JoeB131
Diamond Member
Okay, that was an incoherent rant.
Still not seeing why I should care who wins the Syrian Civil War.
Still not seeing why I should care who wins the Syrian Civil War.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, that was an incoherent rant.
Still not seeing why I should care who wins the Syrian Civil War.
Okay, that was an incoherent rant.
Still not seeing why I should care who wins the Syrian Civil War.
Obama has brought this on himself by being so dedicated to handing over ME countries to radical Islamists.
I thought I'd never see the day when an American President would support toppling a leader in Syria just so that another vacuum is created and AQ and the FSA could take over.
You probably need to educate yourself on history a bit. We went along with coups in Syria for decades because the leaders were people we didn't like, including the first coup in 1948. But that was okay until the Black Guy did it.
I never thought I'd see the day that an American President would take out an old and dear ally in Mubarak and hand the country over to the Muslim Brotherhood.
We didn't take out Mubarak, his own people did.
I never thought I'd see the day that an American President would back regime change in Libya only to hand it over to many militias.
You didn't. Were you asleep during the whole of the 1980's when Reagan did a whole bunch of shit to try to kill Qadaffi, including dropping a bomb on his house that killed his infant daughter? But again- When the Black Guy did it...
And last but not least I thought I would never see the day an American President welcoming the Taliban for "reconcilliation" talks.
You mean recognizing reality.
Hey, here's a funny thing. You know how Nixon finally got us out of Vietnam? He sat down and had "Reconcilation Talks" in Paris with the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong.
Could listening to Obama give another speech be considered torture?
According to high ranking members of the Bush administration the sanctions worked. Saddam was unable to rebuild his WMD program nor was he able to reconstitute his conventional army. He didn't even pose a threat to his neighbors much less the worlds remaining superpower.
Their addiction to being brainwashed by television renders so many Americans mentally incompetent, with blank minds, incoherent logic, and especially, almost totally lacking in memory.In Cairo, on February 24 2001, Powell said: "He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbours."
Powell even boasted that it was the US policy of "containment" that had effectively disarmed the Iraqi dictator - again the very opposite of what Blair said time and again. On May 15 2001, Powell went further and said that Saddam Hussein had not been able to "build his military back up or to develop weapons of mass destruction" for "the last 10 years". America, he said, had been successful in keeping him "in a box".
Two months later, Condoleezza Rice also described a weak, divided and militarily defenseless Iraq. "Saddam does not control the northern part of the country," she said. "We are able to keep his arms from him. His military forces have not been rebuilt."
Both Colin Powell, US Secretary of State, and Condoleezza Rice, President Bush's closest adviser, made clear before September 11 2001 that Saddam Hussein was no threat - to America, Europe or the Middle East.
According to high ranking members of the Bush administration the sanctions worked. Saddam was unable to rebuild his WMD program nor was he able to reconstitute his conventional army. He didn't even pose a threat to his neighbors much less the worlds remaining superpower.Their addiction to being brainwashed by television renders so many Americans mentally incompetent, with blank minds, incoherent logic, and especially, almost totally lacking in memory.In Cairo, on February 24 2001, Powell said: "He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbours."
Powell even boasted that it was the US policy of "containment" that had effectively disarmed the Iraqi dictator - again the very opposite of what Blair said time and again. On May 15 2001, Powell went further and said that Saddam Hussein had not been able to "build his military back up or to develop weapons of mass destruction" for "the last 10 years". America, he said, had been successful in keeping him "in a box".
Two months later, Condoleezza Rice also described a weak, divided and militarily defenseless Iraq. "Saddam does not control the northern part of the country," she said. "We are able to keep his arms from him. His military forces have not been rebuilt."
Both Colin Powell, US Secretary of State, and Condoleezza Rice, President Bush's closest adviser, made clear before September 11 2001 that Saddam Hussein was no threat - to America, Europe or the Middle East.
.
