On the cover of the Rolling Stone !..........

Well Wecause wackos believe they need to stay home and raised kids. This may be true for those that want this. What has strengthened America is those that choose careers over kids and staying home.
 
Well Wecause wackos believe they need to stay home and raised kids. This may be true for those that want this. What has strengthened America is those that choose careers over kids and staying home.
Women still innately want children. Nature.
Feminism denies this and contributes to western cultural demise.
Women can be career-oriented and mothers at the same time. Pretending that the two are mutually exclusive is part of the Marxist scheme. The RS cover promotes the Marxism.
 
Disagree. Women can decide for themselves. If they choose not to have kids and work it HELPS the nation. Less abortions and less dependency on govt handouts. You cannot have it both ways. Not having kids is COURAGEOUS if that is what THEY WISH.
 
Lower birthrates have nothing to do with the demise of anything. You want everyone working yet think they should have kids too? That's weak.
 
Disagree. Women can decide for themselves. If they choose not to have kids and work it HELPS the nation. Less abortions and less dependency on govt handouts. You cannot have it both ways. Not having kids is COURAGEOUS if that is what THEY WISH.
Not having children destroys the society. And the children aren’t exclusively women’s. Dads are as important. So parents decide if they have children, not just women. That disillusionment is part of marxist indoctrination.
 
Yes...dad's are important. But married couples NOT wanting kids have NO duty to have them...if they choose to focus on other things then IT HELPS the nation. No other way to look at it. NONE. It surely doesn't hurt society one bit. It's THEIR life, they owe nobody anything. Your viewpoint is archaic.
 
I agree with you on a young man and woman deciding NOT to have kids in no way whatsoever hurts the nation. That's stupidity to think it does. It's a choice that more and more young couples are making. It's responsible to make the decision together.
 
Any one of them could kick your ass and that`s what troubles you...and the fact that they all have measurable IQs. Do you know how to spell IQ? Did any of them lie 5,000 times last year or bend over for Putin and little Kim like your dream date Trump, little bitch? Have any of them had a crooked Foundation shut down or had to reimburse 4,000 people who were robbed at a bogus university? How many bankruptcies have they been involved in stupid ass? Are any of them so crooked that they need to hide their tax returns you pathetic little shit stain?

LOL. They’re all a bunch of worthless *****. Wastes of flesh and oxygen that don’t know their proper place in the world.

There’s an incredibly unpleasant spot in Hell reserved for all four of them, and their supporters.

they don't care what you think.
I think they're to stupid to think. Proof of their policies.

ahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..... did you vote for the dotard?
 
This is the 21st century. there are no more "women's role" or "men's role."...

...So in your mind, this is not the way it should be because it doesn't fit into your narrow little mold, right?

Right and Wrong don’t have expiration dates. Never have and hopefully never will.

In my mind thst is not a family which I would be, and my family would be allowed to be, socially interacting with on any level.

no worries, girly...you aren't the type that most thinking bipeds wanna interact with either.
 
Yes...dad's are important. But married couples NOT wanting kids have NO duty to have them...if they choose to focus on other things then IT HELPS the nation. No other way to look at it. NONE. It surely doesn't hurt society one bit. It's THEIR life, they owe nobody anything. Your viewpoint is archaic.
Your POV is archaic. You’re stuck in 1960’s think.
Women are different from men, kids need both parents and the society needs generational perpetuation in order to survive. Women can be career-driven and mothers. The suggestion that both conditions can’t coexist is Marxist indoctrination.
 
Well if they don't believe they can handle both there is nothing wrong with that. If they choose to focus on their careers the nation wins.
 

Forum List

Back
Top