Obamacare... ROTFLMFAO!!!!!

[ba1614]

i wish Obozocare had provision for liberals to get intelligence infused into their tiny little brain

They are working on it and trying to figure out how to get someone else to pay for it.

 

[Jarhead]

For starters, you have to consider the story of Brendan Mahoney, a law student at the University of Connecticut, who has gone from a self-sufficient member of society to a welfare recipient in a matter of days.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Mahoney is a 30-year-old, third year law student who has been insured for the last three years “through a $2,400-a-year school-sponsored health plan. But he wanted to see what Obamacare had to offer.” After trying and failing to login a couple of times, Mahoney finally accessed the exchanges and, much to his surprise, realized he was eligible for Medicaid. So he signed up for Medicaid.

“So the great success story of Obamacare’s first day is the transformation of a future lawyer, who was already paying for his insurance, into a welfare case. There’s your success story, gang,” Glenn said on radio this morning. “That’s their intent. Get you hooked on welfare. Get you hooked on the dole. If they can get you hooked, then they know you will never, ever get off it. Don’t take it. Don’t do it. Just say no to Obamacare. It’s the most powerful drug that a government has ever asked us to inject into our own veins. Don’t do it.”

Obama knows the more people that are dependent on government, the more people that will be forced to vote for him. It's all about power and control for de fürher Obama.

Success? Check out Obamacare?s dismal sign-up numbers ? Glenn Beck

Best of the Web Today: Brendan Mahoney Saves ObamaCare - WSJ.com

So did he quit law school?

No.

But he became a burden on the state because he was able to. Not because he had to.

I believe in entitlements for those that need them. Not for those that want them.

 

[P@triot]

For starters, you have to consider the story of Brendan Mahoney, a law student at the University of Connecticut, who has gone from a self-sufficient member of society to a welfare recipient in a matter of days.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Mahoney is a 30-year-old, third year law student who has been insured for the last three years “through a $2,400-a-year school-sponsored health plan. But he wanted to see what Obamacare had to offer.” After trying and failing to login a couple of times, Mahoney finally accessed the exchanges and, much to his surprise, realized he was eligible for Medicaid. So he signed up for Medicaid.

“So the great success story of Obamacare’s first day is the transformation of a future lawyer, who was already paying for his insurance, into a welfare case. There’s your success story, gang,” Glenn said on radio this morning. “That’s their intent. Get you hooked on welfare. Get you hooked on the dole. If they can get you hooked, then they know you will never, ever get off it. Don’t take it. Don’t do it. Just say no to Obamacare. It’s the most powerful drug that a government has ever asked us to inject into our own veins. Don’t do it.”

Obama knows the more people that are dependent on government, the more people that will be forced to vote for him. It's all about power and control for de fürher Obama.

Success? Check out Obamacare?s dismal sign-up numbers ? Glenn Beck

Best of the Web Today: Brendan Mahoney Saves ObamaCare - WSJ.com

So did he quit law school?

Does it matter? The point (which you on the left are a bit slow to realize) is that Obama and the Dumbocrats have admitted that they need young people paying into the system to offset the cost - hence the mandate.

But Obamacare just took a young person PAYING and turned him into a BURDEN to the system.

 

[Jarhead]

For starters, you have to consider the story of Brendan Mahoney, a law student at the University of Connecticut, who has gone from a self-sufficient member of society to a welfare recipient in a matter of days.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Mahoney is a 30-year-old, third year law student who has been insured for the last three years “through a $2,400-a-year school-sponsored health plan. But he wanted to see what Obamacare had to offer.” After trying and failing to login a couple of times, Mahoney finally accessed the exchanges and, much to his surprise, realized he was eligible for Medicaid. So he signed up for Medicaid.

“So the great success story of Obamacare’s first day is the transformation of a future lawyer, who was already paying for his insurance, into a welfare case. There’s your success story, gang,” Glenn said on radio this morning. “That’s their intent. Get you hooked on welfare. Get you hooked on the dole. If they can get you hooked, then they know you will never, ever get off it. Don’t take it. Don’t do it. Just say no to Obamacare. It’s the most powerful drug that a government has ever asked us to inject into our own veins. Don’t do it.”

Obama knows the more people that are dependent on government, the more people that will be forced to vote for him. It's all about power and control for de fürher Obama.

Success? Check out Obamacare?s dismal sign-up numbers ? Glenn Beck

Best of the Web Today: Brendan Mahoney Saves ObamaCare - WSJ.com

So did he quit law school?

Does it matter? The point (which you on the left are a bit slow to realize) is that Obama and the Dumbocrats have admitted that they need young people paying into the system to offset the cost - hence the mandate.

