Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would the market want negative rates? Rich people want a return on their savings too.
I wish I didn't have to deal with so much dishonesty too.
I don't care "what trump called for". Have you learned nothing all these years? Trump says all kinds of stuff. Pay less attention to what he says, and more to what he does.
The irony is, a bunch of people on here still claim that the Federal Reserve is a private bank, and if that's true, why does it matter what Trump says anyway?
Want to bet it happens? There is only one way to go from zero. Money was intended to be "FREE"?
Yes or no.... do wealthy people want interest on their deposits? Yes or no dude. Answer that, or shut up. You are speaking stupid non-stop.
No. They want 12% returns in the market. Wealthy people don't keep their money in savings.
IOW, they put their money to work.
How's that working for them right now? Do you understand that this is why retired people are reluctant to?
So why should they have their money stolen to boost the markets they aren't interested in?
he's trying to fix an overall economy. you are worried about a few who MAY be impacted by this and 9gnoring the people who are.Name the people doing that.he keeps wanting life to be his utopia and gets lost in the reality in his way.Yes or no.... do wealthy people want interest on their deposits? Yes or no dude. Answer that, or shut up. You are speaking stupid non-stop.
Not supporting the idea of stealing from seniors to boost the markets is still a long ways from any utopia.
Trump.
Trump has ramped up calls for negative interest rates. Here's what they are and why they matter. | Markets Insider
Wall Street.
Voices: Is Pimco right that negative yields make sense?
They say it will be good for people to have their money taken from them.
you seem to pride yourself on strawmaning up a helpless victim so you can prance around and shout for their defense.
Want to bet it happens? There is only one way to go from zero. Money was intended to be "FREE"?
Yes or no.... do wealthy people want interest on their deposits? Yes or no dude. Answer that, or shut up. You are speaking stupid non-stop.
No. They want 12% returns in the market. Wealthy people don't keep their money in savings.
IOW, they put their money to work.
How's that working for them right now? Do you understand that this is why retired people are reluctant to?
So why should they have their money stolen to boost the markets they aren't interested in?
That is why, as people get older, they diversity their investments into safer funds that may pay lower returns but generally don't fluctuate as much. Dude, you really need to learn something about this stuff.
The truly wealthy saw this coming and moved their money to safer havens. That's part of what drives market volitility.
Yes or no.... do wealthy people want interest on their deposits? Yes or no dude. Answer that, or shut up. You are speaking stupid non-stop.
No. They want 12% returns in the market. Wealthy people don't keep their money in savings.
IOW, they put their money to work.
How's that working for them right now? Do you understand that this is why retired people are reluctant to?
So why should they have their money stolen to boost the markets they aren't interested in?
That is why, as people get older, they diversity their investments into safer funds that may pay lower returns but generally don't fluctuate as much. Dude, you really need to learn something about this stuff.
The truly wealthy saw this coming and moved their money to safer havens. That's part of what drives market volitility.
More and more do not trust the markets. They understand it's all bubbles now that will always burst.
The theory of how the markets are supposed to work aren't how they work.
No. They want 12% returns in the market. Wealthy people don't keep their money in savings.
IOW, they put their money to work.
How's that working for them right now? Do you understand that this is why retired people are reluctant to?
So why should they have their money stolen to boost the markets they aren't interested in?
That is why, as people get older, they diversity their investments into safer funds that may pay lower returns but generally don't fluctuate as much. Dude, you really need to learn something about this stuff.
The truly wealthy saw this coming and moved their money to safer havens. That's part of what drives market volitility.
More and more do not trust the markets. They understand it's all bubbles now that will always burst.
The theory of how the markets are supposed to work aren't how they work.
And yet, people get rich off the market all the time.
Then why do you want to take from the rich and give to your personal causes?he's trying to fix an overall economy. you are worried about a few who MAY be impacted by this and 9gnoring the people who are.Name the people doing that.he keeps wanting life to be his utopia and gets lost in the reality in his way.
Not supporting the idea of stealing from seniors to boost the markets is still a long ways from any utopia.
Trump.
Trump has ramped up calls for negative interest rates. Here's what they are and why they matter. | Markets Insider
Wall Street.
Voices: Is Pimco right that negative yields make sense?
They say it will be good for people to have their money taken from them.
you seem to pride yourself on strawmaning up a helpless victim so you can prance around and shout for their defense.
I was asked a question. I supplied the answer. It would be cool if others would do the same when asked.
I thought it was wrong to take from some to give to others?
Then why do you want to take from the rich and give to your personal causes?he's trying to fix an overall economy. you are worried about a few who MAY be impacted by this and 9gnoring the people who are.Name the people doing that.Not supporting the idea of stealing from seniors to boost the markets is still a long ways from any utopia.
Trump.
Trump has ramped up calls for negative interest rates. Here's what they are and why they matter. | Markets Insider
Wall Street.
Voices: Is Pimco right that negative yields make sense?
