![11_s640x427.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.washtimes.com%2Fmedia%2Fimage%2F2014%2F05%2F29%2F11_s640x427.jpg%3F73b8e21685896c3f2859310aaa5adb253919b641&hash=5acc82d431a0aa3dde80e683ef968efe)
Inside the Ring: Memo outlines Obamas plan to use the military against citizens
By Bill Gertz
-
The Washington Times
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Pentagon's directive No. 3025.18, Defense Support of Civil Authorities"
A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administrations potential use of military force against Americans.
The directive contains noncontroversial provisions on support to civilian fire and emergency services, special events and the domestic use of the Army Corps of Engineers.
The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest.
This appears to be the latest step in the administrations decision to use force within the United States against its citizens, said a defense official opposed to the directive.
Directive No. 3025.18, Defense Support of Civil Authorities, was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders are provided emergency authority under this directive.
Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority, the directive states.
In these circumstances, those federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the president is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances under two conditions.
The conditions include military support needed to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order. A second use is when federal, state and local authorities are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for federal property or federal governmental functions.
Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions, the directive states.
Read more: Inside the Ring: Directive outlines Obama's plan to use the military against citizens - Washington Times
Follow us: [MENTION=39892]Was[/MENTION]htimes on Twitter
-
The Washington Times
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Pentagon's directive No. 3025.18, Defense Support of Civil Authorities"
A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administrations potential use of military force against Americans.
The directive contains noncontroversial provisions on support to civilian fire and emergency services, special events and the domestic use of the Army Corps of Engineers.
The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest.
This appears to be the latest step in the administrations decision to use force within the United States against its citizens, said a defense official opposed to the directive.
Directive No. 3025.18, Defense Support of Civil Authorities, was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders are provided emergency authority under this directive.
Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority, the directive states.
In these circumstances, those federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the president is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances under two conditions.
The conditions include military support needed to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order. A second use is when federal, state and local authorities are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for federal property or federal governmental functions.
Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions, the directive states.
Read more: Inside the Ring: Directive outlines Obama's plan to use the military against citizens - Washington Times
Follow us: [MENTION=39892]Was[/MENTION]htimes on Twitter