O'Reilly Goes There: Accuses Democrats Of Pushing Communism In America

[Steve_McGarrett]

I have to agree that he got this one right and finally called out the democrats for what they are dangerously doing. I can ad some Republicans in their as accessories too. The ACA is the cornerstone proof of where this is headed. Taking assets from solvent Americans to pay for the citizen unwilling to work is flat out unethical and should be stopped.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxOXqCHu7MA]O'Reilly Goes There: Accuses Democrats of Pushing Communism in America - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Edgetho]

I agree with O'Reilly about the half the time.

This time is in that half

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

He's spot on with his commentary!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Look at all the USMB Libs who openly express their love of Che, Fidel, Mao, Stalin and the very concept of Communism! They think Reagan was the evil one

 

[Stephanie]

and he speak the truth, finally

will it wake the people, all we can is hope...not looking good though when they can vote for someone with no experience in anything but promise of giving them, the life of JULIA

this video is as Socialist/ commie as you can get

they didn't make it for the fun of it

and they have been crawling out of their holes with Obama's election
Like this Perry woman

 

[Edgetho]

You NEED to understand the minds of socialists. Most dimocraps are socialists and don't even know it.

Of course, most dimocraps are irreconcilably stupid....

https://www.marxists.org/archive/draper/1966/twosouls/index.htm

9. Six Strains of Socialism-From-Above​

We have seen that there are several different strains or currents running through Socialism-From-Above. They are usually intertwined, but let us separate out some of the more important aspects for a closer look.

1. Philanthropism. – Socialism (or “freedom,” or what-have-you) is to be handed down, in order to Do the People Good, by the rich and powerful out of the kindness of their hearts. As the Communist Manifesto put it, with the early utopians like Robert Owen in mind, “Only from the point of view of being the most suffering class does the proletariat exist for them.” In gratitude, the downtrodden poor must above all avoid getting rambunctious, and no nonsense about class struggle or self- emancipation. This aspect may be considered a special case of –

2. Elitism. – We have mentioned several cases of this conviction that socialism is the business of a new ruling minority, non-capitalist in nature and therefore guaranteed pure, imposing its own domination either temporarily (for a mere historical era) or even permanently. In either case, this new ruling class is likely to see its goal as an Educational Dictatorship over the masses – to Do Them Good, of course – the dictatorship being exercised by an elite party which suppresses all control from below, or by benevolent despots or Savior-Leaders of some kind, or by Shaw’s “Supermen,” by eugenic manipulators, by Proudhon’s “anarchist” managers or Saint-Simon’s technocrats or their more modern equivalents – with up-to-date terms and new verbal screens which can be hailed as fresh social theory as against “nineteenth-century Marxism.”

On the other hand, the revolutionary-democratic advocates of Socialism-from-Below have also always been a minority, but the chasm between the elitist approach and the vanguard approach is crucial, as we have seen in the case of Debs. For him as for Marx and Luxemburg, the function of the revolutionary vanguard is to impel the mass-majority to fit themselves to take power in their own name, through their own struggles. The point is not to deny the critical importance of minorities, but to establish a different relationship between the advanced minority and the more backward mass.