Official Impeachment Thread 2.0: House Judiciary Committee Hearings

[Auld Phart]

I'm getting tired of the off topic and trolling posts.

get on topic, and stay there.

 

[WEATHER53]

Liberals don’t want this to go to Senate because Senate can punch back
Instead they will abandon this and conjour up some new fabrication to launch a brand new fake and phony investigation into.

 

[The Original Tree]

Sad time for America to see what a vindictive, sordid affair federal “service” has become. When did it become not about American people but all about politicians??

when Trump took office...
he made EVERYTHING about politics and him, within our govt... even for the non political steady state workers.... worship him as King, or they are gone!

It's not an "impeachable offense" that you didn't want him to win the election. Trump won because we have had it with you folks. We are tired of being lied about, slandered, called "deplorable" and "irredeemable" and being order to silently bow to your latest whim or be destroyed politically and economically, even while Democrats attack our basic civil rights:

WHAT HAPPENED? IN A WORD, DEMOCRATS:

Related:

That kind of thing is only a threat to the Republic if a GOP president does it. Remember how nobody cared when Obama was wiretapping reporters, and even reporters’ parents? Also related:

They’ll rue normalizing this sort of thing when the Fusion GPS emails all come out. But they’ll just pretend that’s the first time anything like that ever happened.

you, said it was A-OK for trump to use STOLEN private emails that the Russians hacked, 10 times a day in his rallies, so he could win the election....



And John Solomon WORKS for Giuliani... I'd hardly call that 'reporting'....

How did TRUMP get his hands on THESE STOLEN EMALS?

Assange said Seth Rich gave them to him and like Epstein, you people killed Seth Rich, Killed Epstein, Killed Vince Foster, and Killed Two of Epstein's Private Financial Advisors and Bankers. Who is next?

John Podesta, Manafort, Weinstein, Ed Buck?

I got news for you. The GOP plans to call both Assange and Guccifer in The Senate Impeachment Hearings, and this COUNTRY WILL EXPLODE IN ANGER when THE TRUTH COMES OUT about what you all did.

Brennan, Clapper, Erica Ciaramella, Podesta, Zaid, Ohr, Strozk, Page, McCabe, Comey, and others will be called to testify UNDER OATH.

And it will be DRAGGED OUT until right before the election with night after night of DEMNAZI Dirty Laundry being aired before The American PUBLIC.

read it, and learn something other than your Russian propaganda!

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA* * CRIMINAL NO.v. * * (18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 1030, 1028A, 1956, VIKTOR BORISOVICH NETYKSHO, * and 3551 et seq.) BORIS ALEKSEYEVICH ANTONOV, * DMITRIY SERGEYEVICH BADIN, * IVAN SERGEYEVICH Y ERMAKOV,* ALEKSEY VIKTOROVICH * LUKASHEV, * SERGEY ALEKSANDROVICH * MORGACHEV,* NIKOLAY YURYEVICH KOZACHEK, * PAVEL VYACHESLAVOVICH * YERSHOV,* ARTEM ANDREYEVICH* MALYSHEV, * ALEKSANDR VLADIMIROVICH* OSADCHUK, * ALEKSEY ALEKSANDROVICH * POTEMKIN, and* ANATOLIY SERGEYEVICH * KOVALEV, * * Defendants.* ******** INDICTMENT

The Grand Jury for the District of Columbia charges:COUNT ONE(Conspiracy to Commit an Offense Against the United States)1.In or around 2016, the Russian Federation (“Russia”) operated a military intelligence agency called the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (“GRU”). The GRU had multiple units, including Units 26165 and 74455, engaged in cyber operations that involved the staged releases of documents stolen through computer intrusions. These units conducted large-scale cyber operations to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

If these are real people and what you say is true, then why didn't Adolph Schiffler call them to testify?

Hell, why didn't Mueller or anyone else talk to these people and bring them here in front of The American People?

I also do not see a single shred of evidence to show where President Trump received these emails.

