Dad2three
Gold Member
Household income was lower when Bush left office than it was the day he became President too. So does Bushanomics create poverty too, chief?
The poverty rate consistently increased under Bush. Under Obama it has been statistically steady during the past 4 years.
The claim of this thread title is absurd. That said, one would have hoped poverty would decline and it has not.
Poverty Rate U.S. Poverty rate 1990-2013 | Statistic
View attachment 50317
. December 2007
The Economic Consequences of Mr. Bush
The next president will have to deal with yet another crippling legacy of George W. Bush: the economy. A Nobel laureate, Joseph E. Stiglitz, sees a generation-long struggle to recoup.
The Economic Consequences of Mr. Bush
The Economic Blue Screen of Death
OCT 2008
![]()
In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.
We already know what economic policies work best for our country. Clinton knew that we had to cut spending and increase revenues. We had revenues of 20.6% of GDP and a surplus in 2000. Then something terrible happened, the Republicans gained complete control in 2001 and instead of sticking with what was working they decided that their ideology was more important. The debt has gone up $12+ trillion since then.
Obamanomics Delivers....Poverty | Page 3 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
what would you do if you had to think for yourself???
The answers to hypothetical questions are sometimes interesting.