OK gun grabbers you have your mandatory gun registration

[LeadRoundNose]

Again, we see the "yeah but" response.

LOL!

I've completely dismantled, no, decimated your argument.

Butt that.

 

[LeadRoundNose]

Again, we see the "yeah but" response. Again, it works with cars and it will work with guns.

If someone steals your car and injures others your insurance doesn't pay for it.

Apparently at Mutual of LaLaLand it does....lol

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I don't see it as a money maker at all with the amount of gun violence that goes on in all the gun free cities like Chicago, New York and others.

Rates would be higher there as they are in every insurance market--price differences.

My gawd. Your argument doesn't add up (including the math).

In the regions in question, gun laws are highly restrictive. In fact the effort is to eliminate all lawful gun ownership. This fact alone means that citizens in those areas are already paying more for any gun they might choose to own that is still considered a legal weapon to posses. You add an outrageous insurance policy requirement to that and you'll see less and less legal gun ownership. A citizen may be reduced to owning only one or two firearms. Even be discouraged enough to not buy a weapon. How is an insurance company going to insure a weapon that isn't owned by anybody?

Thus, the "pool" that generates the income for the insurers is drastically reduced again shifting the burden to folks in regions where there is little to no gun violence.

Again, a State that is less restrictive in gun laws has been proven to have less gun crime. The public has a reasonable expectation to be rewarded by the insurers, not penalized.

As I said, you seem to be an insurance agent in la-la land.

Again, we see the "yeah but" response. Again, it works with cars and it will work with guns.

How about HIV infected people should they be forced to register and buy extra healthcare coverage for the damage they may do, because HIV is dangerous and the carrier is the weapon.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I don't see it as a money maker at all with the amount of gun violence that goes on in all the gun free cities like Chicago, New York and others.

Rates would be higher there as they are in every insurance market--price differences.

My gawd. Your argument doesn't add up (including the math).

In the regions in question, gun laws are highly restrictive. In fact the effort is to eliminate all lawful gun ownership. This fact alone means that citizens in those areas are already paying more for any gun they might choose to own that is still considered a legal weapon to posses. You add an outrageous insurance policy requirement to that and you'll see less and less legal gun ownership. A citizen may be reduced to owning only one or two firearms. Even be discouraged enough to not buy a weapon. How is an insurance company going to insure a weapon that isn't owned by anybody?

Thus, the "pool" that generates the income for the insurers is drastically reduced again shifting the burden to folks in regions where there is little to no gun violence.

Again, a State that is less restrictive in gun laws has been proven to have less gun crime. The public has a reasonable expectation to be rewarded by the insurers, not penalized.

As I said, you seem to be an insurance agent in la-la land.

Again, we see the "yeah but" response. Again, it works with cars and it will work with guns.

I love how you put your hands over your ears and yell "LALALAALA!" as people destroy your positions, and then act as if they have not done so.

Never mind that the fact that since they are based on emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty, they destroy themselves.

 

[ItsOnlyMe]

We know this is just the first step in gun confiscation. We also know that gun registration perpetrated on legal gun owners does not bring gun violence crime down.

Exactly. And weapons are forbidden in prison, BUT that doesn't stop them from making their own and stabbing or bludgeoning a fellow inmate. But of course to liberals, it's not murder they're against, as long as it's not committed with a gun. You can be stabbed to death and liberals never get too excited about that. It boggles the mind, doesn't it?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

My gawd. Your argument doesn't add up (including the math).

In the regions in question, gun laws are highly restrictive. In fact the effort is to eliminate all lawful gun ownership. This fact alone means that citizens in those areas are already paying more for any gun they might choose to own that is still considered a legal weapon to posses. You add an outrageous insurance policy requirement to that and you'll see less and less legal gun ownership. A citizen may be reduced to owning only one or two firearms. Even be discouraged enough to not buy a weapon. How is an insurance company going to insure a weapon that isn't owned by anybody?

Thus, the "pool" that generates the income for the insurers is drastically reduced again shifting the burden to folks in regions where there is little to no gun violence.

Again, a State that is less restrictive in gun laws has been proven to have less gun crime. The public has a reasonable expectation to be rewarded by the insurers, not penalized.

As I said, you seem to be an insurance agent in la-la land.

Again, we see the "yeah but" response. Again, it works with cars and it will work with guns.

How about HIV infected people should they be forced to register and buy extra healthcare coverage for the damage they may do, because HIV is dangerous and the carrier is the weapon.

