Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry, I assumed you'd read the transcript of The Call by now. Page 4, halfway down.Here's what he did: apply the signed treaty.
This one:
We have a signed treaty to that effect....
If that is a problem.....
....why did Bill 'the rapist' Clinton sign a treaty with the Ukraine with exactly the same purpose?????
"Formal Title
Date Received from President
- Treaty Between the United States of America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters with Annex, signed at Kiev on July 22, 1998, and with an Exchange of Notes signed on September 30, 1999, which provides for its provisional application.
- 11/10/1999 Text of Treaty Document available as:
- TXT"
- TREATY WITH UKRAINE ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
__________
MESSAGE
from
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
transmitting
TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND UKRAINE ON MUTUAL LEGAL
ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS WITH ANNEX, SIGNED AT KIEV ON JULY 22,
1998, AND WITH AN EXCHANGE OF NOTES SIGNED ON SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, WHICH
PROVIDES FOR ITS PROVISIONAL APPLICATION
Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters
Of course you didn't know this, huh?
Really, A Trump over calling Bill Clinton a rapist. Who did he rape? Did you forget Trump's rape accusation of a 14 year old? Really?
What US investigation did Trump ask for help with?
It appears that everyone else knows.....except you, RealDumb.
Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
http://www.alamo-girl.com/0262.htm
And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax." EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time | Breitbart
And the Liberal elites have admitted what we on the right have said for decades.
1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.
Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.
You, a total dunce, are still fighting the war you've lost.
2. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?
The New York Times
MSNBC
The Atlantic
Slate
Vox
Politico
"So the recent wave of liberals “reckoning” with Bill Clinton’s sexual offenses should be put into proper context. It is not the beginning of the end for the Clintons atop the Democratic Party. It’s just the end.
….the mea culpas from Bill’s defenders proliferating through lefty media, from the New York Times to Politico to Vox, are anything but brave. They’re convenient." https://nypost.com/2017/11/16/dems-...ses-is-the-final-nail-in-the-clintons-coffin/
3. On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....you.....who can't keep up with the program.
“Maher asked, "Could Bill Clinton, if he had done what he did in 1998, survive today or would his own party have thrown him under the bus?"
Farrow explained, "Bill Clinton is a different conversation. He has been credibly accused of rape. That is nothing to do with gray areas. That is, you know, I think the Juanita Broadderick claim has been overdue for revisiting."
Farrow also said that he is "heartened by the fact that people now routinely express outrage about Bill Clinton and particularly those more serious allegations about him." Ronan Farrow Says Juanita Broaddrick's Rape Claim Against Bill Clinton Should Be Revisited
Is there anything....ANYTHING.....you Leftists have been right about?Yeah, Trump told him she was bad news, and he agreed. Kissy kissy.Hey dumbass! Being "recalled" means you are removing an ambassador that does not meet with the approval of the host country. Zelensky did not care for Yovanovitch. She was told to get back to the US on the next plane and was fired.
Link? What indication do you have that Zelinsky didn't "care" for the ambassador?
Facts First: Volodymyr Zelensky did say Yovanovitch’s attitude was “far from the best”
Fact check: Trump tweets Ukraine's president spoke unfavorably of Yovanovitch. Here's what we know.
There you go, dumbass! You should have already known.
Zelensky said, “It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%.”
So where is your link to that statement? Oh, you just made that up also!
You dumbasses couldn't get your own names right without talking points.
https://media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2019/09/25/transcript.pdf
Right. Making direct quotes of what people said is crazy, while gifs of little creatures laughing is the epitome of realistic.I just have to laugh.Really, A Trump over calling Bill Clinton a rapist. Who did he rape? Did you forget Trump's rape accusation of a 14 year old? Really?
What US investigation did Trump ask for help with?
It appears that everyone else knows.....except you, RealDumb.
Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
http://www.alamo-girl.com/0262.htm
And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax." EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time | Breitbart
And the Liberal elites have admitted what we on the right have said for decades.
1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.
Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.
You, a total dunce, are still fighting the war you've lost.
2. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?
The New York Times
MSNBC
The Atlantic
Slate
Vox
Politico
"So the recent wave of liberals “reckoning” with Bill Clinton’s sexual offenses should be put into proper context. It is not the beginning of the end for the Clintons atop the Democratic Party. It’s just the end.
….the mea culpas from Bill’s defenders proliferating through lefty media, from the New York Times to Politico to Vox, are anything but brave. They’re convenient." https://nypost.com/2017/11/16/dems-...ses-is-the-final-nail-in-the-clintons-coffin/
3. On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....you.....who can't keep up with the program.
“Maher asked, "Could Bill Clinton, if he had done what he did in 1998, survive today or would his own party have thrown him under the bus?"
Farrow explained, "Bill Clinton is a different conversation. He has been credibly accused of rape. That is nothing to do with gray areas. That is, you know, I think the Juanita Broadderick claim has been overdue for revisiting."
