Obama sending US Marshalls to ARREST those who owe federal student loans! Dang libs...

[bodecea]

So....to sum up...Bucky wants up to blame President Obama for a US Marshall doing their job as ordered by a judge because someone continuously ignored bench warrants....even tho Bucky wants to claim that it was over student loans, NOT continuously ignored bench warrants.

 

[bucs90]

Someone please tell Skylar that our basic founding principles as a nation has separation of powers. 3 branches. Judicial. Legislative and Executive.

The men with guns....police and military....cannot have a chain of command that is shared by two branches. See....that's not separate.

One branch empowers the other but does not literally command the other.

It's why SCOTUS cannot send us to war and why POTUS can write laws.

 

[Skylar]

So....to sum up...Bucky wants up to blame President Obama for a US Marshall doing their job as ordered by a judge because someone continuously ignored bench warrants....even tho Bucky wants to claim that it was over student loans, NOT continuously ignored bench warrants.

That about sums it up.

The law of averages would mandate that eventually bucky would get something right. But somehow, he always finds a way to fail.

 

[Skylar]

Someone please tell Skylar that our basic founding principles as a nation has separation of powers. 3 branches. Judicial. Legislative and Executive.

The men with guns....police and military....cannot have a chain of command that is shared by two branches. See....that's not separate.

One branch empowers the other but does not literally command the other.

It's why SCOTUS cannot send us to war and why POTUS can write laws.

You're *still* arguing that the marshals don't have to obey a federal court order?

Laughing.....how's that working out for you, boy?

 

[bucs90]

The libs are avoiding the questions now. Their basic understanding of our fundamental principles of government is showing to be quite bad.

By their logic....the Supreme Court could order the Army to invade Canada. It cant. Because the Judicial Branch cannot command the Executive Branch.

But....they don't understand that.

 

[bucs90]

Someone please tell Skylar that our basic founding principles as a nation has separation of powers. 3 branches. Judicial. Legislative and Executive.

The men with guns....police and military....cannot have a chain of command that is shared by two branches. See....that's not separate.

One branch empowers the other but does not literally command the other.

It's why SCOTUS cannot send us to war and why POTUS can write laws.

You're *still* arguing that the marshals don't have to obey a federal court order?

Laughing.....how's that working out for you, boy?

What if they dont? What happens? If they don't serve the warrant and the President supports them 100%.....what happens?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Someone please tell Skylar that our basic founding principles as a nation has separation of powers. 3 branches. Judicial. Legislative and Executive.

The men with guns....police and military....cannot have a chain of command that is shared by two branches. See....that's not separate.

One branch empowers the other but does not literally command the other.

It's why SCOTUS cannot send us to war and why POTUS can write laws.

That you're in fact a ridiculous liar comes as no surprise.

 

[bucs90]

Someone please tell Skylar that our basic founding principles as a nation has separation of powers. 3 branches. Judicial. Legislative and Executive.

The men with guns....police and military....cannot have a chain of command that is shared by two branches. See....that's not separate.

One branch empowers the other but does not literally command the other.

It's why SCOTUS cannot send us to war and why POTUS can write laws.

That you're in fact a ridiculous liar comes as no surprise.

Oh another lib.

Let me guess....you think the Executive Branch gets to write laws and the Senate has a police department they can give orders to?

 

[Skylar]

The libs are avoiding the questions now. Their basic understanding of our fundamental principles of government is showing to be quite bad.

By their logic....the Supreme Court could order the Army to invade Canada. It cant. Because the Judicial Branch cannot command the Executive Branch.

But....they don't understand that.

We get that the marshals have to obey a lawful court order from the federal judiciary.

We also get that it was a judge that sent the marshals to arrest that man. Not 'Obama'.

And we get that he wasn't arrested for his student loan. But because he refused to appear in court.

And you still don't understand any of this. Someone with an actual law enforcement background would.

 

[Si modo]

And, let's not forget there IS LEO discretion, even when a court orders a Bench Warrant.

 

[Skylar]

Someone please tell Skylar that our basic founding principles as a nation has separation of powers. 3 branches. Judicial. Legislative and Executive.

The men with guns....police and military....cannot have a chain of command that is shared by two branches. See....that's not separate.

One branch empowers the other but does not literally command the other.

It's why SCOTUS cannot send us to war and why POTUS can write laws.

That you're in fact a ridiculous liar comes as no surprise.

Oh another lib.

Let me guess....you think the Executive Branch gets to write laws and the Senate has a police department they can give orders to?

Are you still arguing that the marshals don't have to obey a lawful federal court order?

Because Title 28 thoroughly contradicts you.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Someone please tell Skylar that our basic founding principles as a nation has separation of powers. 3 branches. Judicial. Legislative and Executive.

The men with guns....police and military....cannot have a chain of command that is shared by two branches. See....that's not separate.

One branch empowers the other but does not literally command the other.

It's why SCOTUS cannot send us to war and why POTUS can write laws.

