Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's only your opinion they wanted to ruin someone's life. If we all believed filing suit against someone meant trying to ruin their life, the USA would not be such a litigious country.Wishing ain’t getting, but setting out to ruin a person’s livelihood is vile.That's hardly the same thing as wishing peoples' death.Neither is sing people cause they won’t make you a cake!OMG You people are something else, wishing death on everybody. You do realize that wanting people to die because you disagree with them isn't Christian? Or American? Or anything you pretend to value?Those bakers should have baked that stupid cake and put ground up glass in it. Or strychnine.
Of course they wanted to ruin them. If they wished not to ruin them they would have done what most folks do and that is to find a bakery to accommodate them. It’s all about sticking it to the Christian.It's only your opinion they wanted to ruin someone's life. If we all believed filing suit against someone meant trying to ruin their life, the USA would not be such a litigious country.Wishing ain’t getting, but setting out to ruin a person’s livelihood is vile.That's hardly the same thing as wishing peoples' death.Neither is sing people cause they won’t make you a cake!OMG You people are something else, wishing death on everybody. You do realize that wanting people to die because you disagree with them isn't Christian? Or American? Or anything you pretend to value?Those bakers should have baked that stupid cake and put ground up glass in it. Or strychnine.
As far as wishing people's death, it is non-Christian and un-American. It's what Satan's followers would do.
BAKE THAT CAKE !!!!!!Shut up you fat, homo-pedo slob.Fuck off to Chechnya if you dont like it.Ignorance vomits.The truth emergesthey should have built 'black only' diners, as there were and are plenty blacked owned places to eat.
I don't support racism, I support freedom.
you're just to fucking dumb to see that supporting freedom over feelings is more important.
emotional distress? LMAO what a couple of fucking bedwetters
It amazes me how people cheer on loss of individuality and private property.
Fucking sickos
Court rules against Oregon bakers who refused to make gay wedding cake
The Oregon Court of Appeals on Thursday upheld a $135,000 fine against two Christian bakers who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.
The case began back in January 2013, when Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of the since-closed Sweet Cakes by Melissa bakery just outside Portland, Oregon, cited their religious beliefs when declining to make a wedding cake for Rachel and Laurel Bowman-Cryer.
Following the incident, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries found the Kleins in violation of a 2007 state law that protects the rights of LGBTQ people in employment, housing and public accommodations. In 2015, the couple was ordered to pay the Bowman-Cryers emotional distress damages.
Court rules against Oregon bakers who refused to make gay wedding cake
Happy New Years too, THESE LOSER MENTAL ANAL RELIGIOUS BOY RAPE SUPPORTER BAKER MORONS. As you will always bake cakes for raper priest klans roaming our streets. Following fake gods, does suck folks, as shown here by these losers. And costly as well. For what in the end? Just to show others
who are the sickest mental thinkers, walking the planet are.
Melissa and Aaron Klein have been ordered to pay $135,000 to a lesbian couple the bakers declined to make a cake for. (Courtesy Sweet Cakes by Melissa)
“Support Sweet Cakes by Melissa”, which raised over $100,000 before it was shut down by GoFundMe, who stated that the campaign was not compatible with their terms of service.
WOW? The cake would have made them a few bucks. But they wanted to give them a 135K Cash wedding gift..LOL!
BTW: Really, these folks still follow gods after the church paid out 600-1.3 billion in damages for raping kids. WTF is with that? Preist ASSAULT on children (rape) okay
and still follows fake lords. but if, two adults, legal ones, and their personal sexual relationship is not to be allowed, and protested by mentally sick bakers. WTF is with THAT?
They have not baked a queer cake, which has always been their moral stance.They did not bake a queer cake for it.Because of their moral stance. Their morals are more important to them than money. But we already knew that when they refused to profit from a cake.It is up to the individual. If the law of the land conflicts with their morals, they must either break the law or leave.
Or else they aren't morals at all.
And the owners chose to stay at the bakery and accept the consequences of breaking the law.
Do you think cities and states will be so morally strong when their money goes away?
They didn't seem to have any moral problems accepting the $100,000 from GoFundMe, or what ever site collected all that money. "Thou shalt make a fortune off of religious nuts"?
Do you think cities and states will be so morally strong when their money goes away?[
Not sure that will happen. However, the homophobic bakers don't have to make that choice. Bible tumpers gave them 100,000 and the donations didn't stop when GoFundMe closed that page. They have become rich for being homophobes. Which chapter in the bible discusses that?
Click to support Help Sweetcakes by melissa
"civil rights trump Constitutional rights"............Wrong, if the Constitution was followed, and Property RIGHTS enforced, each and every owner can dictate who they will proved service to.That's just not true. If that were true they could decide not to serve Asians or Hispanics or people with red hair and freckles. They can't just pick and choose who to serve.the bakery is private property, thus the owners get to pick and choose, not the government.The constitution wasn’t ignored. Thus the ruling.not sure why people cheer when the Constitution is ignored.
leftist, hating America since fdr
the Constitution was ignored
somehow, wrongly, civil rights trump Constitutional rights.
Is a business that has obtained a state business license considered private property?I see nothing wrong with individuals doing as they please with their private property.Yeah and black people should have sucked it up and sat at the booth instead of the counteremotional distress? LMAO what a couple of fucking bedwetters
It amazes me how people cheer on loss of individuality and private property.
Fucking sickos
Then challenge them in court.....again. Because they already have been challenged and declared Constitutional.PA laws at the federal level was blatantly unconstitutional. The commerce clause has been raped into nothing.
