Offical Impeachment Thread

[IM2]

So to recap:

Wednesday was all the people who heard nothing but are there to tell someone else’s story that wasn’t there but they sure didn’t like how Trump does foreign policy.

Today we move on to some broad that got her feelings hurt because she got fired and also doesn’t like how Trump does foreign policy.

A 33 year professional who was working to end corruption in Ukraine.

 

[IM2]

So to recap:

Wednesday was all the people who heard nothing but are there to tell someone else’s story that wasn’t there but they sure didn’t like how Trump does foreign policy.

Today we move on to some broad that got her feelings hurt because she got fired and also doesn’t like how Trump does foreign policy.

She’s just all broke up because she was not elegible for a p grab.

I'm sure her p is doing quite fine without Trumps little pudgy fingers grabbing it.

 

[BlindBoo]

Joe Biden, speaking on behalf of DumBama, openly stated that if the prosecutor that looked into the firm his son was working for, wasn't fired by the time he left Ukraine, all bets are off.

Was the the prosecutor was looking into corruption that occurred during the time when Hunter was serving on the board?

Why did the prosecutor stop looking into the corruption?

Wasn't the policy to push for the removal the prosecutor developed in conjunction with our EU allies because of alleged corruption by the prosecutor?

why don't you tell us what the prosecutor was looking into that he was so corrupt?

Please, justify why the US had to get him fired. I want the link where the EU said hey US go get that prosecutor fk fired.

Why? Prove that it wasn't US policy developed in coordination with our allies in the region.

 

[IM2]

Yawn! You know exactly what Trump has done. And what's so pathetic is you don't mind him breaking the law. Now democrats can let this go on and then when a democrat becomes president, they let him/her do what Trump is doing.

Name the law he broke and please provide the statute. Thank you.

No. You know what laws he has broken. You are able to name every law on the books for Obama , Clinton, Comey, Clapper, Brennan Biden, etc., but you watch Trump tell people to defy subpoenas, he defies subpoenas, refuses to testify, asks a foreign government to investigate his opponent and suddenly you don't know what laws he has broken. Fuck that.

It's something called Executive Privilege, and using it is not breaking any laws. Furthermore, just because Slow Joe is a presidential nominee (not Trump's challenger) does not excuse him from being looked into for possible suspicious activity while serving as VP. Coke head Hunter got a very lucrative job for somebody that's never dealt in the country before in an industry he has no experience in. That's very suspicious.

Quit trying to pretend Trump was fighting corruption. He was only talking about Biden & yes his political adversary that Trump knows is his biggest threat.,

Try being an American instead of a Trumpette.

Quit lying & saying Hunter Biden had no experience. He had served on boards & was an attorney & advised the Ukrainian company on US law.

wow you really can't read can you? It seems to me the transcript discussed Crowdstrike and the DNC server. No? You didn't read that? And the word 'favor' was actually for that and not Biden. But fk dave, your reading skills never were that fking good. So you just post up the language from the transcript that says 'favor' for biden.

Crowdstrike didn't happen. Understand that.

 

[Olde Europe]

LOLOLOL

Lying fucking moron, you don't have enough brain power to light a match.

Nice.

In order to oversee what is at issue here, we need the equivalent of a well-lit airport at night. And the guy shows up, gloating, with a candle, and proudly proclaims he ain't seeing nothing.

 

[BlindBoo]

Funny shit. False smear campaign against her, but what is what they've been pursuing again the President for the last three years??????

It's just so unfair.......

 

[Ame®icano]

Yovanovitch is presenting a strong argument. I have to take off for a bit--I'm sure the Republicans will draw blood.

I was fired, because "orange man bad".

 

[IM2]

So Wednesday, we heard from the two witnesses that didn't actually witness a damn thing themselves, today we get the disgruntled employee.

Let the games begin!

They witnessed everything. And today we saw Trump dig his grave a little deeper by trying to intimidate the witness with that tweet.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

For all intensive purposes both the Nixon administration and the Clinton administration co-operated with the investigation. Trump never considered co-operating. Both Clinton and Nixon understood the perils of impeachment for both parties and the harm it is does to the country. An impeachment always further divides the nation making bi-partisan efforts nearly impossible. It also makes the process just another method for changing presidents, not a good thing. Unfortunately, Donald Trump sees impeachment as just another personal battle with little thought for how it effects others and the future of the nation.

I believe the House investigation should culminate with a decision to do what the Senate will most likely do, leave the decision of wrong doing in the hands of the voters.

To be honest, the Dems aren't acting too concerned about how this mess affects the entire nation either.

