Official Impeachment Thread 2.0: House Judiciary Committee Hearings

Lots of heat, no light. Until there is a John Dean figure who gives testimony from inside the bunker...the Senate won’t care. I doubt they’ll care then either.
The GOP in the Senate are unpatriotic partisan hacks, which their votes will show and go down in history as such.
I'm sure they've rationalized it as being best for the country if they stay in the driver's seat. The Democrats are partisan hacks, too. I cannot believe they are still using that clip of Trump asking Russia for Hillary's missing emails as "ammunition." Jesus.
 
Where's Schifty-Schiff


shades of Trey Gowdy...except investigating the blob has resulted in numerous indictments and prison sentences

Like who? Process crimes have nothing to do with Trump and what was the longest sentence? Flynn still hasn't been sentenced because he will likely walk!

Some of the many felons your blob hired.

the 6 yr investigation into Clinton yielded nothing
 
You right wingers that didn't listen just missed a real rant from Collins, and now they're arguing over a point of order so vociferously that I'm wondering if someone is going to be thrown out.

I'm sure this will get merged or deleted, but wanted to give you a heads up--this is entertainment, folks! Much less boring than the hearings a couple weeks ago.

FYI
Glad you enjoy dog and pony shows. Doesn't take much to get your attention.
I'm still waiting to see what happens when the Republicans get escorted from the room for refusing to behave. Somehow Schiff kept these guys in order, but they're not listening to Nadler.
Got tso you are saying that you like partisan politics. Well given your past posts I would expect nothing less.
I'm just waiting for the fisticuffs.
 
You right wingers that didn't listen just missed a real rant from Collins, and now they're arguing over a point of order so vociferously that I'm wondering if someone is going to be thrown out.

I'm sure this will get merged or deleted, but wanted to give you a heads up--this is entertainment, folks! Much less boring than the hearings a couple weeks ago.

FYI
Glad you enjoy dog and pony shows. Doesn't take much to get your attention.
It would have gotten yours if you'd been listening. Now there's the Democrats' lawyer giving his great long review of the arguments/evidence. That's not so interesting, I admit, though it's well argued.
Depends on your idea of well argued. If you think a pretzel is a good argument then sure.
Oh, I know there are two sides. I think the impeachment side has the more legitimate one.
 
Anyone watching Nadler yet?

5CEvyaWxjaEsvrFUUDpvCJEXVQnEPTZABrryzm1Qkkk4GXNp2GUybCfaCLsrtP8t8gyujWfA6PXFtidRF.gif
 
I found it very funny that the high-priced Republican lawyer brought his impeachment file to Congress in a bashed up reuseable grocery bag. Doesn't this guy own a briefcase? It made him look so unprofessional.
 
Where's Schifty-Schiff


shades of Trey Gowdy...except investigating the blob has resulted in numerous indictments and prison sentences

Like who? Process crimes have nothing to do with Trump and what was the longest sentence? Flynn still hasn't been sentenced because he will likely walk!

Some of the many felons your blob hired.

the 6 yr investigation into Clinton yielded nothing

Like who?

You can't say because you are pulling them out of your ass!
 
Just more proof that this process is a complete joke. No one, not one of those partisan hacks, are proceeding through this process with the clarity, weight and attention that it deserves. It is ALL showboating.
? The arguments so far have been pretty good, both sides. That Collins guy was super stirring to the rightwinger's breast.
Castor is saying an impeachment would obviate the Trump votes in 2016 and is unfair. I don't see it that way.
 
Last edited:
You right wingers that didn't listen just missed a real rant from Collins, and now they're arguing over a point of order so vociferously that I'm wondering if someone is going to be thrown out.

I'm sure this will get merged or deleted, but wanted to give you a heads up--this is entertainment, folks! Much less boring than the hearings a couple weeks ago.

FYI
It has been entertainment from day one.
 
You right wingers that didn't listen just missed a real rant from Collins, and now they're arguing over a point of order so vociferously that I'm wondering if someone is going to be thrown out.

I'm sure this will get merged or deleted, but wanted to give you a heads up--this is entertainment, folks! Much less boring than the hearings a couple weeks ago.

FYI
Glad you enjoy dog and pony shows. Doesn't take much to get your attention.
It would have gotten yours if you'd been listening. Now there's the Democrats' lawyer giving his great long review of the arguments/evidence. That's not so interesting, I admit, though it's well argued.
Depends on your idea of well argued. If you think a pretzel is a good argument then sure.
Oh, I know there are two sides. I think the impeachment side has the more legitimate one.
On what basis do you make that claim?

Where is the basis for the legitimacy of this impeachment inquiry?
 
You right wingers that didn't listen just missed a real rant from Collins, and now they're arguing over a point of order so vociferously that I'm wondering if someone is going to be thrown out.

I'm sure this will get merged or deleted, but wanted to give you a heads up--this is entertainment, folks! Much less boring than the hearings a couple weeks ago.

FYI


All I hear is blah, blah, blahblah, blah. Impeachment.
 
You right wingers that didn't listen just missed a real rant from Collins, and now they're arguing over a point of order so vociferously that I'm wondering if someone is going to be thrown out.

I'm sure this will get merged or deleted, but wanted to give you a heads up--this is entertainment, folks! Much less boring than the hearings a couple weeks ago.

FYI
Glad you enjoy dog and pony shows. Doesn't take much to get your attention.
It would have gotten yours if you'd been listening. Now there's the Democrats' lawyer giving his great long review of the arguments/evidence. That's not so interesting, I admit, though it's well argued.
Depends on your idea of well argued. If you think a pretzel is a good argument then sure.
Oh, I know there are two sides. I think the impeachment side has the more legitimate one.
On what basis do you make that claim?

Where is the basis for the legitimacy of this impeachment inquiry?
If you want the answer to that, listen to the argument set forth by Berke. I'm not vomiting that all back just to keep me busy while you pick your nose.
 
Just more proof that this process is a complete joke. No one, not one of those partisan hacks, are proceeding through this process with the clarity, weight and attention that it deserves. It is ALL showboating.
? The arguments so far have been pretty good, both sides. That Collins guy was super stirring to the rightwinger's breast.
Castro is saying an impeachment would obviate the Trump votes in 2016 and is unfair. I don't see it that way.
The arguments have been a joke. They are presented by people that have no place 'testifying' in the first place. I don't need congress to call stooges to justify positions they have already taken. If you are going to have someone testify it should be about content.

Everything I have seen thus far amounts to grandstanding.
 
Just more proof that this process is a complete joke. No one, not one of those partisan hacks, are proceeding through this process with the clarity, weight and attention that it deserves. It is ALL showboating.
? The arguments so far have been pretty good, both sides. That Collins guy was super stirring to the rightwinger's breast.
Castro is saying an impeachment would obviate the Trump votes in 2016 and is unfair. I don't see it that way.

Of course you don't see it that way because you have TDS and are a libtard.
 

Forum List

Back
Top