Oppressing lgbt

[TheGreatGatsby]

That's a nice twist. But the reality is one man could marry one woman that another man could not. That is not the same privilege.

The reality was that the 'will of the people' was that mixed race marriage was never to be a privilege to be granted to any couple.

Mixed race marriage was never a privilege granted by the citizenry- as a matter of fact it was a privelage specifically forbidden - but the Supreme Court found that law to be unconstitutional.

And the Supreme Court was right

If it wasn't a privilege guaranteed by the Constitution,.

Read the decisions- it is a privilege guaranteed to all Americans.

I understand you don't think Americans have a right to marriage- but you are wrong.


Loving v Virginia

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."

"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival."

Zablocki v. Rehail

Although Loving arose in the context of racial discrimination, prior and subsequent decisions of this Court confirm that the right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.

Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888), the Court characterized marriage as "the most important relation in life," id. at 125 U. S. 205, and as "the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress,"

In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390(1923), the Court recognized that the right "to marry, establish a home and bring up children" is a central part of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause,

In Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965), the Court observed:

"We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights -- older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions."

Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U. S. 678(1977)

"While the outer limits of [the right of personal privacy] have not been marked by the Court, it is clear that among the decisions that an individual may make without unjustified government interference are personal decisions 'relating to marriage,


Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

"This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"


So tell us again how the Supreme Court was wrong- and were tyrants- when they overturned the will of the people of Viriginia and said that mixed race couples have a constitutional right to marry.

You just brought those right up, didn't you, paid poster?

In any event, they are idiotic points that don't even mention "gay marriage".

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be idiotic?

Why do you parrot Putin?

Marriage between a man and a woman is established by centuries of English common law. Our fucking system was built on it. So, fuck off for even trying to confuse the issue.

 

[Syriusly]

The reality was that the 'will of the people' was that mixed race marriage was never to be a privilege to be granted to any couple.

Mixed race marriage was never a privilege granted by the citizenry- as a matter of fact it was a privelage specifically forbidden - but the Supreme Court found that law to be unconstitutional.

And the Supreme Court was right

If it wasn't a privilege guaranteed by the Constitution,.

Read the decisions- it is a privilege guaranteed to all Americans.

I understand you don't think Americans have a right to marriage- but you are wrong.


Loving v Virginia

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."

"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival."

Zablocki v. Rehail

Although Loving arose in the context of racial discrimination, prior and subsequent decisions of this Court confirm that the right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.

Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888), the Court characterized marriage as "the most important relation in life," id. at 125 U. S. 205, and as "the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress,"

In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390(1923), the Court recognized that the right "to marry, establish a home and bring up children" is a central part of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause,

In Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965), the Court observed:

"We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights -- older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions."

Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U. S. 678(1977)

"While the outer limits of [the right of personal privacy] have not been marked by the Court, it is clear that among the decisions that an individual may make without unjustified government interference are personal decisions 'relating to marriage,


Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

"This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"


So tell us again how the Supreme Court was wrong- and were tyrants- when they overturned the will of the people of Viriginia and said that mixed race couples have a constitutional right to marry.

You just brought those right up, didn't you, paid poster?

In any event, they are idiotic points that don't even mention "gay marriage".

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be idiotic?

Why do you parrot Putin?

Marriage between a man and a woman is established by centuries of English common law. Our fucking system was built on it. So, fuck off for even trying to confuse the issue.

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be fucking idiotic?

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

If it wasn't a privilege guaranteed by the Constitution,.

Read the decisions- it is a privilege guaranteed to all Americans.

I understand you don't think Americans have a right to marriage- but you are wrong.


Loving v Virginia

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."

"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival."

Zablocki v. Rehail

Although Loving arose in the context of racial discrimination, prior and subsequent decisions of this Court confirm that the right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.

Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888), the Court characterized marriage as "the most important relation in life," id. at 125 U. S. 205, and as "the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress,"

In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390(1923), the Court recognized that the right "to marry, establish a home and bring up children" is a central part of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause,

In Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965), the Court observed:

"We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights -- older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions."

Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U. S. 678(1977)

"While the outer limits of [the right of personal privacy] have not been marked by the Court, it is clear that among the decisions that an individual may make without unjustified government interference are personal decisions 'relating to marriage,


Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

"This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"


So tell us again how the Supreme Court was wrong- and were tyrants- when they overturned the will of the people of Viriginia and said that mixed race couples have a constitutional right to marry.

You just brought those right up, didn't you, paid poster?

In any event, they are idiotic points that don't even mention "gay marriage".

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be idiotic?

Why do you parrot Putin?

Marriage between a man and a woman is established by centuries of English common law. Our fucking system was built on it. So, fuck off for even trying to confuse the issue.

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be fucking idiotic?

Not gonna play your games. You know exactly what I said; don't present me with some dumbed down shit.

 

[Syriusly]

Read the decisions- it is a privilege guaranteed to all Americans.

I understand you don't think Americans have a right to marriage- but you are wrong.


Loving v Virginia

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."

"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival."

Zablocki v. Rehail

Although Loving arose in the context of racial discrimination, prior and subsequent decisions of this Court confirm that the right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.

Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888), the Court characterized marriage as "the most important relation in life," id. at 125 U. S. 205, and as "the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress,"

In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390(1923), the Court recognized that the right "to marry, establish a home and bring up children" is a central part of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause,

In Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965), the Court observed:

"We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights -- older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions."

Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U. S. 678(1977)

"While the outer limits of [the right of personal privacy] have not been marked by the Court, it is clear that among the decisions that an individual may make without unjustified government interference are personal decisions 'relating to marriage,


Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

"This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"


So tell us again how the Supreme Court was wrong- and were tyrants- when they overturned the will of the people of Viriginia and said that mixed race couples have a constitutional right to marry.

You just brought those right up, didn't you, paid poster?

In any event, they are idiotic points that don't even mention "gay marriage".

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be idiotic?

Why do you parrot Putin?

Marriage between a man and a woman is established by centuries of English common law. Our fucking system was built on it. So, fuck off for even trying to confuse the issue.

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be fucking idiotic?

Not gonna play your games. You know exactly what I said; don't present me with some dumbed down shit.

It doesn't matter how much I dumb it down- you will never understand shit.

Meanwhile- Americans have the right to marriage- well established- despite your attempts to deny that right.

Loving v Virginia

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."

"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival."

Zablocki v. Rehail

Although Loving arose in the context of racial discrimination, prior and subsequent decisions of this Court confirm that the right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.

Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888), the Court characterized marriage as "the most important relation in life," id. at 125 U. S. 205, and as "the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress,"

In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390(1923), the Court recognized that the right "to marry, establish a home and bring up children" is a central part of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause,

In Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965), the Court observed:

"We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights -- older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions."

Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U. S. 678(1977)

"While the outer limits of [the right of personal privacy] have not been marked by the Court, it is clear that among the decisions that an individual may make without unjustified government interference are personal decisions 'relating to marriage,


Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

"This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"


So tell us again how the Supreme Court was wrong- and were tyrants- when they overturned the will of the people of Viriginia and said that mixed race couples have a constitutional right to marry

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

You just brought those right up, didn't you, paid poster?

In any event, they are idiotic points that don't even mention "gay marriage".

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be idiotic?

Why do you parrot Putin?

Marriage between a man and a woman is established by centuries of English common law. Our fucking system was built on it. So, fuck off for even trying to confuse the issue.

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be fucking idiotic?

Not gonna play your games. You know exactly what I said; don't present me with some dumbed down shit.

It doesn't matter how much I dumb it down- you will never understand shit.

Meanwhile- Americans have the right to marriage- well established- despite your attempts to deny that right.

Loving v Virginia

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."

"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival."

Zablocki v. Rehail

Although Loving arose in the context of racial discrimination, prior and subsequent decisions of this Court confirm that the right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.

Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888), the Court characterized marriage as "the most important relation in life," id. at 125 U. S. 205, and as "the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress,"

In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390(1923), the Court recognized that the right "to marry, establish a home and bring up children" is a central part of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause,

In Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965), the Court observed:

"We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights -- older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions."

Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U. S. 678(1977)

"While the outer limits of [the right of personal privacy] have not been marked by the Court, it is clear that among the decisions that an individual may make without unjustified government interference are personal decisions 'relating to marriage,


Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

"This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"


So tell us again how the Supreme Court was wrong- and were tyrants- when they overturned the will of the people of Viriginia and said that mixed race couples have a constitutional right to marry

Don't care about your dumb shit from your data bank, paid poster.

 

[Syriusly]

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be idiotic?

Why do you parrot Putin?

Marriage between a man and a woman is established by centuries of English common law. Our fucking system was built on it. So, fuck off for even trying to confuse the issue.

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be fucking idiotic?

Not gonna play your games. You know exactly what I said; don't present me with some dumbed down shit.

It doesn't matter how much I dumb it down- you will never understand shit.

Meanwhile- Americans have the right to marriage- well established- despite your attempts to deny that right.

Loving v Virginia

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."

"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival."

Zablocki v. Rehail

Although Loving arose in the context of racial discrimination, prior and subsequent decisions of this Court confirm that the right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.

Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888), the Court characterized marriage as "the most important relation in life," id. at 125 U. S. 205, and as "the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress,"

In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390(1923), the Court recognized that the right "to marry, establish a home and bring up children" is a central part of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause,

In Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965), the Court observed:

"We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights -- older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions."

Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U. S. 678(1977)

"While the outer limits of [the right of personal privacy] have not been marked by the Court, it is clear that among the decisions that an individual may make without unjustified government interference are personal decisions 'relating to marriage,


Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

"This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"


So tell us again how the Supreme Court was wrong- and were tyrants- when they overturned the will of the people of Viriginia and said that mixed race couples have a constitutional right to marry

Don't care about your dumb shit from your data bank, paid poster.

Of course you don't care about the law.

You Pravda posters don't- you just want to spread dissent in America.

 

[namvet]

send em all to the ME for re education

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Marriage between a man and a woman is established by centuries of English common law. Our fucking system was built on it. So, fuck off for even trying to confuse the issue.

Why do you consider American's marriage rights to be fucking idiotic?

Not gonna play your games. You know exactly what I said; don't present me with some dumbed down shit.

It doesn't matter how much I dumb it down- you will never understand shit.

Meanwhile- Americans have the right to marriage- well established- despite your attempts to deny that right.

Loving v Virginia

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."

"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival."

Zablocki v. Rehail

Although Loving arose in the context of racial discrimination, prior and subsequent decisions of this Court confirm that the right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.

Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888), the Court characterized marriage as "the most important relation in life," id. at 125 U. S. 205, and as "the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress,"

In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390(1923), the Court recognized that the right "to marry, establish a home and bring up children" is a central part of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause,

In Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479 (1965), the Court observed:

"We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights -- older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions."

Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U. S. 678(1977)

"While the outer limits of [the right of personal privacy] have not been marked by the Court, it is clear that among the decisions that an individual may make without unjustified government interference are personal decisions 'relating to marriage,


Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

"This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"


So tell us again how the Supreme Court was wrong- and were tyrants- when they overturned the will of the people of Viriginia and said that mixed race couples have a constitutional right to marry

Don't care about your dumb shit from your data bank, paid poster.

Of course you don't care about the law.

You Pravda posters don't- you just want to spread dissent in America.

I care about the people owning their government, not the other way around.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"'I'M FOUR MONTHS PREGNANT'
British man, 20, will be the first to give BIRTH"
British dad-to-be says he 'wanted a baby' so he got 'sperm donor from Facebook'




Transgender movement: forcing everyone to participate in some people's delusions.




Starting to see why so many see Liberalism as a mental disease???