Question: what the EFF is Trump supposed to do? The Dems have been after his ass since the day after the 2016 election, with no actual evidence to base any of their investigations and inquiries on. Has he not released the transcripts of the phone call? Should he not expect reasonable attempts by the Dems to allow him or his people to question the same witnesses and ask whatever questions they deem appropriate?

Question: does Biden get off the hook for whatever he or his son did with respect to Ukraine, because he's running for the Dem nomination? Should we the public not know about whatever took place while Biden was the VP? Why isn't that actually part of his job as President, to look into any possible illegal activities in another country to see if our own laws were broken? Shouldn't he find out?

What is Trump suppose to do? Well to start off, he could start acting like a president instead of narcissistic school boy who's only interest is himself. If he had real information that Biden's son has violate the law, then he would have his AG open an investigation instead trying to bribe a foreign government with military aid.

Of course all he really wants is President Zelensky to announce he is opening and investigation into Biden. Then he could spin all kinds of stories about Biden at his rallies. Of course he will probably do that anyway.

1) Trump never bribed anybody.
2) Never was any investigation.
3) Ukraine got the US aid.

1) Trump never bribed anybody.
2) Never was any investigation.
3) Ukraine got the US aid.

If there never was an investigation, then what is the corruption Biden is alleged to have engaged in?

That's been discussed repeatedly. Coke head Hunter, who was not only kicked out of the military, and attended rehab three times, got a job in a country he never dealt with before, unfamiliar with the language, in an industry he had no experience in, for 80K a month. Out of the 7.5 billion people on this planet, why would Burisma choose him of all people?

A couple of weeks ago the FOIA forced them to release an email of Burisma dropping Hunter's name to try and setup a meeting between them and the State department. Supposedly, more emails are going to be released in the near future as they get legally processed.

You didn't answer my question.

The line on Biden's corruption was that he extorted the Ukrainian govt to fire the prosecutor who was investigating his son.

Now you're saying there was never an investigation and the "corruption" is because
"Crackhead" Hunter Biden landed a lucrative job?

Trump said it was about the investigationand the firing. So which is it?

 

[Ame®icano]

While you call someone a dumbfuck, why do you idiots only give a snippet of what you want people to focus on?
Why the fuck don't you post the entire paragraph of what Trump stated. sheesh

Because that's the salient part. Zelensky is ready to buy military aid from us (with our money) and the first words out of Trump's mouth is to ask for a favor.

And not for nothing, but .... I could have posted more ... I could have posted how Trump asked Zelensky to look into the DNC server from the 2016 election, which only serves to help him politically -- or I could have posted how Trump also asked Zelensky to look into a political rival of his, which also only serves to help him politically. But I chose to just focus on him asking for favors immediately after Zelensky was looking for help from us to fend off Russia.

You left a word out of what Zelensky said. Do you know what it is? Can you say he was ALMOST ready, and he did. If my memory serves, he bought 75 Javelin ATMs and 3 launchers.

.

The sale was approved months later and only after Trump was accused of quid pro quo by a whistleblower. And none of that erases Trump's quid pro quo of asking for favors in exchange for selling them Javelins.

You sure found the word "favor" in the transcript. You just have to quote what exactly favor was for.

Can you quote it, or need someone else do it for you?

• "I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it."

• "The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it..."

That is not part of the transcript where Trump is asking for favor.

Here is the snip, that way you can't cherry pick the words.

 

[jc456]

My god, all of her testimony is about her getting the axe. Please tell me why we're wasting our time and money on this? What the fuck is impeachable about firing an ambassador?

Nothing, just like there is nothing impeachable about Trump asking Zelensky to look into the Biden matter. It's all show for these clowns. Their ship is sinking, and witnesses like her is about all they have left.

It's actually election interference. I want each of you all to begin repeating that, this is election interference, nothing more.

 

[jc456]

How did you feel about the 'smear' campaign? Her voice is going to break five, four, three, two, . .... . come on girl, where's the damn tears?????

Looks like you're the one bawling.

falling on the floor laughing. Dude it's spectacular!!!!

Ohhhhh the drama .....

 

[jc456]

So why is it we had to lead that charge? Why not somebody from the EU?

Questions are good. We were doing that though US policy developed with our allies, not as part of a hidden agenda to harm Republicans or any Republican specifically.

Point is, this impeachment is based on something Biden actually did

Nope, Trumpybears actions are all his own.

no one said it was about harming republicans. again, are you going to call the Ukraine PM a liar? come on jack step out there on that ledge and jump!!!