PA laws at the state level are institutional discrimination. Which is bullshit.
Yes hahaha...is that a serious question?? I hope to god not. You have to get a license to operate a car...that doesn’t mean you no longer own your car.Is a business that has obtained a state business license considered private property?I see nothing wrong with individuals doing as they please with their private property.Yeah and black people should have sucked it up and sat at the booth instead of the counteremotional distress? LMAO what a couple of fucking bedwetters
It amazes me how people cheer on loss of individuality and private property.
Fucking sickos
Why should they force businesses to follow health laws now, eh?So, you should support the Constitution over a 'law' that forces people to provide goods or services.No. Your amateur interpretation is.yes or noYou believe in sick, dystopian nonsense.Ignorance vomits.The truth emerges
I don't support racism, I support freedom.
you're just to fucking dumb to see that supporting freedom over feelings is more important.
Is the US Constitution dystopian?
I ask, b/c that's what it sounds like you are saying, but I'm going to give you the chance to backpeddle.
key word; FORCE
Two separate issues. You can run your business on my personal property.Is a business that has obtained a state business license considered private property?I see nothing wrong with individuals doing as they please with their private property.Yeah and black people should have sucked it up and sat at the booth instead of the counteremotional distress? LMAO what a couple of fucking bedwetters
It amazes me how people cheer on loss of individuality and private property.
Fucking sickos
Health laws do not conflict with their religion.Why should they force businesses to follow health laws now, eh?So, you should support the Constitution over a 'law' that forces people to provide goods or services.No. Your amateur interpretation is.yes or noYou believe in sick, dystopian nonsense.Ignorance vomits.
I don't support racism, I support freedom.
you're just to fucking dumb to see that supporting freedom over feelings is more important.
Is the US Constitution dystopian?
I ask, b/c that's what it sounds like you are saying, but I'm going to give you the chance to backpeddle.
key word; FORCE
Because of the first amendment... “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”... that’s pretty clear. Just because the SCOTUS found slavery, or Jim Crow, or internment camps “constitutional” doesn’t mean they were constitutional.Why should they force businesses to follow health laws now, eh?So, you should support the Constitution over a 'law' that forces people to provide goods or services.No. Your amateur interpretation is.yes or noYou believe in sick, dystopian nonsense.Ignorance vomits.
I don't support racism, I support freedom.
you're just to fucking dumb to see that supporting freedom over feelings is more important.
Is the US Constitution dystopian?
I ask, b/c that's what it sounds like you are saying, but I'm going to give you the chance to backpeddle.
key word; FORCE
Because making businesses that have a business license follow business laws is SO MUCH like the NAZIS forcing Jews to play instruments at the ovens.Nazis forced Jews to play their instruments at the ovens. Today's progressives think Christians should be forced to create celebratory works of art for homosexuals to feast upon during their orgies.
They have not baked a queer cake, which has always been their moral stance.They did not bake a queer cake for it.Because of their moral stance. Their morals are more important to them than money. But we already knew that when they refused to profit from a cake.And the owners chose to stay at the bakery and accept the consequences of breaking the law.
Do you think cities and states will be so morally strong when their money goes away?
They didn't seem to have any moral problems accepting the $100,000 from GoFundMe, or what ever site collected all that money. "Thou shalt make a fortune off of religious nuts"?
Do you think cities and states will be so morally strong when their money goes away?[
Not sure that will happen. However, the homophobic bakers don't have to make that choice. Bible tumpers gave them 100,000 and the donations didn't stop when GoFundMe closed that page. They have become rich for being homophobes. Which chapter in the bible discusses that?
Click to support Help Sweetcakes by melissa
Get back to me when you have some idea of how morally strong your leaders in office might be.
Nazi law said Jews and others...negroes, for instance...were something less than human. Under people, they called them.Because making businesses that have a business license follow business laws is SO MUCH like the NAZIS forcing Jews to play instruments at the ovens.Nazis forced Jews to play their instruments at the ovens. Today's progressives think Christians should be forced to create celebratory works of art for homosexuals to feast upon during their orgies.
^ trumpanzee logic. Anyone wonder why these kinds of dolts voted for trump?
Two different issues. Don't be mad because so many support their morality.They have not baked a queer cake, which has always been their moral stance.They did not bake a queer cake for it.Because of their moral stance. Their morals are more important to them than money. But we already knew that when they refused to profit from a cake.
Do you think cities and states will be so morally strong when their money goes away?
They didn't seem to have any moral problems accepting the $100,000 from GoFundMe, or what ever site collected all that money. "Thou shalt make a fortune off of religious nuts"?
Do you think cities and states will be so morally strong when their money goes away?[
Not sure that will happen. However, the homophobic bakers don't have to make that choice. Bible tumpers gave them 100,000 and the donations didn't stop when GoFundMe closed that page. They have become rich for being homophobes. Which chapter in the bible discusses that?
Click to support Help Sweetcakes by melissa
Get back to me when you have some idea of how morally strong your leaders in office might be.
It has been a very lucrative moral stance for them. For the amount of money collected for to them, I might refuse to bake a cake too, but I'm not a baker.
That's cool....no business licenses no safety laws no health laws to follow now...all one has to do is state it's against their so-called religion.A home is private propertyThe Dumb Democrat Bigots are against Freedom of Religion.
Keep it in your home, where you can be as mentally sick as you want to be, as you offer your kids to priest for fake lord love.
a bakery is also private property
therefore, you proved your support for the gay couple to be wrong.
congratulations.
