Once again, spending is way down under a Democratic President

vq4g1k.jpg

Why do your "stats" have an * next to the Bush numbers, Londoner?

Oh, I see...it's to denote where they cooked the books? Too funny...

Can you not read?
 

You're posting propaganda that has already been discredited.

Just because you don't want to believe it, doesn't mean it's been discredited.
Just because you desperately want to believe it to be true, does not mean it is. This is old news, rehashed and debunked. If you don't care to believe the information that debunks it, then there is nothing more to be said.

However, I suggest you search the forum and read the ENTIRE threads that everyone had back then.
 
You're posting propaganda that has already been discredited.

Just because you don't want to believe it, doesn't mean it's been discredited.
Just because you desperately want to believe it to be true, does not mean it is. This is old news, rehashed and debunked. If you don't care to believe the information that debunks it, then there is nothing more to be said.

However, I suggest you search the forum and read the ENTIRE threads that everyone had back then.

Nothing has been debunked, no matter how many times you cry about it.
 
democrats:

gop is evil for not increasing spending and fighting obama, holding nation hostage

obama is a messiah for not increasing spending

:lol:
 
RDD you are making yourself look ignorant. All the chart shows is "acceleration." It makes the assumption that once a budget goes up it can't come down. It's stupid. Can't cut spending in a recession? Can't cut spending when revenues go down? Stupid, stupid, stupid chart. Worse it ignores congress. It pretends that the entire spending of the country is ascribable to the president. STUPID STUPID STUPID..
 
Last edited:
BTW,

Wasn't Obama and the Democrats just bitching that the Republican controlled House wasn't letting them spend enough?

if you take the libs seriously the GOP is dead

how can the GOP stop O'Bammy in that case?

:dunno:

They don't get that it's the GOP in Congress that slowed Obama's spending down since 2010. Any cut in spending should be attributed to the Republicans keeping him from getting his way on everything. I can't imagine what our debt would be right now if Congress was lead by the Democrats!
 
People are actually defending republicans on spending? Sorry but all politicians seem to spend too much. Bush was given a balanced budget and look what the republican did with it. At least democrats don't pretend they are for less spending. Repubs talk like they are for less then don't deliver. Clinton is most fiscally responsible president of my lifetime.
 

Not good enough!! Obama should do what no other Administration has ever done. That's spend ZERO dollars! Change we can believe in my ass! Money is money whether it's high as Regans or as low as Obamas.

All of it is the same, ITS ALL SPENDING!!!
 
I don't know where the above chart came from but the below data comes directly from the White House OMB.

It shows that the last 3 years of Obama (2010,2011,2012) a total of $3.680 TRILLION in deficits again from the White House!

$Screen Shot 2013-05-17 at 4.46.13 PM.png

Historical Tables | The White House
Federal receipts 2000
$2.025 trillion
Outlays
$1.788 trillion outlays
$0.236 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2001
$1.991 trillion
Outlays
$1.862 trillion outlays
$0.128 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2002
$1.853 trillion
Outlays
$2.010 trillion outlays
$0.157 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2003
$1.782 trillion
Outlays
$2.159 trillion outlays
$0.377 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2004
$1.880 trillion
Outlays
$2.292 trillion outlays
$0.412 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2005
$2.153 trillion
Outlays
$2.471 trillion outlays
$0.318 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2006
$2.406 trillion
Outlays
$2.655 trillion outlays
$0.248 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2007
$2.567 trillion
Outlays
$2.728 trillion outlays
$0.160 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2008
$2.523 trillion
Outlays
$2.982 trillion outlays
$0.458 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2009
$2.104 trillion
Outlays
$3.517 trillion outlays
$1.412 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2010
$2.162 trillion
Outlays
$3.457 trillion outlays
$1.294 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2011
$2.303 trillion
Outlays
$3.603 trillion outlays
$1.299 trillion deficit

Federal receipts 2012
$2.450 trillion
Outlays
$3.537 trillion outlays
$1.086 trillion deficit
 
Bush was the big spender.

Bullshit

Bush was definitely a big spender... he started out good but then after 9/11 it was all down hill. We knew this in TX btw. Bush is not a conservative. He's a RHINO always has been.

THAT IS A BULLSHIT asshole statement!!!

YOU Idiots that totally ignore THE GIGANTIC cataclysmic events that COST TAX REVENUE to the tune of nearly $100 billion a YEAR all because DUH!!!

I am ALWAYS going to post THE below DATA until dumb shits like you FINALLY ADMIT THAT THESE EVENTS HAPPENED!!!

DID THIS HAPPEN??

1) Dot.com bust cost $5 trillion in lost market value.. this means every year for 30 years now starting in 2000 the federal revenue is over $20 billion written off against taxes owed.
How many people LOST jobs due to the bust??
According to the Los Angeles Times, when the dot-com bubble burst, it wiped out $5 trillion dollars in market value for tech companies. More than half of the Internet companies created since 1995 were gone by 2004 -
and hundreds of thousands of skilled technology workers were out of jobs.
The dot-com bubble: How to lose $5 trillion ? Anderson Cooper 360 - CNN.com Blogs