 

[jc456]

LOL

Dumbfuck, what part of, "each Contracting State shall have a Central Authority to make and receive requests pursuant to this treaty," is above your single digit IQ?

Where does it say the president can't simply make a personal request?

When the request is (1) asking a foreign country for assistance in his campaign (you'd think he would have learned....) and (2) he is withholding funds already approved by the Congress in order to force that country to assist.
I could simply make a personal request that you shoot someone for me, and you know what would happen? I'd end up in jail.

You're spouting Dim talking points that have been debunked 1000 times.

They haven't been debunked because the President says so, you know. He's the one being accused. I've never known a crook yet who fessed up and admitted what he did--at least not before the sentence came down.

Thank You!

This has been the case during this entire presidency. Trump has been the only one accused of corruption these guys have ever believed. And they believe every word. I know why, but this is just getting outrageous.

huh? you're confused, ever hear of the Dossier? really, never huh? wow. Oh and the russian's hacking the DNC server? nothing huh? dude, you need to get out of mom's basement.

 

[jc456]

Pelosi looks like a babbling idiot, because she is one. Today it's bribery. What will it be tomorrow? What a joke. What a waste.

It went from collusion to quid pro quo. From quid pro quo, to extortion. From extortion, it went to bribery.

It's called throwing it against the wall to see what sticks.

It is a fsct that the Ruissians interfered in the 2016 election and it was likely Trump colluded by providing them some direction as to where he needed help. This was basically proven whren his campaign forwarded their internal polling.

Later, Trump made a phone call exorting the President of the Ukraine.

One is not related to another.

Mueller report says otherwise.

The Mueller report says that Russia did interfere in the 2016 election. Maybe you read the first part and you will see this.

so you're ok with trump asking for the information Ukraine has on the server and crowdstrike. that a boy!! way to ask the right things. So again, why are we here? oh yeah, election interference for 2020 to bad mouth trump daily!! gotcha.

 

[BlindBoo]

A public announcement about what,

Excellent question. Trumpybear had receive assurances that Ukraine was going to investigate corruption but that did not satisfy the ol'Trumpybear.

 

[Ame®icano]

Hey Obama appointed ambassador bitch.

An impeachment hearing is not about you being butt hurt over getting fired.

She was appointed to Ukraine in May 2016, just in time for the Ukrainian meddling with DNC against Trump. She's part of the whole Clinton/Democrat conspiracy against Trump.

What does she think, that once you're Ambassador, you'll remain Ambassador for life? Was she also butthurt when she was recalled from Ambassador post from Armenia in 2011? Why she was recalled back then?

 

[jc456]

• "The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it..."

Please tell me EXACTLY what is wrong with that? To ask to reopen an investigation in corruption that occurred years ago? Hillary and Obama conspired to keep Trump under investigation since before the election.

Because the allegation that Biden stopped the prosecution is not true. In fact the prosecutor they all wanted removed was the one who abruptly stopped the investigation into the corruption. When he was removed it opened the company to further investigations. Of course all of the corruption the Ukrainians investigated happened before Biden was hired

so biden lied in his video bragging session? wow dude you're calling everyone out today.

 

[jc456]

So Wednesday, we heard from the two witnesses that didn't actually witness a damn thing themselves, today we get the disgruntled employee.

Let the games begin!

They witnessed everything. And today we saw Trump dig his grave a little deeper by trying to intimidate the witness with that tweet.

can't make it up. Jim Jordan to both Kent and Taylor,

Were you on the call, both, NO

Did you speak to the president, both, NO

Did the PM bring it up, Taylor, NO.

so why don't you post up the transcript of what they witnessed exactly other than holding their pee pee's in their hands.

Fk dude, the supposed whistleblower ain't even a whistleblower. Wish to know why? Did not witness anything.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

My understanding was Vindman wasn't on the call.....his twin brother claimed to be.

My understanding was Vindman wasn't on the call.....his twin brother claimed to be.

My understanding was Vindman wasn't on the call.....his twin brother claimed to be.

Your understanding is shit. Everyone knows this.

READ: Testimony Of Alexander Vindman, The White House's Ukraine Specialist

Husky is a triggered Leftist. His posts make me laugh.

Care to expand on that thought? Tell us all what exactly you found funny.

Who is “us”? You and your other personalities?

Who is “us”? You and your other personalities?

All of the readers, dope. Those watching you punk out repeatedly.

All? You mean the ones in your imagination? I am the one getting kudos for my posts not you. I am glad you’re triggered as it shows the typical Leftist personality.