Obama just said our "footprint" is bigger than most country's.

No you really have no idea what you are talking about. If you actually managed a college education, you would see the value in peer-reviewed, independent research on climate change. You do realize, of course, that American Rightwingers are the only people the world over to still think this is a myth. God it's just embarrassing.

GFY loon, it's a scam and I don't need someone as stupid as you are (I've read your nonsense) trying to snow me otherwise
Don't you think it's pretty pathetic that you think this is a scam simply because republicans and Fox News told you it is? Those are the only sources you even listen to on this subject.

Keep guessing, loon. In the meantime get past I take you serious. Although you do have some comedy value. They wouldn't need to be fudging data if it was real but they are and they get caught doing it
So you admit then that you are just a republican/Fox News pawn? Ok good.

See how stupid you are? I never "admitted" any such thing. Now go play outside "Billy", you're way out of your league here and I don't have the time or desire to educate you
You have absolutely nothing to educate me with besides rightwing bullshit.
 
GFY loon, it's a scam and I don't need someone as stupid as you are (I've read your nonsense) trying to snow me otherwise
Don't you think it's pretty pathetic that you think this is a scam simply because republicans and Fox News told you it is? Those are the only sources you even listen to on this subject.

Keep guessing, loon. In the meantime get past I take you serious. Although you do have some comedy value. They wouldn't need to be fudging data if it was real but they are and they get caught doing it
So you admit then that you are just a republican/Fox News pawn? Ok good.

See how stupid you are? I never "admitted" any such thing. Now go play outside "Billy", you're way out of your league here and I don't have the time or desire to educate you
You have absolutely nothing to educate me with besides rightwing bullshit.

That's nice, now run along, child
 
As usual, the stream of lies DRIP from Obama's alien-egg-sac lips..... along with any load of muslim cum he forgot to swallow. Even adjusting for the extreme population disparity, China is the biggest polluter that ever existed. Furthermore, has anyone noticed that like all muslims, that black crybaby is an ingrate punk who spends most of his public discourse sneering/scolding Americans? He's an exercise in miserable, uninspiring whining. I've never seen an American politician with such a sniveling, crybaby contempt for his public than Typhoid Barry. He's a spoiled, ingrate punk like the rest of his vicious, subhuman religion.
 
Footprints? Wait wait, that Al gore thing? That is still going?

HOLY SHIT
It's a shame you people are too stupid to understand what climate change actually is.

We told you, it's a scam designed to redistribute wealth. As soon as they mentioned carbon credits you should have gotten the clue
No you really have no idea what you are talking about. If you actually managed a college education, you would see the value in peer-reviewed, independent research on climate change. You do realize, of course, that American Rightwingers are the only people the world over to still think this is a myth, right? God it's just embarrassing.
Climate papers are not "peer reviewed." They are pal reviewed. All the reviewers are in a cozy little club where everyone belongs to the AGW cult. They conspire together to keep papers sceptical of AGW from getting published. This arrangement was exposed by the Climategate emails.

And so-called "climate scientists" are not independent. They are all sucking on the government tit.
 
Footprints? Wait wait, that Al gore thing? That is still going?

HOLY SHIT
It's a shame you people are too stupid to understand what climate change actually is.

We told you, it's a scam designed to redistribute wealth. As soon as they mentioned carbon credits you should have gotten the clue
No you really have no idea what you are talking about. If you actually managed a college education, you would see the value in peer-reviewed, independent research on climate change. You do realize, of course, that American Rightwingers are the only people the world over to still think this is a myth, right? God it's just embarrassing.
Climate papers are not "peer reviewed." They are pal reviewed. All the reviewers are in a cozy little club where everyone belongs to the AGW cult. They conspire together to keep papers sceptical of AGW from getting published. This arrangement was exposed by the Climategate emails.

And so-called "climate scientists" are not independent. They are all sucking on the government tit.
No, you're just making shit up as always. You and both know you don't even know what peer-reviewed research is, primarily because you have never set foot in a classroom of higher learning.
 
Footprints? Wait wait, that Al gore thing? That is still going?

HOLY SHIT
It's a shame you people are too stupid to understand what climate change actually is.