Farrow also said that he is "heartened by the fact that people now routinely express outrage about Bill Clinton and particularly those more serious allegations about him." Ronan Farrow Says Juanita Broaddrick's Rape Claim Against Bill Clinton Should Be Revisited
Is there anything....ANYTHING.....you Leftists have been right about?Yeah, Trump told him she was bad news, and he agreed. Kissy kissy.Link? What indication do you have that Zelinsky didn't "care" for the ambassador?
Facts First: Volodymyr Zelensky did say Yovanovitch’s attitude was “far from the best”
Fact check: Trump tweets Ukraine's president spoke unfavorably of Yovanovitch. Here's what we know.
There you go, dumbass! You should have already known.
Zelensky said, “It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%.”
Don't mind her, dementia is taking it's toll.
It was, according to Zelensky, Trump who told him that. Why would Trump say something like that? In her testimony Friday, it was really clear she was positive and hopeful about the new administration in Ukraine. I never heard a whisper of a word that in any way was negative toward Zelensky.What did he say?Perhaps because she didn't support the incoming Ukraine admin or our president.
.
lie.
Not what Zelensky said. LMAO
.
That Yovanovitch supported the previous president, not him.
.
Hey dumbass! Being "recalled" means you are removing an ambassador that does not meet with the approval of the host country. Zelensky did not care for Yovanovitch. She was told to get back to the US on the next plane and was fired.
Link? What indication do you have that Zelinsky didn't "care" for the ambassador?
Facts First: Volodymyr Zelensky did say Yovanovitch’s attitude was “far from the best”
There you go, dumbass! You should have already known.
Did you read your link? He said it after Trump brought her up. Zelensky would do or say anything Trump wanted him to...Trump was extorting him after all.
Why would the State Department tell Yovanovich that she did nothing wrong if she had lost the confidence of the host country?
We know how this played out. Yovanovich pushed back against the "drug deal" that the "Three Amigos" were scheming and so she had to be removed to let Rick Perry secure Ukrainian drilling rights for his donors and to make conspiracy theories come to life to make Trump look like Russia didn't help him win. ( they did)
It's disgusting how all those politicians pat each other's back. They ALL did the great job and service to the country. Yeah, right.
She was Obama holdover. That alone is enough to replace her. Yet, she was badmouthing president that she was representing in Ukraine. That is another reason. So who was smearing whom in this case?
She should've been fired the moment Trump walked into White House for simple reason that she was there during time that Ukrainians were working with DNC against Trump and she did nothing about it, even more, I think she had a role in it.
Yovanovich has been in the State Dept since Reagan. Technically she's a Reagan holdover.
Oh, and the accusation that she was badmouthing Trump comes from a bunch of people paid off by Dmytro Firtash, who is currently fighting extradition to the US for Ukrainian Corruption. As was said in the hearing, you can't fight corruption without pissing off corrupt people.
It was, according to Zelensky, Trump who told him that. Why would Trump say something like that? In her testimony Friday, it was really clear she was positive and hopeful about the new administration in Ukraine. I never heard a whisper of a word that in any way was negative toward Zelensky.What did he say?Perhaps because she didn't support the incoming Ukraine admin or our president.
.
lie.
Not what Zelensky said. LMAO
.
That Yovanovitch supported the previous president, not him.
.
all of it? Exposure for all to see, the 30 to 40 year politicians and their elitism to think they can tell 65 million americans to go fk themselves. Yeah.NOTHING that Biden may have done will undo what Trump has done. NOTHING
Here's what he did: apply the signed treaty.
This one:
We have a signed treaty to that effect....
If that is a problem.....
....why did Bill 'the rapist' Clinton sign a treaty with the Ukraine with exactly the same purpose?????
"Formal Title
Date Received from President
- Treaty Between the United States of America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters with Annex, signed at Kiev on July 22, 1998, and with an Exchange of Notes signed on September 30, 1999, which provides for its provisional application.
- 11/10/1999 Text of Treaty Document available as:
- TXT"
- TREATY WITH UKRAINE ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
__________
MESSAGE
from
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
transmitting
TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND UKRAINE ON MUTUAL LEGAL
ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS WITH ANNEX, SIGNED AT KIEV ON JULY 22,
1998, AND WITH AN EXCHANGE OF NOTES SIGNED ON SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, WHICH
PROVIDES FOR ITS PROVISIONAL APPLICATION
Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters
Of course you didn't know this, huh?
Really, A Trump over calling Bill Clinton a rapist. Who did he rape? Did you forget Trump's rape accusation of a 14 year old? Really?
What US investigation did Trump ask for help with?
It appears that everyone else knows.....except you, RealDumb.
Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
http://www.alamo-girl.com/0262.htm
And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax." EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time | Breitbart
And the Liberal elites have admitted what we on the right have said for decades.
1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.
Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.
You, a total dunce, are still fighting the war you've lost.
2. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?
