Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
what is really SICK is these so called "patriot" tea party slimes think the minority of the minority party should be the one getting its way in a democracy.
The founders did not plan it that way and every one of you liars KNOW that fact.
Your bullies and you dont love Democracy
Then you don't know much about our Founding Fathers.
At the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Franklin was queried as he left Independence Hall on the final day of deliberation. In the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Marylands delegates to the Convention, a lady asked Dr. Franklin Well Doctor what have we got, a republic or a monarchy. Franklin replied, A republic . . . if you can keep it.
Our Constitution created a limited representative republic. A republic is different from a democracy. In a democracy, the majority can directly make laws, while in a republic, elected representatives make laws. Basically, in a pure democracy, the majority has unlimited power, whereas in a republic, a written constitution limits the majority and provides safeguards for the individual and minorities.
A Republic, if You Can Keep It . . . | What Would The Founders Think?
Both parties are responsible the meltdown idiot.
This crash was decades in the making under both parties.
Catch a fucking clue and fuck your partisan bullshit.
Jesus your a moron.
It was caused by the housing bubble.
That formed in the years Bush was in office and the republicans controled things.
FACTS dont back your stupid
a republic is a type of Democracy.
A Constitutional Republic is a state where the officials are elected as representatives of the people, and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over citizens.
A Constitutional Republic is the current form of government in the United States. However in recent years, many people have criticized the federal government for moving away from a Constitutional Republic, as defined by the Constitution, and towards a pure democracy.[1]
TeamLaw.org defines a Constitutional Republic as follows:
A Republic, by definition, has two principle elements. First, it is controlled by Law; therefore, it does not control Law. Second, it recognizes the private independent sovereign nature of each person (man or woman) of competent age and capacity; therefore, a Republic must be representative in its nature.
A Republic recognizes Law is unchangeable, or at least that it can only be changed by a higher source than government. In a Republic the concept of collective sovereignty cannot exist, except with recognition that the State or nation, as a body of sovereigns, can speak through one elected voice; though that one voice can never lawfully interfere with the private rights of the individual sovereigns.
A Constitutional Republic is a government created and controlled, at least, by the Law of a Constitution. The Constitution of the United States of America was, in Law, a foundation based on the Bible, the Magna Carta and the Declaration of Independence. Those documents recognize mans sovereignty, the divine nature of mans creation and mans divine right to Life, Liberty, the means of acquiring and possessing Property, and the pursuit of happiness.[2]
Democracy is the government of the people, by the people and for the people (as Abraham Lincoln defined it). It was invented by the ancient Greeks and has spread widely in western nations since the English Civil War in the mid 17th century.
Democracy means the people rule and can do anything they want by majority rule.[1] In the U.S. "super majorities" (over 50%) are required for many decisions, such as ratifying a treaty or passing a constitutional amendment. Republicanism means there is a system of rule of law, or inalienable rights, which no majority can vote out.
The President has 30 to 80 Republicans in the House who are ready to vote for his measures if Boehner will allow a vote.
Boehner knows this, and refuses to put up for vote, any measure he knows he will lose on.
The "ceiling" and "cliff" bills passed with 30 to 80 House Republicans voting with a solid Demmocrat caucus.
Obama wouldn't have to wait until 2014 to gain control of the House, but it will take that vote to put Nancy back into the Speaker's job.
The President has 30 to 80 Republicans in the House who are ready to vote for his measures if Boehner will allow a vote.
Boehner knows this, and refuses to put up for vote, any measure he knows he will lose on.
The "ceiling" and "cliff" bills passed with 30 to 80 House Republicans voting with a solid Demmocrat caucus.
Obama wouldn't have to wait until 2014 to gain control of the House, but it will take that vote to put Nancy back into the Speaker's job.
...Obama wouldn't have to wait until 2014 to gain control of the House, but it will take that vote to put Nancy back into the Speaker's job.
Obama wouldn't have to wait until 2014 to gain control of the House, but it will take that vote to put Nancy back into the Speaker's job
if you are supposing for a moment that any, and I mean any republican would vote to give the House gavel to, hell, not just Nancy but any democrat, your understanding of politics how the chambers and exec. work, etc. etc. is infantile.....
Any Democrat bill that will pass in the Senate is Filibustered by Republicans.
McConnell has used over 400 filibusters in 4 years to block Democrat bills.
The point is, there are 30 to 80 Republicans in the HOUSE who are ready to vote for Democrat bills as shown by the 'cliff' and 'debt ceiling' bills.
Any Democrat bill that will pass in the Senate is Filibustered by Republicans.
McConnell has used over 400 filibusters in 4 years to block Democrat bills.
The point is, there are 30 to 80 Republicans in the HOUSE who are ready to vote for Democrat bills as shown by the 'cliff' and 'debt ceiling' bills.
you really need a cracker
Obama wouldn't have to wait until 2014 to gain control of the House, but it will take that vote to put Nancy back into the Speaker's job
if you are supposing for a moment that any, and I mean any republican would vote to give the House gavel to, hell, not just Nancy but any democrat, your understanding of politics how the chambers and exec. work, etc. etc. is infantile.....
Feel better getting that off your scrawny little chest?
Good.
Now re-read the title of this thread and understand that only the 2014 Democrat majority will vote for Speaker - and they will vote for Nancy
Any Democrat bill that will pass in the Senate is Filibustered by Republicans.
McConnell has used over 400 filibusters in 4 years to block Democrat bills.
The point is, there are 30 to 80 Republicans in the HOUSE who are ready to vote for Democrat bills as shown by the 'cliff' and 'debt ceiling' bills.
Any Democrat bill that will pass in the Senate is Filibustered by Republicans.
McConnell has used over 400 filibusters in 4 years to block Democrat bills.
The point is, there are 30 to 80 Republicans in the HOUSE who are ready to vote for Democrat bills as shown by the 'cliff' and 'debt ceiling' bills.
You didn't read a word I said
google and a curious mind with a modicum of serious neutral interest would reveal senate rules and history. Your one line statement as to '400' filibusters is grossly inaccurate, mischaracterized and to 'pat'.
Any Democrat bill that will pass in the Senate is Filibustered by Republicans.
McConnell has used over 400 filibusters in 4 years to block Democrat bills.
The point is, there are 30 to 80 Republicans in the HOUSE who are ready to vote for Democrat bills as shown by the 'cliff' and 'debt ceiling' bills.
You didn't read a word I said
google and a curious mind with a modicum of serious neutral interest would reveal senate rules and history. Your one line statement as to '400' filibusters is grossly inaccurate, mischaracterized and to 'pat'.
You can rest assured I don't listen to or read the Limbaugh juvenile pap ... who would?
