defcon4
Platinum Member
- Jan 26, 2015
- 20,001
- 8,660
- 950
Please, do not insult parrots, macaws and cockatiels.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please, do not insult parrots, macaws and cockatiels.....
God you people come across so retarded when it comes referencing anything Al Gore says. It's so pathetic when we are talking about real scientific research. You just choose to harp on him because it fits your republican narrative. You can't handle the cognitive dissonance I guess. God forbid you ever actually go to college.Gee there's been a single incident to fudging. Something that other climate scientists exposed and agreed had occurred. It means absolutely nothing if thousands of peer reviewed studies the world over confirm the phenomenon is real. You cherry picking isolated crap like this does nothing to validate your ignorance.
In 2007 the British Court ruled the DATA, not the fudge, was that 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica was increasing. NASA recently validated that...
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
That's 90% of Earth ice GROWING, adding at least 80 billion tons of ice every year...
Two sides went to court. One side won. The other side CHICKENED OUT from appealing, and then claims "there is a consensus" but it isn't going to win an APPEAL...
Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’
"The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing."
EVERY SINGLE TIME a "warmer" has claimed Antarctica is "melting" or "losing ice," that individual LIED...
As I already pointed out, they aren't "peer reviewed." They are pal reviewed.Gee there's been a single incident to fudging. Something that other climate scientists exposed and agreed had occurred. It means absolutely nothing if thousands of peer reviewed studies the world over confirm the phenomenon is real. You cherry picking isolated crap like this does nothing to validate your ignorance.Are you really too stupid to understand what science is? In fact it seems clear you don't even understand what the word consensus means. Good god.We both already know that there is a scientific consensus from peer-reviewed research the world over man made climate change is real. Pathetically, you point to something Al Gore said years ago and pretend that's proof of something. No one gives a shit what Al Gore says besides you douche bags.The "college graduate" Billy doesn't offer up facts, he spews and parrots and attempts lame personal insults. You're out of your league, Billy Boy, we see right through you
The term "scientific consensus" is an oxymoron. A consensus, isn't science, moron.
Whenever someone uses the term "consensus" and calls it science, you know thy don't now their ass from a hole in the ground. "Consensus" is a political term, not a scientific term.
Riddle me this, oh educated one. Why do they keep getting caught fudging the data? Now don't come back with Fox News, science, or any other squawking, just answer the question.
You purchase carbon credits?American conservatives are literally the dumbest people on the planet. Evolutionary left overs that will soon be extinct through counter-selection, hopefully.
Footprints? Wait wait, that Al gore thing? That is still going?
HOLY SHIT
You purchase carbon credits?American conservatives are literally the dumbest people on the planet. Evolutionary left overs that will soon be extinct through counter-selection, hopefully.
You have now literally become the stupidest fucking poster on this site.
I have so many of the left wing insects on ignore. Did any of them admit that they purchase carbon credits?
If not, why not? I mean if Gore is so right, then why aren't they purchasing carbon credits?
If so, please tell me who.
Has any left winger calculated their own footprint size?
They think we are stupid.