At any rate, you post is OFF TOPIC and is considered TROLLING.

 

[The Original Tree]

Once again through this latest anti-Trump farce run by Nadler, the Democrats demonstrated publicly that their Impeachment Crusade has always been a partisan crusade to remove from office the opposing party's candidate who defeated Hillary Clinton, who derailed their plan to own the WH in 2016.

President Obama and his criminal administration / Agency Directors, as proven, began their failed coup attempt during the 2016 Presidential race.

The Democratic Party's and Leftist surrogate MSM publicly announced their intent to remove the President from office immediately after he took his oath of office - 'The Impeachment of President Trump Begins NOW'.

Despite the Mueller Investigation reporting no evidence was found to support the Democrats' 'Collusion Delusion 1.0: Russia' Inquisition (The Weismann Witch Hunt) and there was no finding of or Indictment recommended for 'Obstruction', Unethical, Immoral, Lying, Seditious Democrat D-Adam Schiff flat-out LIED for 2+ YEARS by claiming he personally had DIRECT evidence of crimes committed by the President...only to be exposed as having intentionally falsely accused the President.
- For his CRIME Schiff was not held accountable, was not punished by his fellow Democrats who controlled the House, and was not held accountable for a proven FAILED system of ridiculously allowing elected Federal Politicians to ;police' themselves.

In 2018 Democratic Party nominees openly, publicly declared they were going to win their prospective elections, were going to go to Washington, and stated emphatically that their number one goal / objective was to join the Democrats in the House to remove the President of the United States from office WITHOUT KNOWING ANY DETAILS, WITHOUT A CRIME EXISTING, WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE OF A CRIME EXISTING. On her election night, for example, D-Tlaib declared she was going to Washington and was going to 'Impeach the Son Of A Bit@h!'

*Today Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi lied to the American people when she declared the Democrats in the House were going to move forward with the Impeachment of President Trump...BUT STATED THERE WAS NO ILL-WILL OR HATRED FOR THE PRESIDENT, THAT THIS IMPEACHMENT WAS NOT PARTISAN.

?!

Again:

- Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration paid an agenda-driven, Trump-hating foreign spy for Russian-authored Counter-Intelligence propaganda against Trump - information they knew to be false from a known liar, a foreign informant who proved to be untrustworthy, and they used that information illegally in attempt to ensure Donald Trump lost the election.

- Democrats have continuously, non-stop, attempted to affect debunked failed coup after coup...

- High-Ranking Democrats have committed Perjury, Obstruction, Espionage, Sedition....have lied for YEARS claiming to have evidence they did not, Censured the US AG for REFUSING to break the law, attempted to present personally-authored fiction as 'evidence' during an Impeachment hearing, and have ignored proven Democrat crime after Democrat crime.

- They declared their intent to remove the President from office right after he was sworn in, and in 2018 on election night treasonous, anti-American, Party-1st traitors like Tlaib openly declared they were going to oust the President.

NANCY PELOSI AND ANY OTHER DEMOCRAT WHO ATTEMPT TO DECLARE THAT THEIR OWN PARTISAN AGENDA, IDEOLOGY, AND HATRED FOR THIS PRESIDENT HAS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THEIR NON-STOP OBSESSION WITH REMOVING PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM OFFICE ARE THE BIGGEST F*ING LIARS AND ENEMIES OF THIS STATE THE UNITED STATE HAS EVER KNOWN!

Pelosi declared moving forward with Impeachment is not Partisan, that President Trump gave the Democrats no choice.
- President Trump gave them no choice because he defied the 2016 'Landslide' Prediction and beat HRC to become President
- President Trump gave them no choice by beating the Obama administration's attempt to take him down in their failed coup attempt
- President Trump gave them no choice by exposing Democrats' crimes, the existence and depth of the swamp
- President Trump gave them no choice by publicly showing what LIARS, LEAKERS, and SEDITIOUS criminals Dems like Schiff are

Schiff's 'Collusion Delusion 2.0: Ukraine' Circus showed the world that their latest coup attempt consisted of a supposed / reported (as of yet non-existent) self-identifying left-leaning, pro-Democrat, anti-Trump, Biden-connected, Brennan-groomed Deep State CIA agt specifically trained in Ukraine Geo-Political missions temporarily assigned to the WH filing a 'Whistle Blower' complaint, despite not qualifying as a 'whistle blower', against the President accusing him of crimes, a complaint that was DISMISSED by the prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ because the complaint was based on unsubstantiated hearsay and could not prove a crime was committed.

