Over 70% Of Democrats Think Hillary Should Still Run Even If Indicted

[TheOldSchool]

Heat up the ovens too.

Ovens are too messy. It's easier to make people disappear if there's nothing to clean up.

Still WAY too early for your sick "humor".

I assume you're talking to Mudwhistle, who is the one that brought the ovens up.

 

[Wyld Kard]

They just want to make history at the expense of the country.

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent.

Liberals also like to ignore facts and pretend that she hasn't ever done anything wrong.

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

You prove my point again.

No, I just stated a fact.

You just showed that you don't know what facts are.

Facts are those pesky little things that liberals like to ignore.

 

[Markle]

Legally she can't if indicted.

Where is that provision in the Constitution?

 

[flacaltenn]

To think that 70% of ANY group would vote for someone who should never EVER AGAIN hold a TSecret clearance --- is disgusting.r.

Demonstrating again:

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

There is no doubt she mishandled classification information. ALL of her work was ROUTED thru an UNSECURE private server. Only to be determined what other charges are applied. The very act of purposely DESIGNING a convenience for routing the most secret stuff OUT of the approved comm channels is more than mere mishandling.

The fact that you can DENY this -- means you probably never HAD a clearance and/or don't really give a hot fuck about National Security.. If NONE of that impresses you ---- just read your heroines cackles in my Sig line.

THAT quote is stupidity not requiring a verdict. That comment ALONE --- should tell you how oblivious she is to ethics, morals, or character.

 

[Markle]

Still WAY too early for your sick "humor".

I assume you're talking to Mudwhistle, who is the one that brought the ovens up.

Is this NOT your post?

"

Offline
TheOldSchoolPlatinum Member

Click to expand...
Heat up the ovens too.
Click to expand...
Ovens are too messy. It's easier to make people disappear if there's nothing to clean up.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Still WAY too early for your sick "humor".

I assume you're talking to Mudwhistle, who is the one that brought the ovens up.

Is this NOT your post?

"

Offline
TheOldSchoolPlatinum Member

Click to expand...
Heat up the ovens too.
Click to expand...
Ovens are too messy. It's easier to make people disappear if there's nothing to clean up.

In response to another poster saying it's time to ready the ovens yes

 

[Syriusly]

To think that 70% of ANY group would vote for someone who should never EVER AGAIN hold a TSecret clearance --- is disgusting.r.

Demonstrating again:

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

There is no doubt she mishandled classification information. ALL of her work was ROUTED thru an UNSECURE private server. Only to be determined what other charges are applied. The very act of purposely DESIGNING a convenience for routing the most secret stuff OUT of the approved comm channels is more than mere mishandling.

The fact that you can DENY this -- means you probably never HAD a clearance and/or don't really give a hot fuck about National Security.. If NONE of that impresses you ---- just read your heroines cackles in my Sig line.

THAT quote is stupidity not requiring a verdict. That comment ALONE --- should tell you how oblivious she is to ethics, morals, or character.

What sig line? I ignore sig lines frankly.

Like I said- and nothing you have said changes the facts- Ms. Clinton has not been charged- let alone convicted of anything.


4* If Hillary Clinton is charged with a felony in connection with the e-mail investigation, should she immediately stop campaigning or should she continue running until a court determines her guilt or innocence?

This thread is about a poll in which Democrat voters were asked this question
Questions - Hillary Clinton E-mail - May 29-30, 2016 - Rasmussen Reports™
4* If Hillary Clinton is charged with a felony in connection with the e-mail investigation, should she immediately stop campaigning or should she continue running until a court determines her guilt or innocence?

So far, you and other conservatives have been aghast- AGHAST- that Democrats would presume someone innocent until proven guilty- you know- the question this thread was about.

So once again- my point- which keeps getting demonstrated over and over in this thread:


Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

 

[Syriusly]

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent.

Liberals also like to ignore facts and pretend that she hasn't ever done anything wrong.

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

You prove my point again.

No, I just stated a fact.

You just showed that you don't know what facts are.

Facts are those pesky little things that liberals like to ignore.

Again- you are just showing again that you don't know what a fact is.

