Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People asking for permission to murder aren't real trustworthy. He worked really hard to cultivate that kind of hateful murderous following. You can't blame it on anyone else but him.
Yet none of the canceled venues said ANTIFA threatened their staff in any way. Something like would have at least generated a police report, yet you have nothing like that to back up your silly claim. His attendees want to kill people. They didn't want to supply a venue for that.They referenced the safety of their staff. Please show me where the people wanting to attend the talk threatened the host sites.
Are you denying anti-fa tries to stop gatherings/speeches by political opponents?
So where is the report where they shut down any one of the 5 canceled venues?Sorry, but that doesn't fly. Anti-fa is on record threatening other conservative speakers and venues.
Just one example.
Antifa Fascists Violently Shut Down Free Speech Rally in San Francisco
ANY speech not pre-approved by Democrats is racist incitement.Another conservative speaking event being cancelled by promises of violent protest getting venues to back out from hosting contracts.
Charlie Kirk’s Message of Non-Violence Greeted by ANTIFA Threats, Oregon TPUSA Event Cancelled
Your Leftist cohorts need to hear this even more so!We don't need liars like this spreading lies...
Which is what we keep asking you Leftists about your propaganda and myths.Why tell lies in the first place?
Yet none of the canceled venues said ANTIFA threatened their staff in any way. Something like would have at least generated a police report, yet you have nothing like that to back up your silly claim. His attendees want to kill people. They didn't want to supply a venue for that.
Then maybe it was not Antifa. That certainly does not help your case if you think random people called and made threats because he was speaking there.Yet none of the canceled venues said ANTIFA threatened their staff in any way. Something like would have at least generated a police report, yet you have nothing like that to back up your silly claim. His attendees want to kill people. They didn't want to supply a venue for that.
Pretty much fits the loonie Left's four year plus rant that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election from SHillary.A falsehood is a falsehood without evidence in this world. Speculating fraud when their is none is a lie not a falsehood.
I'm just asking you to support the claim. Seems you haven't been able to do that yet.This is funny from someone who is on record supporting Anti-fa in disrupting anything they disagree with.
Can't have it both ways, you wanna be revolutionary.
Without any indications otherwise, your blaming ANTIFA for the cancellations is just blind conjecture. If they had received threatening phone calls, don't you think there would be at least one police report?Then maybe it was not Antifa. That certainly does not help your case if you think random people called and made threats because he was speaking there.
The idea that the venues were afraid of the people that wanted to attend is asinine. You need a lot more than bland conjecture to make that claim.
I'm just asking you to support the claim. Seems you haven't been able to do that yet.
Without any indications otherwise, your blaming ANTIFA for the cancellations is just blind conjecture. If they had received threatening phone calls, don't you think there would be at least one police report?
You'll have to ask them. Otherwise, you're just making shit up. It's a crazy right winger claim. Not my job to prove it for you.How would I have access to over the phone or emailed threats to the venues?
Why would the venues book this guy, 5 of them, then change their mind?
My version and kirk's version, Anti-fa threatened them, makes far more sense than your version that the venues think the speakers supporters will get violent. They know who he is when they signed a contract, why would all 5 not just reject hosting him?
Another example of you just making shit up, unless you can show a link where I said either of those things.Not if they just caved in and cancelled.
Bulldog:-I SUPPORT ANTIFA THREATENING CONSERVATIVES
Bulldog: ANTIFA DOESN"T THREATEN CONSERVATIVES
Good example of doublethink.
Actually a civil trial is a preponderance of the evidence, but only IF they go on the merits. Weren't most of these cases dismissed out of hand or for jurisdictional issues?
How many actually went in front of juries?
Pretty much fits the loonie Left's four year plus rant that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election from SHillary.
You'll have to ask them. Otherwise, you're just making shit up. It's a crazy right winger claim. Not my job to prove it for you.
Another example of you just making shit up, unless you can show a link where I said either of those things.
Judges make the decisions on evidence.
Litigation in the 2020 Election
This resource tracks litigation surrounding election administration in the 2020 election, an unprecedented election in which numerous changes were made to the voting process in response to the Coronavirus pandemic.www.americanbar.org
Arizona
"The allegations included fabricated ballots and fraudulent use of the election system’s hardware. The plaintiffs also sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent the governor from transmitting the certified election results to the Electoral College. The U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss the case, concluding that the court could not decertify the election results in the state and that accusations of election fraud “that find favor in the public sphere of gossip and innuendo cannot be a substitute for earnest pleadings and procedure in federal court.”