You're *still* arguing that the marshals don't have to obey a federal court order?

Laughing.....how's that working out for you, boy?

What if they dont? What happens? If they don't serve the warrant and the President supports them 100%.....what happens?

Your thread premise is a lie, and you're a liar – as already correctly noted: the president didn't 'send' anyone to arrest anyone concerning student loans, and what actually happened had nothing to do with 'liberals.'

 

[Skylar]

And, let's not forget there IS LEO discretion, even when a court orders a Bench Warrant.

Can you show us the slightest evidence that Obama directed anyone to do anything regarding this arrest? Or that he was even aware of it?

Laughing....of course not.

 

[bucs90]

The libs are avoiding the questions now. Their basic understanding of our fundamental principles of government is showing to be quite bad.

By their logic....the Supreme Court could order the Army to invade Canada. It cant. Because the Judicial Branch cannot command the Executive Branch.

But....they don't understand that.

We get that the marshals have to obey a lawful court order from the federal judiciary.

We also get that it was a judge that sent the marshals to arrest that man. Not 'Obama'.

And we get that he wasn't arrested for his student loan. But because he refused to appear in court.

And you still don't understand any of this. Someone with an actual law enforcement background would.

Plaintiffs and defendants mentioned by NAME must absolutely obey a court order.

But the officers serving a warrant? They can say no. And if their chain of command supports it....guess what happens? Nothing. The warrant just doesn't get served. That's how we are protected against rogue courts and judges. See how that works?

Yay for separation of powers!!

 

[bucs90]

And, let's not forget there IS LEO discretion, even when a court orders a Bench Warrant.

Can you show us the slightest evidence that Obama directed anyone to do anything regarding this arrest? Or that he was even aware of it?

Laughing....of course not.

Hmmm....maybe you're right. He does indeed seem to have no fucking clue about what's going on amongst the people he is in charge of.

 

[Si modo]

And, let's not forget there IS LEO discretion, even when a court orders a Bench Warrant.

Can you show us the slightest evidence that Obama directed anyone to do anything regarding this arrest? Or that he was even aware of it?

Laughing....of course not.

There you go again, listening to the voices in your head telling you what I've posted.

If Obama wasn't aware of it, I am not surprised. He's not aware of much at all.

However, there is LEO discretion.

 

[Skylar]

The libs are avoiding the questions now. Their basic understanding of our fundamental principles of government is showing to be quite bad.

By their logic....the Supreme Court could order the Army to invade Canada. It cant. Because the Judicial Branch cannot command the Executive Branch.

But....they don't understand that.

We get that the marshals have to obey a lawful court order from the federal judiciary.

We also get that it was a judge that sent the marshals to arrest that man. Not 'Obama'.

And we get that he wasn't arrested for his student loan. But because he refused to appear in court.

And you still don't understand any of this. Someone with an actual law enforcement background would.

Plaintiffs and defendants mentioned by NAME must absolutely obey a court order.

Again, Bucky......what's the point in your citing yourself? Your entire thread is a lie. Obama didn't 'send' anyone. A federal judge did. The man wasn't arrested for student debt. But because he refused to appear in court.

And once again our board conservatives are so loathing of the law and the constitution, that they insist that Obama be 'held accountable' because the marshal service obeyed a court order and executed a lawful warrant.

Oh, the horror!

But the officers serving a warrant? They can say no. And if their chain of command supports it....guess what happens? Nothing.

Show me the evidence that Obama had anything to say about this arrest. Or that he was even aware if it.

You can't. Your entire 'Obama sent the marshals' narrative was a lie. There isn't a single part of the OP you got right.

But you expect us to accept you citing yourself on a topic you know jack shit about? Laughing........please.

 

[Skylar]

And, let's not forget there IS LEO discretion, even when a court orders a Bench Warrant.

Can you show us the slightest evidence that Obama directed anyone to do anything regarding this arrest? Or that he was even aware of it?

Laughing....of course not.

There you go again, listening to the voices in your head telling you what I've posted.

So you didn't babble about 'LEO discretion'.....that there's zero evidence to show had anything to do with this case?

You know you can't demonstrate that Obama had a thing to say about this specific arrest. Or was even aware of it. Making your 'LEO discretion' shtick yet another red herring. But hey, what's complete irrelevance to the case we're discussing when you're hopped up on holding Obama 'accountable'.

Accountable for what, you've never actually been able to tell us. Accountable for the marshals obeying a lawful federal court order?

 

[bucs90]

So just for the record......

Skylar isn't sure who ranks higher on the chain of command for federal law enforcement - the POTUS or a court room judge.

He just can't figure it out.

 

[Skylar]

So just for the record......

Skylar isn't sure who ranks higher on the chain of command for federal law enforcement - the POTUS or a court room judge.

He just can't figure it out.

And just for the record.....the marshals are required to obey a federal court order.

And just for the record......you've abandoned your entire OP.

Laughing....keep running, boy.