Our President Has Done A Good Job

Every post you make is idiotic, ill informed, and stupid. Try reading your own links sometimes, dumbass.
A Purdue University news release said that although some of the high prices can be attributed to drought, there’s an incomplete understanding of why the prices have skyrocketed.
 
Our President Has Done A Good Job


ImageProxy.mvc
 
Have you checked the price of gas or food?
Yep.
January 2009 http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid0901.pdf
July 2014 http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid1407.pdf
Food has gone up about 11%, and gas has gone up about 103%


The lowest labor participation rate in history.
Not even close. It's higher than any time before 1978

The highest number of people on welfare in history. /quote]
Percentage-wise?
Yeah 1978. The depth of the Carter economy. Obama is worse than Carter. We've all said so.
 

Yeah, the pesky facts are that unemployment is a fake figure that doesn't count how many people have dropped out and just stopped looking.

bg-not-looking-for-work-2014-chart-1-825.ashx


bg-not-looking-for-work-2014-chart-3.ashx



Yes, facts are pesky and liberals can't spin these facts.



Anyone claiming this president has done a good job is being intentionally provocative and argumentive . It is a preposterous assertion. Even if you are an unabashed leftist, you can't be thrilled with his legacy: Losing the House and hopefully the Congress to the GOP.

And for what? Totally diminishing the philosophy of the left. Their signature legislation remains a disaster , and as unpopular today as ever.
 
Have you checked the price of gas or food?
Yep.
January 2009 http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid0901.pdf
July 2014 http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid1407.pdf
Food has gone up about 11%, and gas has gone up about 103%


The lowest labor participation rate in history.
Not even close. It's higher than any time before 1978

The highest number of people on welfare in history. /quote]
Percentage-wise?
Yeah 1978. The depth of the Carter economy. Obama is worse than Carter. We've all said so.
But the height of the Labor force participation at the time.
fredgraph.png
 

Yeah, the pesky facts are that unemployment is a fake figure that doesn't count how many people have dropped out and just stopped looking.
Why should it? What does someone not trying to work tell us about the labor market? Job search has always been part of everyone's official definition of unemployed (with the exception of those more Socialist countries where the government would look for you)

It's September 2014. That someone in January 2014 stopped looking for work because he thought the economy sucked tells me nothing about the labor market now. That 9 million people unsuccessfully looked for work does tell me something.
 
Yeah, the pesky facts are that unemployment is a fake figure that doesn't count how many people have dropped out and just stopped looking.

bg-not-looking-for-work-2014-chart-1-825.ashx


.
Let me get this straight...You're claiming that the White House manipulated the unemployment rate so that it would look WORSE then they predicted????
 
no matter what.....he is still a piss poor leader.....he is as bad as bush was at bringing people together....and we sure can use a strong leader right now....
America has had strong presidents and some of the strong presidents seemed to want to improve America, but the other party has called them dictators, kings, and commies. Commies that get their orders from Stalin or Hitler and don't allow Congress to act and in fact make laws on their own. Check the historian's rating of presidents, the strong presidents that do well for the United States are at the top of the rating charts.
big deal.....it doesnt make Obama a strong leader.....because he is not a strong or good leader.....
The question is, do we want strong presidents of the other party? When Obama threatens to try and solve problems without Congressional imput, is that the sign of a strong president?
i want a strong President no matter what party he is in....we aint had one of those since last Century.....and to answer your question about trying to solve problems without Congressional imput.....no thats not the sign of a strong President....a strong good LEADER would be able to work with both Parties except the farther right and left.....they dont like anyone who doesnt think like they do....
 
no matter what.....he is still a piss poor leader.....he is as bad as bush was at bringing people together....and we sure can use a strong leader right now....
America has had strong presidents and some of the strong presidents seemed to want to improve America, but the other party has called them dictators, kings, and commies. Commies that get their orders from Stalin or Hitler and don't allow Congress to act and in fact make laws on their own. Check the historian's rating of presidents, the strong presidents that do well for the United States are at the top of the rating charts.
big deal.....it doesnt make Obama a strong leader.....because he is not a strong or good leader.....
The question is, do we want strong presidents of the other party? When Obama threatens to try and solve problems without Congressional imput, is that the sign of a strong president?
A strong president is one that does not look like a pansy. Obama's a fail in that department.
looks have nothing to do with it......its what he says and does and the results he gets....its about motivating the citizens.....its about getting people in the other party to at least trust you enough to give you the benefit of the doubt....and here on the home front the only people who that applies to are the die hard Obama supporters....it was the same way with the other guy.....just the die hard supporters....
 
Last edited:
So we have been in a drought for over four years? Energy prices are also up, heck Obama predicted that, because of his policies.

The fact he quoted Think Progress should tell you something. When nothing matches his claims, he resorts to Newsmax and Think Progress. Newsmax is far right, Think Progress is far left. My oh my, how objective.
 
@Synthaholic

It would do you well to read the whole article, from Newsmax:

A Purdue University news release said that although some of the high prices can be attributed to drought, there’s an incomplete understanding of why the prices have skyrocketed.

“It is easy to list some possible causes, but none of them seem to be large enough to have caused such startlingly high prices,” said Purdue’s extension economist Chris Hurt.

Hurt listed possible reasons for beef prices being high, but said that some who guessed that demand may have been up as supplies were low were proven to be wrong when the first-quarter GDP growth was only 0.1 percent.

The unexplained high prices so far this year have shown cattle ranchers new possibilities for profit potential, Hurt said in the release. Citing National Oceanic and Atmospheric data, the release said it is projected that only 15 percent of the brood cows will be in drought areas; about 85 percent of the beef cows will be in regions that can support herd expansion.

