Obama nominates openly gay man to lead Army

You're the one who tried to establish small percentage as abnormality.
There is no doubt that gay is abnormal.
the question is if that makes them less qualified to do a job or act in a way that is in societies best interest, and that answer to that is no, it does not.

How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.


bi-polar disorder occurs with about the same frequency, it being bi-polar considered normal?
autism and downs syndrome occur at greater frequencies, does that mean they are normal and we should stop wasting money on research?

There is no reason to 'treat' homosexuality because it is not harmful.
if homosexuality is not harmful, what harm does it do for homosexuals to be treated the same as everyone else?
 
There is no doubt that gay is abnormal.
the question is if that makes them less qualified to do a job or act in a way that is in societies best interest, and that answer to that is no, it does not.

How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.


bi-polar disorder occurs with about the same frequency, it being bi-polar considered normal?
autism and downs syndrome occur at greater frequencies, does that mean they are normal and we should stop wasting money on research?

There is no reason to 'treat' homosexuality because it is not harmful.


the spread of aids and other SIDs is harmful to humanity as a whole. But for gays, there would not be an aids epidemic.

You don't know that.
 
I happen to have green eyes so I strongly object to that notion, why not put limitations on blue eyes instead?

:booze:


If you equate eye color to anal intercourse between two males, then you are a very confused person.

You're the one who tried to establish small percentage as abnormality.
There is no doubt that gay is abnormal.
the question is if that makes them less qualified to do a job or act in a way that is in societies best interest, and that answer to that is no, it does not.

How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.
The fact that it does work against the biological reasons for the different sexes and the biological reasons for the genitals, It is not normal. It doesnt make any difference in the quality of the person but its not normal.

Having sex solely for the purpose of producing a child is abnormal, if you talk about percentages. 99% of all sex acts including intercourse occur for reasons other than the intent to produce a baby.
 
There is no doubt that gay is abnormal.
the question is if that makes them less qualified to do a job or act in a way that is in societies best interest, and that answer to that is no, it does not.

How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.


bi-polar disorder occurs with about the same frequency, it being bi-polar considered normal?
autism and downs syndrome occur at greater frequencies, does that mean they are normal and we should stop wasting money on research?

There is no reason to 'treat' homosexuality because it is not harmful.
if homosexuality is not harmful, what harm does it do for homosexuals to be treated the same as everyone else?

They aren't. There's the fight to deny them marriage rights. There are still places where they can be denied jobs because they're gay.
 
How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.


bi-polar disorder occurs with about the same frequency, it being bi-polar considered normal?
autism and downs syndrome occur at greater frequencies, does that mean they are normal and we should stop wasting money on research?

There is no reason to 'treat' homosexuality because it is not harmful.
if homosexuality is not harmful, what harm does it do for homosexuals to be treated the same as everyone else?

They aren't. There's the fight to deny them marriage rights. There are still places where they can be denied jobs because they're gay.
I didnt say there were not inequalities, I only asked because I want to know the reasoning behind the fear of these inequalities.
Personally, Ive never been approached by a gay guy for sexual reasons ( little hurt about that one ) so its not an issue to me as far as that goes.
 
If you equate eye color to anal intercourse between two males, then you are a very confused person.

You're the one who tried to establish small percentage as abnormality.
There is no doubt that gay is abnormal.
the question is if that makes them less qualified to do a job or act in a way that is in societies best interest, and that answer to that is no, it does not.

How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.


bi-polar disorder occurs with about the same frequency, it being bi-polar considered normal?
autism and downs syndrome occur at greater frequencies, does that mean they are normal and we should stop wasting money on research?

Left handedness is an abnormal behaviour, why don't we treat it?
 
There is no doubt that gay is abnormal.
the question is if that makes them less qualified to do a job or act in a way that is in societies best interest, and that answer to that is no, it does not.

How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.


bi-polar disorder occurs with about the same frequency, it being bi-polar considered normal?
autism and downs syndrome occur at greater frequencies, does that mean they are normal and we should stop wasting money on research?

There is no reason to 'treat' homosexuality because it is not harmful.


the spread of aids and other SIDs is harmful to humanity as a whole. But for gays, there would not be an aids epidemic.

Fishy loooooovvveeees him some lesbians though. Lowest risk for STDs and he can't seem to stop thinking about them.
 
