Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How are you going to collect that funding, strongly worded notes?
The same way NGOs collect money. They collect funding from financial backers, corporate partners, and small donors.
Obviously you misinterpret how our system works, oh well.........We do not have a system of "taxation without consent". Your argument is built on a false premise, and thus collapses.
We absolutely due have a system of taxation without consent. Your contention is built on a false assertion, and thus collapses.
*eagerly awaits run off into the woods argument*
what about o-care?Nope. We vote for and against tax increases every election. ln fact, there is a tax increase measure on my state's ballot for this election, and our state's TV breaks are flooded with For and Against ads.We do not have a system of "taxation without consent". Your argument is built on a false premise, and thus collapses.
We absolutely due have a system of taxation without consent.
Try again, kid.
Yep. I've said it a hundred times if I have said it once. If you want to know who is to blame for the massive debt, look in the mirror.We do not have a system of "taxation without consent". Your argument is built on a false premise, and thus collapses.
We absolutely due have a system of taxation without consent. Your contention is built on a false assertion, and thus collapses.
*eagerly awaits run off into the woods argument*
Problem is americans want all the stuff they don't want to pay for.
And Mexico will pay for the wall.
So your remedy is to trade govt overlords for corporate overlords.
Pass.
What about it?what about o-care?Nope. We vote for and against tax increases every election. ln fact, there is a tax increase measure on my state's ballot for this election, and our state's TV breaks are flooded with For and Against ads.We do not have a system of "taxation without consent". Your argument is built on a false premise, and thus collapses.
We absolutely due have a system of taxation without consent.
Try again, kid.
If you did your argument would be different. Oh well.Obviously you misinterpret how our system works, oh well.........
On the contrary, I understand it perfectly.
We do not have a system of "taxation without consent". Your argument is built on a false premise, and thus collapses.
We absolutely due have a system of taxation without consent. Your contention is built on a false assertion, and thus collapses.
*eagerly awaits run off into the woods argument*
Problem is americans want all the stuff they don't want to pay for.
Problem is americans want all the stuff they don't want to pay for.
They do not want to be held accountable for a free and self sufficient society, so these sell outs enable the ruling class and the machine state.
We do not have a system of "taxation without consent". Your argument is built on a false premise, and thus collapses.
We absolutely due have a system of taxation without consent. Your contention is built on a false assertion, and thus collapses.
*eagerly awaits run off into the woods argument*
Problem is americans want all the stuff they don't want to pay for.
Yes. The Democrats solution is you don't have to pay for it, tax the rich. Problem is they're spending so much at this point you could take all the money from the rich at this point and it wouldn't cover it
We do not have a system of "taxation without consent". Your argument is built on a false premise, and thus collapses.
We absolutely due have a system of taxation without consent. Your contention is built on a false assertion, and thus collapses.
*eagerly awaits run off into the woods argument*
Problem is americans want all the stuff they don't want to pay for.
Yes. The Democrats solution is you don't have to pay for it, tax the rich. Problem is they're spending so much at this point you could take all the money from the rich at this point and it wouldn't cover it
Sure, partisanshit will make this all go away.
They didn't sell it as a tax. Do you remember the infamous line "this is not a tax?"What about it?what about o-care?Nope. We vote for and against tax increases every election. ln fact, there is a tax increase measure on my state's ballot for this election, and our state's TV breaks are flooded with For and Against ads.We do not have a system of "taxation without consent". Your argument is built on a false premise, and thus collapses.
We absolutely due have a system of taxation without consent.
Try again, kid.
Obama and the Democrats told us they would enact it if elected. They put a plan on the table.
The American people consented to it.
And they can always repeal it if they don't like it.
Look, I agree with all the the-public-needs-to-resist-and-withhold-consent business, but power always does whatever it can, and the amiercan public has participated in it's own situation. And as long as the unsubstantial people think change is going to come without them having to change anything they're doing personally, here we shall squat forever.
I don't see Cliven Bundy as the model for anything.
Look, I agree with all the the-public-needs-to-resist-and-withhold-consent business, but power always does whatever it can, and the amiercan public has participated in it's own situation. And as long as the unsubstantial people think change is going to come without them having to change anything they're doing personally, here we shall squat forever.
I don't see Cliven Bundy as the model for anything.
That is so moronic.
Rather than redefining who has the power, you are supporting complacency and the same endless game of lobbying the powers that be.
If you did your argument would be different. Oh well.
No arguments. Just worthless and unsubstantiated criticism.
Back up what you are asserting.