The New York Times
MSNBC
The Atlantic
Slate
Vox
Politico
"So the recent wave of liberals “reckoning” with Bill Clinton’s sexual offenses should be put into proper context. It is not the beginning of the end for the Clintons atop the Democratic Party. It’s just the end.
….the mea culpas from Bill’s defenders proliferating through lefty media, from the New York Times to Politico to Vox, are anything but brave. They’re convenient." https://nypost.com/2017/11/16/dems-...ses-is-the-final-nail-in-the-clintons-coffin/
3. On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....you.....who can't keep up with the program.
“Maher asked, "Could Bill Clinton, if he had done what he did in 1998, survive today or would his own party have thrown him under the bus?"
Farrow explained, "Bill Clinton is a different conversation. He has been credibly accused of rape. That is nothing to do with gray areas. That is, you know, I think the Juanita Broadderick claim has been overdue for revisiting."
Farrow also said that he is "heartened by the fact that people now routinely express outrage about Bill Clinton and particularly those more serious allegations about him." Ronan Farrow Says Juanita Broaddrick's Rape Claim Against Bill Clinton Should Be Revisited
Is there anything....ANYTHING.....you Leftists have been right about?
"Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!"
Which part? You knew exactly who Trump was & you voted for him. Sorry, but where does that put your moral standing? About as low as you can get.
Jim Jones? The Ohio State guy that let a predator molest? That Jim Jones? What was his Quid Pro Quo then?Right. Making direct quotes of what people said is crazy, while gifs of little creatures laughing is the epitome of realistic.I just have to laugh.It appears that everyone else knows.....except you, RealDumb.
Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
http://www.alamo-girl.com/0262.htm
And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax." EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time | Breitbart
And the Liberal elites have admitted what we on the right have said for decades.
1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.
Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.
You, a total dunce, are still fighting the war you've lost.
2. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?
The New York Times
MSNBC
The Atlantic
Slate
Vox
Politico
"So the recent wave of liberals “reckoning” with Bill Clinton’s sexual offenses should be put into proper context. It is not the beginning of the end for the Clintons atop the Democratic Party. It’s just the end.
….the mea culpas from Bill’s defenders proliferating through lefty media, from the New York Times to Politico to Vox, are anything but brave. They’re convenient." https://nypost.com/2017/11/16/dems-...ses-is-the-final-nail-in-the-clintons-coffin/
3. On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....you.....who can't keep up with the program.
“Maher asked, "Could Bill Clinton, if he had done what he did in 1998, survive today or would his own party have thrown him under the bus?"
Farrow explained, "Bill Clinton is a different conversation. He has been credibly accused of rape. That is nothing to do with gray areas. That is, you know, I think the Juanita Broadderick claim has been overdue for revisiting."
Farrow also said that he is "heartened by the fact that people now routinely express outrage about Bill Clinton and particularly those more serious allegations about him." Ronan Farrow Says Juanita Broaddrick's Rape Claim Against Bill Clinton Should Be Revisited
Is there anything....ANYTHING.....you Leftists have been right about?Yeah, Trump told him she was bad news, and he agreed. Kissy kissy.Facts First: Volodymyr Zelensky did say Yovanovitch’s attitude was “far from the best”
Fact check: Trump tweets Ukraine's president spoke unfavorably of Yovanovitch. Here's what we know.
There you go, dumbass! You should have already known.
Zelensky said, “It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%.”
Don't mind her, dementia is taking it's toll.
How's this?
“Jim Jordan: ‘No One Has Testified That There Has Been a Quid Pro Quo’
…Democrats failed to prove a quid pro quo took place during President Donald Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
"No one's testified there's been a quid pro quo," Jordan explained. "Everyone's got second, third, fourth-hand information. Mr. Morrison, who was on the call, said he didn't think anything was improper or illegal in the call. Ms. Williams didn't think anything improper or illegal happened in the call."
The congressman reminded Brennan of one important tidbit, the same one he has made in the past: the four facts surround the call have not changed.
"That's the funny thing about facts. They don't change.
1.The fact that we have the transcript and there was no linkage of any type of assertion of dollars for an investigation on the call.
2.We have the two guys on the call. President Trump and President Zelensky said no pressure and no linkage," he explained.
3. "My point is that he [Zelensky] didn't know that their aid was held up at the time of the call.
4. And, most importantly, they didn't do anything, any specific action or investigation to get the aid released." Jim Jordan: ‘No One Has Testified That There Has Been a Quid Pro Quo’
Better?
How was the stupid Americas been invaded by 30, million illegals they’ve lowered our wages maybe not for you but for millions of poor AmericansHow about Trump's fake emergency to steak money from the soldiers you liars claim to like to build his stupid wall?Any evidence?And T-Rump tried to circumvent congress you moron.Congress controls funding you moronFirst, jackass, why would the President of the Ukraine admit he accepted a bribe? Second, why would he piss off Trump when Trump controlled the funding.
Using funds to try to bribe a foreign official is illegal
Biden was leading in the polls. Joe Biden was the centrist. He was kicking Trumps ass in e ery poll.