On the other hand, Think Progress turns this into a climate change issue:

Underlying the drought, the rising crop prices and the rising cattle prices is the reality of climate change

You really just like copying and pasting links, don't you?
 
no matter what.....he is still a piss poor leader.....he is as bad as bush was at bringing people together....and we sure can use a strong leader right now....
America has had strong presidents and some of the strong presidents seemed to want to improve America, but the other party has called them dictators, kings, and commies. Commies that get their orders from Stalin or Hitler and don't allow Congress to act and in fact make laws on their own. Check the historian's rating of presidents, the strong presidents that do well for the United States are at the top of the rating charts.
big deal.....it doesnt make Obama a strong leader.....because he is not a strong or good leader.....
The question is, do we want strong presidents of the other party? When Obama threatens to try and solve problems without Congressional imput, is that the sign of a strong president?
A strong president is one that does not look like a pansy. Obama's a fail in that department.
looks have nothing to do with it......its what he says and does and the results he gets....its about motivating the citizens.....its about getting people in the other party to at least trust you enough to give you the benefit of the doubt....and here on the home front the only people who that applies to are the die hard Obama supporters....it was the same way with the other guy.....just the die hard supporters....

You're confusing what you imagine as good results with strength. The guy's a pansy. That would be the opposite of strength.

Pansy pitch:


Strong pitch:
 
The lowest labor participation rate in history.
Not even close. It's higher than any time before 1978

You might want to rethink the Labor force participation rate, which sits at 62.8 percent, the lowest it has been in 32 years. Free them and weep:
Katzndogz said "in history." Are you claiming history only goes back 32 years?????

I said it is higher than anytime before 1978, which is true:
fredgraph.png


Now....notice when the participation rate started its decline?
 
no matter what.....he is still a piss poor leader.....he is as bad as bush was at bringing people together....and we sure can use a strong leader right now....
America has had strong presidents and some of the strong presidents seemed to want to improve America, but the other party has called them dictators, kings, and commies. Commies that get their orders from Stalin or Hitler and don't allow Congress to act and in fact make laws on their own. Check the historian's rating of presidents, the strong presidents that do well for the United States are at the top of the rating charts.
big deal.....it doesnt make Obama a strong leader.....because he is not a strong or good leader.....
The question is, do we want strong presidents of the other party? When Obama threatens to try and solve problems without Congressional imput, is that the sign of a strong president?
A strong president is one that does not look like a pansy. Obama's a fail in that department.
looks have nothing to do with it......its what he says and does and the results he gets....its about motivating the citizens.....its about getting people in the other party to at least trust you enough to give you the benefit of the doubt....and here on the home front the only people who that applies to are the die hard Obama supporters....it was the same way with the other guy.....just the die hard supporters....

You're confusing what you imagine as good results with strength. The guy's a pansy. That would be the opposite of strength.

Pansy pitch:


Strong pitch:

no matter what i say aint going to matter.....you just dont like the guy.....right?....
 
no matter what.....he is still a piss poor leader.....he is as bad as bush was at bringing people together....and we sure can use a strong leader right now....
America has had strong presidents and some of the strong presidents seemed to want to improve America, but the other party has called them dictators, kings, and commies. Commies that get their orders from Stalin or Hitler and don't allow Congress to act and in fact make laws on their own. Check the historian's rating of presidents, the strong presidents that do well for the United States are at the top of the rating charts.
big deal.....it doesnt make Obama a strong leader.....because he is not a strong or good leader.....
The question is, do we want strong presidents of the other party? When Obama threatens to try and solve problems without Congressional imput, is that the sign of a strong president?
A strong president is one that does not look like a pansy. Obama's a fail in that department.
looks have nothing to do with it......its what he says and does and the results he gets....its about motivating the citizens.....its about getting people in the other party to at least trust you enough to give you the benefit of the doubt....and here on the home front the only people who that applies to are the die hard Obama supporters....it was the same way with the other guy.....just the die hard supporters....

You're confusing what you imagine as good results with strength. The guy's a pansy. That would be the opposite of strength.

Pansy pitch:


Strong pitch:

no matter what i say aint going to matter.....you just dont like the guy.....right?....

I heard he sucks at basketball too.
 
no matter what.....he is still a piss poor leader.....he is as bad as bush was at bringing people together....and we sure can use a strong leader right now....
America has had strong presidents and some of the strong presidents seemed to want to improve America, but the other party has called them dictators, kings, and commies. Commies that get their orders from Stalin or Hitler and don't allow Congress to act and in fact make laws on their own. Check the historian's rating of presidents, the strong presidents that do well for the United States are at the top of the rating charts.
big deal.....it doesnt make Obama a strong leader.....because he is not a strong or good leader.....
The question is, do we want strong presidents of the other party? When Obama threatens to try and solve problems without Congressional imput, is that the sign of a strong president?
A strong president is one that does not look like a pansy. Obama's a fail in that department.
looks have nothing to do with it......its what he says and does and the results he gets....its about motivating the citizens.....its about getting people in the other party to at least trust you enough to give you the benefit of the doubt....and here on the home front the only people who that applies to are the die hard Obama supporters....it was the same way with the other guy.....just the die hard supporters....

You're confusing what you imagine as good results with strength. The guy's a pansy. That would be the opposite of strength.

Pansy pitch:


Strong pitch:

no matter what i say aint going to matter.....you just dont like the guy.....right?....

I heard he sucks at basketball too.


pro.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top