Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would you have to murder a guy in a car even if he had a gun?
Why not clear the area and bring in the negotiators?
Oh right, because he's a black guy.
Right wingers seem to think every black disabled father sitting in a car waiting for his son and taking his medicine is sitting there holding a gun and waiting for police to show up so he could shoot one.
In NC, it's OCEIB.
Open carry except if black.
The police confirmed that it was a gun and circled it in red, are they fools or you?it wasn't a gun fool.Exactly, the throw down gun was placed there afterwards! DUH!Maybe this will help.I watched the video and cant see a damn thing, please be specific and explain how it proves he didn't have a firearm. Just because she is saying he doesn't have one doesn't prove anything. And on the video you can not see anything.
Photo released by police claiming gun on ground.
Still from video right after shooting showing no throw down gun on the ground yet.
You do understand that the two are not photo'd at anywhere near the same time, right?
There's police tape in one, non in the other
Cops release photo of Keith Lamont Scott that shows gun nearby
Advocates demanding the release of police video showing the death of Keith Lamont Scott are firing back at Charlotte, N.C. police for releasing a photo of the slain 43-year-old black man.
The photo, taken by a witness just after the shooting, shows two police officers hovering over Scott as he lies facedown on the ground. An apparent firearm — which police circled in red — is lying inches from his feet, which supports the police account that Scott was armed when he was shot.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg police chief Kerr Putney released the photo while refusing to make dashcam video of the shooting public, saying Thursday that "transparency is in the eye of the beholder."
Why would you have to murder a guy in a car even if he had a gun?
Why not clear the area and bring in the negotiators?
Oh right, because he's a black guy.
So you are saying that the Black Officer killed the black guy in the automobile because he was black!?!
Right wingers seem to think every black disabled father sitting in a car waiting for his son and taking his medicine is sitting there holding a gun and waiting for police to show up so he could shoot one.
In NC, it's OCEIB.
Open carry except if black.
Why would you have to murder a guy in a car even if he had a gun?
Why not clear the area and bring in the negotiators?
Oh right, because he's a black guy.
So you are saying that the Black Officer killed the black guy in the automobile because he was black!?!
Right wingers seem to think every black disabled father sitting in a car waiting for his son and taking his medicine is sitting there holding a gun and waiting for police to show up so he could shoot one.
In NC, it's OCEIB.
Open carry except if black.
I would like you to obtain a firearm and sit in your automobile and when a officer come up to you I want you to point it at them and claim it is your right to open carry while pointing your firearm and see how many damn bullets fill your idiotic corpse!
Open Carry or Conceal Carry does not give you the right to pull it can point, well except in some Progressive Liberal way of thinking!
Right wingers seem to think every black disabled father sitting in a car waiting for his son and taking his medicine is sitting there holding a gun and waiting for police to show up so he could shoot one.
In NC, it's OCEIB.
Open carry except if black.
I would like you to obtain a firearm and sit in your automobile and when a officer come up to you I want you to point it at them and claim it is your right to open carry while pointing your firearm and see how many damn bullets fill your idiotic corpse!
Open Carry or Conceal Carry does not give you the right to pull it can point, well except in some Progressive Liberal way of thinking!
Were you there?
Why would you have to murder a guy in a car even if he had a gun?
Why not clear the area and bring in the negotiators?
Oh right, because he's a black guy.
So you are saying that the Black Officer killed the black guy in the automobile because he was black!?!
Have you seen the statistics for Black on Black crime?
Just sayin
If the photo meant absolutely nothing the police would not have circled the gun and then released the photo to the public. It obviously meant something to the police!!!!The police confirmed that it was a gun and circled it in red, are they fools or you?it wasn't a gun fool.Exactly, the throw down gun was placed there afterwards! DUH!Maybe this will help.
Photo released by police claiming gun on ground.
Still from video right after shooting showing no throw down gun on the ground yet.
You do understand that the two are not photo'd at anywhere near the same time, right?
There's police tape in one, non in the other
Cops release photo of Keith Lamont Scott that shows gun nearby
Advocates demanding the release of police video showing the death of Keith Lamont Scott are firing back at Charlotte, N.C. police for releasing a photo of the slain 43-year-old black man.
The photo, taken by a witness just after the shooting, shows two police officers hovering over Scott as he lies facedown on the ground. An apparent firearm — which police circled in red — is lying inches from his feet, which supports the police account that Scott was armed when he was shot.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg police chief Kerr Putney released the photo while refusing to make dashcam video of the shooting public, saying Thursday that "transparency is in the eye of the beholder."
Ok, we went from moments after, to just after.
Now, when did the crime scene tape go up? Until you know that, AND CAN ANSWER THAT, the photo means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
Why would you have to murder a guy in a car even if he had a gun?
Why not clear the area and bring in the negotiators?
Oh right, because he's a black guy.
So you are saying that the Black Officer killed the black guy in the automobile because he was black!?!
Yes. You can be racist against your own race.