Schiff's treasonous circus showed the world the Democrats do not have a crime, can not present evidence of a crime, and do not have any witnesses that can testify and provide 1st-hand account evidence a crime was committed by the President (when asked to name the crimes / High Crimes & Misdemeanors under oath THEY COULD NOT DO SO)...they can't even produce the co-called whistle blower who supposedly started this. (UNTIL they do, I will remain convinced the 'whistle blower' is yet ANOTHER manufactured 'parody' created by Adam Schiff!)

.

401 Reps voted for Impeachment for Nixon. Think about that for a minute. Not one GOP voted for Impeachment here.

Impeachment is supposed to be Bi-Partisan.

 

[easyt65]

Despite showing the world they can not prove a crime was committed, despite showing the world they do not have any evidence a crime was committed, despite showing the world they do not have any witnesses who have evidence of a crime or who actually witnessed anything, proven liar (Sedition) and compromised (taking money from Russian-born arms dealers and Burisma) Democrat submitted a report - that consisted of nothing more than the same unsubstantiated accusations against the President - to proven co-conspirator House Non-Judiciary Committee Chairman Nadler recommending Impeachment Proceedings go forward.

Nadler, who leads the House Judiciary Committee - proving he has no respect for or knowledge of the Rule of Law - led Trump-hating House Democrats in Censuring the US AG, the leading Law Enforcer in the US, for REFUSING TO BREAK THE LAW, a law Nadler helped pass as a Congressman.

The Democrats' case during Nadler's Phase 2 of their latest coup attempt consisted of 3 Democrat Party-donating, Liberal Progressive Socialist Democrat Extremist College / University Professors, who have a history of public opposition to and condemnation of the President - 1 who actually unnecessarily invoked the President's son / son's name during their testimony - who - shockingly - gave their OPINION that the President abused his power and created crimes that demanded he be Impeached.

The Republicans, denied any other opportunity to call witnesses, called a DEMOCRAT Constitutional Scholar - who does not like / did not vote for President Trump - to testify. This DEMOCRAT Constitutional Scholar's testimony PUBLICLY DESTROYED the Democrats' attempt to Impeach this President, exposing it as a complete partisan coup attempt!

During his testimony, Turley pointed out - again - the Democrats do not have a crime committed or Un-Constitutional abuse of power, do not have evidence of any crime or any evidence of any Un-Constitutional abuse of power, and do not have 1 single witness who witnessed any such crime or Un-Constitutional abuse of power.

Turley proved that the 3 previous self-identified anti-Trump Democrat professors gave SUBJECTIVE PERSONAL OPINION under oath during their testimony.

Turley declared the Democrats' rush to Impeach has been the FASTEST IN US HISTORY, that their 'case' for Impeachment is the WEAKEST IN US HISTORY, that Constitutionally and legally the President did not commit extortion, did not commit bribery, and did not abuse his Constitutional authority / power. In fact, Turley declared that the ONLY criminal abuse of Constitutional Authority / Power has been and continues to be perpetrated by the DEMOCRATS!

......and based on THIS failed Dem coup IMPLOSION Speaker Pelosi had the crooked gall to claim their unsubstantiated entire obsession and crusade to Impeach the president is not partisan and that the 'evidence' presented in their 2 failed Impeachment hearings forces them to proceed with Impeachment of the President.