Leave it to a conservative to come up with new ways to violate citizens’ civil liberties.

And as usual, as a consequence of your ignorance and stupidity, you pose a greater threat to the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any ‘gun grabber.’

 

[ItsOnlyMe]

Again, we see the "yeah but" response. Again, it works with cars and it will work with guns.

How about HIV infected people should they be forced to register and buy extra healthcare coverage for the damage they may do, because HIV is dangerous and the carrier is the weapon.

Leave it to a conservative to come up with new ways to violate citizens’ civil liberties.

And as usual, as a consequence of your ignorance and stupidity, you pose a greater threat to the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any ‘gun grabber.’

telling people they can't defend themselves and their families ISN't violating their civil liberties. I hate to break it to you honey, but everybody with a communicable disease is quarantined and HIPAA does NOT apply. Except of course HIV/AIDS. Heavens no we can't know who has that. We've given you marriage of your same gender, free birth control, and legalized Marijuana for you, what the hell else do you want?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How about HIV infected people should they be forced to register and buy extra healthcare coverage for the damage they may do, because HIV is dangerous and the carrier is the weapon.

Leave it to a conservative to come up with new ways to violate citizens’ civil liberties.

And as usual, as a consequence of your ignorance and stupidity, you pose a greater threat to the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any ‘gun grabber.’

telling people they can't defend themselves and their families ISN't violating their civil liberties. I hate to break it to you honey, but everybody with a communicable disease is quarantined and HIPAA does NOT apply. Except of course HIV/AIDS. Heavens no we can't know who has that. We've given you marriage of your same gender, free birth control, and legalized Marijuana for you, what the hell else do you want?

He is truly an idiot. I mean guns aren't the only dangerous thing out there HIV is very dangerous, and the carrier is the weapon.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Again, we see the "yeah but" response. Again, it works with cars and it will work with guns.

How about HIV infected people should they be forced to register and buy extra healthcare coverage for the damage they may do, because HIV is dangerous and the carrier is the weapon.

Leave it to a conservative to come up with new ways to violate citizens’ civil liberties.

And as usual, as a consequence of your ignorance and stupidity, you pose a greater threat to the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any ‘gun grabber.’

You want to register dangerous things such as guns but not HIV infected weapons.

 

[LeadRoundNose]

How about HIV infected people should they be forced to register and buy extra healthcare coverage for the damage they may do, because HIV is dangerous and the carrier is the weapon.

Leave it to a conservative to come up with new ways to violate citizens’ civil liberties.

And as usual, as a consequence of your ignorance and stupidity, you pose a greater threat to the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any ‘gun grabber.’

You want to register dangerous things such as guns but not HIV infected weapons.

HIV is why cops put on latex gloves before they have to grab a perpetrator since so many of them have diseases like HIV. They search them for guns/weapons and do so with gloves on, asking them if they have any needles or anything that can stick them.

Nothing is as deadly as being infected with aids, but the bungholing brigade just can't tolerate that truth.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Leave it to a conservative to come up with new ways to violate citizens’ civil liberties.

And as usual, as a consequence of your ignorance and stupidity, you pose a greater threat to the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment than any ‘gun grabber.’

You want to register dangerous things such as guns but not HIV infected weapons.

HIV is why cops put on latex gloves before they have to grab a perpetrator since so many of them have diseases like HIV. They search them for guns/weapons and do so with gloves on, asking them if they have any needles or anything that can stick them.

Nothing is as deadly as being infected with aids, but the bungholing brigade just can't tolerate that truth.

What the bungholing brigade doesn't realize after the government get's this pesky gun thing under control AND being they already have this healthcare thing under control HIV registration will be next.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Register this deadly weapon

HIV-positive Missouri man may have knowingly exposed 300 partners - Los Angeles Times

Fort Myers man arrested for knowingly spreading HIV - NBC-2.com WBBH News for Fort Myers, Cape Coral & Naples, Florida

Nushawn J. Williams News - The New York Times

Sex, Lies and HIV: When What You Don?t Tell Your Partner Is a Crime - ProPublica

Man arrested for knowingly infecting victims with HIV : News : miNBCnews.com

Daniel Rick convicted of knowingly spreading HIV virus

Gay Men Knowingly Have Unprotected Sex Despite HIV Status - Shepherds Piehole

 

[Vandalshandle]

"What the bungholing brigade doesn't realize after the government get's this pesky gun thing under control AND being they already have this healthcare thing under control HIV registration will be next. "

Your deeply felt concern for the rights of gay mailes is very touching.....