We told you, it's a scam designed to redistribute wealth. As soon as they mentioned carbon credits you should have gotten the clue
No you really have no idea what you are talking about. If you actually managed a college education, you would see the value in peer-reviewed, independent research on climate change. You do realize, of course, that American Rightwingers are the only people the world over to still think this is a myth, right? God it's just embarrassing.
Climate papers are not "peer reviewed." They are pal reviewed. All the reviewers are in a cozy little club where everyone belongs to the AGW cult. They conspire together to keep papers sceptical of AGW from getting published. This arrangement was exposed by the Climategate emails.

And so-called "climate scientists" are not independent. They are all sucking on the government tit.
No, you're just making shit up as always. You and both know you don't even know what peer-reviewed research is, primarily because you have never set foot in a classroom of higher learning.

The "college graduate" Billy doesn't offer up facts, he spews and parrots and attempts lame personal insults. You're out of your league, Billy Boy, we see right through you
 
Footprints? Wait wait, that Al gore thing? That is still going?

HOLY SHIT
It's a shame you people are too stupid to understand what climate change actually is.

We told you, it's a scam designed to redistribute wealth. As soon as they mentioned carbon credits you should have gotten the clue
No you really have no idea what you are talking about. If you actually managed a college education, you would see the value in peer-reviewed, independent research on climate change. You do realize, of course, that American Rightwingers are the only people the world over to still think this is a myth, right? God it's just embarrassing.
Climate papers are not "peer reviewed." They are pal reviewed. All the reviewers are in a cozy little club where everyone belongs to the AGW cult. They conspire together to keep papers sceptical of AGW from getting published. This arrangement was exposed by the Climategate emails.

And so-called "climate scientists" are not independent. They are all sucking on the government tit.
No, you're just making shit up as always. You and both know you don't even know what peer-reviewed research is, primarily because you have never set foot in a classroom of higher learning.
If you had an argument you wouldn't post such lame shit.
 
It's a shame you people are too stupid to understand what climate change actually is.

We told you, it's a scam designed to redistribute wealth. As soon as they mentioned carbon credits you should have gotten the clue
No you really have no idea what you are talking about. If you actually managed a college education, you would see the value in peer-reviewed, independent research on climate change. You do realize, of course, that American Rightwingers are the only people the world over to still think this is a myth, right? God it's just embarrassing.
Climate papers are not "peer reviewed." They are pal reviewed. All the reviewers are in a cozy little club where everyone belongs to the AGW cult. They conspire together to keep papers sceptical of AGW from getting published. This arrangement was exposed by the Climategate emails.

And so-called "climate scientists" are not independent. They are all sucking on the government tit.
No, you're just making shit up as always. You and both know you don't even know what peer-reviewed research is, primarily because you have never set foot in a classroom of higher learning.
If you had an argument you wouldn't post such lame shit.

BINGO!!!
 
It's a shame you people are too stupid to understand what climate change actually is.

We told you, it's a scam designed to redistribute wealth. As soon as they mentioned carbon credits you should have gotten the clue
No you really have no idea what you are talking about. If you actually managed a college education, you would see the value in peer-reviewed, independent research on climate change. You do realize, of course, that American Rightwingers are the only people the world over to still think this is a myth, right? God it's just embarrassing.
Climate papers are not "peer reviewed." They are pal reviewed. All the reviewers are in a cozy little club where everyone belongs to the AGW cult. They conspire together to keep papers sceptical of AGW from getting published. This arrangement was exposed by the Climategate emails.

And so-called "climate scientists" are not independent. They are all sucking on the government tit.
No, you're just making shit up as always. You and both know you don't even know what peer-reviewed research is, primarily because you have never set foot in a classroom of higher learning.

The "college graduate" Billy doesn't offer up facts, he spews and parrots and attempts lame personal insults. You're out of your league, Billy Boy, we see right through you
We both already know that there is a scientific consensus from peer-reviewed research the world over man made climate change is real. Pathetically, you point to something Al Gore said years ago and pretend that's proof of something. No one gives a shit what Al Gore says besides you douche bags.
 
Jeopardy! Music still playing for parroting moron science invalids who believe CO2 has something to do with Earth climate change...


here's the question AGAIN


Why does one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, have 9 times the ice of the other???



Parrots scramble, search the net, all censored, nobody to parrot.... oh no, do they have to THINK for once???

LMFAO!!
 