Pelosi just showed the world she is the leader of the criminal organization, the enemies of this state, that currently control the United States House of Representatives, and the Democrats in the House, led by Schiff and Nadler, have just shown the world they are moving forward to Impeach the President, NOT because of having committed any crime or having abused his constitutional power / authority - which it was proven he did NOT - but they are moving forward to remove the Democratically-elected President to keep a promise they made 5 minutes after he was sworn into office, to keep promises made by freshmen liberal extremists during their campaigns in 2018, because he beat their party's candidate in 2016, because they oppose his policies, and they simply hate his guts.

They have proven they are Party-1st extremists who will rip this country apart, will piss on the Constitution and Rule of Law, trample citizens' Constitutional Rights, and do whatever they have to do to take down this President and take back power and control.

 

[easyt65]

Turley testified that what the Democrats are doing, moving forward to Impeach a President without having a proven crime, without having evidence of a crime committed or an abuse of power, and without any witnesses of a crime or abuse of power having been committed is 'DANGEROUS' to this Republic / nation.

Turley explained that what the Democrats are doing is so 'Dangerous' because it is a rushed, unsubstantiated attempt to remove a democratically-elected President through a process NOT supported by the Constitution, that violates every foundation of our established Rule of Law - starting with the established premise that 'Americans are INNOCENT until PROVEN Guilty', that no Impeachment process has ever been so intentionally made unfair, denying the accused of the most basic of Constitutionally-protected rights.

Turley explained the process the Democrats created to affect the removal of the President from office is NOT an American / Constitutional Process at all but is rather some oppressive- socialist/soviet style process whose objective is to follow through with the 'sentencing' of the 'crime' they declared he committed 5 minutes after he was worn in....a crime they failed to prove was committed and a crime they failed to prove was committed by the President.

 

[easyt65]

Speaker of the House Pelosi 'snaps' hen confronted by reporters about the REAL reason she and Democrats are proceeding with Impeachment despite failing to prove any foundation for doing so: 'Don't Mess With Me'.



"I don't hate anybody," she initially shot back. She wagged her finger and pointed at Rosen, telling him not to accuse her of hating someone."

Perhaps the real reason Pelosi is proceeding with Impeachment despite having no crime, no evidence, no witnesses, and 'a heart full of love' for the President is because Nancy Pelosi is f*ing STUPID and does NOT understand the English Language, as she just proved is the case.

Rosen did NOT accuse Pelosi of hating the President, as is plain for the entire world to see / read - He ASKED Speaker Pelosi IF she hated the President:

"Do you hate the president?"

Pelosi and the Democrats continue to show the world they are UNHINGED TDS-Suffering Enemies Of The State!

Nancy Pelosi snaps at reporter after question about hating Trump: 'Don't mess with me'

 

[OKTexas]

Sad time for America to see what a vindictive, sordid affair federal “service” has become. When did it become not about American people but all about politicians??

when Trump took office...
he made EVERYTHING about politics and him, within our govt... even for the non political steady state workers.... worship him as King, or they are gone!

It's not an "impeachable offense" that you didn't want him to win the election. Trump won because we have had it with you folks. We are tired of being lied about, slandered, called "deplorable" and "irredeemable" and being order to silently bow to your latest whim or be destroyed politically and economically, even while Democrats attack our basic civil rights:

WHAT HAPPENED? IN A WORD, DEMOCRATS:

Related:

That kind of thing is only a threat to the Republic if a GOP president does it. Remember how nobody cared when Obama was wiretapping reporters, and even reporters’ parents? Also related:

They’ll rue normalizing this sort of thing when the Fusion GPS emails all come out. But they’ll just pretend that’s the first time anything like that ever happened.

you, said it was A-OK for trump to use STOLEN private emails that the Russians hacked, 10 times a day in his rallies, so he could win the election....



And John Solomon WORKS for Giuliani... I'd hardly call that 'reporting'....

Using information that was being reported by the media is fair game for either party. Trump had nothing to do with the theft of the emails or their publication. Cry all you want, Trump did nothing wrong.