But Obamacare just took a young person PAYING and turned him into a BURDEN to the system.

In a way, it is actually a good thing. It has opened the eyes of the lawmakers as to what parts of the law need to be adjusted.

The system will collapse if that winds up being the norm. They will need to amend. it. And they will.

 

[Claudette]

As I said. The only winners will be those we taxpayers are forced to subsidize.

Wonder how long it this POS will take to break the bank??

 

[P@triot]

So did he quit law school?

Does it matter? The point (which you on the left are a bit slow to realize) is that Obama and the Dumbocrats have admitted that they need young people paying into the system to offset the cost - hence the mandate.

But Obamacare just took a young person PAYING and turned him into a BURDEN to the system.

In a way, it is actually a good thing. It has opened the eyes of the lawmakers as to what parts of the law need to be adjusted.

The system will collapse if that winds up being the norm. They will need to amend. it. And they will.

I've got news for you - the system collapses even if they amend it. Every major piece of socialism that Dumbocrats have implemented (Socials Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.) is bankrupt (and both sides have admitted it).

Socialism is unsustainable. The problem is, Dumbocrats are too stupid to learn from history. They ignore it and move "forward" (right off the cliff )

 

[P@triot]

As I said. The only winners will be those we taxpayers are forced to subsidize.

Wonder how long it this POS will take to break the bank??

We're $17 trillion in debt. Obama already broke the bank.

 

[Jarhead]

Does it matter? The point (which you on the left are a bit slow to realize) is that Obama and the Dumbocrats have admitted that they need young people paying into the system to offset the cost - hence the mandate.

But Obamacare just took a young person PAYING and turned him into a BURDEN to the system.

In a way, it is actually a good thing. It has opened the eyes of the lawmakers as to what parts of the law need to be adjusted.

The system will collapse if that winds up being the norm. They will need to amend. it. And they will.

I've got news for you - the system collapses even if they amend it. Every major piece of socialism that Dumbocrats have implemented (Socials Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.) is bankrupt (and both sides have admitted it).

Socialism is unsustainable. The problem is, Dumbocrats are too stupid to learn from history. They ignore it and move "forward" (right off the cliff )

Don't get me wrong. I, too, don't see the law, as it is currently laid out, as sustainable.

My biggest concern is the contradiction that no one seems to be talking about....and, unless I am misunderstanding the law, it will kill the system within months....

Pre existing conditions is no longer an issue. You are sick, you enroll in a plan and they must take you.

So...what about this scenario....

I am 25 years old (I wish)....
I make 60,000 a year and single. I have a nice apartment in Manhattan, I get a share in the Hamptons for the summer, I bust my butt ant work and love the Manhattan night life after hours.

I have an expensive lifestyle....but I earn it.

I am healthy as an ox and I am only 25....I will not get sick.

I look to enroll in the system....and I find out I will need to pay 4K a year for insurance and have a 2500 deductible.

or.....

I pay the 600 "tax" for not having insurance......and buy a policy the3 day I find out I am sick...or the day I break my leg.....or the day I decide to have a nose job......

Who in their right mind would not follow that path?

 

[NYcarbineer]

For starters, you have to consider the story of Brendan Mahoney, a law student at the University of Connecticut, who has gone from a self-sufficient member of society to a welfare recipient in a matter of days.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Mahoney is a 30-year-old, third year law student who has been insured for the last three years “through a $2,400-a-year school-sponsored health plan. But he wanted to see what Obamacare had to offer.” After trying and failing to login a couple of times, Mahoney finally accessed the exchanges and, much to his surprise, realized he was eligible for Medicaid. So he signed up for Medicaid.

“So the great success story of Obamacare’s first day is the transformation of a future lawyer, who was already paying for his insurance, into a welfare case. There’s your success story, gang,” Glenn said on radio this morning. “That’s their intent. Get you hooked on welfare. Get you hooked on the dole. If they can get you hooked, then they know you will never, ever get off it. Don’t take it. Don’t do it. Just say no to Obamacare. It’s the most powerful drug that a government has ever asked us to inject into our own veins. Don’t do it.”

Obama knows the more people that are dependent on government, the more people that will be forced to vote for him. It's all about power and control for de fürher Obama.

Success? Check out Obamacare?s dismal sign-up numbers ? Glenn Beck

Best of the Web Today: Brendan Mahoney Saves ObamaCare - WSJ.com

So did he quit law school?

No.

But he became a burden on the state because he was able to. Not because he had to.

I believe in entitlements for those that need them. Not for those that want them.

And when Obamacare is repealed, all the under 26 year olds who are in college now and have been given the right to stay on their parents' healthcare plans

will be kicked off and then they can go find out if they can get Medicaid.

