Obamacare Kicks In and American Life Expectancy...DROPS

Another high end democRATic success story.

That's right, ratz. Another failure for you...and you only...not a single Republican vote.

U.S. life expectancy declines for the first time since 1993
It truly does beg the question as to why life expectancy has dropped. Why would Obamacare do that?

Because it sucks. The first year of fully operational data and life expectancy drops to rates not seen in 20 years. If global temps did that, the ratz would be building bonfires to heat the planet back up.
 
Another high end democRATic success story.

That's right, ratz. Another failure for you...and you only...not a single Republican vote.

U.S. life expectancy declines for the first time since 1993
It truly does beg the question as to why life expectancy has dropped. Why would Obamacare do that?

Because it sucks. The first year of fully operational data and life expectancy drops to rates not seen in 20 years. If global temps did that, the ratz would be building bonfires to heat the planet back up.

One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise.
 
One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise.
Obamacare has been the law for far more than one year. I cannot understand why with all that much more coverage and the increased rates for almost all, life expectancy is dropping.
 
]
I'm not even talking about Sir Winston, you brainless Snowflake. Focus...Hellary and the rest of you got kicked to the curb.
See, you brainless Snowflake, you can't address any of the OP and various points. Trump must satisfy the will of the great majority, which rejected him, or they will Nixonize him.

PUPPS IS THE OP you ignorant clod snowflake.

ROFLMAO
You are such a Foolish Child. OP also stands Opening Premise. And that sucks badly.


*cough* Jakie...it also stands for Opening Poster ;)

Don't confuse the Flake with facts. His head might burst like his blow up date.

He just can't handle the facts in the OP (opening/original post, also). Obarrycare comes online and life expectancy rates drop to levels not seen in 20 years. Those are facts from the Obarry government. Sorry Flake, can't blame this on BOOSH or a video this time.
 
]
I'm not even talking about Sir Winston, you brainless Snowflake. Focus...Hellary and the rest of you got kicked to the curb.
See, you brainless Snowflake, you can't address any of the OP and various points. Trump must satisfy the will of the great majority, which rejected him, or they will Nixonize him.

PUPPS IS THE OP you ignorant clod snowflake.

ROFLMAO
You are such a Foolish Child. OP also stands Opening Premise. And that sucks badly.


*cough* Jakie...it also stands for Opening Poster ;)

Don't confuse the Flake with facts. His head might burst like his blow up date.

He just can't handle the facts in the OP (opening/original post, also). Obarrycare comes online and life expectancy rates drop to levels not seen in 20 years. Those are facts from the Obarry government. Sorry Flake, can't blame this on BOOSH or a video this time.


I took my umbrella out and it started raining. Imagine that! I had no idea umbrellas caused it to rain. I think I've found the solution for droughts - send everyone an umbrella! :)
 
Another high end democRATic success story.

That's right, ratz. Another failure for you...and you only...not a single Republican vote.

U.S. life expectancy declines for the first time since 1993
It truly does beg the question as to why life expectancy has dropped. Why would Obamacare do that?

Because it sucks. The first year of fully operational data and life expectancy drops to rates not seen in 20 years. If global temps did that, the ratz would be building bonfires to heat the planet back up.

One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise.

Link?

Introduce a given change to a system then compare it to the control. The control in this case is empirical historical data...both average and trend. The methodology used in global warming is the same.

That is a dangerous statement since it is time and not event based:

"One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise."

If the ACA eliminated ALL medical care are you saying there would be no effect? Of course not, but the required answer does establish the causality of available care and life expectancy.
 
]See, you brainless Snowflake, you can't address any of the OP and various points. Trump must satisfy the will of the great majority, which rejected him, or they will Nixonize him.

PUPPS IS THE OP you ignorant clod snowflake.

ROFLMAO
You are such a Foolish Child. OP also stands Opening Premise. And that sucks badly.


*cough* Jakie...it also stands for Opening Poster ;)

Don't confuse the Flake with facts. His head might burst like his blow up date.