.

 

[The Original Tree]

This thread is petering out and should be unpinned.

 

[OKTexas]

We must gather FACTS, and EVERYONE needs to be Interviewed and CROSS EXAMINED including Eric Ciaramella and his Muslim Lawyer Zaid.
It will tie The Senate up for 6 months but it will be worth it for AMERICA to know The Truth.

This is the only FACT you need bud: The transcript that Trump released on Sept. 24
https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=6429015-Trump-Ukraine-Transcript

Game over. No need to look further or muddle the waters further..... unless you would prefer a King ?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...ed-is-still-only-evidence-needed-impeach-him/

The president of the United States tried to cheat in the 2020 election, and used his awesome powers as commander in chief to ask a foreign government to help him do so.

This is the very crime of which our founders were most afraid; it’s the paradigmatic impeachable offense, the one impeachment was included in our Constitution to protect against; and we already have all of the evidence we need to prove it. In fact, we’ve had the goods since Sept. 24, when Trump released an edited transcript which he has claimed is “perfect” and “beautiful,” even though it’s perfectly and beautifully impeachable.

"The President: Good because I· heard you had a prosecutor who· was very·good and he was shut down and that's really unfair. _·A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the_ mayor bf New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General.· :Rudy very much knows what's happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could _speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States,· the woman., was bad news and the people she was dealing with in .the Ukraine .were bad news so I just want to_let you know that. The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son,. that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you ·can look into it ... It sounds horrible to me"

Abuse of office/ abuse of power. Game over.

Please provide one quote from Trump, where he asked for anything for himself. You're batting zero so far.

.

 

[easyt65]

ZERO crime

ZERO evidence of any crime...committed by the GOP / President

ZERO witnesses of any crime committed by the GOP / President

A Democrat Constitutional Scholar declared the Democrats' rush to Impeach is the fastest in US history, their case is the weakest in US history, what they are doing is 'Dangerous' to the Republic because it is a manufactured, non-Constitutionally-supported, soviet-style inquisition where the decision to Impeach was made 5 minutes after the President took the oath of office.

The only successful case they made was for the Democratic Party to be officially named a Criminal Organization, an enemy of the state.

 

[OKTexas]

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

Brilliant.

First we must assume Trump said something nobody witnessed him saying.

Second we must must assume somebody felt pressure because they said they didn't.

It doesn't take Perry Mason to defend against that.

No guessing necessary we know the agenda and we know the i tensions. It’s not a mystery. Several members of Trump foreign policy team testified to it... aid was withheld, it was leveraged for investigations. Not rocket science

Yet every damn one of them, on cross examination, said they had no direct knowledge that was the case. Assumptions and presumptions are not evidence. The one person with first hand knowledge of what the president said, testified that the president told him that he wanted nothing from Ukraine. He just wanted Zelensky to do what he campaigned on. You can spew the commie talking points all you wish, that doesn't alter the facts presented.

.

 

[OKTexas]

If they had felt pressure they would have announced an investigation, they didn't. Use your brain man.

.

you are joking right? You know they had one set up with CNN but canceled after the aid was released

LMAO, they had all of Aug to make the announcement and you're saying the waited till mid Sep? Damn you're gullible.

.

uh yeah. CNN interview.... canceled after whistler blower report. You just think that’s a neat coincidence?

Who said it was scheduled, CNN? Did they speculate on what the topic was? You got a link for this interview that never happened?

.

CNN host Fareed Zakaria was set to interview Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky until scandal took shape - CNNPolitics

LMAO, more speculation and assumptions, contradicting what Volker testified to. Use your brain child.

.

 

[Slade3200]

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

Brilliant.

First we must assume Trump said something nobody witnessed him saying.

Second we must must assume somebody felt pressure because they said they didn't.

It doesn't take Perry Mason to defend against that.

