OK Racists, It's Time to do the Math.

[IM2]

This means that for every 100 blacks, 95 blacks are not committing crimes and 97 whites are not committing crimes.

Which means that there are two more negroes out there committing crimes than there are whites...

No it does not. But you're a racist so you want to hang on to that lie.

 

[freyasman]

Another thing you've got to ask yourselves too is that the small drops of Latino, Asian, Eskimo, Native American folk, combined make up a total % of the population similar to that of the total black population but for the similar % of them when added together, the black still commit considerably more crime than them combined too.

The creator of the thread has had an absolute nightmare.

No only you racist have because no matter how much you try twisting this, it proves my point.

Can you explain how it proves your point, please.

This I've gotta hear.

Another thing you've got to ask yourselves too is that the small drops of Latino, Asian, Eskimo, Native American folk, combined make up a total % of the population similar to that of the total black population but for the similar % of them when added together, the black still commit considerably more crime than them combined too.

The creator of the thread has had an absolute nightmare.

No only you racist have because no matter how much you try twisting this, it proves my point.

Can you explain how it proves your point, please.

This I've gotta hear.

Ok, let me explain this again using Black Sands "applied math."

According to BlackSand, for every 100 blacks/whites, 4.6 blacks are committing crimes and 2.8 whites are. This means that for every 100 blacks, 95 blacks are not committing crimes and 97 whites are not committing crimes. So the claim of this high black crime rate is non existent. Hence BlackSand provrs my point.

And let's not get stupid. Whites like you guys want to multiply things by 5 instead of looking at the fact you have a problem. But if you multiply things by 5 to make the populations the same, there are things that no longer exist for blacks. We would have more economic opportunity. We would have equal representation relative to numbers of police, lawyers, judges, and political representatives. Things would be dramatically different. Yet those like you and others here fail to understand this. No matter what, you continue arguing this ridiculous per capita idiocy.

Since whites have 5 times the population and want to make that an issue, let’s start multiplying by 5. Blacks have over 2 million businesses right now, let’s multiply that by 5 and then see what the outcome will be. Now there are 10 million black owned businesses and more jobs in the black community. Let us reduce our unemployment rate by 5 to 2.6 percent. Blacks live at a 24 percent rate of poverty so reduce that by 5 to make it 4.5 percent..

The black economy now grows to 6.5 trillion instead of the 1.3 trillion we have now. Blacks now have 5 times the amount of money to spend and invest. What happens them? All kinds of community development, that is what. Now property values increase in the black community and because of that we have more money for our schools. Let us multiply the number of blacks who go to college by 5, there are now 8.5 million blacks in college or getting vocational training. That equals approximately 1 out of every 5 black citizen receiving post-secondary training. This results in a more highly trained and qualified black workforce which increases employment. So this increase in population and jobs lowers the unemployment rate meaning fewer blacks are on government assistance because they have stable employment. Youth crime is reduced even further because youth now have facilities and jobs available in their immediate communities. What happens to crime? It reduces itself by 5 from 26 percent to 5.2 percent. Why? because the factors that create crime are reduced, so then crime is reduced. Yet to the racist nothing else changes. The only change is crime increases. The use of per capita fails miserably and is used by racist whites to deny a severe crime problem THEY need to address instead of trying to preach to us. For if we apply per capita like you racists do, when a white person has 5 dollars and I have 1, it is the same amount.

That post is pure aids and gave my eyes cancer - even skim reading it.

Your logic falls down everywhere on it's first point when you try to say 95 blacks in every 100 aren't committing crime & 97 whites in every 100 aren't committing crime because you are taking the small value of 5 and 3 in the first instance per 100 folk, but ignoring the fact that them 3 of a difference is multiplied literally hundreds of millions of times when you take the whole population of the USA into account and it gives you a vast metric and the true picture.

The rest of your comment has zero to do with anything (i.e economy, money to invest, communities, jobs etc) because that's a conspiracy that the race baiters wheel out to try and prove systemic racism exists where it doesn't.

There's nothing stopping black people making something of themselves - they have even more opportunities than your average white person does in the USA at the moment with affirmative action schemes, special programes, diversity quotas, special scholarships that exclude white kids from similarly poor backgrounds etc.

For people like you the need and demand for racism outstrips the amount of tangible racism that there actually is.