Right wingers seem to think every black disabled father sitting in a car waiting for his son and taking his medicine is sitting there holding a gun and waiting for police to show up so he could shoot one.
In NC, it's OCEIB.
Open carry except if black.
I would like you to obtain a firearm and sit in your automobile and when a officer come up to you I want you to point it at them and claim it is your right to open carry while pointing your firearm and see how many damn bullets fill your idiotic corpse!
Open Carry or Conceal Carry does not give you the right to pull it can point, well except in some Progressive Liberal way of thinking!
Were you there?
You gotta just love the opportunalism of the racist Right, if they can't justify the murder of a black man by the police, they pounce on the opportunity to blame the "government."So now you claim the government shoots innocents and fabricates evidence against innocents while at the same time you say the government needs to be bigger and more powerful.Since they didn't release it until after the police finally showed them their video that took them days to edit, she didn't tell them she had a video to see whether they would alter their videos thinking they were safe to edit them.Sure they did, they had the video all this time and only now released it, sure thing. The family has been lying since this started.
Or they waited to release it to use as leverage on the advice of their counsel.
The police will have no choice but to release their own now.
You're stuck on stupid.
If the photo meant absolutely nothing the police would not have circled the gun and then released the photo to the public. It obviously meant something to the police!!!!The police confirmed that it was a gun and circled it in red, are they fools or you?it wasn't a gun fool.Exactly, the throw down gun was placed there afterwards! DUH!You do understand that the two are not photo'd at anywhere near the same time, right?
There's police tape in one, non in the other
Cops release photo of Keith Lamont Scott that shows gun nearby
Advocates demanding the release of police video showing the death of Keith Lamont Scott are firing back at Charlotte, N.C. police for releasing a photo of the slain 43-year-old black man.
The photo, taken by a witness just after the shooting, shows two police officers hovering over Scott as he lies facedown on the ground. An apparent firearm — which police circled in red — is lying inches from his feet, which supports the police account that Scott was armed when he was shot.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg police chief Kerr Putney released the photo while refusing to make dashcam video of the shooting public, saying Thursday that "transparency is in the eye of the beholder."
Ok, we went from moments after, to just after.
Now, when did the crime scene tape go up? Until you know that, AND CAN ANSWER THAT, the photo means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
well again, here's the evidence they're gloves, one in the air that was tossed between 2:11 and 2:12 of the video.But how does that explain the photo the POLICE released where the POLICE circled the GUN in red???it's because they are gloves on the ground and I explained the times you can see them tossed to the ground. my word are you a loser.Still from video is not "crappy" at all and shows no gun, but it is interesting how the "gun" gets closer to the body as the cop in white shoes gets closer to the body.
And then there is the photo the cops released where they circled the gun in yet a different location. There is no gun in any of the three positions in the still from the video.
Your photos
Police photo
Still from video
Cops release photo of Keith Lamont Scott that shows gun nearby
Advocates demanding the release of police video showing the death of Keith Lamont Scott are firing back at Charlotte, N.C. police for releasing a photo of the slain 43-year-old black man.
The photo, taken by a witness just after the shooting, shows two police officers hovering over Scott as he lies facedown on the ground. An apparent firearm — which police circled in red — is lying inches from his feet, which supports the police account that Scott was armed when he was shot.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg police chief Kerr Putney released the photo while refusing to make dashcam video of the shooting public, saying Thursday that "transparency is in the eye of the beholder."
it doesn't even prove that is a gun.If the photo meant absolutely nothing the police would not have circled the gun and then released the photo to the public. It obviously meant something to the police!!!!The police confirmed that it was a gun and circled it in red, are they fools or you?it wasn't a gun fool.Exactly, the throw down gun was placed there afterwards! DUH!
Cops release photo of Keith Lamont Scott that shows gun nearby
Advocates demanding the release of police video showing the death of Keith Lamont Scott are firing back at Charlotte, N.C. police for releasing a photo of the slain 43-year-old black man.
The photo, taken by a witness just after the shooting, shows two police officers hovering over Scott as he lies facedown on the ground. An apparent firearm — which police circled in red — is lying inches from his feet, which supports the police account that Scott was armed when he was shot.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg police chief Kerr Putney released the photo while refusing to make dashcam video of the shooting public, saying Thursday that "transparency is in the eye of the beholder."
Ok, we went from moments after, to just after.
Now, when did the crime scene tape go up? Until you know that, AND CAN ANSWER THAT, the photo means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
God you may be the dumbest poster on USMB.
Yes Einstein, the photo has value, BUT WITHOUT THE CONTEXT OF THE TIME IT WAS TAKEN, OR HOW LONG AFTER THE SHOOTING, IT PROVES NOTHING.
Why would you have to murder a guy in a car even if he had a gun?
Why not clear the area and bring in the negotiators?
Oh right, because he's a black guy.
Why would you have to murder a guy in a car even if he had a gun?
Why not clear the area and bring in the negotiators?
Oh right, because he's a black guy.
So you are saying that the Black Officer killed the black guy in the automobile because he was black!?!
Yes. You can be racist against your own race.
