Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My view is very mainstream. Nobody wants young lovers to go to jail because one of them is over an imaginary line, but when the age difference starts becoming 4-6 years, then it stops being teenage mutual frolicking and starts becoming predatory behavior.I don't agree with that. If you have a 14 year old daughter, for example, you want to know that the law is helping you in your effort to protect her from predators. 2 or 3 years most people understand, but what if it's a 19 year old seducing a 13 year old girl?Teen sex should not be criminalized
With that said however, I think a little jail time is fine, but the sex registry is over the top barbaric.
So if your 14 year old daughter shacks up with a 17 year old Junior it is OK, but if she shacks up with an 18 year old Senior it is a felony
The jury acquitted on that charge, so you're wrong.You're both 'substandard' {mod}. Statutory rape can never be considered 'just plain old rape'.In his case it was just plain old rape. When the girl says no, that's it, boys...The jury nullified stat rape or he would have been in prison for 11 years. At least someone was looking out for him if not this Nazi judge.http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/30/us/owen-labrie-st-pauls-school-sentencing.html?_r=0
This is why sometimes I can't stand the law. The felony is for using a computer? not the actual act?
For once i agree 100% with you.
I hope you both understand exactly what I mean by 'substandard'. It is in fact the height of 'substandardness' to make such a statement.
It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
The jury acquitted on that charge, so you're wrong.You're both 'substandard' {mod}. Statutory rape can never be considered 'just plain old rape'.In his case it was just plain old rape. When the girl says no, that's it, boys...The jury nullified stat rape or he would have been in prison for 11 years. At least someone was looking out for him if not this Nazi judge.
For once i agree 100% with you.
I hope you both understand exactly what I mean by 'substandard'. It is in fact the height of 'substandardness' to make such a statement.
It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
My point? It wasn't "plain old rape". I'm beginning to wonder if you even know what rape is.The jury acquitted on that charge, so you're wrong.You're both 'substandard' {mod}. Statutory rape can never be considered 'just plain old rape'.In his case it was just plain old rape. When the girl says no, that's it, boys...
For once i agree 100% with you.
I hope you both understand exactly what I mean by 'substandard'. It is in fact the height of 'substandardness' to make such a statement.
It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
Yes, they did. A jury acquitted OJ too. Your point?
I point this out with a heavy heart. I am not happy with the dumbing down of America:It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
You're both 'substandard' {mod}. Statutory rape can never be considered 'just plain old rape'.In his case it was just plain old rape. When the girl says no, that's it, boys...The jury nullified stat rape or he would have been in prison for 11 years. At least someone was looking out for him if not this Nazi judge.http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/30/us/owen-labrie-st-pauls-school-sentencing.html?_r=0
This is why sometimes I can't stand the law. The felony is for using a computer? not the actual act?
For once i agree 100% with you.
I hope you both understand exactly what I mean by 'substandard'. It is in fact the height of 'substandardness' to make such a statement.
It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
My point? It wasn't "plain old rape". I'm beginning to wonder if you even know what rape is.The jury acquitted on that charge, so you're wrong.You're both 'substandard' {mod}. Statutory rape can never be considered 'just plain old rape'.For once i agree 100% with you.
I hope you both understand exactly what I mean by 'substandard'. It is in fact the height of 'substandardness' to make such a statement.
It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
Yes, they did. A jury acquitted OJ too. Your point?
Actually murder was against the law in the good ol' days too. A good ass kicking might have been overlooked though and that's what this kid really deserves.You're both 'substandard' {mod}. Statutory rape can never be considered 'just plain old rape'.In his case it was just plain old rape. When the girl says no, that's it, boys...The jury nullified stat rape or he would have been in prison for 11 years. At least someone was looking out for him if not this Nazi judge.
For once i agree 100% with you.
I hope you both understand exactly what I mean by 'substandard'. It is in fact the height of 'substandardness' to make such a statement.
