Oregon Bakers: You get to pay 135,000 for being radical religious morons, Judge so orders!

[Baz Ares]

Clearly, we need to nationalize bakeries.

We have them now. They are better bakers and are called Dunkin' Donuts

 

[BULLDOG]

Odd that you would try to discuss it then. Perhaps you should read the OP of a thread to determine the subject before you try to join the discussion. Obviously you were not prepared to join this one.

I am discussing it. The case has yet to be adjudicated.

OK. Do you have anything to add to that?

Regarding the unresolved court case? It's unresolved.

I see another head banging collision between those who believe in moral objections to federal immigration and marijuana laws.

You?

I'm sure there are threads on those subjects. Use the search function to find them

This is one. It's regarding the moral refusal to follow federal law.

Should you be able to refuse a woman from buying gas if your religion says she shouldn't drive? What if the religion opposed interracial marriages, or even mixing of races as they eat? At what point does your religion over ride the law?

 

[Aba Incieni]

I am discussing it. The case has yet to be adjudicated.

OK. Do you have anything to add to that?

Regarding the unresolved court case? It's unresolved.

I see another head banging collision between those who believe in moral objections to federal immigration and marijuana laws.

You?

I'm sure there are threads on those subjects. Use the search function to find them

This is one. It's regarding the moral refusal to follow federal law.

Should you be able to refuse a woman from buying gas if your religion says she shouldn't drive? What if the religion opposed interracial marriages, or even mixing of races as they eat? At what point does your religion over ride the law?

Yes. Yes. Always.

 

[BULLDOG]

OK. Do you have anything to add to that?

Regarding the unresolved court case? It's unresolved.

I see another head banging collision between those who believe in moral objections to federal immigration and marijuana laws.

You?

I'm sure there are threads on those subjects. Use the search function to find them

This is one. It's regarding the moral refusal to follow federal law.

Should you be able to refuse a woman from buying gas if your religion says she shouldn't drive? What if the religion opposed interracial marriages, or even mixing of races as they eat? At what point does your religion over ride the law?

Yes. Yes. Always.

Always? Some religions call for human sacrifice. You all for sacrificing a virgin for a good crop?

 

[Windparadox]

`
`
One thing for sure, Rachel and Laurel Bowman-Cryer now have $135,000 reasons to celebrate the new year. Good for them.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Regarding the unresolved court case? It's unresolved.

I see another head banging collision between those who believe in moral objections to federal immigration and marijuana laws.

You?

I'm sure there are threads on those subjects. Use the search function to find them

This is one. It's regarding the moral refusal to follow federal law.

Should you be able to refuse a woman from buying gas if your religion says she shouldn't drive? What if the religion opposed interracial marriages, or even mixing of races as they eat? At what point does your religion over ride the law?

Yes. Yes. Always.

Always? Some religions call for human sacrifice. You all for sacrificing a virgin for a good crop?

Which religions call for human sacrifices?

 

[BULLDOG]

I'm sure there are threads on those subjects. Use the search function to find them

This is one. It's regarding the moral refusal to follow federal law.

Should you be able to refuse a woman from buying gas if your religion says she shouldn't drive? What if the religion opposed interracial marriages, or even mixing of races as they eat? At what point does your religion over ride the law?

Yes. Yes. Always.

Always? Some religions call for human sacrifice. You all for sacrificing a virgin for a good crop?

Which religions call for human sacrifices?

Does it matter? The question wasn't which religions could ignore the laws, but if religions should be able to ignore the law. There are millions of religions, and many of them require things that are not accepted by most. Female circumcision comes to mind. Sex with children, Murdering a family member who turned away from the religion. Are all of these valid excuses to ignore the law?

 

[Aba Incieni]

This is one. It's regarding the moral refusal to follow federal law.

Should you be able to refuse a woman from buying gas if your religion says she shouldn't drive? What if the religion opposed interracial marriages, or even mixing of races as they eat? At what point does your religion over ride the law?

Yes. Yes. Always.

Always? Some religions call for human sacrifice. You all for sacrificing a virgin for a good crop?

Which religions call for human sacrifices?

Does it matter? The question wasn't which religions could ignore the laws, but if religions should be able to ignore the law. There are millions of religions, and many of them require things that are not accepted by most. Female circumcision comes to mind. Sex with children, Murdering a family member who turned away from the religion. Are all of these valid excuses to ignore the law?

You made a boo boo. Lots of aimless words won't hide it.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Religion is a joke and should never be part of any legal or moral system.

 

[BULLDOG]

Should you be able to refuse a woman from buying gas if your religion says she shouldn't drive? What if the religion opposed interracial marriages, or even mixing of races as they eat? At what point does your religion over ride the law?

Yes. Yes. Always.

Always? Some religions call for human sacrifice. You all for sacrificing a virgin for a good crop?

Which religions call for human sacrifices?

Does it matter? The question wasn't which religions could ignore the laws, but if religions should be able to ignore the law. There are millions of religions, and many of them require things that are not accepted by most. Female circumcision comes to mind. Sex with children, Murdering a family member who turned away from the religion. Are all of these valid excuses to ignore the law?

You made a boo boo. Lots of aimless words won't hide it.

No, but if you insist. Were these incidents acceptable because their religion superseded the law?
Where Human sacrifices are still taking place throughout the world

 

[ScienceRocks]

The christian religion has a history of promoting
-Genocide
-Murder
-Incest
-Slaughter of babies
-Slavery

No, I don't want that as the basis for our legal system.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Yes. Yes. Always.