You want desperately to believe your narrative, but then when we see the real numbers it shows that whites commit far more crime. Now that is the reality. I base my argument on the real total number of actual criminals. Your ppst is just a load of white racist crap you refuse to give up. Everything I said was correct. You believe a bunch of lies and try arguing those lies against the truth. Whites still today get the mot given to them. Whites have benefitted the most from Affirmative Action, all those special things do not exist. Diversity quitas? Ha! If they actually existed whites would still get the majority of things. You really don't know what the fuck you are talking about. You live in the UK, go get a cup of tea, some fish and chips then shut the fuck up.

IM2 No one here is ever going to be able to clown you as thoroughly as you clown yourself.


Congratulations.

Take a bow.

 

[IM2]

Another thing you've got to ask yourselves too is that the small drops of Latino, Asian, Eskimo, Native American folk, combined make up a total % of the population similar to that of the total black population but for the similar % of them when added together, the black still commit considerably more crime than them combined too.

The creator of the thread has had an absolute nightmare.

No only you racist have because no matter how much you try twisting this, it proves my point.

Can you explain how it proves your point, please.

This I've gotta hear.

Another thing you've got to ask yourselves too is that the small drops of Latino, Asian, Eskimo, Native American folk, combined make up a total % of the population similar to that of the total black population but for the similar % of them when added together, the black still commit considerably more crime than them combined too.

The creator of the thread has had an absolute nightmare.

No only you racist have because no matter how much you try twisting this, it proves my point.

Can you explain how it proves your point, please.

This I've gotta hear.

Ok, let me explain this again using Black Sands "applied math."

According to BlackSand, for every 100 blacks/whites, 4.6 blacks are committing crimes and 2.8 whites are. This means that for every 100 blacks, 95 blacks are not committing crimes and 97 whites are not committing crimes. So the claim of this high black crime rate is non existent. Hence BlackSand provrs my point.

And let's not get stupid. Whites like you guys want to multiply things by 5 instead of looking at the fact you have a problem. But if you multiply things by 5 to make the populations the same, there are things that no longer exist for blacks. We would have more economic opportunity. We would have equal representation relative to numbers of police, lawyers, judges, and political representatives. Things would be dramatically different. Yet those like you and others here fail to understand this. No matter what, you continue arguing this ridiculous per capita idiocy.

Since whites have 5 times the population and want to make that an issue, let’s start multiplying by 5. Blacks have over 2 million businesses right now, let’s multiply that by 5 and then see what the outcome will be. Now there are 10 million black owned businesses and more jobs in the black community. Let us reduce our unemployment rate by 5 to 2.6 percent. Blacks live at a 24 percent rate of poverty so reduce that by 5 to make it 4.5 percent..

The black economy now grows to 6.5 trillion instead of the 1.3 trillion we have now. Blacks now have 5 times the amount of money to spend and invest. What happens them? All kinds of community development, that is what. Now property values increase in the black community and because of that we have more money for our schools. Let us multiply the number of blacks who go to college by 5, there are now 8.5 million blacks in college or getting vocational training. That equals approximately 1 out of every 5 black citizen receiving post-secondary training. This results in a more highly trained and qualified black workforce which increases employment. So this increase in population and jobs lowers the unemployment rate meaning fewer blacks are on government assistance because they have stable employment. Youth crime is reduced even further because youth now have facilities and jobs available in their immediate communities. What happens to crime? It reduces itself by 5 from 26 percent to 5.2 percent. Why? because the factors that create crime are reduced, so then crime is reduced. Yet to the racist nothing else changes. The only change is crime increases. The use of per capita fails miserably and is used by racist whites to deny a severe crime problem THEY need to address instead of trying to preach to us. For if we apply per capita like you racists do, when a white person has 5 dollars and I have 1, it is the same amount.

That post is pure aids and gave my eyes cancer - even skim reading it.

Your logic falls down everywhere on it's first point when you try to say 95 blacks in every 100 aren't committing crime & 97 whites in every 100 aren't committing crime because you are taking the small value of 5 and 3 in the first instance per 100 folk, but ignoring the fact that them 3 of a difference is multiplied literally hundreds of millions of times when you take the whole population of the USA into account and it gives you a vast metric and the true picture.