Nice Try but Trump is toast.
all of it? Exposure for all to see, the 30 to 40 year politicians and their elitism to think they can tell 65 million americans to go fk themselves. Yeah.Here's what he did: apply the signed treaty.
This one:
We have a signed treaty to that effect....
If that is a problem.....
....why did Bill 'the rapist' Clinton sign a treaty with the Ukraine with exactly the same purpose?????
"Formal Title
Date Received from President
- Treaty Between the United States of America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters with Annex, signed at Kiev on July 22, 1998, and with an Exchange of Notes signed on September 30, 1999, which provides for its provisional application.
- 11/10/1999 Text of Treaty Document available as:
- TXT"
- TREATY WITH UKRAINE ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
__________
MESSAGE
from
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
transmitting
TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND UKRAINE ON MUTUAL LEGAL
ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS WITH ANNEX, SIGNED AT KIEV ON JULY 22,
1998, AND WITH AN EXCHANGE OF NOTES SIGNED ON SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, WHICH
PROVIDES FOR ITS PROVISIONAL APPLICATION
Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters
Of course you didn't know this, huh?
Really, A Trump over calling Bill Clinton a rapist. Who did he rape? Did you forget Trump's rape accusation of a 14 year old? Really?
What US investigation did Trump ask for help with?
It appears that everyone else knows.....except you, RealDumb.
Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
http://www.alamo-girl.com/0262.htm
And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax." EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time | Breitbart
And the Liberal elites have admitted what we on the right have said for decades.
1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.
Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.
You, a total dunce, are still fighting the war you've lost.
2. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?
The New York Times
MSNBC
The Atlantic
Slate
Vox
Politico
"So the recent wave of liberals “reckoning” with Bill Clinton’s sexual offenses should be put into proper context. It is not the beginning of the end for the Clintons atop the Democratic Party. It’s just the end.
….the mea culpas from Bill’s defenders proliferating through lefty media, from the New York Times to Politico to Vox, are anything but brave. They’re convenient." https://nypost.com/2017/11/16/dems-...ses-is-the-final-nail-in-the-clintons-coffin/
3. On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....you.....who can't keep up with the program.
“Maher asked, "Could Bill Clinton, if he had done what he did in 1998, survive today or would his own party have thrown him under the bus?"
Farrow explained, "Bill Clinton is a different conversation. He has been credibly accused of rape. That is nothing to do with gray areas. That is, you know, I think the Juanita Broadderick claim has been overdue for revisiting."
Farrow also said that he is "heartened by the fact that people now routinely express outrage about Bill Clinton and particularly those more serious allegations about him." Ronan Farrow Says Juanita Broaddrick's Rape Claim Against Bill Clinton Should Be Revisited
Is there anything....ANYTHING.....you Leftists have been right about?
"Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!"
Which part? You knew exactly who Trump was & you voted for him. Sorry, but where does that put your moral standing? About as low as you can get.
When 65 Americans are so fucking stupid that they actually voted for a piece of shit like Trump, yes.
Jim Jones? The Ohio State guy that let a predator molest? That Jim Jones? What was his Quid Pro Quo then?Right. Making direct quotes of what people said is crazy, while gifs of little creatures laughing is the epitome of realistic.I just have to laugh.Yeah, Trump told him she was bad news, and he agreed. Kissy kissy.
Zelensky said, “It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%.”
Don't mind her, dementia is taking it's toll.
How's this?
“Jim Jordan: ‘No One Has Testified That There Has Been a Quid Pro Quo’
…Democrats failed to prove a quid pro quo took place during President Donald Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
"No one's testified there's been a quid pro quo," Jordan explained. "Everyone's got second, third, fourth-hand information. Mr. Morrison, who was on the call, said he didn't think anything was improper or illegal in the call. Ms. Williams didn't think anything improper or illegal happened in the call."
The congressman reminded Brennan of one important tidbit, the same one he has made in the past: the four facts surround the call have not changed.
"That's the funny thing about facts. They don't change.
1.The fact that we have the transcript and there was no linkage of any type of assertion of dollars for an investigation on the call.
2.We have the two guys on the call. President Trump and President Zelensky said no pressure and no linkage," he explained.
3. "My point is that he [Zelensky] didn't know that their aid was held up at the time of the call.
4. And, most importantly, they didn't do anything, any specific action or investigation to get the aid released." Jim Jordan: ‘No One Has Testified That There Has Been a Quid Pro Quo’
Better?
You know the Congressional Republicans got to question them in the Committees, right?Yes, they could one up the Senate by not impeaching Trump and saying they will leave it to the voters to decide. However, that won't work. Trump would claim a victory stating it was another democrat witch hunt to discredit him. I think the democrats have gone too far to back down now.Your side lost the election, IM2, move on and vote him out in a year."Are you saying running for office makes one immune form investigation? If not, we have a treaty with Ukraine on criminal investigations, I haven't seen where politicians are exempted form that treaty."