No guessing necessary we know the agenda and we know the i tensions. It’s not a mystery. Several members of Trump foreign policy team testified to it... aid was withheld, it was leveraged for investigations. Not rocket science

Yet every damn one of them, on cross examination, said they had no direct knowledge that was the case. Assumptions and presumptions are not evidence. The one person with first hand knowledge of what the president said, testified that the president told him that he wanted nothing from Ukraine. He just wanted Zelensky to do what he campaigned on. You can spew the commie talking points all you wish, that doesn't alter the facts presented.

.

Oh you mean Trump didn’t call them personally and say I’d like a quid pro quo with Ukraine aid for these interviews?! Ok you got me there. Trump didn’t do that. But his agenda was made very clear from his top guys, all of whom he blocked from testifying, down through those on the ground who actually did testify and all agreed as to what the agenda was. Wake up man, this isn’t even a sly cover up

 

[easyt65]

The only explanation for why Democrats are proceeding with Impeachment despite the fact that both of their Committee hearings were a disaster that demonstrated they have no crime, no evidence of a crime, no abuse of power, no evidence of abuse of power, and no witnesses and have been called out a 'dangerous' process that threatens the Republic is they have no other option to attempt to convince Americans THEY are the ones trying to save America - like Comey and other self-appointed 'saviors' actually proclaimed publicly - before the US IG Report and Durham's criminal report and Indictments come out / begin, fully exposing their crimes and treason.

 

[OKTexas]

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

Brilliant.

First we must assume Trump said something nobody witnessed him saying.

Second we must must assume somebody felt pressure because they said they didn't.

It doesn't take Perry Mason to defend against that.

No guessing necessary we know the agenda and we know the i tensions. It’s not a mystery. Several members of Trump foreign policy team testified to it... aid was withheld, it was leveraged for investigations. Not rocket science

Yet every damn one of them, on cross examination, said they had no direct knowledge that was the case. Assumptions and presumptions are not evidence. The one person with first hand knowledge of what the president said, testified that the president told him that he wanted nothing from Ukraine. He just wanted Zelensky to do what he campaigned on. You can spew the commie talking points all you wish, that doesn't alter the facts presented.

.

Oh you mean Trump didn’t call them personally and say I’d like a quid pro quo with Ukraine aid for these interviews?! Ok you got me there. Trump didn’t do that. But his agenda was made very clear from his top guys, all of whom he blocked from testifying, down through those on the ground who actually did testify and all agreed as to what the agenda was. Wake up man, this isn’t even a sly cover up

Wrong again, the guy from OMB didn't back up those claims, why do you think shitt didn't call him for the public hearings.

.

 

[The Original Tree]

We must gather FACTS, and EVERYONE needs to be Interviewed and CROSS EXAMINED including Eric Ciaramella and his Muslim Lawyer Zaid.
It will tie The Senate up for 6 months but it will be worth it for AMERICA to know The Truth.

This is the only FACT you need bud: The transcript that Trump released on Sept. 24
https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=6429015-Trump-Ukraine-Transcript

Game over. No need to look further or muddle the waters further..... unless you would prefer a King ?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...ed-is-still-only-evidence-needed-impeach-him/

The president of the United States tried to cheat in the 2020 election, and used his awesome powers as commander in chief to ask a foreign government to help him do so.

This is the very crime of which our founders were most afraid; it’s the paradigmatic impeachable offense, the one impeachment was included in our Constitution to protect against; and we already have all of the evidence we need to prove it. In fact, we’ve had the goods since Sept. 24, when Trump released an edited transcript which he has claimed is “perfect” and “beautiful,” even though it’s perfectly and beautifully impeachable.

"The President: Good because I· heard you had a prosecutor who· was very·good and he was shut down and that's really unfair. _·A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the_ mayor bf New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General.· :Rudy very much knows what's happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could _speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States,· the woman., was bad news and the people she was dealing with in .the Ukraine .were bad news so I just want to_let you know that. The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son,. that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you ·can look into it ... It sounds horrible to me"

Abuse of office/ abuse of power. Game over.