Always? Some religions call for human sacrifice. You all for sacrificing a virgin for a good crop?

Which religions call for human sacrifices?

Does it matter? The question wasn't which religions could ignore the laws, but if religions should be able to ignore the law. There are millions of religions, and many of them require things that are not accepted by most. Female circumcision comes to mind. Sex with children, Murdering a family member who turned away from the religion. Are all of these valid excuses to ignore the law?

You made a boo boo. Lots of aimless words won't hide it.

No, but if you insist. Were these incidents acceptable because their religion superseded the law?
Where Human sacrifices are still taking place throughout the world

It is up to the individual. If the law of the land conflicts with their morals, they must either break the law or leave.

Or else they aren't morals at all.

 

[BULLDOG]

Always? Some religions call for human sacrifice. You all for sacrificing a virgin for a good crop?

Which religions call for human sacrifices?

Does it matter? The question wasn't which religions could ignore the laws, but if religions should be able to ignore the law. There are millions of religions, and many of them require things that are not accepted by most. Female circumcision comes to mind. Sex with children, Murdering a family member who turned away from the religion. Are all of these valid excuses to ignore the law?

You made a boo boo. Lots of aimless words won't hide it.

No, but if you insist. Were these incidents acceptable because their religion superseded the law?
Where Human sacrifices are still taking place throughout the world

It is up to the individual. If the law of the land conflicts with their morals, they must either break the law or leave.

Or else they aren't morals at all.

And the owners chose to stay at the bakery and accept the consequences of breaking the law.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Which religions call for human sacrifices?

Does it matter? The question wasn't which religions could ignore the laws, but if religions should be able to ignore the law. There are millions of religions, and many of them require things that are not accepted by most. Female circumcision comes to mind. Sex with children, Murdering a family member who turned away from the religion. Are all of these valid excuses to ignore the law?

You made a boo boo. Lots of aimless words won't hide it.

No, but if you insist. Were these incidents acceptable because their religion superseded the law?
Where Human sacrifices are still taking place throughout the world

It is up to the individual. If the law of the land conflicts with their morals, they must either break the law or leave.

Or else they aren't morals at all.

And the owners chose to stay at the bakery and accept the consequences of breaking the law.

Because of their moral stance. Their morals are more important to them than money. But we already knew that when they refused to profit from a cake.

Do you think cities and states will be so morally strong when their money goes away?

 

[BULLDOG]

Does it matter? The question wasn't which religions could ignore the laws, but if religions should be able to ignore the law. There are millions of religions, and many of them require things that are not accepted by most. Female circumcision comes to mind. Sex with children, Murdering a family member who turned away from the religion. Are all of these valid excuses to ignore the law?

You made a boo boo. Lots of aimless words won't hide it.

No, but if you insist. Were these incidents acceptable because their religion superseded the law?
Where Human sacrifices are still taking place throughout the world

It is up to the individual. If the law of the land conflicts with their morals, they must either break the law or leave.

Or else they aren't morals at all.

And the owners chose to stay at the bakery and accept the consequences of breaking the law.

Because of their moral stance. Their morals are more important to them than money. But we already knew that when they refused to profit from a cake.

Do you think cities and states will be so morally strong when their money goes away?

They didn't seem to have any moral problems accepting the $100,000 from GoFundMe, or what ever site collected all that money. "Thou shalt make a fortune off of religious nuts"?

 

[Baz Ares]

`
`
One thing for sure, Rachel and Laurel Bowman-Cryer now have $135,000 reasons to celebrate the new year. Good for them.

They suckered folks out of 100k on GoFundMe and can use that money. So after taxes from the fraud of being godly folks.
They're only out some 54K for just not baking the cake. How many wedding cakes cost 54k to the stupid baker?

btw: Another great business success model for moron religious losers, as I see it.
We don't like your lifestyle. You will still be there later. But we want to pay
for your WEDDING!

 

[ScienceRocks]

God slaughered cities of people because some of them wanted to have butt sex.

Yet, these idiots think they have the moral high ground? lol

What a bunch of monsters.

 

[Aba Incieni]

You made a boo boo. Lots of aimless words won't hide it.

No, but if you insist. Were these incidents acceptable because their religion superseded the law?
Where Human sacrifices are still taking place throughout the world

It is up to the individual. If the law of the land conflicts with their morals, they must either break the law or leave.

Or else they aren't morals at all.

And the owners chose to stay at the bakery and accept the consequences of breaking the law.

Because of their moral stance. Their morals are more important to them than money. But we already knew that when they refused to profit from a cake.

Do you think cities and states will be so morally strong when their money goes away?

They didn't seem to have any moral problems accepting the $100,000 from GoFundMe, or what ever site collected all that money. "Thou shalt make a fortune off of religious nuts"?

They did not bake a queer cake for it.

Do you think cities and states will be so morally strong when their money goes away?[

 

[Aba Incieni]

God slaughered cities of people because some of them wanted to have butt sex.

Yet, these idiots think they have the moral high ground? lol

What a bunch of monsters.

60 million dead babies in the US alone makes you look even sillier.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Do you think religious nuts should be able to ignore the law or not?

Do you think that government should be allowed to ignore the Constitution—which is this nation's highest law—or not?

Still trying to change subject, aren't you. Any reason you are afraid to answer the question?

My question is perfectly relevant. You're trying to pretend to be on the side of law and order, and yet, ignoring the highest law in order to do so. You're taking a position that is thinly-disguised as support for the rule of law, but which is, in fact, a position of lawlessness and corruption.