Oh look, more Global Warming heading across the United States. Sure am glad i live in Floor E. Da.

Climate change is a FACT

Pick a point anywhere on the Earth's surface ...
Tell me what the climate was 100 years ago, what the climate is there today and what the climate will be in 100 years ...
IF all three are the same, THEN climate isn't changing at that point ... and ...
IF this is true for all the points on Earth's surface, THEN climate isn't changing anywhere ...

There's better reasons to curtail fossil fuel use than some make-believe "climate crisis" ... hypercanes and hockey sticks ... just nonsense from the beginning ...
 
God forbid if people have to make sacrifices
Sacrifices for the sake of a lie?

all your dire predictions over the past 40 years add up to nothing

No, sacrifices for the sake of life

Our dire predictions over the last 40 years have been ignored. Our climate change has gotten worse

You forgot this thread?

Wrong Again: 2020’s Failed Climate Doomsaying

Stop spreading lies!

Climate change is a FACT

Who said it isn't changing.
 
Scientific predictions are much more accurate than American Conservative predictions that call it all a myth
We have been bombarded with scientific predictions for 40 years and nothing happened
Plenty has happened
We are seeing global warming

View attachment 432683

Who said it isn't warming.

Snicker...........
no shit Sherlock

It IS warming
Why should we contribute to it?

Who says humans' isn't contributing to it?
 
Scientific predictions are much more accurate than American Conservative predictions that call it all a myth
We have been bombarded with scientific predictions for 40 years and nothing happened
Plenty has happened
We are seeing global warming

View attachment 432683

Who said it isn't warming.

Snicker...........
no shit Sherlock

It IS warming
Why should we contribute to it?

Who says humans' isn't contributing to it?
Then why should we continue if we know it is bad for us?
 
Climate change is a FACT

Pick a point anywhere on the Earth's surface ...
Tell me what the climate was 100 years ago, what the climate is there today and what the climate will be in 100 years ...
IF all three are the same, THEN climate isn't changing at that point ... and ...
IF this is true for all the points on Earth's surface, THEN climate isn't changing anywhere ...

There's better reasons to curtail fossil fuel use than some make-believe "climate crisis" ... hypercanes and hockey sticks ... just nonsense from the beginning ...

We have no way of knowing what climate change will be in a hundred years.

We know by sampling points worldwide that it is getting worse
 
Then why should we continue if we know it is bad for us?

Why do you think it's bad? ... even the IPCC predictions are below what we experienced just 10,000 years ago ...

Half of us live in cities ... half the world's food has to be trucked in from farm to these cities ... what happens to cities if we reduce the food being trucked in? ...
 
Scientific predictions are much more accurate than American Conservative predictions that call it all a myth
We have been bombarded with scientific predictions for 40 years and nothing happened
Plenty has happened
We are seeing global warming

View attachment 432683

Who said it isn't warming.

Snicker...........
no shit Sherlock

It IS warming
Why should we contribute to it?

Who says humans' isn't contributing to it?
Then why should we continue if we know it is bad for us?

You and many warmist/alarmists have been been utter failures to show the AGW conjecture is accurate or credible.

I notice you are going to ignore the link I posted showing significant modeling prediction/projection failures.

Wrong Again: 2020’s Failed Climate Doomsaying

Why are you afraid of valid criticisms?
 
Then why should we continue if we know it is bad for us?

Why do you think it's bad? ... even the IPCC predictions are below what we experienced just 10,000 years ago ...

Half of us live in cities ... half the world's food has to be trucked in from farm to these cities ... what happens to cities if we reduce the food being trucked in? ...
People die

Most cities are at sea level and will be flooded
 
Then why should we continue if we know it is bad for us?

Why do you think it's bad? ... even the IPCC predictions are below what we experienced just 10,000 years ago ...

Half of us live in cities ... half the world's food has to be trucked in from farm to these cities ... what happens to cities if we reduce the food being trucked in? ...
People die

Most cities are at sea level and will be flooded

What about those cities that were flooded out when the great meltwater pulses came along? What about those communities that existed in Doggerland?

The world doesn't give a shit about human cities, it does what it does naturally destroys and modify large areas in a flash, as it has done so many many times in the past.