Please provide one quote from Trump, where he asked for anything for himself. You're batting zero so far.

.

He used THE ROYAL "US" which means "Me"
Baron Von Baron Trump decreed it so.

 

[The Original Tree]

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

Brilliant.

First we must assume Trump said something nobody witnessed him saying.

Second we must must assume somebody felt pressure because they said they didn't.

It doesn't take Perry Mason to defend against that.

No guessing necessary we know the agenda and we know the i tensions. It’s not a mystery. Several members of Trump foreign policy team testified to it... aid was withheld, it was leveraged for investigations. Not rocket science

Yet every damn one of them, on cross examination, said they had no direct knowledge that was the case. Assumptions and presumptions are not evidence. The one person with first hand knowledge of what the president said, testified that the president told him that he wanted nothing from Ukraine. He just wanted Zelensky to do what he campaigned on. You can spew the commie talking points all you wish, that doesn't alter the facts presented.

.

Oh you mean Trump didn’t call them personally and say I’d like a quid pro quo with Ukraine aid for these interviews?! Ok you got me there. Trump didn’t do that. But his agenda was made very clear from his top guys, all of whom he blocked from testifying, down through those on the ground who actually did testify and all agreed as to what the agenda was. Wake up man, this isn’t even a sly cover up

If I put you on Ignore, then you are guilty of something. I just can't figure it out yet, BUT MY FEELINGS tell me so.

Your Guilt is out there in the Unseen Pyschic World of LibPhuckistan.

 

[easyt65]

Oh you mean Trump didn’t call them personally and say I’d like a quid pro quo with Ukraine aid for these interviews?!

Thank you for the personal liberal extremist Trump-hating OPINION and translation...which perfectly sums up both disastrous Coup Attempt Hearings held by the Democrats.

Bwuhahahahaha....the snowflakes and Democrats keep trying to 'splain' what happened, what Trump and his team were THINKING, what they really MEANT, but everything - the hearings and every comment made is self-explanatory, no snowflake translation needed.

Schiff's committee hearings did not produce a crime or abuse of power, did not produce evidence of any crime or abuse of power, did not produce 1 single witness - someone who actually witnessed ANYTHING. It was sad and pathetic...and criminal.

Nadler's committee hearings presented 3 proven anti-Trump/Trump-hating, DNC-Donating liberal extremist socialist Democrat Extremist University professors who gave their OPINION that Trump deserves Impeachment, and one DEMOCRAT Constitutional Scholar that declared what the Democrats are doing is dangerous to our Republic and the only ones abusing power is the DEMOCRAS!

If you can't READ the transcripts, you're in luck - it was broadcast live and you can still watch the videos.

 

[Slade3200]

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

Brilliant.

First we must assume Trump said something nobody witnessed him saying.

Second we must must assume somebody felt pressure because they said they didn't.

It doesn't take Perry Mason to defend against that.

No guessing necessary we know the agenda and we know the i tensions. It’s not a mystery. Several members of Trump foreign policy team testified to it... aid was withheld, it was leveraged for investigations. Not rocket science

Yet every damn one of them, on cross examination, said they had no direct knowledge that was the case. Assumptions and presumptions are not evidence. The one person with first hand knowledge of what the president said, testified that the president told him that he wanted nothing from Ukraine. He just wanted Zelensky to do what he campaigned on. You can spew the commie talking points all you wish, that doesn't alter the facts presented.

.

Oh you mean Trump didn’t call them personally and say I’d like a quid pro quo with Ukraine aid for these interviews?! Ok you got me there. Trump didn’t do that. But his agenda was made very clear from his top guys, all of whom he blocked from testifying, down through those on the ground who actually did testify and all agreed as to what the agenda was. Wake up man, this isn’t even a sly cover up

Wrong again, the guy from OMB didn't back up those claims, why do you think shitt didn't call him for the public hearings.

.

You mean Mick Mulvaney the guy that runs that department who said during a press conference on national Tv that they did the QPQ?