The rest of your comment has zero to do with anything (i.e economy, money to invest, communities, jobs etc) because that's a conspiracy that the race baiters wheel out to try and prove systemic racism exists where it doesn't.

There's nothing stopping black people making something of themselves - they have even more opportunities than your average white person does in the USA at the moment with affirmative action schemes, special programes, diversity quotas, special scholarships that exclude white kids from similarly poor backgrounds etc.

For people like you the need and demand for racism outstrips the amount of tangible racism that there actually is.

You want desperately to believe your narrative, but then when we see the real numbers it shows that whites commit far more crime. Now that is the reality. I base my argument on the real total number of actual criminals. Your ppst is just a load of white racist crap you refuse to give up. Everything I said was correct. You believe a bunch of lies and try arguing those lies against the truth. Whites still today get the mot given to them. Whites have benefitted the most from Affirmative Action, all those special things do not exist. Diversity quitas? Ha! If they actually existed whites would still get the majority of things. You really don't know what the fuck you are talking about. You live in the UK, go get a cup of tea, some fish and chips then shut the fuck up.

IM2 No one here is ever going to be able to clown you as thoroughly as you clown yourself.


Congratulations.

Take a bow.


View attachment 498439

Off topic trolling is not clowning. Neither is per capita the total number of people who were reported by police to be participants in criminal behavior.

 

[freyasman]

Another thing you've got to ask yourselves too is that the small drops of Latino, Asian, Eskimo, Native American folk, combined make up a total % of the population similar to that of the total black population but for the similar % of them when added together, the black still commit considerably more crime than them combined too.

The creator of the thread has had an absolute nightmare.

No only you racist have because no matter how much you try twisting this, it proves my point.

Can you explain how it proves your point, please.

This I've gotta hear.

Another thing you've got to ask yourselves too is that the small drops of Latino, Asian, Eskimo, Native American folk, combined make up a total % of the population similar to that of the total black population but for the similar % of them when added together, the black still commit considerably more crime than them combined too.

The creator of the thread has had an absolute nightmare.

No only you racist have because no matter how much you try twisting this, it proves my point.

Can you explain how it proves your point, please.

This I've gotta hear.

Ok, let me explain this again using Black Sands "applied math."

According to BlackSand, for every 100 blacks/whites, 4.6 blacks are committing crimes and 2.8 whites are. This means that for every 100 blacks, 95 blacks are not committing crimes and 97 whites are not committing crimes. So the claim of this high black crime rate is non existent. Hence BlackSand provrs my point.

And let's not get stupid. Whites like you guys want to multiply things by 5 instead of looking at the fact you have a problem. But if you multiply things by 5 to make the populations the same, there are things that no longer exist for blacks. We would have more economic opportunity. We would have equal representation relative to numbers of police, lawyers, judges, and political representatives. Things would be dramatically different. Yet those like you and others here fail to understand this. No matter what, you continue arguing this ridiculous per capita idiocy.

Since whites have 5 times the population and want to make that an issue, let’s start multiplying by 5. Blacks have over 2 million businesses right now, let’s multiply that by 5 and then see what the outcome will be. Now there are 10 million black owned businesses and more jobs in the black community. Let us reduce our unemployment rate by 5 to 2.6 percent. Blacks live at a 24 percent rate of poverty so reduce that by 5 to make it 4.5 percent..

The black economy now grows to 6.5 trillion instead of the 1.3 trillion we have now. Blacks now have 5 times the amount of money to spend and invest. What happens them? All kinds of community development, that is what. Now property values increase in the black community and because of that we have more money for our schools. Let us multiply the number of blacks who go to college by 5, there are now 8.5 million blacks in college or getting vocational training. That equals approximately 1 out of every 5 black citizen receiving post-secondary training. This results in a more highly trained and qualified black workforce which increases employment. So this increase in population and jobs lowers the unemployment rate meaning fewer blacks are on government assistance because they have stable employment. Youth crime is reduced even further because youth now have facilities and jobs available in their immediate communities. What happens to crime? It reduces itself by 5 from 26 percent to 5.2 percent. Why? because the factors that create crime are reduced, so then crime is reduced. Yet to the racist nothing else changes. The only change is crime increases. The use of per capita fails miserably and is used by racist whites to deny a severe crime problem THEY need to address instead of trying to preach to us. For if we apply per capita like you racists do, when a white person has 5 dollars and I have 1, it is the same amount.

