WillowTree
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2008
- 84,532
- 16,092
- 2,180
Oh, and what is the problem with putting the previous admin on trial?
They broke no laws.. What exactly do you want to try them for? Breathing?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, and what is the problem with putting the previous admin on trial?
so many thoughts so many responses which one is right. So Obama is treating war like a crime, thats all.
Clinton treated terrorism as a crime, that is why we got attacked, so Obama does the same thing, it resulted in the Ft. Hood massacre.
I see no problem taking KSM into court, he freely admits his guilt, what happens when you go to court and plead guilty, there is no trial, you are sentenced right then and there. KSM is admitting he attaced the World trade center twice, once in 1993 and again on 9/11, the 1993 attack ties the 9/11 attack to Iraq, so if there is a trail this should come out.
But this is not about justice, this is about Obama, the guy is full of himself, Obama makes himself look good by making others look bad, not by accomplishments. It is the same as Obama standing next to a pile of dog shit and making a speech about how good Obama smells.
Justice, predetermined outcome, the Marxist did this under Mao, the accused were already considered guilty and the trial was a Marxist propaganda show, so this is just another example how Obama is a Marxist.
Oh, and what is the problem with putting the previous admin on trial?
They broke no laws.. What exactly do you want to try them for? Breathing?
Oh, and what is the problem with putting the previous admin on trial?
Oh, and what is the problem with putting the previous admin on trial?
Go for it. But don't do a sham trial with terrorists to get there.
Oh, and what is the problem with putting the previous admin on trial?
They broke no laws.. What exactly do you want to try them for? Breathing?
Really? How do you know? Were you privy to their closed-door meetings?
They broke no laws.. What exactly do you want to try them for? Breathing?
Really? How do you know? Were you privy to their closed-door meetings?
so you want a phishing trial? What a moron!
"when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him." - Barry Hussien Obama BEFORE the Accused is even Tried...
He is Absolutely a Bafoon without his Teleprompter.
peace...
ok..lets spend a bunch of money to try this guy. It'll probably go on for weeks, or months. Then we'll put him on death row for what...about 10 yrs? So our tax money will keep him alive then until they finally decide to put him out. If this ends up a quick trial, and the execution is within a couple months i won't complain. But that's not usually how it works.
I don't believe the Feds keep people on death row for 10 years....how long did Timothy McVeigh wait? The Washington D.C. sniper?
It's the states that take forever...unless it's Texas. They'd forego the trial if it didn't look bad.
OK. The fellow is guilty. He had a big hand in the attack that killed 3000 Americans. In many nations, he would already be dead.
But, since we are a nation of laws, we will do the right thing, give him a trial, formally establish his guilt, then execute him.
I listened closely and heard that the reason for this circus was so that the rest of the world could see how American justice works.
But didn't AG Holder defeat the purpose by saying that is he were found not guilty, well, we'll keep him locked up anyway...???
ok..lets spend a bunch of money to try this guy. It'll probably go on for weeks, or months. Then we'll put him on death row for what...about 10 yrs? So our tax money will keep him alive then until they finally decide to put him out. If this ends up a quick trial, and the execution is within a couple months i won't complain. But that's not usually how it works.
I don't believe the Feds keep people on death row for 10 years....how long did Timothy McVeigh wait? The Washington D.C. sniper?
It's the states that take forever...unless it's Texas. They'd forego the trial if it didn't look bad.
McVeigh was found guilty in June of 1997 and executed in June of 2001.
You're making the assumption we only have one crime to try him for. If someone is a suspect in multiple crimes, getting off in the first trial doesn't mean you're absolved of the other crimes.
You're making the assumption we only have one crime to try him for. If someone is a suspect in multiple crimes, getting off in the first trial doesn't mean you're absolved of the other crimes.
That's exactly the point. It happened with Saddam, it happens with the Mob, and pretty much anyone else of a criminal enterprise. They will go after you multiple times under multiple charges until they get you. As with the Saddam example, if they didn't get him the first time, they had about another ten charges at the very least lined up to go against him.
WRONG and NOT the POINT. These were people from a ROGUE orginization that have declared WAR upon the UNITED STATES, and it's citizens.
Congratulations for SIDING with the terrorists DOGBOY. And making yourself as BAD as them. ARE YOU an enemy of the United States, YOUR family, and MINE? If you say NO? Then YOU belie your statement.
how will KSM be sentenced to death in New York when New York doesn't have the death penalty?