It is against the law to ask a foreign government to investigate your political rival. Get that through your think skulls Trumpers. Stop being disingenuous.
No laws have been broken and Schiff and Pelosi know it, they are just trying to muddy the waters for
the inept and confused. Your stable of mules couldn't win an election for dog catcher....and they know it.
(R) nutters need to move on from that tired old excuse. if that happened, then y'all could finally stop bring up hillary everytime you hafta defend donny.
Consider this plan.
If the Democrats were actually clever.......they'd hold the hearings......and then vote not to impeach.
Why?
a. they know the Republican Senate is a dead end for the ploy
b. independent voters have made clear that they are sick of the charade
c. the only hope is to damage Trump for the election....and they can see that it isn't working
d. they realize that if it gets to the Senate.....the Republicans can recall not just the same 'witnesses'...and ask what they want
and when they want....
e. but they can call Schiff to testify!!!!
Also, there are a lot of witness yet to testify and there may be more. Unlike last week's witnesses, the upcoming witnesses are much closer to Trump which means they could make things a lot worse for Trump such that a Senate acquittal might be impossible. If republican senators see Trump as a looser, they will desert him.
Let's see if the Leftists want the Republican Senate to question those witnesses.
all of it? Exposure for all to see, the 30 to 40 year politicians and their elitism to think they can tell 65 million americans to go fk themselves. Yeah.Really, A Trump over calling Bill Clinton a rapist. Who did he rape? Did you forget Trump's rape accusation of a 14 year old? Really?
What US investigation did Trump ask for help with?
It appears that everyone else knows.....except you, RealDumb.
Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
http://www.alamo-girl.com/0262.htm
And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax." EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time | Breitbart
And the Liberal elites have admitted what we on the right have said for decades.
1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.
Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.
You, a total dunce, are still fighting the war you've lost.
2. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?
The New York Times
MSNBC
The Atlantic
Slate
Vox
Politico
"So the recent wave of liberals “reckoning” with Bill Clinton’s sexual offenses should be put into proper context. It is not the beginning of the end for the Clintons atop the Democratic Party. It’s just the end.
….the mea culpas from Bill’s defenders proliferating through lefty media, from the New York Times to Politico to Vox, are anything but brave. They’re convenient." https://nypost.com/2017/11/16/dems-...ses-is-the-final-nail-in-the-clintons-coffin/
3. On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....you.....who can't keep up with the program.
“Maher asked, "Could Bill Clinton, if he had done what he did in 1998, survive today or would his own party have thrown him under the bus?"
Farrow explained, "Bill Clinton is a different conversation. He has been credibly accused of rape. That is nothing to do with gray areas. That is, you know, I think the Juanita Broadderick claim has been overdue for revisiting."
Farrow also said that he is "heartened by the fact that people now routinely express outrage about Bill Clinton and particularly those more serious allegations about him." Ronan Farrow Says Juanita Broaddrick's Rape Claim Against Bill Clinton Should Be Revisited
Is there anything....ANYTHING.....you Leftists have been right about?
"Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!"
Which part? You knew exactly who Trump was & you voted for him. Sorry, but where does that put your moral standing? About as low as you can get.
When 65 Americans are so fucking stupid that they actually voted for a piece of shit like Trump, yes.
Jim Jones? The Ohio State guy that let a predator molest? That Jim Jones? What was his Quid Pro Quo then?Right. Making direct quotes of what people said is crazy, while gifs of little creatures laughing is the epitome of realistic.I just have to laugh.
Don't mind her, dementia is taking it's toll.
How's this?
“Jim Jordan: ‘No One Has Testified That There Has Been a Quid Pro Quo’
…Democrats failed to prove a quid pro quo took place during President Donald Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
"No one's testified there's been a quid pro quo," Jordan explained. "Everyone's got second, third, fourth-hand information. Mr. Morrison, who was on the call, said he didn't think anything was improper or illegal in the call. Ms. Williams didn't think anything improper or illegal happened in the call."
The congressman reminded Brennan of one important tidbit, the same one he has made in the past: the four facts surround the call have not changed.
"That's the funny thing about facts. They don't change.
1.The fact that we have the transcript and there was no linkage of any type of assertion of dollars for an investigation on the call.
2.We have the two guys on the call. President Trump and President Zelensky said no pressure and no linkage," he explained.
3. "My point is that he [Zelensky] didn't know that their aid was held up at the time of the call.
4. And, most importantly, they didn't do anything, any specific action or investigation to get the aid released." Jim Jordan: ‘No One Has Testified That There Has Been a Quid Pro Quo’
Better?
Jim who????
Gads, you go to quite an extent to prove you're a moron.
Trust me....it is unnecessary......everyone knows.
BTW, there is no regulation in our Federal Government that requires Spies-Whistle-blowers be kept Anonymous.Where is this DOUCHE then?My opinion, since The Democrats are refusing to allow The Republicans any Witnesses of their own, that this is going to be extremely boring. There won't be any back and forth. There won't be any counter narrative, or a lot of cross examining of the Witnesses. All the KEY people are not allowed to testify or are being kept secret from The American People.Should be less than interesting and I'm wondering what Trump and his attorneys will make of it all especially when they get to speak with all the so called witnesses.
