obama to deny poor children the chance at a decent education...denies D.C. scholarships...

[LordBrownTrout]

On the radio today they discussed obama's joke of a budget....and one of the items not funded....the D.C. scholarship program which allows poor children in D.C. to go to quality schools by providing them with scholarships..........again...the democrats do not want successful followers...they need uneducated, poor, angry people to vote them power.......what a jerk.....

So you support a nationwide taxpayer funded federal program to allow poor children to go to costly schools?

No....I think they should take the education dollars we already give them and be given a voucher, to be redeemed at any public or private school of their choice...if what the tax payers pay is not enough to cover the cost they make up the difference.....since most Catholic schools are less expensive, and provide a better eduation.....the state would keep what they didn't use.....

Of course the democrats want uneducated children....they make excellent adult, democrat voters.....

Why of course,,,,, the right only has their kids going to the good private schools and they are all Rhodes scholarship material...not a dumb right-winger in the USA.....

O is a rightie? His kids go to private school.

 

[Siete]

Obama wants to deny our kids an education, but the Republicans are the ones constantly yammering about cutting funding for education ..

how does that work anyway?

anybody?

 

[The Rabbi]

It's part of the Democrat war on poor black children. Dems are terrified that if they actually adopted programs to hellp poor black children succeed in school they would quit voting Democrat.

 

[The Rabbi]

Obama wants to deny our kids an education, but the Republicans are the ones constantly yammering about cutting funding for education ..

how does that work anyway?

anybody?

Please quote any Republican yammering about cutting funding for education.
Republicans oppose the Democrat approach: Throw more money are teachers' unions.

 

[Moonglow]

It's part of the Democrat war on poor black children. Dems are terrified that if they actually adopted programs to hellp poor black children succeed in school they would quit voting Democrat.

Nobody is stopping anyone from getting an education...An education evolves and revolves around a school setting, but learning can be done at anytime in anyone's life without hindrance..

 

[The Rabbi]

It's part of the Democrat war on poor black children. Dems are terrified that if they actually adopted programs to hellp poor black children succeed in school they would quit voting Democrat.

Nobody is stopping anyone from getting an education...An education evolves and revolves around a school setting, but learning can be done at anytime in anyone's life without hindrance..

So we should just abolish all schools?

 

[Moonglow]

Obama wants to deny our kids an education, but the Republicans are the ones constantly yammering about cutting funding for education ..

how does that work anyway?

anybody?

Please quote any Republican yammering about cutting funding for education.
Republicans oppose the Democrat approach: Throw more money are teachers' unions.

Argh,, teacher union is what you meant...

 

[Moonglow]

It's part of the Democrat war on poor black children. Dems are terrified that if they actually adopted programs to hellp poor black children succeed in school they would quit voting Democrat.

Nobody is stopping anyone from getting an education...An education evolves and revolves around a school setting, but learning can be done at anytime in anyone's life without hindrance..

So we should just abolish all schools?

Yeah, we could value an illiterate society...

 

[The Rabbi]

Obama wants to deny our kids an education, but the Republicans are the ones constantly yammering about cutting funding for education ..

how does that work anyway?

anybody?

Please quote any Republican yammering about cutting funding for education.
Republicans oppose the Democrat approach: Throw more money are teachers' unions.

Argh,, teacher union is what you meant...

No, teachers' unions. A union of teachers. The possessive plural of a noun ending in s puts the apostrophe after the s.

 

[The Rabbi]

It's part of the Democrat war on poor black children. Dems are terrified that if they actually adopted programs to hellp poor black children succeed in school they would quit voting Democrat.

Nobody is stopping anyone from getting an education...An education evolves and revolves around a school setting, but learning can be done at anytime in anyone's life without hindrance..

So we should just abolish all schools?

Yeah, we could value an illiterate society...

Democrat wet dream.

 

[Siete]

Obama wants to deny our kids an education, but the Republicans are the ones constantly yammering about cutting funding for education ..

how does that work anyway?

anybody?

Please quote any Republican yammering about cutting funding for education.
Republicans oppose the Democrat approach: Throw more money are teachers' unions.

great ! ... so you're all for spending on public education !

hear that RW's ?

 

[Siete]

Please quote any Republican yammering about cutting funding for education ..


Scott Walker's Budget Cuts $2.6 Billion From Public Education
Between direct reductions to school districts, reduced state aid to localities, cuts to the UW-System and tech colleges, Scott Walker's budget slashed nearly $2.6 billion from public education. Walker and his legislature have defended the cuts, arguing that by eliminating the right to bargain collectively and forcing through higher contributions for health insurance and pensions in the "budget repair bill," they had given school districts the so-called "tools" to offset these reductions. The problem for many schools is that these tools, which are really just cuts, are a one-time solution to a bigger problem. [2011 Wisconsin Act 32]




keep yammering Rabid, you idiot.

 

[The Rabbi]

Please quote any Republican yammering about cutting funding for education ..


Scott Walker's Budget Cuts $2.6 Billion From Public Education
Between direct reductions to school districts, reduced state aid to localities, cuts to the UW-System and tech colleges, Scott Walker's budget slashed nearly $2.6 billion from public education. Walker and his legislature have defended the cuts, arguing that by eliminating the right to bargain collectively and forcing through higher contributions for health insurance and pensions in the "budget repair bill," they had given school districts the so-called "tools" to offset these reductions. The problem for many schools is that these tools, which are really just cuts, are a one-time solution to a bigger problem. [2011 Wisconsin Act 32]




keep yammering Rabid, you idiot.

I dont see any yammering. I do see an attempt to impose some fiscal discipline and accountability on schools. All things Democrats oppose.
Keep trying though. One day you might get it right.