What this thread demonstrates though is

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

 

[flacaltenn]

To think that 70% of ANY group would vote for someone who should never EVER AGAIN hold a TSecret clearance --- is disgusting.r.

Demonstrating again:

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

There is no doubt she mishandled classification information. ALL of her work was ROUTED thru an UNSECURE private server. Only to be determined what other charges are applied. The very act of purposely DESIGNING a convenience for routing the most secret stuff OUT of the approved comm channels is more than mere mishandling.

The fact that you can DENY this -- means you probably never HAD a clearance and/or don't really give a hot fuck about National Security.. If NONE of that impresses you ---- just read your heroines cackles in my Sig line.

THAT quote is stupidity not requiring a verdict. That comment ALONE --- should tell you how oblivious she is to ethics, morals, or character.

What sig line? I ignore sig lines frankly.

Like I said- and nothing you have said changes the facts- Ms. Clinton has not been charged- let alone convicted of anything.


4* If Hillary Clinton is charged with a felony in connection with the e-mail investigation, should she immediately stop campaigning or should she continue running until a court determines her guilt or innocence?

This thread is about a poll in which Democrat voters were asked this question
Questions - Hillary Clinton E-mail - May 29-30, 2016 - Rasmussen Reports™
4* If Hillary Clinton is charged with a felony in connection with the e-mail investigation, should she immediately stop campaigning or should she continue running until a court determines her guilt or innocence?

So far, you and other conservatives have been aghast- AGHAST- that Democrats would presume someone innocent until proven guilty- you know- the question this thread was about.

So once again- my point- which keeps getting demonstrated over and over in this thread:


Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

The fact that you won't read the Sig Line is troublesome. So in case you've locked yourself in a tiny safe space, I'll provide it for your comments (or for you to simply ignore which is the EXPECTED lemming response).


>>Hillary Victory Speech 3-15-16>> The epitome of clueless hypocrisy..

"We live in a complex and, yes, a dangerous world. Protecting America's national security can never be an after thought."

Yeah -- she actually said that...


BTW --- I'm not a Conservative. I dont usually vote for Dems or Reps. I just happen to have spent about 8 years in national intelligence areas. And my life was restricted whilst I did and had to contend with all the "inconveniences" that your power whore arrogantly ignored. And I (and millions of others that have served in those trusted capacities) am MIGHTILY PISSED.

Figures you would just blow this off as another "partisan thing"..

 

[my2¢]

If it is true that 70% of Democrats believe this then unfortunately I don't see how she'll be defeated if she's not charged with anything.

 

[mudwhistle]

Legally she can't if indicted.

Where is that provision in the Constitution?

It's not in the Constitution. It's in the book of knowledge. Something you people on the left never read or subscribe to.
It's clear you'all have no sense of right or wrong.
The reason your leaders suck so much is because you expect so little of them.

 

[paperview]

Democrats want a known criminal in the White House. According to Rasmussen 71% of Democrat voters want her to keep running even if she's indicted. This is no surprise because Democrats have been putting criminals in office for decades. Half of all voters don't seem to mind for one reason or another. Seems the media has succeeded in dumbing down America.

50% Say Clinton Should Keep Running Even If Indicted

Legally she can't if indicted.

Always., always, so misinformed.

 

[Wyld Kard]

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

You prove my point again.

No, I just stated a fact.

You just showed that you don't know what facts are.

Facts are those pesky little things that liberals like to ignore.

Again- you are just showing again that you don't know what a fact is.

What this thread demonstrates though is

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

you are just showing again that you don't what a fact is

Hillary Clinton is someone who is corrupt, dishonest, untrustworthy, and who doesn't have a good track record. Those are FACTS about her.

 

[mudwhistle]

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

You prove my point again.

No, I just stated a fact.

You just showed that you don't know what facts are.

Facts are those pesky little things that liberals like to ignore.

Again- you are just showing again that you don't know what a fact is.

What this thread demonstrates though is

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

you are just showing again that you don't what a fact is

Hillary Clinton is someone who is corrupt, dishonest, untrustworthy, and who doesn't have a good track record. Those are FACTS about her.