These reactive, brainwashed types -- hypnotizable, ready to swallow any propaganda swirling into their brains through the flashing lights of the boob tube -- are the perfection of modern idiocy, aren't they?Putin isn't dictating anything. It's just words in a newspaper. Man, you sure are easily taunted into reacting just like a schoolboy who doesn't have enough emotional maturity to see something for what it is as opposed to how someone wants you to react because they're intentionally manipulating you.I'd never thought I'd live to see the day when a Russian leader is dictating foreign policy to our own president. It is reprehensible how far our country has fallen. I for one am not going to sit here and take this.
Well, this is rather humiliating...I actually feel sorry for Obama. On the other hand, there is no fucking way in hell that Obama would ever get away with lecturing Putin in a Russian op-ed piece because they don't have the same freedoms that our exceptional nation possess.
Obviously, he was lying.So did Powell lie to the UN or was he too stupid to know the truth? It has to be one or the other------which?
What does my rep power have to do with anything?
That fact that you've been here 4 years and all you have come up with in that amount of time is "you're a troll" or "what he says is horseshit" in counter to any factual argument.
Compared to me, who has been here all of six months, who has lain many a liberal and his arguments to rest. Our rep totals only speak to who is the real troll here. It is not I. I am not one for arrogance, but learn to recognize your superior when you see him. That is a fact of life here on this board you will need to deal with, Erik.
Good day.
That fact that you've been here 4 years and all you have come up with in that amount of time is "you're a troll" or "what he says is horseshit" in counter to any factual argument.
Compared to me, who has been here all of six months, who has lain many a liberal and his arguments to rest. Our rep totals only speak to who is the real troll here. It is not I. I am not one for arrogance, but learn to recognize your superior when you see him. That is a fact of life here on this board you will need to deal with, Erik.
Good day.
you are a funny little poster.
Careful, there. This one will take that to mean humorous and witty. He is, after all, superior and recognizes his status on this board!
If he were to think you were saying he is funny....as in odd or abnormal, he might "lay you to rest" with his remarkable wit. SLAM! Negged!
Obviously, he was lying.So did Powell lie to the UN or was he too stupid to know the truth? It has to be one or the other------which?
However, to understand the full depth of his surrender to the Dark Side, you need to read Orwell's 1984 about "double-think."
.
Hard to argue with when 90% of what he said is true.
But first somebody had to spill the beans and then declare that waterboarding was torture.
The Iraqis loved hanging our guys on hooks and beating them with iron rods. Waterboarding is pretty tame compared to what the Iraqis did.
One form of torture is no different than another.
Do you think that giving someone a Happy Meal for months than cutting them off is the same as attaching battery cables to your testicles? Both are considered to be torture.
You're a friggen idiot not worth discussing serious issues with.
Obviously, he was lying.So did Powell lie to the UN or was he too stupid to know the truth? It has to be one or the other------which?
However, to understand the full depth of his surrender to the Dark Side, you need to read Orwell's 1984 about "double-think."
.
So the great Colin Powell is nothing but a political whore? So his blackness trumps his americanness?
And you are celebrating that![]()
Obviously, he was lying.
However, to understand the full depth of his surrender to the Dark Side, you need to read Orwell's 1984 about "double-think."
.
So the great Colin Powell is nothing but a political whore? So his blackness trumps his americanness?
And you are celebrating that![]()
Uh--you'll find that politicians on both sides of the isle are just that--"political whores" always ready to back up their own party--regardless of which party they belong too--regardless of the consequences so that the Commander and Chief get's his way.
Exactly what John Kerry is doing right now.
Welcome to the real world of politics.
I'd never thought I'd live to see the day when a Russian leader is dictating foreign policy to our own president. It is reprehensible how far our country has fallen. I for one am not going to sit here and take this.
Putin isn't dictating anything. It's just words in a newspaper. Man, you sure are easily taunted into reacting just like a schoolboy who doesn't have enough emotional maturity to see something for what it is as opposed to how someone wants you to react because they're intentionally manipulating you.
Naw, he's just a troll. He knows what he's saying is horseshit.