 

[NYcarbineer]

On the radio today they discussed obama's joke of a budget....and one of the items not funded....the D.C. scholarship program which allows poor children in D.C. to go to quality schools by providing them with scholarships..........again...the democrats do not want successful followers...they need uneducated, poor, angry people to vote them power.......what a jerk.....

So you support a nationwide taxpayer funded federal program to allow poor children to go to costly schools?

No....I think they should take the education dollars we already give them and be given a voucher, to be redeemed at any public or private school of their choice...if what the tax payers pay is not enough to cover the cost they make up the difference.....since most Catholic schools are less expensive, and provide a better eduation.....the state would keep what they didn't use.....

Of course the democrats want uneducated children....they make excellent adult, democrat voters.....

You think the poor families in DC are paying big numbers in school tax? lol

 

[Siete]

This truly ignorant idiot makes statements like these which are just so out of touch with the world!
EVERYONE KNOWS OBAMA what happened 600 years ago...i.e. the INQUISITIONS! WE KNOW IT
And Obama EVERYONE who has had history lessons KNOWS OBAMA.... that the Crusades were violent..
nearly 1,000 years ago!
But we are talking about TODAY OBAMA!
We are talking about persecutions BY Muslims of Christians also AND NO deaths equal to what the Islamic extremists have done in the last 13 years! LAST 13 years!
DO YOU UNDERSTAND OBAMA??? There is NO need to talk about "high horse" you dummy!
All you are doing is making these gross barbarians EQUAL and they are NOT to Christians today if they
believe in burning, beheading, women as 2nd class, etc.!
Once again we have the apologist President just making the situation WORSE!
Obama just be an honest person and take the lead that EXTREMIST Muslims are causing this we know!
NOT CHRISTIANS!
At the National Prayer Breakfast, President Obama reminded attendees that violence rooted in religion isn’t exclusive to Islam, but has been carried out by Christians as well.

Obama said that even though religion is a source for good around the world, there will always be people willing to “hijack religion for their own murderous ends.”
“Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ,” Obama said.
“In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”
Obama At National Prayer Breakfast People Committed Terrible Deeds In The Name of Christ - Breitbart

On the radio today they discussed obama's joke of a budget....and one of the items not funded....the D.C. scholarship program which allows poor children in D.C. to go to quality schools by providing them with scholarships..........again...the democrats do not want successful followers...they need uneducated, poor, angry people to vote them power.......what a jerk.....

So you support a nationwide taxpayer funded federal program to allow poor children to go to costly schools?

No....I think they should take the education dollars we already give them and be given a voucher, to be redeemed at any public or private school of their choice...if what the tax payers pay is not enough to cover the cost they make up the difference.....since most Catholic schools are less expensive, and provide a better eduation.....the state would keep what they didn't use.....

Of course the democrats want uneducated children....they make excellent adult, democrat voters.....

You think the poor families in DC are paying big numbers in school tax? lol

yeah, the property tax in the projects is a killer.

 

[JoeB131]

No....I think they should take the education dollars we already give them and be given a voucher, to be redeemed at any public or private school of their choice...if what the tax payers pay is not enough to cover the cost they make up the difference.....since most Catholic schools are less expensive, and provide a better eduation.....the state would keep what they didn't use.....

Catholic Schools aren't less expensive.

They also pick and choose what kids they want. So they won't take Corky the Tard or Jamal the gang-banger.

Because fuck those guys.

 

[The Rabbi]

No....I think they should take the education dollars we already give them and be given a voucher, to be redeemed at any public or private school of their choice...if what the tax payers pay is not enough to cover the cost they make up the difference.....since most Catholic schools are less expensive, and provide a better eduation.....the state would keep what they didn't use.....

Catholic Schools aren't less expensive.

They also pick and choose what kids they want. So they won't take Corky the Tard or Jamal the gang-banger.

Because fuck those guys.

So they should take them and fuck those students who are actually trying? Nice one.

 

[JoeB131]

No....I think they should take the education dollars we already give them and be given a voucher, to be redeemed at any public or private school of their choice...if what the tax payers pay is not enough to cover the cost they make up the difference.....since most Catholic schools are less expensive, and provide a better eduation.....the state would keep what they didn't use.....

Catholic Schools aren't less expensive.

They also pick and choose what kids they want. So they won't take Corky the Tard or Jamal the gang-banger.

Because fuck those guys.

So they should take them and fuck those students who are actually trying? Nice one.

No, they should make the schools good for everyone, not just the kids they pick and choose to try to foist their stupid religion on.

 

[The Rabbi]

No....I think they should take the education dollars we already give them and be given a voucher, to be redeemed at any public or private school of their choice...if what the tax payers pay is not enough to cover the cost they make up the difference.....since most Catholic schools are less expensive, and provide a better eduation.....the state would keep what they didn't use.....

Catholic Schools aren't less expensive.

They also pick and choose what kids they want. So they won't take Corky the Tard or Jamal the gang-banger.

Because fuck those guys.

So they should take them and fuck those students who are actually trying? Nice one.

No, they should make the schools good for everyone, not just the kids they pick and choose to try to foist their stupid religion on.

How do you propose "making the schools good for everyone"? ANd you understand parents choose to send their kids to parochial schools, right?

 

[JoeB131]

[
How do you propose "making the schools good for everyone"? ANd you understand parents choose to send their kids to parochial schools, right?

And Parochial schools choose the kids they want. the kids who aren't going to be any trouble.

I'll bet you if you made rich kids have to go to the same schools poor kids had to go to, they would make those schools a lot better, quick.