Obama's "forced diversity" plan to turn suburbs into ghettos

[HereWeGoAgain]

Thanks to obama there is no way to escape the black animals. People are crazy to buy a house. Rent, and then you can move without losing a $100,000 when obama puts some savage in the unit next to you.

Man . Yall are horrible racists .

I'll try to get better at it......

 

[TNHarley]

Ya know sect 8 ain't race based .

I know. Its based on standards of living.

 

[TNHarley]

Good gone bad
I think the dependable citizens that contribute to society should just fuckin leave.
Develop our own country and leave these limp wrists to kill each other.
Or maybe make abortion free so their blood lines will just stop....

 

[SuperDemocrat]

It is just a matter of time before the government can force us into whatever agenda it wants. So much for lu I got in a free country. I've given up o. The idea that this is a free country anymore when we have people who are ok with being coerced into doing shit they don't want to do. How can anyone say that is true anymore?

The same people who tell us gay marriage doesn't stop you from marrying straight (normal) now tells us we have to xyz in this country. I actually agree that gay marriage doesn't stop Anya e from marrying normal but the entire argument is based on the independence each individual has in a society that values freedom but when the same people tell us we have to buy health insurance or live in certain neighbourhoods then that is hypocracy.

 

[francoHFW]

And remain useless and ruin the neighborhood. Look at Ferguson. My dad grew up there, now look at it. Funny thing, the blacks hate whites. Why do you suppose whiter leave?.

Of course blacks hate whites. Dependency always leads to hatred. Blacks know that without affirmative action and welfare, 90% of blacks would starve. The more we help them, the more they will hate us.

No, they hate racist a-holes, which we have plenty of. Almost all GOPers duh...

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It is just a matter of time before the government can force us into whatever agenda it wants. So much for lu I got in a free country. I've given up o. The idea that this is a free country anymore when we have people who are ok with being coerced into doing shit they don't want to do. How can anyone say that is true anymore?

Easy. Because when you tell Democrats they live in a free country, they think everything they get should be free.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Good gone bad
I think the dependable citizens that contribute to society should just fuckin leave.
Develop our own country and leave these limp wrists to kill each other.
Or maybe make abortion free so their blood lines will just stop....

I always thought it would be great if we could divide the country in half: on the left side of the country, that's where the Democrats would live. On the right side, that's where Republicans would live.

It's a great idea except for one problem: we would need to build a wall to keep the Democrats from running over to our side once the results of Socialism sets in.

 

[Timmy]

By the way. Sect 8s have always been transferable to other city/ towns. It's nothing new.

 

[Conservative65]

By the way. Sect 8s have always been transferable to other city/ towns. It's nothing new.

Seems if someone is a leech in one location they can be a leech in other locations.

 

[Conservative65]

You guys don't understand how section 8 works do you ?

I understand that it involves someone having the taxpayers fund the place where they live. It's all I need to know.

 

[Wilbur Right]

You guys don't understand how section 8 works do you ?

I admit, I don't know. Please post the short version. I don't want to look it up.

Allow me to sum it up for you:

If you take 3/4 cup of fresh wholesome milk, and mix that with 1/4 cup of stale, sour, curdled milk, you only have one thing: a cup of bad milk.

The good never changes the bad, the bad changes the good. Unfortunately this is something liberals never learned and never will.

Good milk, sour milk, add together.
You making cheese? Or you dont like cheese? Or what?

 

[Conservative65]

You guys don't understand how section 8 works do you ?

You mean you think it works?

Neat

-Geaux

To someone like Timmy, anything where one person that didn't earn it gets what another person that did earn it has, it works. For those on the funding end, it's a different story.

 

[Wilbur Right]

Section 8 provides a voucher for housing.

You right wing bigots love you some vouchers for education.

But not housing.

Got it. Typical hypocrites.

 

[francoHFW]

Good gone bad
I think the dependable citizens that contribute to society should just fuckin leave.
Develop our own country and leave these limp wrists to kill each other.
Or maybe make abortion free so their blood lines will just stop....

I always thought it would be great if we could divide the country in half: on the left side of the country, that's where the Democrats would live. On the right side, that's where Republicans would live.