Another steaming pile of horse shit brought to you by the Dems who are paving the way for a Trump win in 2020.
Enjoy.
^Lie.
You idiots. Is that the whistle blower? He's kind of irrelevant now, he or she reported things that they saw that didn't seem right, and investigation started and we've now moved on from the whistle blower, not really pertinent to the hearings now as we now have actual witnesses who have and will continue to testify.
However, uncovering the identify of the whistle blower whether accurately or not is meant to intimidate future whistle blowers from coming forward. Congratulations, moving forward whether the presidency is held by Republicans or Democrats people who want to report on corruption will think twice about it.
If there were, we wouldn't know who Eric Snowden was.
You know that Donald J. Trump is the whistleblower, right and that he is playing you fools so he can take both Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barak Obama and The DNC down in one stroke of Genius, right?BTW, there is no regulation in our Federal Government that requires Spies-Whistle-blowers be kept Anonymous.Where is this DOUCHE then?My opinion, since The Democrats are refusing to allow The Republicans any Witnesses of their own, that this is going to be extremely boring. There won't be any back and forth. There won't be any counter narrative, or a lot of cross examining of the Witnesses. All the KEY people are not allowed to testify or are being kept secret from The American People.
^Lie.
You idiots. Is that the whistle blower? He's kind of irrelevant now, he or she reported things that they saw that didn't seem right, and investigation started and we've now moved on from the whistle blower, not really pertinent to the hearings now as we now have actual witnesses who have and will continue to testify.
However, uncovering the identify of the whistle blower whether accurately or not is meant to intimidate future whistle blowers from coming forward. Congratulations, moving forward whether the presidency is held by Republicans or Democrats people who want to report on corruption will think twice about it.
If there were, we wouldn't know who Eric Snowden was.
For starters Snowden leaked information to the press, that does not afford any whistle blower protections.
As far as the person's identity, no it;s not a crime to reveal their name and nobody said there was, not sure why you guys like to keep building strawmen just to burn them down.
However, if say the president released the name of the whistle blower that could be considered intimidation become an additional article of impeachment for Congress to deal with. Also, whoever reveals the whistle blowers name could face a civil lawsuit if intent behind the revealing of the name are intended to be injurious. Considering the mood of this country revealing the person's name I think is irresponsible and could potentially put the persons life in danger. Also, as I've already stated the whistle blower is now irrelevant, the claims were investigated and we've now moved on to actual witness testimony. The whistle blower claims will not be used to draw up articles of impeachment. I'd treat the whistle blower no more important to a crime as an anonymous call to 911.
You know that Donald J. Trump is the whistleblower, right and that he is playing you fools so he can take both Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barak Obama and The DNC down in one stroke of Genius, right?BTW, there is no regulation in our Federal Government that requires Spies-Whistle-blowers be kept Anonymous.
You idiots. Is that the whistle blower? He's kind of irrelevant now, he or she reported things that they saw that didn't seem right, and investigation started and we've now moved on from the whistle blower, not really pertinent to the hearings now as we now have actual witnesses who have and will continue to testify.
However, uncovering the identify of the whistle blower whether accurately or not is meant to intimidate future whistle blowers from coming forward. Congratulations, moving forward whether the presidency is held by Republicans or Democrats people who want to report on corruption will think twice about it.
If there were, we wouldn't know who Eric Snowden was.
For starters Snowden leaked information to the press, that does not afford any whistle blower protections.
As far as the person's identity, no it;s not a crime to reveal their name and nobody said there was, not sure why you guys like to keep building strawmen just to burn them down.
However, if say the president released the name of the whistle blower that could be considered intimidation become an additional article of impeachment for Congress to deal with. Also, whoever reveals the whistle blowers name could face a civil lawsuit if intent behind the revealing of the name are intended to be injurious. Considering the mood of this country revealing the person's name I think is irresponsible and could potentially put the persons life in danger. Also, as I've already stated the whistle blower is now irrelevant, the claims were investigated and we've now moved on to actual witness testimony. The whistle blower claims will not be used to draw up articles of impeachment. I'd treat the whistle blower no more important to a crime as an anonymous call to 911.
If you haven’t figured out that Trump set this all up to expose The Democrats involvement in both The Dossier and corruption in The Ukraine, then you are on a level of stupid even I am unable to fathom.
Why do you think you keep coming up with Nothing Burgers each and every time?
And why to they each and EVERY Time expose Democrat Corruption?
President Trump has access to Intel not even Congress has as right to see. You think he doesn't know what The Democrats did in the Ukraine and with Russia, and you think he doesn't know where all the missing money went?
You think he doesn't know what Clapper, Brennan, Biden, Clinton, Podesta and Obama were all doing in The Ukraine through Soros NGOs and The Ukraine Embassy?