That post is pure aids and gave my eyes cancer - even skim reading it.

Your logic falls down everywhere on it's first point when you try to say 95 blacks in every 100 aren't committing crime & 97 whites in every 100 aren't committing crime because you are taking the small value of 5 and 3 in the first instance per 100 folk, but ignoring the fact that them 3 of a difference is multiplied literally hundreds of millions of times when you take the whole population of the USA into account and it gives you a vast metric and the true picture.

The rest of your comment has zero to do with anything (i.e economy, money to invest, communities, jobs etc) because that's a conspiracy that the race baiters wheel out to try and prove systemic racism exists where it doesn't.

There's nothing stopping black people making something of themselves - they have even more opportunities than your average white person does in the USA at the moment with affirmative action schemes, special programes, diversity quotas, special scholarships that exclude white kids from similarly poor backgrounds etc.

For people like you the need and demand for racism outstrips the amount of tangible racism that there actually is.

You want desperately to believe your narrative, but then when we see the real numbers it shows that whites commit far more crime. Now that is the reality. I base my argument on the real total number of actual criminals. Your ppst is just a load of white racist crap you refuse to give up. Everything I said was correct. You believe a bunch of lies and try arguing those lies against the truth. Whites still today get the mot given to them. Whites have benefitted the most from Affirmative Action, all those special things do not exist. Diversity quitas? Ha! If they actually existed whites would still get the majority of things. You really don't know what the fuck you are talking about. You live in the UK, go get a cup of tea, some fish and chips then shut the fuck up.

Whites have benefited the most from affirmative action? lmao what a doosh bag.

You can't even interpret your own numbers correctly - that's what makes it hilarious. Blacks commit almost 50% more crime than whites in America - FACT - you even said so yourself with your 97 and 95 out of every 100 - that's 3 and 5 respectively - 2 of a difference - 5 divided by 2 = 2.5 which gives you almost 50% of that number, your number.

You know for someone that's big on so-called racism, that was a nice little display of it at the end there. Hypocrite.

Whites have benefitted the most from Affirmative Action.

On June 17, 2013 Sally Kohn wrote an article in Time titled, “Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone.” Kohn provides this historical backdrop for the implementation including the reasons why President Johnson added women: “Originally, women weren’t even included in legislation attempting to level the playing field in education and employment. The first affirmative-action measure in America was an executive order signed by President Kennedy in 1961 requiring that federal contractors “take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.” In 1967, President Johnson amended this, and a subsequent measure included sex, recognizing that women also faced many discriminatory barriers and hurdles to equal opportunity.” Kohn continues by stating that while Affirmative Action has helped people of color, it has disproportionately benefitted white women.

“While people of color, individually and as groups, have been helped by affirmative action in the subsequent years, data and studies suggest women — white women in particular — have benefited disproportionately. According to one study, in 1995, 6 million women, the majority of whom were white, had jobs they wouldn’t have otherwise held but for affirmative action.”

Sally Kohn​

The National Womens Law Center did a study on Affirmatives Action and found that: “Women of color have lagged particularly far behind in both employment and education. For example, in 1998, the median weekly salary for Black women was $400 compared to $468 for white women and $615 for white men. Hispanic women earned a median weekly income of only $337. Even in sectors where women have made inroads into management, minority women continue to be underrepresented. In the banking industry, only 2.6% of executive, managerial and administrative jobs were held by Black women, and 5% by Hispanic women, compared to 37.6% by white women. In the hospital industry, Black and Hispanic women each held 4.6% of these jobs, while white women held 50.2%. At the top, women of color represented only 11.2% of all corporate officers in Fortune 500 companies. Women of color also earn fewer college degrees than white women. In 1997, white women made up 39% of college undergraduates and 42% of graduate students; minority women were only 16% of undergraduates and 10% of graduate students.”

Tim Wise had a paper published in the National Women’s Studies Association Journal in the fall of 1998 titled, “Is Sisterhood Conditional?: White Women and the Rollback of Affirmative Action”. His paper was about the reluctance of some white women to advocate for Affirmative Action despites the gains white women had achieved from the policy over the 30 years at that time, due to the policy.