 

[Jarhead]

So did he quit law school?

No.

But he became a burden on the state because he was able to. Not because he had to.

I believe in entitlements for those that need them. Not for those that want them.

And when Obamacare is repealed, all the under 26 year olds who are in college now and have been given the right to stay on their parents' healthcare plans

will be kicked off and then they can go find out if they can get Medicaid.

Actually, I am all for the 26 year old thing...and, of course, the no pre existing condition part of it.

I just don't see it as sustainable...as I explained a my post a few posts below

 

[NYcarbineer]

For starters, you have to consider the story of Brendan Mahoney, a law student at the University of Connecticut, who has gone from a self-sufficient member of society to a welfare recipient in a matter of days.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Mahoney is a 30-year-old, third year law student who has been insured for the last three years “through a $2,400-a-year school-sponsored health plan. But he wanted to see what Obamacare had to offer.” After trying and failing to login a couple of times, Mahoney finally accessed the exchanges and, much to his surprise, realized he was eligible for Medicaid. So he signed up for Medicaid.

“So the great success story of Obamacare’s first day is the transformation of a future lawyer, who was already paying for his insurance, into a welfare case. There’s your success story, gang,” Glenn said on radio this morning. “That’s their intent. Get you hooked on welfare. Get you hooked on the dole. If they can get you hooked, then they know you will never, ever get off it. Don’t take it. Don’t do it. Just say no to Obamacare. It’s the most powerful drug that a government has ever asked us to inject into our own veins. Don’t do it.”

Obama knows the more people that are dependent on government, the more people that will be forced to vote for him. It's all about power and control for de fürher Obama.

Success? Check out Obamacare?s dismal sign-up numbers ? Glenn Beck

Best of the Web Today: Brendan Mahoney Saves ObamaCare - WSJ.com

So did he quit law school?

Does it matter? The point (which you on the left are a bit slow to realize) is that Obama and the Dumbocrats have admitted that they need young people paying into the system to offset the cost - hence the mandate.

But Obamacare just took a young person PAYING and turned him into a BURDEN to the system.

Did the Medicaid expansion in Obamacare make him eligible when he wasn't before?

 

[NYcarbineer]

No.

But he became a burden on the state because he was able to. Not because he had to.

I believe in entitlements for those that need them. Not for those that want them.

And when Obamacare is repealed, all the under 26 year olds who are in college now and have been given the right to stay on their parents' healthcare plans

will be kicked off and then they can go find out if they can get Medicaid.

Actually, I am all for the 26 year old thing...and, of course, the no pre existing condition part of it.

I just don't see it as sustainable...as I explained a my post a few posts below

Not sustainable in what sense?

 

[Jarhead]

And when Obamacare is repealed, all the under 26 year olds who are in college now and have been given the right to stay on their parents' healthcare plans

will be kicked off and then they can go find out if they can get Medicaid.

Actually, I am all for the 26 year old thing...and, of course, the no pre existing condition part of it.

I just don't see it as sustainable...as I explained a my post a few posts below

Not sustainable in what sense?

Read my post #28.

If my scenario is wrong, let me know. I am by no means well read as it pertains to the ACA.

But if I am correct....I believe it will seriously drain the system.

 

[P@triot]

So did he quit law school?

No.

But he became a burden on the state because he was able to. Not because he had to.

I believe in entitlements for those that need them. Not for those that want them.

And when Obamacare is repealed, all the under 26 year olds who are in college now and have been given the right to stay on their parents' healthcare plans

will be kicked off and then they can go find out if they can get Medicaid.

OR...... the college kid and his parents can pay for his own fuck'n policy. Gee...who could imagine?

 

[P@triot]

And when Obamacare is repealed, all the under 26 year olds who are in college now and have been given the right to stay on their parents' healthcare plans

will be kicked off and then they can go find out if they can get Medicaid.

Actually, I am all for the 26 year old thing...and, of course, the no pre existing condition part of it.

I just don't see it as sustainable...as I explained a my post a few posts below

Not sustainable in what sense?

In the sense that everything you idiots do has lead to $17 trillion in debt and collapse

 

[P@triot]

So did he quit law school?

Does it matter? The point (which you on the left are a bit slow to realize) is that Obama and the Dumbocrats have admitted that they need young people paying into the system to offset the cost - hence the mandate.

But Obamacare just took a young person PAYING and turned him into a BURDEN to the system.

Did the Medicaid expansion in Obamacare make him eligible when he wasn't before?

Yes

 

[Claudette]

In a way, it is actually a good thing. It has opened the eyes of the lawmakers as to what parts of the law need to be adjusted.

