Obama's $400,000 speech could prompt Congress to go after his pension

[Soggy in NOLA]

A larger oddity is blue-collar workers voting for a man that wants to revoke their healthcare or make it so expensive , if you have a pre-existing condition, one cannot afford the price.

Wait, Obama called Wall Street fat cats and bashed them for 8 years and now he's taking $400k from Wall Street fat cats for making a 1 hour speech? Doesn't that seem more than a bit odd?

Why wouldn't it cost more? The insurance company is on the hook for a large chunk of money when you have yet to pay them a dime.

 

[BluesLegend]

A larger oddity is blue-collar workers voting for a man that wants to revoke their healthcare or make it so expensive , if you have a pre-existing condition, one cannot afford the price.

Wait, Obama called Wall Street fat cats and bashed them for 8 years and now he's taking $400k from Wall Street fat cats for making a 1 hour speech? Doesn't that seem more than a bit odd?

Ahahaha we are talking about Obama's epic hypocrisy not Trump try to pay attention.

 

[BluesLegend]

A larger oddity is blue-collar workers voting for a man that wants to revoke their healthcare or make it so expensive , if you have a pre-existing condition, one cannot afford the price.

Wait, Obama called Wall Street fat cats and bashed them for 8 years and now he's taking $400k from Wall Street fat cats for making a 1 hour speech? Doesn't that seem more than a bit odd?

Why wouldn't it cost more? The insurance company is on the hook for a large chunk of money when you have yet to pay them a dime.

You have to use the Nancy Pelosi calculator, then it will make sense.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

hypocrites

George W. Bush's $15 Million Speech Payday

What is hypocritical about that? He would lose his pension also.

The presidential pensions exist because Harry Truman had no fortune to fall back on when he left office in 1953. Times have changed.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

An ordinary person on social security loses income when he or she works. Politicians should be no different.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Maybe he should pay for his own damn security detail

because he's black?

because he's raking in money like a 1%'er

trump's not?

Is Trump's pension or retirement security under discussion?

 

[toomuchtime_]

Maybe he should pay for his own damn security detail

because he's black?

There you go. If you criticize Obama you must be a racist. If you criticize Clinton you must be a misogynist.

 

[toomuchtime_]

The issue isn't a partisan one — or at least, it wasn't last year. The bill passed both the House and Senate with no opposition, and no veto threat had come from the White House.

And did the House and Senate vote on reducing their own pensions?

Hmmm...

Is that what you think was on Obama's mind when he vetoes this bill last year? Or was he already thinking about being paid $400,000 an hour to talk about things he clearly doesn't understand?

 

[bendog]

hypocrites

George W. Bush's $15 Million Speech Payday

What is hypocritical about that? He would lose his pension also.

The presidential pensions exist because Harry Truman had no fortune to fall back on when he left office in 1953. Times have changed.

Obama is a hypocrite for taking Wall St's money. He could just make his speech and give the money to charity.

The pension thing is just petty, and it's championed by a goper who really is a petty little man.

 

[NYcarbineer]

hypocrites

George W. Bush's $15 Million Speech Payday

What is hypocritical about that? He would lose his pension also.

The presidential pensions exist because Harry Truman had no fortune to fall back on when he left office in 1953. Times have changed.

Obama is a hypocrite for taking Wall St's money. He could just make his speech and give the money to charity.

The pension thing is just petty, and it's championed by a goper who really is a petty little man.

He gave the money to charity.

 

[fncceo]

But a 20% tax cut for wealthy corporations, which will cost hundreds of billions in federal revenue

 

[bendog]

hypocrites

George W. Bush's $15 Million Speech Payday

What is hypocritical about that? He would lose his pension also.

The presidential pensions exist because Harry Truman had no fortune to fall back on when he left office in 1953. Times have changed.

Obama is a hypocrite for taking Wall St's money. He could just make his speech and give the money to charity.

The pension thing is just petty, and it's championed by a goper who really is a petty little man.

He gave the money to charity.

Really? to whom?

 

[NYcarbineer]

hypocrites

George W. Bush's $15 Million Speech Payday

What is hypocritical about that? He would lose his pension also.

The presidential pensions exist because Harry Truman had no fortune to fall back on when he left office in 1953. Times have changed.

Obama is a hypocrite for taking Wall St's money. He could just make his speech and give the money to charity.

The pension thing is just petty, and it's championed by a goper who really is a petty little man.

He gave the money to charity.

Really? to whom?

