Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama was handed a disaster, he has dealt well.WASHINGTON (Reuters) - American household incomes lost ground last year and the poverty rate ticked up, a sign the U.S. economic expansion had yet to lead to gains for many Americans five years after the 2007-2009 recession.
The data released by the U.S. Census Bureau on Wednesday, which showed the inflation-adjusted median income slipping to $53,657 last year from $54,462 in 2013, offered a reminder of the tepid nature of the economy's recovery.
"In 2014, real median household income was 6.5 percent lower
than in 2007, the year before the most recent recession," Census researchers wrote.
At the same time, the poverty rate ticked up to 14.8 percent from 14.5 percent in 2013, the data showed. Census researchers said the changes in both the median income and poverty rate were not statistically significant.
The Census Bureau also said the number of people in the United States without health insurance coverage fell to 33 million last year, or 10.4 percent of the population, from 41.8 million, or 13.3 percent, in 2013.
White House economists welcomed the sharp drop in the number of uninsured, which reflected the impact of President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law, and a steep decline in the child poverty rate.
Obama was handed a disaster, he has dealt well.WASHINGTON (Reuters) - American household incomes lost ground last year and the poverty rate ticked up, a sign the U.S. economic expansion had yet to lead to gains for many Americans five years after the 2007-2009 recession.
The data released by the U.S. Census Bureau on Wednesday, which showed the inflation-adjusted median income slipping to $53,657 last year from $54,462 in 2013, offered a reminder of the tepid nature of the economy's recovery.
"In 2014, real median household income was 6.5 percent lower
than in 2007, the year before the most recent recession," Census researchers wrote.
At the same time, the poverty rate ticked up to 14.8 percent from 14.5 percent in 2013, the data showed. Census researchers said the changes in both the median income and poverty rate were not statistically significant.
The Census Bureau also said the number of people in the United States without health insurance coverage fell to 33 million last year, or 10.4 percent of the population, from 41.8 million, or 13.3 percent, in 2013.
White House economists welcomed the sharp drop in the number of uninsured, which reflected the impact of President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law, and a steep decline in the child poverty rate.
Today's demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
Obama was handed a disaster, he has dealt well.WASHINGTON (Reuters) - American household incomes lost ground last year and the poverty rate ticked up, a sign the U.S. economic expansion had yet to lead to gains for many Americans five years after the 2007-2009 recession.
The data released by the U.S. Census Bureau on Wednesday, which showed the inflation-adjusted median income slipping to $53,657 last year from $54,462 in 2013, offered a reminder of the tepid nature of the economy's recovery.
"In 2014, real median household income was 6.5 percent lower
than in 2007, the year before the most recent recession," Census researchers wrote.
At the same time, the poverty rate ticked up to 14.8 percent from 14.5 percent in 2013, the data showed. Census researchers said the changes in both the median income and poverty rate were not statistically significant.
The Census Bureau also said the number of people in the United States without health insurance coverage fell to 33 million last year, or 10.4 percent of the population, from 41.8 million, or 13.3 percent, in 2013.
White House economists welcomed the sharp drop in the number of uninsured, which reflected the impact of President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law, and a steep decline in the child poverty rate.
Seven years on, and still decrying Bush.
Moron.
LOL. Preparing to make the Iran deal and pulling troops out of bushs disaster is bad?Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
Of course that is your response. You're a blind fool.Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
No, he hasn't.
You said it, I didn't.LOL. Preparing to make the Iran deal and pulling troops out of bushs disaster is bad?Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
Can't follow a discussion?You said it, I didn't.LOL. Preparing to make the Iran deal and pulling troops out of bushs disaster is bad?Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
Reducing irans nuclear capacity is totally horrible.. LOL.Of course that is your response. You're a blind fool.Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
No, he hasn't.
Of course that is your response. You're a blind fool.Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
No, he hasn't.
Well, it's either you or me. Which is it?Of course that is your response. You're a blind fool.Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
No, he hasn't.
No, I'm not.
He can't read a question mark.Can't follow a discussion?You said it, I didn't.LOL. Preparing to make the Iran deal and pulling troops out of bushs disaster is bad?Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
You, obviously.Well, it's either you or me. Which is it?Of course that is your response. You're a blind fool.Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
No, he hasn't.
No, I'm not.
How compassionate, loving, and caring.You, obviously.Well, it's either you or me. Which is it?Of course that is your response. You're a blind fool.Today demographics, politics, and international affairs are a totally different scene.
And Obama has mismanaged all three.
No, he hasn't.
No, I'm not.
ACTUALLY, this is STILL Reaganomics, defended to the death by bought off Pubs and their fools like you...Obama was handed a disaster, he has dealt well.WASHINGTON (Reuters) - American household incomes lost ground last year and the poverty rate ticked up, a sign the U.S. economic expansion had yet to lead to gains for many Americans five years after the 2007-2009 recession.
The data released by the U.S. Census Bureau on Wednesday, which showed the inflation-adjusted median income slipping to $53,657 last year from $54,462 in 2013, offered a reminder of the tepid nature of the economy's recovery.
"In 2014, real median household income was 6.5 percent lower
than in 2007, the year before the most recent recession," Census researchers wrote.
At the same time, the poverty rate ticked up to 14.8 percent from 14.5 percent in 2013, the data showed. Census researchers said the changes in both the median income and poverty rate were not statistically significant.
The Census Bureau also said the number of people in the United States without health insurance coverage fell to 33 million last year, or 10.4 percent of the population, from 41.8 million, or 13.3 percent, in 2013.
White House economists welcomed the sharp drop in the number of uninsured, which reflected the impact of President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law, and a steep decline in the child poverty rate.
Seven years on, and still decrying Bush.
Moron.
Actually no, this is you making an ass of yourself.ACTUALLY, this is STILL Reaganomics, defended to the death by bought off Pubs and their fools like you...Obama was handed a disaster, he has dealt well.WASHINGTON (Reuters) - American household incomes lost ground last year and the poverty rate ticked up, a sign the U.S. economic expansion had yet to lead to gains for many Americans five years after the 2007-2009 recession.
The data released by the U.S. Census Bureau on Wednesday, which showed the inflation-adjusted median income slipping to $53,657 last year from $54,462 in 2013, offered a reminder of the tepid nature of the economy's recovery.
"In 2014, real median household income was 6.5 percent lower
than in 2007, the year before the most recent recession," Census researchers wrote.
At the same time, the poverty rate ticked up to 14.8 percent from 14.5 percent in 2013, the data showed. Census researchers said the changes in both the median income and poverty rate were not statistically significant.
The Census Bureau also said the number of people in the United States without health insurance coverage fell to 33 million last year, or 10.4 percent of the population, from 41.8 million, or 13.3 percent, in 2013.
White House economists welcomed the sharp drop in the number of uninsured, which reflected the impact of President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law, and a steep decline in the child poverty rate.
Seven years on, and still decrying Bush.
Moron.