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"What the bungholing brigade doesn't realize after the government get's this pesky gun thing under control AND being they already have this healthcare thing under control HIV registration will be next. "

Your deeply felt concern for the rights of gay mailes is very touching.....

Those deadly weapons need to be registered.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

You want to register dangerous things such as guns but not HIV infected weapons.

HIV is why cops put on latex gloves before they have to grab a perpetrator since so many of them have diseases like HIV. They search them for guns/weapons and do so with gloves on, asking them if they have any needles or anything that can stick them.

Nothing is as deadly as being infected with aids, but the bungholing brigade just can't tolerate that truth.

What the bungholing brigade doesn't realize after the government get's this pesky gun thing under control AND being they already have this healthcare thing under control HIV registration will be next.

You’re truly an ignorant, hateful nitwit.

You’re also stupid and clueless – you succeed in only reinforcing the negative stereotype of the ‘deranged gun nut,’ making it easier to enact new gun control measures because gun owners are incorrectly perceived to be ‘irresponsible.’

You are indeed an enemy of the Second Amendment.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

HIV is why cops put on latex gloves before they have to grab a perpetrator since so many of them have diseases like HIV. They search them for guns/weapons and do so with gloves on, asking them if they have any needles or anything that can stick them.

Nothing is as deadly as being infected with aids, but the bungholing brigade just can't tolerate that truth.

What the bungholing brigade doesn't realize after the government get's this pesky gun thing under control AND being they already have this healthcare thing under control HIV registration will be next.

You’re truly an ignorant, hateful nitwit.

You’re also stupid and clueless – you succeed in only reinforcing the negative stereotype of the ‘deranged gun nut,’ making it easier to enact new gun control measures because gun owners are incorrectly perceived to be ‘irresponsible.’

You are indeed an enemy of the Second Amendment.

Really who is the clueless one? I know it's you

Register this deadly weapon

HIV-positive Missouri man may have knowingly exposed 300 partners - Los Angeles Times

Fort Myers man arrested for knowingly spreading HIV - NBC-2.com WBBH News for Fort Myers, Cape Coral & Naples, Florida

Nushawn J. Williams News - The New York Times

Sex, Lies and HIV: When What You Don?t Tell Your Partner Is a Crime - ProPublica

Man arrested for knowingly infecting victims with HIV : News : miNBCnews.com

Daniel Rick convicted of knowingly spreading HIV virus

Gay Men Knowingly Have Unprotected Sex Despite HIV Status - Shepherds Piehole

You want to register something register these bastards and many more like them.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Clayton you talk about civil liberty's, what about my civil liberty's? Should they also be protected? As much as you think an HIV infected weapons civil liberty needs to be protected?

 

[LeadRoundNose]

Register this deadly weapon

HIV-positive Missouri man may have knowingly exposed 300 partners - Los Angeles Times

Fort Myers man arrested for knowingly spreading HIV - NBC-2.com WBBH News for Fort Myers, Cape Coral & Naples, Florida

Nushawn J. Williams News - The New York Times

Sex, Lies and HIV: When What You Don?t Tell Your Partner Is a Crime - ProPublica

Man arrested for knowingly infecting victims with HIV : News : miNBCnews.com

Daniel Rick convicted of knowingly spreading HIV virus

Gay Men Knowingly Have Unprotected Sex Despite HIV Status - Shepherds Piehole

Look at that first one. 300 people infected. No mass shooting can compare to those numbers. Yes, the deadly gay aids carriers need to register. Maybe even sew a rainbow on their jackets for quick identification.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Register this deadly weapon

HIV-positive Missouri man may have knowingly exposed 300 partners - Los Angeles Times

Fort Myers man arrested for knowingly spreading HIV - NBC-2.com WBBH News for Fort Myers, Cape Coral & Naples, Florida

Nushawn J. Williams News - The New York Times

Sex, Lies and HIV: When What You Don?t Tell Your Partner Is a Crime - ProPublica

Man arrested for knowingly infecting victims with HIV : News : miNBCnews.com

Daniel Rick convicted of knowingly spreading HIV virus

Gay Men Knowingly Have Unprotected Sex Despite HIV Status - Shepherds Piehole

Look at that first one. 300 people infected. No mass shooting can compare to those numbers. Yes, the deadly gay aids carriers need to register. Maybe even sew a rainbow on their jackets for quick identification.

All of those deadly attacks deal with more than one victim.

 

[novasteve]

Liberal faggots want to decriminalize the knowing transmission of hiv