DID THIS HAPPEN??
2) Did YOU forget that 9/11 occurred and it cost $2 trillion over the next 30 years again $8 billion will NOT BE PAiD.. was that Bush's fault?
Jobs lost in New York owing to the attacks: 146,100 JUST in New York!!
Year 2001: September 11 Terrorist Attacks
The 9/11 terrorist attacks were the events that helped shape other financial events of the decade. After that terrible day in September 2001, our economic climate was never to be the same again. It was only the third time in history that the New York Stock Exchange was shut down for a period of time. In this case, it was closed from September 10 - 17. Besides the tragic human loss of that day, the economic loss cannot even be estimated. Some estimate that there was over $60 billion in insurance losses alone.
Approximately 18,000 small businesses were either displaced or destroyed in Lower Manhattan after the Twin Towers fell. There was a buildup in homeland security on all levels. 9/11 caused a catastrophic financial loss for the U.S.
The Top 10 Financial Events of the Decade

DID THIS HAPPEN??
3) $1 trillion in written off losses due to the WORST Hurricane SEASONS in history!
The worst Katrina made landfall in Louisiana as a Category 3 in 2005. It took 1,836 lives and caused $81.2 billion in damages. Andrew slammed into South Florida in 1992 as a Category 5. It caused 40 deaths and $30 billion in property damage. More than 250,000 people were left homeless and 82,000 businesses were destroyed or damaged.
Hurricane Katrina ALONE! Year 2005: Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
On August 25, 2005, Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast of the U.S. as a strong Category 3 or low Category 4 storm. It quickly became the biggest natural disaster in U.S. history, almost destroying New Orleans due to severe flooding.

Hurricane Rita quickly followed Katrina only to make matters worse. Between the two, more than $200 billion in damage was done. 400,000 jobs were lost and 275,000 homes were destroyed. Many of the jobs and homes were never to be recovered. Hundreds of thousands of people were displaced and over 1,000 were killed and more are missing. The effect on oil and gasoline prices was long-lasting.

400,000 jobs due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita
145,000 jobs in NYC alone due to 9/11
300,000 jobs lost due to dot.com busts.

Almost 1 million jobs alone from those 3 events

DID THIS HAPPEN??
4) Economic terrorist attack 9/18/2008 or how the world almost came to the end at 2pm on 9/18/2008.
How close to entire collapse the ENTIRE world's economy was on 9/18/2008 when an economic terrorist attack occurred..

On Thursday (Sept 18), at 11am the Federal Reserve noticed a tremendous draw-down of money market accounts in the U.S., to the tune of $550 billion was being drawn out in the matter of an hour or two. The Treasury ...estimation is that by 2pm that afternoon, $5.5 trillion would have been drawn out of the money market system of the U.S., would have collapsed the entire economy of the U.S., and within 24 hours the world economy would have collapsed. It would have been the end of our economic system and our political system as we know it."
Zero Hedge: How The World Almost Came To An End At 2PM On September 18

Oh and did I mention along the way when "Mission Accomplished" occurred after less then six weeks of combat in May 2003.. 10 years ago..that over 1 million Iraq people were
saved from starving? 50,000 people a year were starving under Saddam and when he was removed, (by the way at the request of Kerry,Pelosi, and 90% of the 28 million Iraqis) the UN mandated embargo was removed.
Researcher Richard Garfield estimated that "a minimum of 100,000 and a more likely estimate of 227,000 excess deaths among young children from August 1991 through March 1998" from all causes including sanctions. Human rights in Saddam Hussein's Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Again all this happened and at the same time the MSM was bashing the President DAILY!

Well, our job is to bash the president, that's what we do." --
Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington,
February 2, 2007.Newsweek's Evan Thomas: 'Our Job Is To Bash the President' | NewsBusters

How can one ignore the FACT that $8 trillion in losses are being written off against tax payments?
How can one ignore that near 1 million jobs were lost DUE to those events?
How can one ignore THAT the results of these events have never been widely share because the biased MSM totally bashes Bush FACTS?
-------------------
When Bush started 131,785,000 people employed.
At the end of 2008 136,790,000 people employed or

5,000,000 more employed then when he took office.

When Bush took office in 2001 GDP was $12.355,271,000,000
when Bush left office in 2008 GDP was $14,359,490,000,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A 16% increase in GDP or $2 TRILLION.

ALL of the above GAINS in GDP and people employed IN SPITE of the 4 major world changing events AND the BASHING by the BIASED MSM!

ALL of the ABOVE occurred YET you idiots for some stupid reason WILL NOT ADMIT THEY HAPPENED!
When they happened people lost lives! Businesses were destroyed! ASSETS were destroyed! TAX REVENUE property taxes sales taxes ALL DOWN!!!
YET did we go into an economic DIVE??? NOPE!!!
 
Last edited:
Meltdown, Healthmyth's style.

Complete with inaccuracies and myths in several fonts and colors.

YOU ARE CALLING ME A LIAR!
WHERE are the INACCURACIES I challenge you to tell me dot.com bust didn't happen??
And of 9/11 never happened 3,000 people never died, trillions of dollars in assets gone! That never happened right???
WORST HURRICANE SEASONS!! NOT HURRICANES but SEASONS! PLural!!!

You tell me any other president that faced those events BUT of course THEY NEVER happened in NEVERLAND RIGHT???
 
No, it isn't.

How much NEW debt has Obama created that wasn't a direct or indirect result of Bush actions and policies?

Every single penny of it that has been spent since May 2009 belongs to Obama.

Why May? Is the fed fiscal year too complicated for you?

Because the Senate did not pass the 2009 budget until March so that Obama could get credit for the economy getting better under the massive stimulus program they threw in.

How did that work out again?
 

Forum List

Back
Top