“Thanks in large measure to affirmative action and civil rights protections that opened up previously restricted opportunities to women of all colors, from 1972-1993:

— The percentage of women architects increased from 3% to nearly 19% of the total;

— The percentage of women doctors more than doubled from 10% to 22% of all doctors;

— The percentage of women lawyers grew from 4% to 23% of the national total;

— The percentage of female engineers went from less than 1% to nearly 9%;

— The percentage of female chemists grew from 10% to 30% of all chemists; and,

— The percentage of female college faculty went from 28% to 42% of all faculty.

The gender benefits of affirmative action have extended beyond economically privileged women, expanding opportunity for working-class women as well: The 1985 Perkins Act, which requires states to set aside 10.5% of federal vocational-education funds for girls and women — such as displaced homemakers and single-mothers — has helped these women find new jobs to support themselves and their families. In Florida, thanks to this program, more than 70% of women receiving voc-ed funds found new jobs, at pay levels averaging twice their prior salaries (National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education 1995).”

These increases in white women graduating college then entering into higher paying fields formerly dominated by men increased the earnings of white women. Since white men were already disproportionately represented in high paying positions, as white women married those men, their earnings combined with his further increased white wealth. White women have been the number one beneficiary of Affirmative Action. At the same time, white women have been the fiercest in opposition to the policy.

The numbers I presented show that 1.4 percent of the United States population are whites who commit crimes and 0.005 percent of the U.S population are black and commit crimes. You are trying to make a claim based on per capita, not the actual nubers of participants in crime. Hence you are the one who can't interpret numbers. You want so desperately to cling to your racist be;ief. Blacks do not commit 50 percent more crime. And since blacks, ad asias live in the UUK and I did not say anything about race, once again you showed your idiocy by whining about what I said in the last sentence. Funny how I have never said things like that to Tommy Tainant and he lives in the UK. You really don't know wtf you're talking about, stfu.

Sally Kohn, Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone, Time, JUNE 17, 2013, Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone.

Fact Sheet: Affirmative Action and What It Means for Women, July 1, 2000, The National Womens Law Center, Affirmative Action and What It Means for Women | NWLC

Tim Wise, Is Sisterhood Conditional?: White Women and the Rollback of Affirmative Action, September 23, 1998, Is Sisterhood Conditional?: White Women and the Rollback of Affirmative Action

Except, none of that actually helped.
It's actually contributed to the destruction of the family unit and left us with an overwhelming surplus of thots, feral children, and bitter cat ladies.

It sure as hell hasn't made women any happier.

 

[freyasman]

The claim has been consistently made that blacks are 13 percent of the population but commit 50 or more percent of the crime. That is inaccurate but the racists want to talk shit about per capita. When shown that per capita reveals that the difference between blacks and white per capita is 6 people, the racists continue. So because they do so, it is time to do the math.

We will use stats from the most recent uniform crime reports Table 43-Arrests by Race/Ethnicity

View attachment 498100
View attachment 498102

I will use 2019 population numbers.

The population of U.S. in 2019 was 329,064,917.

6,816,975 people were arrested for crimes. 6,816,975/329,064,917= 0.0207162011

2 percent of the American population participated in criminal activity.

4,729,290 were white. 4,729,290/329,064,917= 0.0143719058

1.4 percent of the U.S population were whites who participated in crime.

1,815,144 were black. 1,815,144/329,064,917=0.00551606661

Just over 1/2 of 1 percent of the U.S population were blacks who participated in crime.

Whites participated in more than double the crime as blacks.

Table 43

ucr.fbi.gov

Here endeth the lesson.

If rightwing Republican racists didn't lie, they'd have NOTHING to say!

Your problem is that about this, they don't have to lie, do they?

That's the part that pisses you off.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

My math is correct. You just can't face the truth.

Tell me the truth about per capita rates.

How about you face the truth about the real numbers of actual participants.

The actual number of black perps is much higher, in proportion to their population, than the actual number of white perps in proportion to their population.

Do I need to post the definition of proportion for you?

Is it a white word?

 

[freyasman]

Lots of ways to lie with statistics.

.

But the statistics aren't lying, just the people using them incorrectly.

.​

"Figures may not lie, but liars can figure."

 

[freyasman]

If IM2 had a lick of sense ...