Seattle and Tacoma sits right by Mt. Rainer which can obliterate part of the region with a massive eruption.

People take risks wherever we live, some are high and some are low, I live in a VERY low risk area.
 
Then why should we continue if we know it is bad for us?

Why do you think it's bad? ... even the IPCC predictions are below what we experienced just 10,000 years ago ...

Half of us live in cities ... half the world's food has to be trucked in from farm to these cities ... what happens to cities if we reduce the food being trucked in? ...
People die

Most cities are at sea level and will be flooded

What about those cities that were flooded out when the great meltwater pulses came along? What about those communities that existed in Doggerland?

The world doesn't give a shit about human cities, it does what it does naturally destroys and modify large areas in a flash, as it has done so many many times in the past.

Seattle and Tacoma sits right by Mt. Rainer which can obliterate part of the region with a massive eruption.

People take risks wherever we live, some are high and some are low, I live in a VERY low risk area.
Our population has congregated near the coasts.
Florida is mostly at sea level

A rise of a few feet will cause massive damage
 
Then why should we continue if we know it is bad for us?

Why do you think it's bad? ... even the IPCC predictions are below what we experienced just 10,000 years ago ...

Half of us live in cities ... half the world's food has to be trucked in from farm to these cities ... what happens to cities if we reduce the food being trucked in? ...
People die

Most cities are at sea level and will be flooded

What about those cities that were flooded out when the great meltwater pulses came along? What about those communities that existed in Doggerland?

The world doesn't give a shit about human cities, it does what it does naturally destroys and modify large areas in a flash, as it has done so many many times in the past.

Seattle and Tacoma sits right by Mt. Rainer which can obliterate part of the region with a massive eruption.

People take risks wherever we live, some are high and some are low, I live in a VERY low risk area.
Our population has congregated near the coasts.
Florida is mostly at sea level

A rise of a few feet will cause massive damage

No they can easily walk away from the scary 3mm/year rise.

You trying tell us how stupid and scared you are of a non lethal sea level rise?
 
Then why should we continue if we know it is bad for us?

Why do you think it's bad? ... even the IPCC predictions are below what we experienced just 10,000 years ago ...

Half of us live in cities ... half the world's food has to be trucked in from farm to these cities ... what happens to cities if we reduce the food being trucked in? ...
People die

Most cities are at sea level and will be flooded

What about those cities that were flooded out when the great meltwater pulses came along? What about those communities that existed in Doggerland?

The world doesn't give a shit about human cities, it does what it does naturally destroys and modify large areas in a flash, as it has done so many many times in the past.

Seattle and Tacoma sits right by Mt. Rainer which can obliterate part of the region with a massive eruption.

People take risks wherever we live, some are high and some are low, I live in a VERY low risk area.
Our population has congregated near the coasts.
Florida is mostly at sea level

A rise of a few feet will cause massive damage

No they can easily walk away from the scary 3mm/year rise.

You trying tell us how stupid and scared you are of a non lethal sea level rise?

It would destroy our economy

1608770360456.png
 
Scientific predictions are much more accurate than American Conservative predictions that call it all a myth
We have been bombarded with scientific predictions for 40 years and nothing happened
Plenty has happened
We are seeing global warming

View attachment 432683

How many trillions do we need to spend on windmills to stop the rise in temperature?
How will we know when we've built enough?
We need to reduce our reliance on oil.

Solar, wind, conservation can all ease the burden

Even a ten percent reduction s a start. Why are you afraid to start?
If you actually believe the bs you are putting up about global warming---the only solution and I do mean only solution that would stop it would be POPULATION CONTROL and I don't see you pushing for this.
 
1608770337581.png

Scientific predictions are much more accurate than American Conservative predictions that call it all a myth
We have been bombarded with scientific predictions for 40 years and nothing happened
Plenty has happened
We are seeing global warming

View attachment 432683

How many trillions do we need to spend on windmills to stop the rise in temperature?
How will we know when we've built enough?
We need to reduce our reliance on oil.

Solar, wind, conservation can all ease the burden

Even a ten percent reduction s a start. Why are you afraid to start?
If you actually believe the bs you are putting up about global warming---the only solution and I do mean only solution that would stop it would be POPULATION CONTROL and I don't see you pushing for this.
Our population is on the coasts
They are already there
 
Then why should we continue if we know it is bad for us?

