Care4all
Warrior Princess
- Mar 24, 2007
- 73,878
- 28,798
in massachusetts, no id was required at all....what was required was filling out a postcard they sent registered voters, verifying they still lived at the address they registered to vote under, or filling out their new address on this post card if they did move, and mailing it back to the State....postage was prepaid.You sir are full of shit..
Show me where in the O'Keefe propaganda video they ever got to signature verification. The video is a fraud. Just like everything else O'Keefe puts out
That isnt the point moron.
The voting precincts have x amount of time for verification. Often unable to meet the demand on time set by the legislature.
You dont have the know how, to defeat me here.
Since it wasnt sent for verification neither of us can prove the points with this ballot.
But your dumbass is trying.
Show me what exactly O'Keefe proved with his fraudulent video
Did he prove that signature verification doesn't work? No
Did he prove he could vote under someone elses name? No
Did he prove that photo ID works better? No
Other than prove that he could walk up to the desk and say his name was Eric Holder, what did he prove?
Then when you went to vote, the clerk first asked what Party you were registered under, what your name was, what street address you lived at, and they made you sign your name.....then you got to vote.
not ONE recorded CASE of voter fraud took place where someone else came in and used another person's name to vote at the voting precinct.