LOLOL!!! That's funny.

Okay, this has been fun, but my hot Puerto Rican girlfriend and I are going to New Orleans until Saturday. I'm going to spread my white privilege all along the Gulf coast for all to see.

You guys keep IM2 in check...

Bring some beignets from Cafe Du Monde back with you.

 

[freyasman]

Another thing you've got to ask yourselves too is that the small drops of Latino, Asian, Eskimo, Native American folk, combined make up a total % of the population similar to that of the total black population but for the similar % of them when added together, the black still commit considerably more crime than them combined too.

The creator of the thread has had an absolute nightmare.

No only you racist have because no matter how much you try twisting this, it proves my point.

Can you explain how it proves your point, please.

This I've gotta hear.

Another thing you've got to ask yourselves too is that the small drops of Latino, Asian, Eskimo, Native American folk, combined make up a total % of the population similar to that of the total black population but for the similar % of them when added together, the black still commit considerably more crime than them combined too.

The creator of the thread has had an absolute nightmare.

No only you racist have because no matter how much you try twisting this, it proves my point.

Can you explain how it proves your point, please.

This I've gotta hear.

Ok, let me explain this again using Black Sands "applied math."

According to BlackSand, for every 100 blacks/whites, 4.6 blacks are committing crimes and 2.8 whites are. This means that for every 100 blacks, 95 blacks are not committing crimes and 97 whites are not committing crimes. So the claim of this high black crime rate is non existent. Hence BlackSand provrs my point.

And let's not get stupid. Whites like you guys want to multiply things by 5 instead of looking at the fact you have a problem. But if you multiply things by 5 to make the populations the same, there are things that no longer exist for blacks. We would have more economic opportunity. We would have equal representation relative to numbers of police, lawyers, judges, and political representatives. Things would be dramatically different. Yet those like you and others here fail to understand this. No matter what, you continue arguing this ridiculous per capita idiocy.

Since whites have 5 times the population and want to make that an issue, let’s start multiplying by 5. Blacks have over 2 million businesses right now, let’s multiply that by 5 and then see what the outcome will be. Now there are 10 million black owned businesses and more jobs in the black community. Let us reduce our unemployment rate by 5 to 2.6 percent. Blacks live at a 24 percent rate of poverty so reduce that by 5 to make it 4.5 percent..

The black economy now grows to 6.5 trillion instead of the 1.3 trillion we have now. Blacks now have 5 times the amount of money to spend and invest. What happens them? All kinds of community development, that is what. Now property values increase in the black community and because of that we have more money for our schools. Let us multiply the number of blacks who go to college by 5, there are now 8.5 million blacks in college or getting vocational training. That equals approximately 1 out of every 5 black citizen receiving post-secondary training. This results in a more highly trained and qualified black workforce which increases employment. So this increase in population and jobs lowers the unemployment rate meaning fewer blacks are on government assistance because they have stable employment. Youth crime is reduced even further because youth now have facilities and jobs available in their immediate communities. What happens to crime? It reduces itself by 5 from 26 percent to 5.2 percent. Why? because the factors that create crime are reduced, so then crime is reduced. Yet to the racist nothing else changes. The only change is crime increases. The use of per capita fails miserably and is used by racist whites to deny a severe crime problem THEY need to address instead of trying to preach to us. For if we apply per capita like you racists do, when a white person has 5 dollars and I have 1, it is the same amount.

That post is pure aids and gave my eyes cancer - even skim reading it.

Your logic falls down everywhere on it's first point when you try to say 95 blacks in every 100 aren't committing crime & 97 whites in every 100 aren't committing crime because you are taking the small value of 5 and 3 in the first instance per 100 folk, but ignoring the fact that them 3 of a difference is multiplied literally hundreds of millions of times when you take the whole population of the USA into account and it gives you a vast metric and the true picture.

The rest of your comment has zero to do with anything (i.e economy, money to invest, communities, jobs etc) because that's a conspiracy that the race baiters wheel out to try and prove systemic racism exists where it doesn't.

There's nothing stopping black people making something of themselves - they have even more opportunities than your average white person does in the USA at the moment with affirmative action schemes, special programes, diversity quotas, special scholarships that exclude white kids from similarly poor backgrounds etc.

