2012. Keep this kind of nonsense up, and it will be kicked in 2016 as well. The little tin hat brigade is not impressing anybody.
If you guys want to continue your ridiculous pissing contest, do it in the other thread.