He just can't handle the facts in the OP (opening/original post, also). Obarrycare comes online and life expectancy rates drop to levels not seen in 20 years. Those are facts from the Obarry government. Sorry Flake, can't blame this on BOOSH or a video this time.


I took my umbrella out and it started raining. Imagine that! I had no idea umbrellas caused it to rain. I think I've found the solution for droughts - send everyone an umbrella! :)

That doesn't establish causality.
 
Another high end democRATic success story.

That's right, ratz. Another failure for you...and you only...not a single Republican vote.

U.S. life expectancy declines for the first time since 1993
It truly does beg the question as to why life expectancy has dropped. Why would Obamacare do that?

Because it sucks. The first year of fully operational data and life expectancy drops to rates not seen in 20 years. If global temps did that, the ratz would be building bonfires to heat the planet back up.

One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise.

Link?

Introduce a given change to a system then compare it to the control. The control in this case is empirical historical data...both average and trend. The methodology used in global warming is the same.

That is a dangerous statement since it is time and not event based:

"One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise."

If the ACA eliminated ALL medical care are you saying there would be no effect? Of course not, but the required answer does establish the causality of available care and life expectancy.
One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise.
Obamacare has been the law for far more than one year. I cannot understand why with all that much more coverage and the increased rates for almost all, life expectancy is dropping.

You'd understand why if you understood what affects life expectancy. The largest increases in mortality are in chronic diseases like heart disease, stroke, diabetes, kidney failure which are heavily influenced by obesity and are being seen at a younger age. It takes more than a few years to effect life expectancy. If you think it's due to Obamacare - then perhaps you can show actual causation.
 
PUPPS IS THE OP you ignorant clod snowflake.

ROFLMAO
You are such a Foolish Child. OP also stands Opening Premise. And that sucks badly.


*cough* Jakie...it also stands for Opening Poster ;)

Don't confuse the Flake with facts. His head might burst like his blow up date.

He just can't handle the facts in the OP (opening/original post, also). Obarrycare comes online and life expectancy rates drop to levels not seen in 20 years. Those are facts from the Obarry government. Sorry Flake, can't blame this on BOOSH or a video this time.


I took my umbrella out and it started raining. Imagine that! I had no idea umbrellas caused it to rain. I think I've found the solution for droughts - send everyone an umbrella! :)

That doesn't establish causality.

It establishes causality about as much as claiming Obamacare is causing decreased life expectancy.
 
Another high end democRATic success story.

That's right, ratz. Another failure for you...and you only...not a single Republican vote.

U.S. life expectancy declines for the first time since 1993
It truly does beg the question as to why life expectancy has dropped. Why would Obamacare do that?

Because it sucks. The first year of fully operational data and life expectancy drops to rates not seen in 20 years. If global temps did that, the ratz would be building bonfires to heat the planet back up.

One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise.

Link?

Introduce a given change to a system then compare it to the control. The control in this case is empirical historical data...both average and trend. The methodology used in global warming is the same.

That is a dangerous statement since it is time and not event based:

"One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise."

If the ACA eliminated ALL medical care are you saying there would be no effect? Of course not, but the required answer does establish the causality of available care and life expectancy.

Correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation. Many factors effect life expectancy. There is no indication that you've provided yet that large numbers of people are forgoing preventative care or that it is because of ACA.
 
Coyote is kind to give depotoo and Pupps some needed lessons. I am sure they are grateful.
 
Another high end democRATic success story.

That's right, ratz. Another failure for you...and you only...not a single Republican vote.

U.S. life expectancy declines for the first time since 1993
It truly does beg the question as to why life expectancy has dropped. Why would Obamacare do that?

Because it sucks. The first year of fully operational data and life expectancy drops to rates not seen in 20 years. If global temps did that, the ratz would be building bonfires to heat the planet back up.

One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise.

Link?

Introduce a given change to a system then compare it to the control. The control in this case is empirical historical data...both average and trend. The methodology used in global warming is the same.

That is a dangerous statement since it is time and not event based:

"One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise."

If the ACA eliminated ALL medical care are you saying there would be no effect? Of course not, but the required answer does establish the causality of available care and life expectancy.

Correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation. Many factors effect life expectancy. There is no indication that you've provided yet that large numbers of people are forgoing preventative care or that it is because of ACA.

I never claimed it was/did. I merely stated facts. The reader's personal biases filled in the rest of the narrative.

"Obamacare kicks in and American life expectancy drops" (title)

Fact, now for the rest of the OP:

"Another high end democRATic success story.

That's right, ratz. Another failure for you...and you only...not a single Republican vote."

Obamacare is touted as Barry's great success, is it not? Therefore the first sentence is true.

The second sentence is the hook. The bait is "another failure for you". Yet I never state what the failure is, do I? I've manipulated the reader into creating the linkage themselves.

The rest is obvious, it was a rat vote only bill.
 
Another high end democRATic success story.

That's right, ratz. Another failure for you...and you only...not a single Republican vote.

U.S. life expectancy declines for the first time since 1993
It truly does beg the question as to why life expectancy has dropped. Why would Obamacare do that?

Because it sucks. The first year of fully operational data and life expectancy drops to rates not seen in 20 years. If global temps did that, the ratz would be building bonfires to heat the planet back up.

One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise.

No, but inadequate health care will.
 
D_D did not even get it right the second time.

(1) You people need to give links and cites. Not one of you are trustworthy on your world alone.

(2) The quotes are mishs mashed together.

(3) Read below.

(4) Do it right and you don't called out for looking like the fools you all looked like.

"Socialism is the philosophy of failure..." - Winston Churchill - The Churchill Project - Hillsdale College

This quotation is now going around the web attributed to Churchill. Is it accurate? “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” —M.S.


It is more or less correct, but it’s a run-together, truncated version of two separate comments:

“Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.” —Perth, Scotland, 28 May 1948, in Churchill, Europe Unite: Speeches 1947 & 1948 (London: Cassell, 1950), 347.

AND

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” —House of Commons, 22 October 1945.

A variation on the above is: “I do not at all wonder that British youth is in revolt against the morbid doctrine that nothing matters but the equal sharing of miseries, that what used to be called the ‘submerged tenth’ can only be rescued by bringing the other nine-tenths down to their level…” —House of Commons, 13 June 1948.

Churchill’s “withering barrage of sarcasm,” said the late Dr. Harry Jaffa, “moreover puts us in mind of that dictum concerning property asserted by the Father of the American Constitution, James Madison, when he said, in the tenth Federalist, that ‘the protection of different and unequal faculties of acquiring property [is] the first object of government.’ One might add that according to Madison, the U.S. Constitution is intended to provide equal protection to unequal abilities. This is just as surely what Abraham Lincoln meant when in 1864 wrote to the Workingmen’s Association of New York that ‘Property is the fruit of labor; property is desirable; it is a positive good in the world. That some should be rich shows that others may become rich, and hence is just encouragement to industry and enterprise’”1

1 Harry V. Jaffa, “Remarks for Churchill’s Birthday: Requiem for Socialism and the Iron Curtain Churchill’s Relevance to the Challenges of the Present,” Finest Hour, January 1, 1991, 22.
 
Another high end democRATic success story.

That's right, ratz. Another failure for you...and you only...not a single Republican vote.

U.S. life expectancy declines for the first time since 1993
It truly does beg the question as to why life expectancy has dropped. Why would Obamacare do that?

Because it sucks. The first year of fully operational data and life expectancy drops to rates not seen in 20 years. If global temps did that, the ratz would be building bonfires to heat the planet back up.

One year of the ACA is not going to have any effect on life expectancy. That's a false premise.

No, but inadequate health care will.
You, once again, make a suggeston: only a suggestion with no proof that this the case with ACA.

You are a dupe.
 
Pupps shall close his participation tonight in HIS thread with a tribute to Greg Lake:


"Who'll make his mark", the captain cried.
"To the devil drink a toast.
We'll glut the hold with cups of gold
And we'll feed the sea with ghosts"

Enjoy my fellow Great Americans.


 

Forum List

Back
Top