In the DUPLICATE thread about this yesterday, I posted the details of the Obama 2 million dollar donation to a educational center in Chicago.

 

[bendog]

hypocrites

George W. Bush's $15 Million Speech Payday

What is hypocritical about that? He would lose his pension also.

The presidential pensions exist because Harry Truman had no fortune to fall back on when he left office in 1953. Times have changed.

Obama is a hypocrite for taking Wall St's money. He could just make his speech and give the money to charity.

The pension thing is just petty, and it's championed by a goper who really is a petty little man.

He gave the money to charity.

Really? to whom?

In the DUPLICATE thread about this yesterday, I posted the details of the Obama 2 million dollar donation to a educational center in Chicago.

That's nice, but the Wall St speech and the donation don't seem to be connected.

Business News - Chicago Tribune

 

[NYcarbineer]

What is hypocritical about that? He would lose his pension also.

The presidential pensions exist because Harry Truman had no fortune to fall back on when he left office in 1953. Times have changed.

Obama is a hypocrite for taking Wall St's money. He could just make his speech and give the money to charity.

The pension thing is just petty, and it's championed by a goper who really is a petty little man.

He gave the money to charity.

Really? to whom?

In the DUPLICATE thread about this yesterday, I posted the details of the Obama 2 million dollar donation to a educational center in Chicago.

That's nice, but the Wall St speech and the donation don't seem to be connected.

Business News - Chicago Tribune

lol, have you forgotten? Money is fungible. That's what the anti-planned parenthood people keep insisting.

Let them explain it to us.

 

[bendog]

Obama is a hypocrite for taking Wall St's money. He could just make his speech and give the money to charity.

The pension thing is just petty, and it's championed by a goper who really is a petty little man.

He gave the money to charity.

Really? to whom?

In the DUPLICATE thread about this yesterday, I posted the details of the Obama 2 million dollar donation to a educational center in Chicago.

That's nice, but the Wall St speech and the donation don't seem to be connected.

Business News - Chicago Tribune

lol, have you forgotten? Money is fungible. That's what the anti-planned parenthood people keep insisting.

Let them explain it to us.

Yeah its fungible.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What is hypocritical about that? He would lose his pension also.

The presidential pensions exist because Harry Truman had no fortune to fall back on when he left office in 1953. Times have changed.

Obama is a hypocrite for taking Wall St's money. He could just make his speech and give the money to charity.

The pension thing is just petty, and it's championed by a goper who really is a petty little man.

He gave the money to charity.

Really? to whom?

In the DUPLICATE thread about this yesterday, I posted the details of the Obama 2 million dollar donation to a educational center in Chicago.

That's nice, but the Wall St speech and the donation don't seem to be connected.

Business News - Chicago Tribune

Doesn't every ex-president make at least $400,000 in a year one way or another?

 

[NYcarbineer]

He gave the money to charity.

Really? to whom?

In the DUPLICATE thread about this yesterday, I posted the details of the Obama 2 million dollar donation to a educational center in Chicago.

That's nice, but the Wall St speech and the donation don't seem to be connected.

Business News - Chicago Tribune

lol, have you forgotten? Money is fungible. That's what the anti-planned parenthood people keep insisting.

Let them explain it to us.

Yeah its fungible.

So they fung the 2 million into the 400,000 speeches and 5 of them get erased, lol.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Obama is a hypocrite for taking Wall St's money. He could just make his speech and give the money to charity.

The pension thing is just petty, and it's championed by a goper who really is a petty little man.

He gave the money to charity.

Really? to whom?

In the DUPLICATE thread about this yesterday, I posted the details of the Obama 2 million dollar donation to a educational center in Chicago.

That's nice, but the Wall St speech and the donation don't seem to be connected.

Business News - Chicago Tribune

Doesn't every ex-president make at least $400,000 in a year one way or another?

Of course Obama is getting paid at the rate of $400,000 an hour, but either way you are making the point that taxpayers shouldn't be burdened with paying these rich people a $200,000 a year pension.

 

[bendog]

He gave the money to charity.

Really? to whom?

In the DUPLICATE thread about this yesterday, I posted the details of the Obama 2 million dollar donation to a educational center in Chicago.

That's nice, but the Wall St speech and the donation don't seem to be connected.

Business News - Chicago Tribune

Doesn't every ex-president make at least $400,000 in a year one way or another?

Of course Obama is getting paid at the rate of $400,000 an hour, but either way you are making the point that taxpayers shouldn't be burdened with paying these rich people a $200,000 a year pension.

Oh it's such a burden. I am weeping.