The media has been conditioning the public into accepting a dishonest candidate like Hillary for decades. This is why Trump called them a bunch of sleazy journalists yesterday. They know the truth but refuse to report it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

Whereas you leftists believe in innocent if a party member.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hillary Clinton is someone who is corrupt, dishonest, untrustworthy, and who doesn't have a good track record. Those are FACTS about her.

Which makes her a perfect reflection of the democratic - socialist party.

What we need to accept is that democrats are NOT good people; not the leaders, not the rank and file.

Scumbags want to elect a scumbag that represents their own values and ethics.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The media has been conditioning the public into accepting a dishonest candidate like Hillary for decades. This is why Trump called them a bunch of sleazy journalists yesterday. They know the truth but refuse to report it.

That made me burst out laughing.

The man may win me over yet. It's about time someone called out the little Goebbels of the DNC press.

 

[Syriusly]

[

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

Whereas you leftists believe in innocent if a party member.

No- you convict someone, I will believe the person is guilty regardless of party.
Former Connecticut Gov. John G. Rowland, Republican- guilty
Former Rep. Frank Ballance, D-N.C.- guilty

See- not that hard to do.

But you- and your fellow travellers Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent.

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

 

[Syriusly]

No, I just stated a fact.

You just showed that you don't know what facts are.

Facts are those pesky little things that liberals like to ignore.

Again- you are just showing again that you don't know what a fact is.

What this thread demonstrates though is

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

you are just showing again that you don't what a fact is

Hillary Clinton is someone who is corrupt, dishonest, untrustworthy, and who doesn't have a good track record. Those are FACTS about her.

The media has been conditioning the public into accepting a dishonest candidate like Hillary for decades. This is why Trump called them a bunch of sleazy journalists yesterday. They know the truth but refuse to report it.

So your contention is that is the reason why Trumpsters are willing to accept Trumps dishonesty?

Perhaps it is true.

 

[Syriusly]

To think that 70% of ANY group would vote for someone who should never EVER AGAIN hold a TSecret clearance --- is disgusting.r.

Demonstrating again:

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

There is no doubt she mishandled classification information. ALL of her work was ROUTED thru an UNSECURE private server. Only to be determined what other charges are applied. The very act of purposely DESIGNING a convenience for routing the most secret stuff OUT of the approved comm channels is more than mere mishandling.

The fact that you can DENY this -- means you probably never HAD a clearance and/or don't really give a hot fuck about National Security.. If NONE of that impresses you ---- just read your heroines cackles in my Sig line.

THAT quote is stupidity not requiring a verdict. That comment ALONE --- should tell you how oblivious she is to ethics, morals, or character.

What sig line? I ignore sig lines frankly.

Like I said- and nothing you have said changes the facts- Ms. Clinton has not been charged- let alone convicted of anything.


4* If Hillary Clinton is charged with a felony in connection with the e-mail investigation, should she immediately stop campaigning or should she continue running until a court determines her guilt or innocence?

This thread is about a poll in which Democrat voters were asked this question
Questions - Hillary Clinton E-mail - May 29-30, 2016 - Rasmussen Reports™
4* If Hillary Clinton is charged with a felony in connection with the e-mail investigation, should she immediately stop campaigning or should she continue running until a court determines her guilt or innocence?

So far, you and other conservatives have been aghast- AGHAST- that Democrats would presume someone innocent until proven guilty- you know- the question this thread was about.

So once again- my point- which keeps getting demonstrated over and over in this thread:


Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent

The fact that you won't read the Sig Line is troublesome. So in case you've locked yourself in a tiny safe space, I'll provide it for your comments (or for you to simply ignore which is the EXPECTED lemming response).


>>Hillary Victory Speech 3-15-16>> The epitome of clueless hypocrisy..

"We live in a complex and, yes, a dangerous world. Protecting America's national security can never be an after thought."

Yeah -- she actually said that...


BTW --- I'm not a Conservative. I dont usually vote for Dems or Reps. I just happen to have spent about 8 years in national intelligence areas. And my life was restricted whilst I did and had to contend with all the "inconveniences" that your power whore arrogantly ignored. And I (and millions of others that have served in those trusted capacities) am MIGHTILY PISSED.

Figures you would just blow this off as another "partisan thing"..

Okay- you are not a Conservative.

You are just another person who believes in guilty until proven innocent.