We told you, it's a scam designed to redistribute wealth. As soon as they mentioned carbon credits you should have gotten the clue
No you really have no idea what you are talking about. If you actually managed a college education, you would see the value in peer-reviewed, independent research on climate change. You do realize, of course, that American Rightwingers are the only people the world over to still think this is a myth, right? God it's just embarrassing.
Climate papers are not "peer reviewed." They are pal reviewed. All the reviewers are in a cozy little club where everyone belongs to the AGW cult. They conspire together to keep papers sceptical of AGW from getting published. This arrangement was exposed by the Climategate emails.

And so-called "climate scientists" are not independent. They are all sucking on the government tit.
No, you're just making shit up as always. You and both know you don't even know what peer-reviewed research is, primarily because you have never set foot in a classroom of higher learning.

The "college graduate" Billy doesn't offer up facts, he spews and parrots and attempts lame personal insults. You're out of your league, Billy Boy, we see right through you
We both already know that there is a scientific consensus from peer-reviewed research the world over man made climate change is real. Pathetically, you point to something Al Gore said years ago and pretend that's proof of something. No one gives a shit what Al Gore says besides you douche bags.

The term "scientific consensus" is an oxymoron. A consensus, isn't science, moron.
Whenever someone uses the term "consensus" and calls it science, you know thy don't now their ass from a hole in the ground. "Consensus" is a political term, not a scientific term.
 
No you really have no idea what you are talking about. If you actually managed a college education, you would see the value in peer-reviewed, independent research on climate change. You do realize, of course, that American Rightwingers are the only people the world over to still think this is a myth, right? God it's just embarrassing.
Climate papers are not "peer reviewed." They are pal reviewed. All the reviewers are in a cozy little club where everyone belongs to the AGW cult. They conspire together to keep papers sceptical of AGW from getting published. This arrangement was exposed by the Climategate emails.

And so-called "climate scientists" are not independent. They are all sucking on the government tit.
No, you're just making shit up as always. You and both know you don't even know what peer-reviewed research is, primarily because you have never set foot in a classroom of higher learning.

The "college graduate" Billy doesn't offer up facts, he spews and parrots and attempts lame personal insults. You're out of your league, Billy Boy, we see right through you
We both already know that there is a scientific consensus from peer-reviewed research the world over man made climate change is real. Pathetically, you point to something Al Gore said years ago and pretend that's proof of something. No one gives a shit what Al Gore says besides you douche bags.

The term "scientific consensus" is an oxymoron. A consensus, isn't science, moron.
Whenever someone uses the term "consensus" and calls it science, you know thy don't now their ass from a hole in the ground. "Consensus" is a political term, not a scientific term.
Are you really too stupid to understand what science is? In fact it seems clear you don't even understand what the word consensus means. Good god.
 
Climate papers are not "peer reviewed." They are pal reviewed. All the reviewers are in a cozy little club where everyone belongs to the AGW cult. They conspire together to keep papers sceptical of AGW from getting published. This arrangement was exposed by the Climategate emails.

And so-called "climate scientists" are not independent. They are all sucking on the government tit.
No, you're just making shit up as always. You and both know you don't even know what peer-reviewed research is, primarily because you have never set foot in a classroom of higher learning.

The "college graduate" Billy doesn't offer up facts, he spews and parrots and attempts lame personal insults. You're out of your league, Billy Boy, we see right through you
We both already know that there is a scientific consensus from peer-reviewed research the world over man made climate change is real. Pathetically, you point to something Al Gore said years ago and pretend that's proof of something. No one gives a shit what Al Gore says besides you douche bags.

The term "scientific consensus" is an oxymoron. A consensus, isn't science, moron.
Whenever someone uses the term "consensus" and calls it science, you know thy don't now their ass from a hole in the ground. "Consensus" is a political term, not a scientific term.
Are you really too stupid to understand what science is? In fact it seems clear you don't even understand what the word consensus means. Good god.

Riddle me this, oh educated one. Why do they keep getting caught fudging the data? Now don't come back with Fox News, science, or any other squawking, just answer the question.
 
Are you really too stupid to understand what science is? In fact it seems clear you don't even understand what the word consensus means. Good god.


You are the one who wants censorship and cannot even answer THE FIRST QUESTION of EARTH CLIMATE CHANGE...


You are a ...

 
No, you're just making shit up as always. You and both know you don't even know what peer-reviewed research is, primarily because you have never set foot in a classroom of higher learning.