Just hang out a while, because there are going to be some hangings when this is all done, and it's not going to be The President.
I'm a cat, toying with a mouse, before the cat decides the game is over.You know that Donald J. Trump is the whistleblower, right and that he is playing you fools so he can take both Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barak Obama and The DNC down in one stroke of Genius, right?BTW, there is no regulation in our Federal Government that requires Spies-Whistle-blowers be kept Anonymous.Where is this DOUCHE then?
You idiots. Is that the whistle blower? He's kind of irrelevant now, he or she reported things that they saw that didn't seem right, and investigation started and we've now moved on from the whistle blower, not really pertinent to the hearings now as we now have actual witnesses who have and will continue to testify.
However, uncovering the identify of the whistle blower whether accurately or not is meant to intimidate future whistle blowers from coming forward. Congratulations, moving forward whether the presidency is held by Republicans or Democrats people who want to report on corruption will think twice about it.
If there were, we wouldn't know who Eric Snowden was.
For starters Snowden leaked information to the press, that does not afford any whistle blower protections.
As far as the person's identity, no it;s not a crime to reveal their name and nobody said there was, not sure why you guys like to keep building strawmen just to burn them down.
However, if say the president released the name of the whistle blower that could be considered intimidation become an additional article of impeachment for Congress to deal with. Also, whoever reveals the whistle blowers name could face a civil lawsuit if intent behind the revealing of the name are intended to be injurious. Considering the mood of this country revealing the person's name I think is irresponsible and could potentially put the persons life in danger. Also, as I've already stated the whistle blower is now irrelevant, the claims were investigated and we've now moved on to actual witness testimony. The whistle blower claims will not be used to draw up articles of impeachment. I'd treat the whistle blower no more important to a crime as an anonymous call to 911.
Then why are you so wrapped up in the identity of the whistle blower? Some really dumb logic you got going there. Green and Blue is going to want to talk to you about that.
If you haven’t figured out that Trump set this all up to expose The Democrats involvement in both The Dossier and corruption in The Ukraine, then you are on a level of stupid even I am unable to fathom.
Why do you think you keep coming up with Nothing Burgers each and every time?
And why to they each and EVERY Time expose Democrat Corruption?
President Trump has access to Intel not even Congress has as right to see. You think he doesn't know what The Democrats did in the Ukraine and with Russia, and you think he doesn't know where all the missing money went?
You think he doesn't know what Clapper, Brennan, Biden, Clinton, Podesta and Obama were all doing in The Ukraine through Soros NGOs and The Ukraine Embassy?
Just hang out a while, because there are going to be some hangings when this is all done, and it's not going to be The President.
Ah, yes let's paraphrase the wingnut response: "I don't know why Trump keeps stepping in it but he told me he's a stable genius so he must be playing a game I never learned called Chess...4 dimensional chess....cuz that sounds smart".
I'm a cat, toying with a mouse, before the cat decides the game is over.You know that Donald J. Trump is the whistleblower, right and that he is playing you fools so he can take both Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barak Obama and The DNC down in one stroke of Genius, right?BTW, there is no regulation in our Federal Government that requires Spies-Whistle-blowers be kept Anonymous.You idiots. Is that the whistle blower? He's kind of irrelevant now, he or she reported things that they saw that didn't seem right, and investigation started and we've now moved on from the whistle blower, not really pertinent to the hearings now as we now have actual witnesses who have and will continue to testify.
However, uncovering the identify of the whistle blower whether accurately or not is meant to intimidate future whistle blowers from coming forward. Congratulations, moving forward whether the presidency is held by Republicans or Democrats people who want to report on corruption will think twice about it.
If there were, we wouldn't know who Eric Snowden was.
For starters Snowden leaked information to the press, that does not afford any whistle blower protections.
As far as the person's identity, no it;s not a crime to reveal their name and nobody said there was, not sure why you guys like to keep building strawmen just to burn them down.
However, if say the president released the name of the whistle blower that could be considered intimidation become an additional article of impeachment for Congress to deal with. Also, whoever reveals the whistle blowers name could face a civil lawsuit if intent behind the revealing of the name are intended to be injurious. Considering the mood of this country revealing the person's name I think is irresponsible and could potentially put the persons life in danger. Also, as I've already stated the whistle blower is now irrelevant, the claims were investigated and we've now moved on to actual witness testimony. The whistle blower claims will not be used to draw up articles of impeachment. I'd treat the whistle blower no more important to a crime as an anonymous call to 911.
Then why are you so wrapped up in the identity of the whistle blower? Some really dumb logic you got going there. Green and Blue is going to want to talk to you about that.
If you haven’t figured out that Trump set this all up to expose The Democrats involvement in both The Dossier and corruption in The Ukraine, then you are on a level of stupid even I am unable to fathom.
Why do you think you keep coming up with Nothing Burgers each and every time?
And why to they each and EVERY Time expose Democrat Corruption?