For people like you the need and demand for racism outstrips the amount of tangible racism that there actually is.

You want desperately to believe your narrative, but then when we see the real numbers it shows that whites commit far more crime. Now that is the reality. I base my argument on the real total number of actual criminals. Your ppst is just a load of white racist crap you refuse to give up. Everything I said was correct. You believe a bunch of lies and try arguing those lies against the truth. Whites still today get the mot given to them. Whites have benefitted the most from Affirmative Action, all those special things do not exist. Diversity quitas? Ha! If they actually existed whites would still get the majority of things. You really don't know what the fuck you are talking about. You live in the UK, go get a cup of tea, some fish and chips then shut the fuck up.

IM2 No one here is ever going to be able to clown you as thoroughly as you clown yourself.


Congratulations.

Take a bow.


View attachment 498439

Off topic trolling is not clowning. Neither is per capita the total number of people who were reported by police to be participants in criminal behavior.

Yeah, just like that......






Nobody ever makes you look as much of a fool as you do yourself, guy.

 

[freyasman]

My math is correct. You just can't face the truth.

Tell me the truth about per capita rates.

How about you face the truth about the real numbers of actual participants.

The actual number of black perps is much higher, in proportion to their population, than the actual number of white perps in proportion to their population.

Do I need to post the definition of proportion for you?

Is it a white word?

When you take into account the fact that the vast majority of blacks aren't committing violent crime, just a small percentage of mostly bangers, and druggies, the numbers get even more outrageous....... it's not 13% of the population doing all the murdering and robbing, it's actually more like 5%, maybe?

Think about that for a minute...... just a very few people are responsible for damn near all the violent crime in this country.

That shit is crazy.

 

[BlackSand]

You have been shown the actual numbers of people arrested for crimes in America by race. Not some estimate per 100, 1,000 or 100,000. The actual numbers. What the numbers shows is that 2 percent of all Americans participate in crime. 2 percent. 1.4 percent of the American population committing crimes according to the actual numbers are white. 0.0055 percent of the American population committing crime are black. Not 70 percent and not 13 percent.

Now these numbers show several things. 1. America is a low crime country. 2. There is no race of people in this country with astronomically high rates of crimes. 3. How we ignore the real damage that happens to people due to white collar crimes and white collar crimes destroy entire families maybe even moreso than murder.

When a white stockbroker runs a scame he gets rich from that cleans out the wealth accumulations of entire families, nobody talks about that and perhaps we need to do so.

.

It doesn't matter if the crooked stock broker is White or Black, the crime is the same ...

.​

 

[Paul Essien]

Don't even take notice of Canon Shooter he's a joke

 

[BlackSand]

Since WHITES have used rave to define this society, don't dodge the issue by now pretending. Race suddenly becomes unimportant to whites when whites are shown they are the ones with thr problem. That's why you suggested I read people like Thomas Sowell but you don't tell whites to look at anything. You only make these statements when blacks point out the larger problems whites have or that they created. I do not see you in ANY thread by whites saying these same things.

.

Whatever problems Black and Whites have are Our Problems.
I am not ever going to post what you want me to, because what you want is fucked up and covered in the stench of racial division.

.​

 

[Godboy]

The claim has been consistently made that blacks are 13 percent of the population but commit 50 or more percent of the crime. That is inaccurate but the racists want to talk shit about per capita. When shown that per capita reveals that the difference between blacks and white per capita is 6 people, the racists continue. So because they do so, it is time to do the math.

We will use stats from the most recent uniform crime reports Table 43-Arrests by Race/Ethnicity

View attachment 498100
View attachment 498102

I will use 2019 population numbers.

The population of U.S. in 2019 was 329,064,917.

6,816,975 people were arrested for crimes. 6,816,975/329,064,917= 0.0207162011

2 percent of the American population participated in criminal activity.

4,729,290 were white. 4,729,290/329,064,917= 0.0143719058

1.4 percent of the U.S population were whites who participated in crime.

1,815,144 were black. 1,815,144/329,064,917=0.00551606661

Just over 1/2 of 1 percent of the U.S population were blacks who participated in crime.

Whites participated in more than double the crime as blacks.

Table 43

ucr.fbi.gov

Here endeth the lesson.