It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
Unlike the good ol' days, they don't kill much any more. Easier to pay people off it seems. I miss the good ol' days
You're both 'substandard' {mod}. Statutory rape can never be considered 'just plain old rape'.In his case it was just plain old rape. When the girl says no, that's it, boys...The jury nullified stat rape or he would have been in prison for 11 years. At least someone was looking out for him if not this Nazi judge.
For once i agree 100% with you.
I hope you both understand exactly what I mean by 'substandard'. It is in fact the height of 'substandardness' to make such a statement.
It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
Unlike the good ol' days, they don't kill much any more. Easier to pay people off it seems. I miss the good ol' days
No she didn't. There sex was mutual. The judge's position was that the girl wasn't mature enough to know what she was consenting to.My point? It wasn't "plain old rape". I'm beginning to wonder if you even know what rape is.The jury acquitted on that charge, so you're wrong.You're both 'substandard' {mod}. Statutory rape can never be considered 'just plain old rape'.
I hope you both understand exactly what I mean by 'substandard'. It is in fact the height of 'substandardness' to make such a statement.
It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
Yes, they did. A jury acquitted OJ too. Your point?
Did the girl say "no".
You're both 'substandard' {mod}. Statutory rape can never be considered 'just plain old rape'.In his case it was just plain old rape. When the girl says no, that's it, boys...
For once i agree 100% with you.
I hope you both understand exactly what I mean by 'substandard'. It is in fact the height of 'substandardness' to make such a statement.
It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
Unlike the good ol' days, they don't kill much any more. Easier to pay people off it seems. I miss the good ol' days
Don't bet any money on that.
We have turned into a country of self-righteous pussies, mod excluded of course.
We have turned into a country of self-righteous pussies, mod excluded of course.
For the record, you said that. Not that I disagree of course.We have turned into a country of self-righteous pussies, mod excluded of course.
Mod excused for below average intelligence. He just demonstrated he has no idea what "plain old rape" is.
No she didn't. There sex was mutual. The judge's position was that the girl wasn't mature enough to know what she was consenting to.My point? It wasn't "plain old rape". I'm beginning to wonder if you even know what rape is.The jury acquitted on that charge, so you're wrong.It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
Yes, they did. A jury acquitted OJ too. Your point?
Did the girl say "no".
Did you actually read the article?
Good to know. I amend my previous comments and add that West is a self-righteous pussy.We have turned into a country of self-righteous pussies, mod excluded of course.
Not a mod if not acting in mod-capacity is my reading of the rules. Wanna weigh in on threads and be a dick you can. But we can treat you like we do each other too is my reading of the Rules.
Their sex was not mutual...No she didn't. There sex was mutual. The judge's position was that the girl wasn't mature enough to know what she was consenting to.My point? It wasn't "plain old rape". I'm beginning to wonder if you even know what rape is.The jury acquitted on that charge, so you're wrong.It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
Yes, they did. A jury acquitted OJ too. Your point?
Did the girl say "no".
Did you actually read the article?
Good to know. I amend my previous comments and add that West is a self-righteous pussy.We have turned into a country of self-righteous pussies, mod excluded of course.
Not a mod if not acting in mod-capacity is my reading of the rules. Wanna weigh in on threads and be a dick you can. But we can treat you like we do each other too is my reading of the Rules.
She did not have the legal right to say 'yes' is the point.My point? It wasn't "plain old rape". I'm beginning to wonder if you even know what rape is.The jury acquitted on that charge, so you're wrong.You're both 'substandard' {mod}. Statutory rape can never be considered 'just plain old rape'.
I hope you both understand exactly what I mean by 'substandard'. It is in fact the height of 'substandardness' to make such a statement.
It wasn't statutory. According to every bit of evidence I have seen it was rape pure and simple. Like I said the little asshole got off lucky and the poor girl no doubt is now set up for life and no longer needs to ever have to find a job. That's how the rich handle things. That or they just have their enemy killed.
Yes, they did. A jury acquitted OJ too. Your point?
Did the girl say "no".