Why do you think it's bad? ... even the IPCC predictions are below what we experienced just 10,000 years ago ...

Half of us live in cities ... half the world's food has to be trucked in from farm to these cities ... what happens to cities if we reduce the food being trucked in? ...
People die

Most cities are at sea level and will be flooded

What about those cities that were flooded out when the great meltwater pulses came along? What about those communities that existed in Doggerland?

The world doesn't give a shit about human cities, it does what it does naturally destroys and modify large areas in a flash, as it has done so many many times in the past.

Seattle and Tacoma sits right by Mt. Rainer which can obliterate part of the region with a massive eruption.

People take risks wherever we live, some are high and some are low, I live in a VERY low risk area.
Our population has congregated near the coasts.
Florida is mostly at sea level

A rise of a few feet will cause massive damage

No they can easily walk away from the scary 3mm/year rise.

You trying tell us how stupid and scared you are of a non lethal sea level rise?

It would destroy our economy

View attachment 432778

Ha ha ha, you have so little regards for human adaptability, not only that, they will have a lot of time to adjust, you are being hysterically pessimistic.

3mm/ year is how many inches in 80 years?

Hint: 3mm is 0.11811024 inch..

:auiqs.jpg:
 
Scientific predictions are much more accurate than American Conservative predictions that call it all a myth
We have been bombarded with scientific predictions for 40 years and nothing happened
Plenty has happened
We are seeing global warming

View attachment 432683
Vertical lines indicate a 95% confidence interval? It's BS. How did they measure water temperature back then. HMS Challenger 1872 to 1876 traveled a certain route dropping a rope with a thermometer that could maybe withstand the pressure of the ocean at several different depths. Assuming that the thermometer could withstand the pressure---------the other issue would be that getting a rope to go straight down would have been impossible meaning that the thermometer would have been HIGHER depths than recorded where it is WARMER. The rise in supposed ocean temp then is merely the result in the change of technology allowing for better temperature measure.

Your chart is Fubar chit. The propagandists that put this chit out know it-------------
 
View attachment 432777
Scientific predictions are much more accurate than American Conservative predictions that call it all a myth
We have been bombarded with scientific predictions for 40 years and nothing happened
Plenty has happened
We are seeing global warming

View attachment 432683

How many trillions do we need to spend on windmills to stop the rise in temperature?
How will we know when we've built enough?
We need to reduce our reliance on oil.

Solar, wind, conservation can all ease the burden

Even a ten percent reduction s a start. Why are you afraid to start?
If you actually believe the bs you are putting up about global warming---the only solution and I do mean only solution that would stop it would be POPULATION CONTROL and I don't see you pushing for this.
Our population is on the coasts
They are already there
Is this your attempt to deflect? Again, you are not pushing population control----------so you obviously don't believe your global warming BS.
 
Most cities are at sea level and will be flooded

That's a material falsehood ... Miami Airport is at 7 feet above current sea level ... Baltimore at 115 feet ... Seattle 20 feet ...

Our population has congregated near the coasts.
Florida is mostly at sea level
A rise of a few feet will cause massive damage

Using the data in hand ... and I agree it's a short data set of about 25 years ... we'll see a 22 inch rise in sea levels by year 2100 ... ± 4 inches ... "a few feet" is hyperbole and can't be verified with any data we have at the moment ... most likely less than a couple of feet ... {Cite} ...

This leaves us 80 years to add three feet to our sea walls ... which is trivial ... one guy, one shovel, ten years to completely protect Houston, Texas ... this is compared to Japan finishing about 500 miles of 50 foot sea walls that washed out March of 2011 ... it's not that difficult, it's not that expensive (except for the real estate) ... again "massive damage" is hyperbole, and stinks of fear-mongering for the sake of fear-mongering ...

Hypercanes and Hockey Sticks ... utter rubbish ...

The highest tides of the year will be this next month ... either full or new Moon ... go down to the beach ... where the highest wave breaks and recedes ... drive a stick into the sand until two feet are exposed above the sand ... then level across ... that's where the wave will break 80 years from now ... underwhelming isn't it? ...
 

Forum List

Back
Top