Once again, spending is way down under a Democratic President

[Londoner]

 

[Londoner]

Do you know how long it took for people to realize the Reagan more than doubled Carter's spending?

Obama has spent less than Bush, and his deficits are smaller.

FOX News is raising a generation of Republicans on propaganda. .

 

[Darkwind]

This misleading shit is still out there?

Figures. Anything to take the pressure off of IRS-gate, Benghazi-gate and AP-gate, right?

BTW....Do you know how long it took for liberals to realize how badly Carter gutted the military and left us practically defenseless? Gee...I wonder where that spending came from to return us to a Superpower status?

 

[Lakhota]

Once again, spending is way down under a Democratic President

True, but Republicans really don't care about the deficit/debt. They can't wait to get back in office and make it even worse than Reagan and Dubya.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Stupid people keep posting the same stupid lies.

 

[Erand7899]

Do you know how long it took for people to realize the Reagan more than doubled Carter's spending?

Obama has spent less than Bush, and his deficits are smaller.

FOX News is raising a generation of Republicans on propaganda. .

I don't recall Bush having more than one $trillion deficit, and most of that TARP money was paid back to the government. Nor, do I recall Bush spending $7 trillion in less than five years. Bush doubled the debt, and Obama is on line to double it again. Maybe you need a refresher course in basic math.

By the end of his second term, Obama will have added to the debt more than all previous presidents combined. Put that in your propaganda pipe and try to smoke it.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

This chart was debunked a year ago.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Obama has spent less than Bush, and his deficits are smaller.

That is false.

 

[Lakhota]

Obama has spent less than Bush, and his deficits are smaller.

That is false.

No, it isn't.

How much NEW debt has Obama created that wasn't a direct or indirect result of Bush actions and policies?

 

[RKMBrown]

ROFL....

This is inflation adjusted. I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that Londoner is not a math guy.

 

[S.J.]

You don't really expect anybody to believe that bullshit, do you?

 

[Lakhota]

Bush was the big spender.

 

[Political Junky]

Once again, spending is way down under a Democratic President

True, but Republicans really don't care about the deficit/debt. They can't wait to get back in office and make it even worse than Reagan and Dubya.

Yes, and they'll blame their increasing debt on Obama. They've played the game for a very long time.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Obama has spent less than Bush, and his deficits are smaller.

That is false.

No, it isn't.

How much NEW debt has Obama created that wasn't a direct or indirect result of Bush actions and policies?

Every single penny of it that has been spent since May 2009 belongs to Obama.

 

[Meathead]

Of course he did. that's why we voted ourselves a magic negro.

 

[Lumpy 1]

You don't really expect anybody to believe that bullshit, do you?

If Democrats are told to believe it by their media and potentate, they believe it.

Freewill is the price of Democratic Party submission..

 

[Lakhota]

That is false.

No, it isn't.

How much NEW debt has Obama created that wasn't a direct or indirect result of Bush actions and policies?

Every single penny of it that has been spent since May 2009 belongs to Obama.

Why May? Is the fed fiscal year too complicated for you?

 

[Political Junky]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxBfOj_1ebY&feature=player_embedded]Hartmann: Has #OWS "blown up" the Republican Santa Claus theory? - YouTube[/ame]

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Obama has spent less than Bush, and his deficits are smaller.

That is false.

No, it isn't.

How much NEW debt has Obama created that wasn't a direct or indirect result of Bush actions and policies?

How about we do a little side by side comparison of government spending.

According to DPCC Democratic Policy and Communications Center

Initiations of U.S. combat operations March 19, 2003
Length of U.S. military mission 8 years, 9 months, 12 days
Total U.S. funding for the Iraq Operations $820 Billion ( CRS: 3/29/11 )

http://www.emersonkent.com/source_documents/iraq_war.htm

The Obama Stimulus Bill

The Congressional Budget Office now puts the ultimate price tag at $821 billion, $7 billion higher than its previous estimate, and well above the initial projection of $787 billion back when the package was passed in 2009.

Obama stimulus bill has new price tag

Hate to be the bearer of bad news Lakhota, but that's some pretty damning facts when you take into consideration the actual timelines involved.

 

[Lakhota]