If we started burying people alive and letting them stay buried till they passed out from lack of oxygen before we revived them, would that be torture redfish?
No marks, no physical harm at all. Mental harm may be different but would that action be torture?
Just curious where the limits might be.
Not a valid analogy. No one has ever died from waterboarding, being buried alive has resulted in millions of deaths.
Now, if we want to define torture, lets look at what muslims do to those who do not kowtow to mohammed.
beheading
feet first into a wood chipper
pushed off a third floor roof
electrodes to the testicles
eyes burned out with a red hot poker
gang rape
cutting off hands, feet, ears, noses
making you stand in a water filled room and then dropping electric leads into the water
pulling off fingernails
cutting off tongues
you libtards get all spun up about waterboarding but say nothing about the methods of your muslim friends. you are lunatics.
Very valid analogy. I said that death would not happen. It's just torture. And I take it you think being buried alive would constitute torture.
And how the hell would you even possibly know if people have been killed while waterboarding? The Inquisition liked to use it. The Japanese liked to use it. You have no idea if people died while being waterboarded.