🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Obama To Tote Lies At The Un Today!!

That would be skook's little picture of a shooting gun, cheering people, and a call to "take sides."

I already know none of you will criticize his call for violence. The groupthink of your cult is too strong. Plus, most of you agree with his call for violence, even though you don't like to say so openly.



Oh Gawd s0n.........you're such a fairy.:up:
 
First of all, I don't "take sides." Second, posting some cheesy animated gifs IS NOT stating a position or a point of view.

Creative dodge. Like I said, none of you will criticize Skook's calls for violence, because you all agree.

I did hear about that hot head Kennedy actually going so far as stating folks should be thrown in jail for denying AGW exists?

I don't know. Did you? Nobody else cared about what one person said. You're cherrypicking to find a reason to endorse violence against your political opponents, a tried-and-true tactic of tyrants everywhere.

Yeah, if they came to throw him in jail for exercising his freedom of speech? I understand the impulse to use the second amendment to defend the first amendment, don't you?

And here you take it to its conclusion, formally justfying your side's calls for violence.

Or are you a global socialist instead of an American?

Ah, another Alinskyite. I see you've taken the tactics of "Rules For Radicals" to heart.
 
First of all, I don't "take sides." Second, posting some cheesy animated gifs IS NOT stating a position or a point of view.

Creative dodge. Like I said, none of you will criticize Skook's calls for violence, because you all agree.

I did hear about that hot head Kennedy actually going so far as stating folks should be thrown in jail for denying AGW exists?

I don't know. Did you? Nobody else cared about what one person said. You're cherrypicking to find a reason to endorse violence against your political opponents, a tried-and-true tactic of tyrants everywhere.

Yeah, if they came to throw him in jail for exercising his freedom of speech? I understand the impulse to use the second amendment to defend the first amendment, don't you?

And here you take it to its conclusion, formally justfying your side's calls for violence.

Or are you a global socialist instead of an American?

Ah, another Alinskyite. I see you've taken the tactics of "Rules For Radicals" to heart.

I don't do this type of tit for tat discussing. Learn to write like an adult.

It wasn't a dodge. Address this issue. Did he or did he not ever call for violence? You believe posting some images is a call to violence, I'm saying that would never stand up in court. You can't guess what's in a man's head or his intentions by some images. Even anthropologists disagree about what prehistoric man's motives were when they painted this.

7330lascaux1.jpg

Since you are such an expert in knowing what people's intentions are when they post an image, why don't you alert the anthropological community and tell them you have the definitive answer to know what is in a man's mind, eh?

It's not just Kennedy that wants to throw people that disagree with his point of view in jail, it all authoritarians like him. Yes, he's the celebrity politician that floated the stupid idea, but the far left actually wants to shut people up by throwing them in jail.
Arrest Climate-Change Deniers
Arrest Climate-Change Deniers
Man-made climate change happens. Man-made climate change kills a lot of people. It's going to kill a lot more. We have laws on the books to punish anyone whose lies contribute to people's deaths. It's time to punish the climate-change liars.

This is an argument that's just being discussed seriously in some circles. It was laid out earlier this month, with all the appropriate caveats, by Lawrence Torcello, a philosophy professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology.

And I am not "endorsing" violence. I am merely stating my belief in the right to self defense. Statists believe the State has a monopoly on the right to the use of violence. Do you or do you not believe that Americans have the right to defend their right to the first amendment? Who is dodging the question now?
 
Maybe time to choose up sides huh????

What sides would that be Skooks? The people who are concerned about the future of the planet and the people who are not? The people who can think rationally and those who cannot?
The people who can objectively perceive what is going on around them and those whose paranoid fantasies have taken over whatever capability they ever possessed to conduct valid reasoning?

Why did you have a graphic of a gun? Have you ever shot someone Skooks? Have you ever been in war? Have you ever had one pointed at you? Have you ever been robbed at gunpoint? Have you ever been arrested at gunpoint? Have you ever lost a friend or a family member to someone with a gun? Ever lost anyone to suicide with a gun?

Where the fuck did you ever get the idea that guns were funny or cute or that they advance causes or that our discussions about how to respond to an environmental issue could ever justify violence at that level? What the fuck is wrong with YOU?
 
Maybe time to choose up sides huh????

What sides would that be Skooks? The people who are concerned about the future of the planet and the people who are not? The people who can think rationally and those who cannot?
The people who can objectively perceive what is going on around them and those whose paranoid fantasies have taken over whatever capability they ever possessed to conduct valid reasoning?

Why did you have a graphic of a gun? Have you ever shot someone Skooks? Have you ever been in war? Have you ever had one pointed at you? Have you ever been robbed at gunpoint? Have you ever been arrested at gunpoint? Have you ever lost a friend or a family member to someone with a gun? Ever lost anyone to suicide with a gun?

Where the fuck did you ever get the idea that guns were funny or cute or that they advance causes or that our discussions about how to respond to an environmental issue could ever justify violence at that level? What the fuck is wrong with YOU?



Hey s0n.....I live in the real world and not in a bubble. Think Im alone in thinking the choose up sides landscape might play out??:eusa_dance: People like you and your ilk are in a perpetual mode of trying to destroy America and there are tens of millions of folks who are just a wee bit upset about that. I rule nothing out because I don't live in a bubble. Your world view is fringe.....and Im the one who's not rational?:coffee: All of the environment nuts are also anti-gun, pro open borders, anti-traditional marriage, multicultural at-all-costs, anti-Israel, anti-constitution, anti-military, anti-capitalist, anti-business, anti-tradition, anti-objective truth, pro-strong central government control, and pro-tax. Tens of millions of Americans ( like me ) consider that kind of thinking dangerous.......and quite frankly, k00ky.:poke::up:. Any group ( the AGW crowd ) that advocates locking up people who are skeptical of the science are dangerous.

And s0n.....not for nothing but......about the "rational" thing?? Im not on an internet forum 16 hours/day like some people I know!!!o_O

Oh.....and never shot somebody s0n......but got plenty of stuff to put holes in assholes, if it ever came to it.:bye1:

My main go-to home defense weapon >> [URL='http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/vulcan-1.jpg.html'][/URL]


Enjoy your wiffle ball bat collection s0n............my Vulcan dominates!!!:rock::rock::rock:
 
Last edited:
First of all, I don't "take sides." Second, posting some cheesy animated gifs IS NOT stating a position or a point of view.

Creative dodge. Like I said, none of you will criticize Skook's calls for violence, because you all agree.

I did hear about that hot head Kennedy actually going so far as stating folks should be thrown in jail for denying AGW exists?

I don't know. Did you? Nobody else cared about what one person said. You're cherrypicking to find a reason to endorse violence against your political opponents, a tried-and-true tactic of tyrants everywhere.

Yeah, if they came to throw him in jail for exercising his freedom of speech? I understand the impulse to use the second amendment to defend the first amendment, don't you?

And here you take it to its conclusion, formally justfying your side's calls for violence.

Or are you a global socialist instead of an American?

Ah, another Alinskyite. I see you've taken the tactics of "Rules For Radicals" to heart.
:puke:.......:puke:.......:puke:..............:puke:...............WiNNiNg :rock:
 

Forum List

Back
Top