The system will collapse if that winds up being the norm. They will need to amend. it. And they will.

I've got news for you - the system collapses even if they amend it. Every major piece of socialism that Dumbocrats have implemented (Socials Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.) is bankrupt (and both sides have admitted it).

Socialism is unsustainable. The problem is, Dumbocrats are too stupid to learn from history. They ignore it and move "forward" (right off the cliff )

Don't get me wrong. I, too, don't see the law, as it is currently laid out, as sustainable.

My biggest concern is the contradiction that no one seems to be talking about....and, unless I am misunderstanding the law, it will kill the system within months....

Pre existing conditions is no longer an issue. You are sick, you enroll in a plan and they must take you.

So...what about this scenario....

I am 25 years old (I wish)....
I make 60,000 a year and single. I have a nice apartment in Manhattan, I get a share in the Hamptons for the summer, I bust my butt ant work and love the Manhattan night life after hours.

I have an expensive lifestyle....but I earn it.

I am healthy as an ox and I am only 25....I will not get sick.

I look to enroll in the system....and I find out I will need to pay 4K a year for insurance and have a 2500 deductible.

or.....

I pay the 600 "tax" for not having insurance......and buy a policy the3 day I find out I am sick...or the day I break my leg.....or the day I decide to have a nose job......

Who in their right mind would not follow that path?

Your oh so right. He and all other young folks will pay the penalty.

That will leave exactly who providing the money for this POS bill??

 

[Jarhead]

I've got news for you - the system collapses even if they amend it. Every major piece of socialism that Dumbocrats have implemented (Socials Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.) is bankrupt (and both sides have admitted it).

Socialism is unsustainable. The problem is, Dumbocrats are too stupid to learn from history. They ignore it and move "forward" (right off the cliff )

Don't get me wrong. I, too, don't see the law, as it is currently laid out, as sustainable.

My biggest concern is the contradiction that no one seems to be talking about....and, unless I am misunderstanding the law, it will kill the system within months....

Pre existing conditions is no longer an issue. You are sick, you enroll in a plan and they must take you.

So...what about this scenario....

I am 25 years old (I wish)....
I make 60,000 a year and single. I have a nice apartment in Manhattan, I get a share in the Hamptons for the summer, I bust my butt ant work and love the Manhattan night life after hours.

I have an expensive lifestyle....but I earn it.

I am healthy as an ox and I am only 25....I will not get sick.

I look to enroll in the system....and I find out I will need to pay 4K a year for insurance and have a 2500 deductible.

or.....

I pay the 600 "tax" for not having insurance......and buy a policy the3 day I find out I am sick...or the day I break my leg.....or the day I decide to have a nose job......

Who in their right mind would not follow that path?

Your oh so right. He and all other young folks will pay the penalty.

That will leave exactly who providing the money for this POS bill??

That's my concern.

It is the younger generation that is supposed to fund the bulk of the ACA....but as my example shows, people will opt to pay the tax...and buy insurance the day they break their leg.

SO what will fund the ACA?

The elderly?

 

[Old Rocks]

And idiocy like you just posted is going to change anyone's mind? Perfect example of the kind of person satized in this song;

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVgOl3cETb4]"We're Number 37" - Paul Hipp - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Old Rocks]

Don't get me wrong. I, too, don't see the law, as it is currently laid out, as sustainable.

My biggest concern is the contradiction that no one seems to be talking about....and, unless I am misunderstanding the law, it will kill the system within months....

Pre existing conditions is no longer an issue. You are sick, you enroll in a plan and they must take you.

So...what about this scenario....

I am 25 years old (I wish)....
I make 60,000 a year and single. I have a nice apartment in Manhattan, I get a share in the Hamptons for the summer, I bust my butt ant work and love the Manhattan night life after hours.

I have an expensive lifestyle....but I earn it.

I am healthy as an ox and I am only 25....I will not get sick.

I look to enroll in the system....and I find out I will need to pay 4K a year for insurance and have a 2500 deductible.

or.....

I pay the 600 "tax" for not having insurance......and buy a policy the3 day I find out I am sick...or the day I break my leg.....or the day I decide to have a nose job......

Who in their right mind would not follow that path?

Your oh so right. He and all other young folks will pay the penalty.

That will leave exactly who providing the money for this POS bill??

That's my concern.

It is the younger generation that is supposed to fund the bulk of the ACA....but as my example shows, people will opt to pay the tax...and buy insurance the day they break their leg.

SO what will fund the ACA?

The elderly?

Well, easy fix. Single payer Universal Health Care System paid for with a graduated income tax on ALL income.