The "college graduate" Billy doesn't offer up facts, he spews and parrots and attempts lame personal insults. You're out of your league, Billy Boy, we see right through you
We both already know that there is a scientific consensus from peer-reviewed research the world over man made climate change is real. Pathetically, you point to something Al Gore said years ago and pretend that's proof of something. No one gives a shit what Al Gore says besides you douche bags.

The term "scientific consensus" is an oxymoron. A consensus, isn't science, moron.
Whenever someone uses the term "consensus" and calls it science, you know thy don't now their ass from a hole in the ground. "Consensus" is a political term, not a scientific term.
Are you really too stupid to understand what science is? In fact it seems clear you don't even understand what the word consensus means. Good god.

Riddle me this, oh educated one. Why do they keep getting caught fudging the data? Now don't come back with Fox News, science, or any other squawking, just answer the question.
Gee there's been a single incident to fudging. Something that other climate scientists exposed and agreed had occurred. It means absolutely nothing if thousands of peer reviewed studies the world over confirm the phenomenon is real. You cherry picking isolated crap like this does nothing to validate your ignorance.
 
The "college graduate" Billy doesn't offer up facts, he spews and parrots and attempts lame personal insults. You're out of your league, Billy Boy, we see right through you
We both already know that there is a scientific consensus from peer-reviewed research the world over man made climate change is real. Pathetically, you point to something Al Gore said years ago and pretend that's proof of something. No one gives a shit what Al Gore says besides you douche bags.

The term "scientific consensus" is an oxymoron. A consensus, isn't science, moron.
Whenever someone uses the term "consensus" and calls it science, you know thy don't now their ass from a hole in the ground. "Consensus" is a political term, not a scientific term.
Are you really too stupid to understand what science is? In fact it seems clear you don't even understand what the word consensus means. Good god.

Riddle me this, oh educated one. Why do they keep getting caught fudging the data? Now don't come back with Fox News, science, or any other squawking, just answer the question.
Gee there's been a single incident to fudging. Something that other climate scientists exposed and agreed had occurred. It means absolutely nothing if thousands of peer reviewed studies the world over confirm the phenomenon is real. You cherry picking isolated crap like this does nothing to validate your ignorance.

Been more than that, maybe you should get off left loon sites and get informed. I posted four links yesterday on it.
 
Gee there's been a single incident to fudging. Something that other climate scientists exposed and agreed had occurred. It means absolutely nothing if thousands of peer reviewed studies the world over confirm the phenomenon is real. You cherry picking isolated crap like this does nothing to validate your ignorance.


In 2007 the British Court ruled the DATA, not the fudge, was that 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica was increasing. NASA recently validated that...

http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses


That's 90% of Earth ice GROWING, adding at least 80 billion tons of ice every year...

Two sides went to court. One side won. The other side CHICKENED OUT from appealing, and then claims "there is a consensus" but it isn't going to win an APPEAL...


Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’


"The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing."



EVERY SINGLE TIME a "warmer" has claimed Antarctica is "melting" or "losing ice," that individual LIED...
 
The "college graduate" Billy doesn't offer up facts, he spews and parrots and attempts lame personal insults. You're out of your league, Billy Boy, we see right through you
We both already know that there is a scientific consensus from peer-reviewed research the world over man made climate change is real. Pathetically, you point to something Al Gore said years ago and pretend that's proof of something. No one gives a shit what Al Gore says besides you douche bags.

The term "scientific consensus" is an oxymoron. A consensus, isn't science, moron.
Whenever someone uses the term "consensus" and calls it science, you know thy don't now their ass from a hole in the ground. "Consensus" is a political term, not a scientific term.
Are you really too stupid to understand what science is? In fact it seems clear you don't even understand what the word consensus means. Good god.

Riddle me this, oh educated one. Why do they keep getting caught fudging the data? Now don't come back with Fox News, science, or any other squawking, just answer the question.
Gee there's been a single incident to fudging. Something that other climate scientists exposed and agreed had occurred. It means absolutely nothing if thousands of peer reviewed studies the world over confirm the phenomenon is real. You cherry picking isolated crap like this does nothing to validate your ignorance.
Whether it be man made global warming, global cooling, climate change - it's all pseudoscience made up of control freaks
 

Forum List

Back
Top