Jarhead
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2010
- 20,670
- 2,378
- 245
Your oh so right. He and all other young folks will pay the penalty.
That will leave exactly who providing the money for this POS bill??
That's my concern.
It is the younger generation that is supposed to fund the bulk of the ACA....but as my example shows, people will opt to pay the tax...and buy insurance the day they break their leg.
SO what will fund the ACA?
The elderly?
Well, easy fix. Single payer Universal Health Care System paid for with a graduated income tax on ALL income.
We can debate that idea...and maybe it is a good one.....but I am far from on board with it.
But that doesn't change the fact that if my scenario is correct, why the hell hasn't anyone realized it by now?
I mean...it is basic math. If the younger generations doesn't buy in because they find paying 600 a year tax more cost effective than 4000 a year for a policy they will likely not need. (And if they find they DO need it, that is when they will buy into it), then they are actually a serious drain on the system.
Why?
They will only be paying in 600 a year and then 4000 when they find they are sick...and in return, they will get thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars worth of benefits...
So the younger generation is the exact opposite of what they claim. They will be a serious drain.
SO what will happen?
Premiums will skyrocket...and then ALL Americans will play the system....pay the tax until they need it...or their spouse...or their kids.
It is something that is so basic.......why isn't anyone talking about it?