VIOLENT crime, moron. No one cares if their neighbor cheated on his taxes. Violent crimes are the crimes that really matter.

 

[freyasman]

Since WHITES have used rave to define this society, don't dodge the issue by now pretending. Race suddenly becomes unimportant to whites when whites are shown they are the ones with thr problem. That's why you suggested I read people like Thomas Sowell but you don't tell whites to look at anything. You only make these statements when blacks point out the larger problems whites have or that they created. I do not see you in ANY thread by whites saying these same things.

.

Whatever problems Black and Whites have are Our Problems.
I am not ever going to post what you want me to, because what you want is fucked up and covered in the stench of racial division.

.​

Well, he's a racist and a black supremacist...... what do you expect?

 

[BlackSand]

Well, he's a racist and a black supremacist...... what do you expect?

.

A better description would be ... Incorrigible.
I don't care what race he is.

.​

 

[Paul Essien]

The claim has been consistently made that blacks are 13 percent of the population but commit 50 or more percent of the crime. That is inaccurate but the racists want to talk shit about per capita. When shown that per capita reveals that the difference between blacks and white per capita is 6 people, the racists continue. So because they do so, it is time to do the math.

We will use stats from the most recent uniform crime reports Table 43-Arrests by Race/Ethnicity

View attachment 498100
View attachment 498102

I will use 2019 population numbers.

The population of U.S. in 2019 was 329,064,917.

6,816,975 people were arrested for crimes. 6,816,975/329,064,917= 0.0207162011

2 percent of the American population participated in criminal activity.

4,729,290 were white. 4,729,290/329,064,917= 0.0143719058

1.4 percent of the U.S population were whites who participated in crime.

1,815,144 were black. 1,815,144/329,064,917=0.00551606661

Just over 1/2 of 1 percent of the U.S population were blacks who participated in crime.

Whites participated in more than double the crime as blacks.

Table 43

ucr.fbi.gov

Here endeth the lesson.

VIOLENT crime, moron. No one cares if their neighbor cheated on his taxes. Violent crimes are the crimes that really matter.

And white people are the most violent ppl on earth.

 

[freyasman]

The claim has been consistently made that blacks are 13 percent of the population but commit 50 or more percent of the crime. That is inaccurate but the racists want to talk shit about per capita. When shown that per capita reveals that the difference between blacks and white per capita is 6 people, the racists continue. So because they do so, it is time to do the math.

We will use stats from the most recent uniform crime reports Table 43-Arrests by Race/Ethnicity

View attachment 498100
View attachment 498102

I will use 2019 population numbers.

The population of U.S. in 2019 was 329,064,917.

6,816,975 people were arrested for crimes. 6,816,975/329,064,917= 0.0207162011

2 percent of the American population participated in criminal activity.

4,729,290 were white. 4,729,290/329,064,917= 0.0143719058

1.4 percent of the U.S population were whites who participated in crime.

1,815,144 were black. 1,815,144/329,064,917=0.00551606661

Just over 1/2 of 1 percent of the U.S population were blacks who participated in crime.

Whites participated in more than double the crime as blacks.

Table 43

ucr.fbi.gov

Here endeth the lesson.

VIOLENT crime, moron. No one cares if their neighbor cheated on his taxes. Violent crimes are the crimes that really matter.

And white people are the most violent ppl on earth.

No, that's actually not true.
We are the absolute best at it, but we don't engage in nearly as much of it as others.

It's just that we cause a shitload more casualties than any others do, when we finally do decide to get down.

 

[Paul Essien]

freyasman
No, that's actually not true. We are the absolute best at it, but we don't engage in nearly as much of it as others. It's just that we cause a shitload more casualties than any others do, when we finally do decide to get down.

So we agree then ? If white ppl are the best at being violent (as you just said) that means they are the most violent.

 

[freyasman]

freyasman
No, that's actually not true. We are the absolute best at it, but we don't engage in nearly as much of it as others. It's just that we cause a shitload more casualties than any others do, when we finally do decide to get down.

So we agree then ? If white ppl are the best at being violent (as you just said) that means they are the most violent.

No.
If you slap someone every day, then you're extremely violent, you just aren't any good at it.

If I only engage in one violent act all year, then I'm less violent than you, even if I leave bodies laying bleeding in the street that day.

You're confusing effectiveness with propensity.