Lord-Humungus
Diamond Member
- Aug 29, 2023
- 3,988
- 3,736
- 1,908
- Thread starter
- #281
As opposed to you saying it was because the university reviewed her speechSecurity concerns relating to what exactly? You don't know, you're making an ASSumption.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As opposed to you saying it was because the university reviewed her speechSecurity concerns relating to what exactly? You don't know, you're making an ASSumption.
there might be----there should be an accounting for each fatality and execution for the murderers. ALSO complete maps of the tunnels andThere are no hostages alive.
why do you doubt that the speech was reviewed--as far as I know--THAT IS STANDARD PRACTICEAs opposed to you saying it was because the university reviewed her speech
Oh, then she should have no problem saying she doesn't want Israel wiped off the map and destroyed.
I’m not saying it was not reviewed. I am saying there is no proof her speech has anything to do with why she is not being allowed to speak.there might be----there should be an accounting for each fatality and execution for the murderers. ALSO complete maps of the tunnels and
why do you doubt that the speech was reviewed--as far as I know--THAT IS STANDARD PRACTICE
I’m not saying it was not reviewed. I am saying there is no proof her speech has anything to do with why she is not being allowed to speak.
You have made that claim a few time and haven’t backed it up with any evidence.Based on her social media hate speech, the school made a decision to not let her disseminate more of it on campus.
It was a good call.
You have made that claim a few time and haven’t backed it up with any evidence.
No you just keep doubling down claiming you saw something on social media that was not there.Yes I have, you just ignored it, because your Jew-hate makes you blind.
No you just keep doubling down claiming you saw something on social media that was not there.
Repeating your lie doesn’t make it trueExcept it is there, and I provided a link.
You ignored it, because you hate Jews.
oh----right----it might be an issue of confidentiality---someone could ask her but-----she seems aggrievedI’m not saying it was not reviewed. I am saying there is no proof her speech has anything to do with why she is not being allowed to speak.
I understand what you’re saying. I just don’t believe you can prove that happened. You’re making assumptions. If you read that somewhere, then post the link. I listened to an interview with this girl who said that the school had no idea what she was going to say. So if that’s true, you’re either listening to fake news or spreading it yourselfThey stopped her from making the speech. Actually all school speeches are reviewed for content. They read the speech, considered it in light of her media posts and pulled her appearance.
Why is this so hard to understand?
They are dead too.Six Americans among them, and the Biden regime doesn't give two shits about them.
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you didn't read my post #260 where I made it crystal clear that I don't hate ANY entire group of people because of religion, race or nationality. Hating people goes against what I believe.
If you DID see my post, then you are just plain dishonest and you use slimy tactics (slander and personal attacks) in lieu of an actual argument.
As opposed to you saying it was because the university reviewed her speech
I’m not saying it was not reviewed. I am saying there is no proof her speech has anything to do with why she is not being allowed to speak.
ApparentlyExcept she does.