It's a great idea except for one problem: we would need to build a wall to keep the Democrats from running over to our side once the results of Socialism sets in.

Tell us how great Booosh was for the economy, and how Reaganism helps the people and the country lol...absolute idiocy.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = FRB: Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--December 10, 2015
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Section 8 provides a voucher for housing.

You right wing bigots love you some vouchers for education.

But not housing.

Got it. Typical hypocrites.

It is considered free money because you are giving money to someone to buy something in the market. That funding didn't exist before that unlike vouchers for private schools. That money did get sent to public schools but now it is getting spent at a private one unlike free housing.

 

[francoHFW]

Good gone bad
I think the dependable citizens that contribute to society should just fuckin leave.
Develop our own country and leave these limp wrists to kill each other.
Or maybe make abortion free so their blood lines will just stop....

I always thought it would be great if we could divide the country in half: on the left side of the country, that's where the Democrats would live. On the right side, that's where Republicans would live.

It's a great idea except for one problem: we would need to build a wall to keep the Democrats from running over to our side once the results of Socialism sets in.

Tell us how great Booosh was for the economy, and how Reaganism helps the people and the country lol...absolute idiocy.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = FRB: Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--December 10, 2015
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

Your country would be an oligarchy/banana republic in no time. Like Al/Miss
Ark/Ok. but no fed aid or regs protecting the workers or environment, dupe....

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Good gone bad
I think the dependable citizens that contribute to society should just fuckin leave.
Develop our own country and leave these limp wrists to kill each other.
Or maybe make abortion free so their blood lines will just stop....

I always thought it would be great if we could divide the country in half: on the left side of the country, that's where the Democrats would live. On the right side, that's where Republicans would live.

It's a great idea except for one problem: we would need to build a wall to keep the Democrats from running over to our side once the results of Socialism sets in.

Tell us how great Booosh was for the economy, and how Reaganism helps the people and the country lol...absolute idiocy.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = FRB: Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--December 10, 2015
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

Your country would be an oligarchy/banana republic in no time. Like Al/Miss
Ark/Ok. but no fed aid or regs protecting the workers or environment, dupe....

The biggest banana republic is Venezuela and the only party that wants to duplicate that is....

 

[francoHFW]

Good gone bad
I think the dependable citizens that contribute to society should just fuckin leave.
Develop our own country and leave these limp wrists to kill each other.
Or maybe make abortion free so their blood lines will just stop....

I always thought it would be great if we could divide the country in half: on the left side of the country, that's where the Democrats would live. On the right side, that's where Republicans would live.

It's a great idea except for one problem: we would need to build a wall to keep the Democrats from running over to our side once the results of Socialism sets in.

Tell us how great Booosh was for the economy, and how Reaganism helps the people and the country lol...absolute idiocy.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = FRB: Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--December 10, 2015
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

Your country would be an oligarchy/banana republic in no time. Like Al/Miss
Ark/Ok. but no fed aid or regs protecting the workers or environment, dupe....

The biggest banana republic is Venezuela and the only party that wants to duplicate that is....

IN THE LAST TEN YEARS, THEY CUT ILLITERACY TO NOTHING AND HALVED THE POVERTY RATE. oops. Things you'll never hear, dupe. And their "dictatorship' had all the scheduled elections. They're certainly better off than El Salvador and Guatemala. Socialism has helped many Latin American countries lately, since Booshie sabotage and covert ops ended.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Section 8 provides a voucher for housing.

You right wing bigots love you some vouchers for education.

But not housing.

Got it. Typical hypocrites.

School vouchers don't ruin schools. HUD buying and renting homes and apartments in nice neighborhoods does ruin them costing a city hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars in lost property value, businesses moving out and expanded police and rescue employees needed to deal with the crime.

There is nothing hypocritical about it. Republicans have always believed our public school systems are a failure. They are doing something to try and remedy that. Nothing positive comes from moving in lowlifes with hard working middle-class Americans.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

By the way. Sect 8s have always been transferable to other city/ towns. It's nothing new.

HUD targets nice areas to destroy. That's not supposed to be the job of government.