Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Spits the idiot who actually stated the retired folks are "not a factor in the rate of labor force participation."I really don't need you to accept my facts as facts for them to be facts.You're too fucking stupid for words. They're record numbers because we have a record high number of people 62 and older, which is growing at a rate of about 10,000 every day.Most of them don't. Most of them are baby boomers who've retired.
um wrong again idiot. you just cant stop lying to YOURSELF HUH?
record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS arent participating in the Labor Market
Meanwhile, there have been over 7 million people retire since Obama became president.
Social Security Beneficiary Statistics
you are a joke. seriously when are you going to post a fact?
um but they arent dummy. that's the problem.
Spits the idiot who actually stated the retired folks are "not a factor in the rate of labor force participation."I really don't need you to accept my facts as facts for them to be facts.You're too fucking stupid for words. They're record numbers because we have a record high number of people 62 and older, which is growing at a rate of about 10,000 every day.um wrong again idiot. you just cant stop lying to YOURSELF HUH?
record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS arent participating in the Labor Market
Meanwhile, there have been over 7 million people retire since Obama became president.
Social Security Beneficiary Statistics
you are a joke. seriously when are you going to post a fact?
um but they arent dummy. that's the problem.
You clearly have no fucking clue what a fact even looks like.
You fucking rightard. You said they're not a factor in the labor force participation rate. You really can't get any dumber.This may just be the dumbest post I ever read on this forum ... and that saying A LOT.retirees are not counted in the labor force you dullard; hence they are not a factor in the rate of labor force participation; which counts working-age people. population increases would have made up for retiring workers
Retired folks are not a factor in the labor force participation rate?? Are you fucking nuts???
Don't answer -- your post answered that question answered for you.
ok here is the Bureau of Labor Statistics own website; show me where retirees are counted genius. then; if you're a man. come back and apologize ok?
www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
may i direct your attention about halfway down the page leftard? to the paragraph titled "Who is Not Counted In The Labor Force"???
3rd sentence
You fucking rightard. You said they're not a factor in the labor force participation rate. You really can't get any dumber.This may just be the dumbest post I ever read on this forum ... and that saying A LOT.retirees are not counted in the labor force you dullard; hence they are not a factor in the rate of labor force participation; which counts working-age people. population increases would have made up for retiring workers
Retired folks are not a factor in the labor force participation rate?? Are you fucking nuts???
Don't answer -- your post answered that question answered for you.
ok here is the Bureau of Labor Statistics own website; show me where retirees are counted genius. then; if you're a man. come back and apologize ok?
www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
may i direct your attention about halfway down the page leftard? to the paragraph titled "Who is Not Counted In The Labor Force"???
3rd sentence
Holyfuckingshit!This may just be the dumbest post I ever read on this forum ... and that saying A LOT.retirees are not counted in the labor force you dullard; hence they are not a factor in the rate of labor force participation; which counts working-age people. population increases would have made up for retiring workers
Retired folks are not a factor in the labor force participation rate?? Are you fucking nuts???
Don't answer -- your post answered that question answered for you.
ok here is the Bureau of Labor Statistics own website; show me where retirees are counted genius. then; if you're a man. come back and apologize ok?
www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
may i direct your attention about halfway down the page leftard? to the paragraph titled "Who is Not Counted In The Labor Force"???
3rd sentence
I never said that, you flaming imbecile. What I am saying is that the dumbest thing I ever read here is your moronic claim that retired folks are not a factor in the labor force participation rate.i cant read leftard; please direct me to the part of your source that confirms retirees are part of the labor force?
Holyfuckingshit!This may just be the dumbest post I ever read on this forum ... and that saying A LOT.retirees are not counted in the labor force you dullard; hence they are not a factor in the rate of labor force participation; which counts working-age people. population increases would have made up for retiring workers
Retired folks are not a factor in the labor force participation rate?? Are you fucking nuts???
Don't answer -- your post answered that question answered for you.
ok here is the Bureau of Labor Statistics own website; show me where retirees are counted genius. then; if you're a man. come back and apologize ok?
www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
may i direct your attention about halfway down the page leftard? to the paragraph titled "Who is Not Counted In The Labor Force"???
3rd sentence
ur right dummy; the
Now you're trying to conflate the labor force with the labor force participation rate to mask your idiocy??
You said retired folks are not a factor in the labor force participation rate.
I never said that, you flaming imbecile. What I am saying is that the dumbest thing I ever read here is your moronic claim that retired folks are not a factor in the labor force participation rate.i cant read leftard; please direct me to the part of your source that confirms retirees are part of the labor force?
What do you think the labor force participation rate is comprised of??
You backed up shit, you idiot. You backed up retired folks are not in the labor force, which no one was contesting.Spits the idiot who actually stated the retired folks are "not a factor in the rate of labor force participation."I really don't need you to accept my facts as facts for them to be facts.You're too fucking stupid for words. They're record numbers because we have a record high number of people 62 and older, which is growing at a rate of about 10,000 every day.
Meanwhile, there have been over 7 million people retire since Obama became president.
Social Security Beneficiary Statistics
you are a joke. seriously when are you going to post a fact?
um but they arent dummy. that's the problem.
You clearly have no fucking clue what a fact even looks like.
i backed it up
you're a clown
Laughing at imbeciles like you makes me look angry to you, does it?my my; you're quite the angry idiot!!
lol
You backed up shit, you idiot. You backed up retired folks are not in the labor force, which no one was contesting.Spits the idiot who actually stated the retired folks are "not a factor in the rate of labor force participation."I really don't need you to accept my facts as facts for them to be facts.you are a joke. seriously when are you going to post a fact?
um but they arent dummy. that's the problem.
You clearly have no fucking clue what a fact even looks like.
i backed it up
you're a clown
meanwhile, your idiotic claim that retired folks are not a factor in the labor force participation rate remains the dumbest nonsense I've ever read here.
You're clearly out of your league.
