Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do want a guilty verdict, because I believe the President is guilty and caught red handed and no one, despite all kinds of deflection to other topics, can explain what the Pres was up to, if not what the Dems are saying he was.Oh, I know there are two sides.
No. You don't.
You completely support the idea of the minority being suppressed in this process. You want there to be only one side. One guilty verdict.
They are patriotic only when they think it will work in their favor. Just as with everything else in this case, something tells me the general public sees right through it, just as we do.Oh fucking spare us the tiresome appeals to patriotism....You're as big a bore as Pelosi.The GOP in the Senate are unpatriotic partisan hacks, which their votes will show and go down in history as such.Lots of heat, no light. Until there is a John Dean figure who gives testimony from inside the bunker...the Senate won’t care. I doubt they’ll care then either.
Your guy will be on soon.You right wingers that didn't listen just missed a real rant from Collins, and now they're arguing over a point of order so vociferously that I'm wondering if someone is going to be thrown out.
I'm sure this will get merged or deleted, but wanted to give you a heads up--this is entertainment, folks! Much less boring than the hearings a couple weeks ago.
FYI
All I hear is blah, blah, blahblah, blah. Impeachment.
I do want a guilty verdict, because I believe the President is guilty and caught red handed and no one, despite all kinds of deflection to other topics, can explain what the Pres was up to, if not what the Dems are saying he was.Oh, I know there are two sides.
No. You don't.
You completely support the idea of the minority being suppressed in this process. You want there to be only one side. One guilty verdict.
I have no idea what all the procedural arguments are every time someone takes a breath. I just think it's interesting that when Schiff told them to pipe down, they did. With Nadler? Not so much.
Yes, I agree it is primarily repetitive at this point. It is not "grandstanding" though. It is a summation of all the evidence the two sides have. We have already heard the points, now they are being repeated once more prior to the House's vote.The arguments have been a joke. They are presented by people that have no place 'testifying' in the first place. I don't need congress to call stooges to justify positions they have already taken. If you are going to have someone testify it should be about content.? The arguments so far have been pretty good, both sides. That Collins guy was super stirring to the rightwinger's breast.Just more proof that this process is a complete joke. No one, not one of those partisan hacks, are proceeding through this process with the clarity, weight and attention that it deserves. It is ALL showboating.
Castro is saying an impeachment would obviate the Trump votes in 2016 and is unfair. I don't see it that way.
Everything I have seen thus far amounts to grandstanding.
oh for fk sake. grow up dick.The GOP in the Senate are unpatriotic partisan hacks, which their votes will show and go down in history as such.Lots of heat, no light. Until there is a John Dean figure who gives testimony from inside the bunker...the Senate won’t care. I doubt they’ll care then either.
The GOP in the Senate are unpatriotic partisan hacks, which their votes will show and go down in history as such.Lots of heat, no light. Until there is a John Dean figure who gives testimony from inside the bunker...the Senate won’t care. I doubt they’ll care then either.
Yes, I agree it is primarily repetitive at this point. It is not "grandstanding" though. It is a summation of all the evidence the two sides have. We have already heard the points, now they are being repeated once more prior to the House's vote.The arguments have been a joke. They are presented by people that have no place 'testifying' in the first place. I don't need congress to call stooges to justify positions they have already taken. If you are going to have someone testify it should be about content.? The arguments so far have been pretty good, both sides. That Collins guy was super stirring to the rightwinger's breast.Just more proof that this process is a complete joke. No one, not one of those partisan hacks, are proceeding through this process with the clarity, weight and attention that it deserves. It is ALL showboating.
Castro is saying an impeachment would obviate the Trump votes in 2016 and is unfair. I don't see it that way.
Everything I have seen thus far amounts to grandstanding.
I'm STILL waiting to hear what the Articles of Impeachment are. Has anyone actually seen them yet?
Oh....pee break.
Your guy will be on soon.You right wingers that didn't listen just missed a real rant from Collins, and now they're arguing over a point of order so vociferously that I'm wondering if someone is going to be thrown out.
I'm sure this will get merged or deleted, but wanted to give you a heads up--this is entertainment, folks! Much less boring than the hearings a couple weeks ago.
FYI
All I hear is blah, blah, blahblah, blah. Impeachment.
Thanks, Admiral.Yes, I agree it is primarily repetitive at this point. It is not "grandstanding" though. It is a summation of all the evidence the two sides have. We have already heard the points, now they are being repeated once more prior to the House's vote.The arguments have been a joke. They are presented by people that have no place 'testifying' in the first place. I don't need congress to call stooges to justify positions they have already taken. If you are going to have someone testify it should be about content.? The arguments so far have been pretty good, both sides. That Collins guy was super stirring to the rightwinger's breast.Just more proof that this process is a complete joke. No one, not one of those partisan hacks, are proceeding through this process with the clarity, weight and attention that it deserves. It is ALL showboating.
Castro is saying an impeachment would obviate the Trump votes in 2016 and is unfair. I don't see it that way.
Everything I have seen thus far amounts to grandstanding.
I'm STILL waiting to hear what the Articles of Impeachment are. Has anyone actually seen them yet?
Oh....pee break.
The Articles have not been written yet, and they will likely be based on the lies that the Democrats are swearing to in their committee report. The committee isn't expected to have them ready for their vote until late this week Then they will submitted to the House for debate, which will take weeks.
Thanks, Admiral.Yes, I agree it is primarily repetitive at this point. It is not "grandstanding" though. It is a summation of all the evidence the two sides have. We have already heard the points, now they are being repeated once more prior to the House's vote.The arguments have been a joke. They are presented by people that have no place 'testifying' in the first place. I don't need congress to call stooges to justify positions they have already taken. If you are going to have someone testify it should be about content.? The arguments so far have been pretty good, both sides. That Collins guy was super stirring to the rightwinger's breast.Just more proof that this process is a complete joke. No one, not one of those partisan hacks, are proceeding through this process with the clarity, weight and attention that it deserves. It is ALL showboating.
Castro is saying an impeachment would obviate the Trump votes in 2016 and is unfair. I don't see it that way.
Everything I have seen thus far amounts to grandstanding.
I'm STILL waiting to hear what the Articles of Impeachment are. Has anyone actually seen them yet?
Oh....pee break.
The Articles have not been written yet, and they will likely be based on the lies that the Democrats are swearing to in their committee report. The committee isn't expected to have them ready for their vote until late this week Then they will submitted to the House for debate, which will take weeks.
The Republicans are making public asses of themselves.
What a bunch of monkeys.
That's the kind of frugality and re-purposing that we need in this country. Apparently she wants that plastic bag in a landfill?I found it very funny that the high-priced Republican lawyer brought his impeachment file to Congress in a bashed up reuseable grocery bag. Doesn't this guy own a briefcase? It made him look so unprofessional.
Is that all you could focus on?