President Trump has access to Intel not even Congress has as right to see. You think he doesn't know what The Democrats did in the Ukraine and with Russia, and you think he doesn't know where all the missing money went?
You think he doesn't know what Clapper, Brennan, Biden, Clinton, Podesta and Obama were all doing in The Ukraine through Soros NGOs and The Ukraine Embassy?
Just hang out a while, because there are going to be some hangings when this is all done, and it's not going to be The President.
Ah, yes let's paraphrase the wingnut response: "I don't know why Trump keeps stepping in it but he told me he's a stable genius so he must be playing a game I never learned called Chess...4 dimensional chess....cuz that sounds smart".
Figure it out. I gave you the clues. I have been giving you all the clues over the past three years.
If you think you can take down The Deep State and Drain The Swamp overnight, you are wrong.
This takes careful multi-year planning.
Now, there again, I gave you, yet another clue. I am only permitted to say, what I am permitted to say when I am permitted to say it.
I can tell you now, that the trap is set, and the vermin has taken the bait, and the hammer is about to fall.
The Panel Of 'Witnesses' Was Asked Directly:TheProgressivePatriot said:NOTHING that Biden may have done will undo what Trump has done. NOTHING
The democrats are really shooting themselves in the foot with women voters. The stupid Schiff hearings are on almost all of the daytime TV channels. My wife is really pissed about it. If the democrats piss off the women voters they are done. Most women could care less about politics, unless they fuck with their soap operas. My God she was mad!! I have at least one female Trump voter!!
You're basing the opinion of all women on the uninformed opinion of one? Cute.
The democrats are really shooting themselves in the foot with women voters. The stupid Schiff hearings are on almost all of the daytime TV channels. My wife is really pissed about it. If the democrats piss off the women voters they are done. Most women could care less about politics, unless they fuck with their soap operas. My God she was mad!! I have at least one female Trump voter!!
You're basing the opinion of all women on the uninformed opinion of one? Cute.
WOW! Don't dispute real time polling! I'm sure that there are millions of women voters who are just as pissed-off as the one I have.
Impeachment vs soap operas......think about it....especially for suburban housewives and retired ladies.
Oh, I think soon, you and your "Comrades" or going to be begging for Mercy once the facts are exposed, and once you realize that a trap was set for you all, to expose you, smoke you out and then ensnare you by the very trap you attempted to set for others.I'm a cat, toying with a mouse, before the cat decides the game is over.You know that Donald J. Trump is the whistleblower, right and that he is playing you fools so he can take both Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barak Obama and The DNC down in one stroke of Genius, right?BTW, there is no regulation in our Federal Government that requires Spies-Whistle-blowers be kept Anonymous.
If there were, we wouldn't know who Eric Snowden was.
For starters Snowden leaked information to the press, that does not afford any whistle blower protections.
As far as the person's identity, no it;s not a crime to reveal their name and nobody said there was, not sure why you guys like to keep building strawmen just to burn them down.
However, if say the president released the name of the whistle blower that could be considered intimidation become an additional article of impeachment for Congress to deal with. Also, whoever reveals the whistle blowers name could face a civil lawsuit if intent behind the revealing of the name are intended to be injurious. Considering the mood of this country revealing the person's name I think is irresponsible and could potentially put the persons life in danger. Also, as I've already stated the whistle blower is now irrelevant, the claims were investigated and we've now moved on to actual witness testimony. The whistle blower claims will not be used to draw up articles of impeachment. I'd treat the whistle blower no more important to a crime as an anonymous call to 911.
Then why are you so wrapped up in the identity of the whistle blower? Some really dumb logic you got going there. Green and Blue is going to want to talk to you about that.
If you haven’t figured out that Trump set this all up to expose The Democrats involvement in both The Dossier and corruption in The Ukraine, then you are on a level of stupid even I am unable to fathom.
Why do you think you keep coming up with Nothing Burgers each and every time?
And why to they each and EVERY Time expose Democrat Corruption?
President Trump has access to Intel not even Congress has as right to see. You think he doesn't know what The Democrats did in the Ukraine and with Russia, and you think he doesn't know where all the missing money went?
You think he doesn't know what Clapper, Brennan, Biden, Clinton, Podesta and Obama were all doing in The Ukraine through Soros NGOs and The Ukraine Embassy?
Just hang out a while, because there are going to be some hangings when this is all done, and it's not going to be The President.
Ah, yes let's paraphrase the wingnut response: "I don't know why Trump keeps stepping in it but he told me he's a stable genius so he must be playing a game I never learned called Chess...4 dimensional chess....cuz that sounds smart".
Figure it out. I gave you the clues. I have been giving you all the clues over the past three years.
If you think you can take down The Deep State and Drain The Swamp overnight, you are wrong.
This takes careful multi-year planning.
Now, there again, I gave you, yet another clue. I am only permitted to say, what I am permitted to say when I am permitted to say it.
I can tell you now, that the trap is set, and the vermin has taken the bait, and the hammer is about to fall.
^Delusions of grandeur. Seek help.