How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.


bi-polar disorder occurs with about the same frequency, it being bi-polar considered normal?
autism and downs syndrome occur at greater frequencies, does that mean they are normal and we should stop wasting money on research?

There is no reason to 'treat' homosexuality because it is not harmful.


the spread of aids and other SIDs is harmful to humanity as a whole. But for gays, there would not be an aids epidemic.

You don't know that.

Syphilis has killed more humans than AIDs. It is not a 'gay' disease.
 
You're the one who tried to establish small percentage as abnormality.
There is no doubt that gay is abnormal.
the question is if that makes them less qualified to do a job or act in a way that is in societies best interest, and that answer to that is no, it does not.

How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.


bi-polar disorder occurs with about the same frequency, it being bi-polar considered normal?
autism and downs syndrome occur at greater frequencies, does that mean they are normal and we should stop wasting money on research?

Left handedness is an abnormal behaviour, why don't we treat it?
I know when I see someone writing with their left hand, I get this serious urge to slap them in the side of head.
We should outlaw it and send them to camps to learn to use the correct hand.
 
There is no doubt that gay is abnormal.
the question is if that makes them less qualified to do a job or act in a way that is in societies best interest, and that answer to that is no, it does not.

How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.


bi-polar disorder occurs with about the same frequency, it being bi-polar considered normal?
autism and downs syndrome occur at greater frequencies, does that mean they are normal and we should stop wasting money on research?

There is no reason to 'treat' homosexuality because it is not harmful.


the spread of aids and other SIDs is harmful to humanity as a whole. But for gays, there would not be an aids epidemic.

So is/was syphilis. What discriminatory actions should have been taken against heterosexuals for that?
 
Having sex solely for the purpose of producing a child is abnormal, if you talk about percentages. 99% of all sex acts including intercourse occur for reasons other than the intent to produce a baby.

What, seriously?

Why didn't someone tell me this before, I've been practicing abstinence for no good reason at all?

:banana:
not to be mean but,,,, if thats you in your avatar, you might not be practicing abstinence by choice.
just saying.
 
How do you know gay is abnormal? Our knowledge of human history would say that homosexuality is a normally occurring subset of sexual orientation with the human species.


bi-polar disorder occurs with about the same frequency, it being bi-polar considered normal?
autism and downs syndrome occur at greater frequencies, does that mean they are normal and we should stop wasting money on research?

There is no reason to 'treat' homosexuality because it is not harmful.


the spread of aids and other SIDs is harmful to humanity as a whole. But for gays, there would not be an aids epidemic.
how about disease that is spread through straight men having sex with addict prostitutes. If not for them, the aids epidemic would have stayed in the gay community.
It was in the blood supply but it was more important to be politically correct and not single out gays.
 
Having sex solely for the purpose of producing a child is abnormal, if you talk about percentages. 99% of all sex acts including intercourse occur for reasons other than the intent to produce a baby.

What, seriously?

Why didn't someone tell me this before, I've been practicing abstinence for no good reason at all?

:banana:

I wouldn't be surprised if the contraceptive industry is as big as the diaper industry. lol, although that might not hold up now that heterosexual anal sex is the fastest growing sexual activity on the planet.
 
Having sex solely for the purpose of producing a child is abnormal, if you talk about percentages. 99% of all sex acts including intercourse occur for reasons other than the intent to produce a baby.

What, seriously?

Why didn't someone tell me this before, I've been practicing abstinence for no good reason at all?

:banana:

I wouldn't be surprised if the contraceptive industry is as big as the diaper industry. lol, although that might not hold up now that heterosexual anal sex is the fastest growing sexual activity on the planet.
are you implying that stretching out the butt hole brings about a need for diapers due to the leaking caused by bad seals?
 
They aren't. There's the fight to deny them marriage rights. There are still places where they can be denied jobs because they're gay.
People have the right to fight for their right to define marriage too. Which job determines your sexual preference before hiring? You must be on crack.
 
They aren't. There's the fight to deny them marriage rights. There are still places where they can be denied jobs because they're gay.
People have the right to fight for their right to define marriage too. Which job determines your sexual preference before hiring? You must be on crack.
sexual preference is a pretty big concern in the porn industry
 

Forum List

Back
Top