Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, just wow president Trump's subordinates armchair quarterbacking the president on foreign policy and eavesdropping on the presidents phone calls.
THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE PAID TO DO, YOU DOLT. THEY WERE HIRED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP TO DO EXACTLY THESE THINGS.
Yes but we have EVIDENCE OF HER FELONIES....Liar. The right holds that record over Hillary at 26 years (and counting).
All YOU GOT is HE HURT MY FEELINGS, AND "PRESUMED" with nothing else!
What evidence do you have that Hillary committed felonies? Why haven't you revealed this evidence? Why haven't any of the more than 20 investigations ever produced any of this evidence?
Trump has ONE investigation, out of which come 5 credible charges of obstruction of justice, and a second impeachment investigation where he's already admitted to abuse of power.
I'm starting to wonder if all of this pissing around in the Ukraine is Trump's hissy fit because the Ukrainians revealed Manafort's corruption with the Black Ledger.
Didn’t Sondland say his perceived Quid Pro Quo was for a meeting at the White House and had jack Schitt to do with Biden?
Isn’t that what he said before backtracking that Trump told him no quid pro quo?
Witness after witness confirming that there was in fact a Quid Pro Quo that came from Trump and was designed to leverage U.S. resources to personally benefit himself while leveraging a foreign nation to attempt to influence our elections.
Republicans will get to decide if they want side with America or Trump.
What happened to cut and dry?
It was cut and dry. Facts state that aid was released. We don't know the "why". That is conjecture, Enrique.
Perhaps Jordan slept through the testimony that Zelensky would be making an announcement. Did you not know the aid was released due to knowledge of the hold becoming widespread? Or do we have to pretend that was coincidental?
Did you know that this is pure conjecture? You cannot convict on coincidence, Enrique.
So you keep saying, though I'm not sure why, since I've never said one can.
If you choose to characterize Jordan's disingenuous spiel as cut and dry, good for you. It was truthy, but unconcerned with honesty.
You just spoke out of both sides of your mouth. Trump can easily argue that on that date he garnered enough data to become comfortable with the new regime and its fight on corruption and it had nothing to do with this phone call. How would you prove him wrong? It is impossible to garner his intent, which is why all this is a stupid farce. How about we start reading transcripts from all prior presidents and their conversations with foreign leaders? There is not enough here to impeach and your party has cried wolf how many times?
Ever read the Boy who cried Wolf?
- Paige / Strzok;
- Russia Collusion
- Brett Kavanaugh
- Stormy Daniels / Avenatti
- Ukraine
Even if something is real now people will no longer believe the Democrats and the polls show that.
Wanting to investigate what and why they paid Hunter Biden is definitely jumping into America's domestic political arena.You mean the CORRUPT UKRAINE INVESTIGATING ITSELF...you idiots are the ones that pushed that fallacy...and FACT CHECK is another SOROS FUNDED organization through his shell companiesOh. THAT investigation. The one investigating the shit you guys made up. There was a clear investigation into Burisma by Ukraine, and the actors/timeline all involved situations BEFORE Hunter went on their board.That is another FUCKING LIE there has never been an investigation into Biden, his son and his involvement with HIS EXTORTION....IF SO POST IT, and not just some left wing pundit saying so....we can wait!The corruption allegations against Joe Biden were NOT CREDIBLE. According to everyone who has testified so far. Including the million-dollar Trump supporter Sondland, who the Republicans thought were on "their side."How is that a criminal act? We have no obligation to give them money. When we do give money, why would we give it to a country that reeks of corruption? When they start cracking down on corruption, then we’ll be willing to to give them aid. Nothing wrong, immoral, or illegal about it.
You also haven’t cited which law this supposedly breaks.
The fact that a corruption investigation would look bad for old Joe, isn’t an excuse to prevent such an investigation. Maybe if Dems don’t like being outted as corrupt then they shouldn’t be such corrupt assholes, eh?
When are you people going to wake up and smell the coffee?
There is absolutely no evidence, except an active and hostile imagination on your part, to support that there was any extortion involved.
Fact check: What Joe and Hunter Biden actually did in Ukraine
Now let's get a NEW INVESTIGATION GOING under the NEW PRESIDENT....
Ukraine Wants To Probe the Company That Paid Hunter Biden. But It's 'Too Sensitive'
Witness after witness confirming that there was in fact a Quid Pro Quo that came from Trump and was designed to leverage U.S. resources to personally benefit himself while leveraging a foreign nation to attempt to influence our elections.
Republicans will get to decide if they want side with America or Trump.
What kind of investigation will the Senate open up when it comes to trying Trump? Will they expand the investigation into Biden, his son and other Democrats? This maybe a can that the Democrats really don’t want to open and let Republicans run with.
Open it.
Gotta love how Pelousy is scheduling votes immediately after the Dimwingers bore America to death with their lawyer asking witnesses about their feelings, impressions, and opinions.
I guess they hope America tunes out before the Republicans destroy the latest bullshit "witnesses".
Nunes gave a bizarre performance. He seemed to be making the case that Biden was a bad egg and worth investigating. Begs the question of why he hasnt done so.
He also failed to make the link between Biden being Lucifer and the quid pro quo. Do they not get it or are they just running cover ?
It was cut and dry. Facts state that aid was released. We don't know the "why". That is conjecture, Enrique.
Perhaps Jordan slept through the testimony that Zelensky would be making an announcement. Did you not know the aid was released due to knowledge of the hold becoming widespread? Or do we have to pretend that was coincidental?
Did you know that this is pure conjecture? You cannot convict on coincidence, Enrique.
So you keep saying, though I'm not sure why, since I've never said one can.
If you choose to characterize Jordan's disingenuous spiel as cut and dry, good for you. It was truthy, but unconcerned with honesty.
You just spoke out of both sides of your mouth. Trump can easily argue that on that date he garnered enough data to become comfortable with the new regime and its fight on corruption and it had nothing to do with this phone call. How would you prove him wrong? It is impossible to garner his intent, which is why all this is a stupid farce. How about we start reading transcripts from all prior presidents and their conversations with foreign leaders? There is not enough here to impeach and your party has cried wolf how many times?
Ever read the Boy who cried Wolf?
- Paige / Strzok;
- Russia Collusion
- Brett Kavanaugh
- Stormy Daniels / Avenatti
- Ukraine
Even if something is real now people will no longer believe the Democrats and the polls show that.
We're talking about your cut and dry video. Jordan sat there and listened to sworn testimony as to a quid pro quo requirement and testimony of efforts to get the aid released, and then he posited that failure equaled innocence. It's propaganda for useful idiots.
Impossible to garner his intent? You're not serious. His obstruction leaves room for deniability, but only colonic breathers can avoid it.
Go ahead and read all the previous presidents' transcripts you like. None are relevant to the issue at hand.
I thought we were talking bribery. When did the Dimms abandon that? Yesterday???