They say it will be good for people to have their money taken from them.
you seem to pride yourself on strawmaning up a helpless victim so you can prance around and shout for their defense.
I was asked a question. I supplied the answer. It would be cool if others would do the same when asked.
I thought it was wrong to take from some to give to others?
Check mate.
Which illustrates the real problem. Younger people today feel no need to work over 40 hours a week.
Lol....because gas stations regularly offer overtime.
Then work a different job on the weekends. When I was younger, if I didn't work six days a week, I always had another job.
No you didn't.
Oh yes I did, and back then, it was not uncommon for other people as well. At one point, I was working three jobs seven days a week.
Of course back then, we didn't blow money on recreational products like we do today. We had one house phone, one family car, McDonald's was not a weekly part of your diet, it was a huge treat. We had a color television and an 8-track player and stereo. You got three channels on your television, and all summer they only played reruns.
My father laughs today when he tells us he's paying more for his monthly cell phone bill than he did the mortgage on the house we grew up in. And yes, during the construction season, my father worked night and day, and usually Saturday and Sunday.
He's paying more for his cell phone because shareholders demand ever increasing returns. Despite cell carriers making money left and right, ask the guy at the mall trying to sell these services what he is making.
Lol....because gas stations regularly offer overtime.
Then work a different job on the weekends. When I was younger, if I didn't work six days a week, I always had another job.
No you didn't.
Oh yes I did, and back then, it was not uncommon for other people as well. At one point, I was working three jobs seven days a week.
Of course back then, we didn't blow money on recreational products like we do today. We had one house phone, one family car, McDonald's was not a weekly part of your diet, it was a huge treat. We had a color television and an 8-track player and stereo. You got three channels on your television, and all summer they only played reruns.
My father laughs today when he tells us he's paying more for his monthly cell phone bill than he did the mortgage on the house we grew up in. And yes, during the construction season, my father worked night and day, and usually Saturday and Sunday.
He's paying more for his cell phone because shareholders demand ever increasing returns. Despite cell carriers making money left and right, ask the guy at the mall trying to sell these services what he is making.
That's not the point. The point is, we spend a hell of a lot of money on convenience and entertainment than we did many years ago. However even in the most dire position, we won't give any of it up in desperate times, even if you are living paycheck to paycheck.
Look in the paper sometime for cars. The purchase price is not highlighted, the lease price is, because many people lease their car instead of buying it. Do you really need the internet? Well, for some things you probably do, but the internet is mostly for entertainment. You don't have to have it as libraries offer it for free. Cell phones? Yes, it's good to have one just in case of an emergency, but people don't stop there. They need unlimited access to the internet, smart phones, unlimited calls, and many today (like myself) don't even have a landline phone. My cousin told me his plan for him and his family was over $235.00 a month. Mine is $150.00 a month just for me and my mother.
A lot of people are not buying homes any longer. They rent. Good for me being a landlord, but rental prices have skyrocketed the last ten years due to supply and demand from coast to coast. Younger people today simply don't want to deal with the problems and work involved with home ownership. Some states like California talked about rent price controls.
Then work a different job on the weekends. When I was younger, if I didn't work six days a week, I always had another job.
No you didn't.
Oh yes I did, and back then, it was not uncommon for other people as well. At one point, I was working three jobs seven days a week.
Of course back then, we didn't blow money on recreational products like we do today. We had one house phone, one family car, McDonald's was not a weekly part of your diet, it was a huge treat. We had a color television and an 8-track player and stereo. You got three channels on your television, and all summer they only played reruns.
My father laughs today when he tells us he's paying more for his monthly cell phone bill than he did the mortgage on the house we grew up in. And yes, during the construction season, my father worked night and day, and usually Saturday and Sunday.
He's paying more for his cell phone because shareholders demand ever increasing returns. Despite cell carriers making money left and right, ask the guy at the mall trying to sell these services what he is making.
That's not the point. The point is, we spend a hell of a lot of money on convenience and entertainment than we did many years ago. However even in the most dire position, we won't give any of it up in desperate times, even if you are living paycheck to paycheck.
Look in the paper sometime for cars. The purchase price is not highlighted, the lease price is, because many people lease their car instead of buying it. Do you really need the internet? Well, for some things you probably do, but the internet is mostly for entertainment. You don't have to have it as libraries offer it for free. Cell phones? Yes, it's good to have one just in case of an emergency, but people don't stop there. They need unlimited access to the internet, smart phones, unlimited calls, and many today (like myself) don't even have a landline phone. My cousin told me his plan for him and his family was over $235.00 a month. Mine is $150.00 a month just for me and my mother.
A lot of people are not buying homes any longer. They rent. Good for me being a landlord, but rental prices have skyrocketed the last ten years due to supply and demand from coast to coast. Younger people today simply don't want to deal with the problems and work involved with home ownership. Some states like California talked about rent price controls.
You apply for jobs now with your cell phone and internet. No, people can not just give it up.
see what I mean? we go from it's wrong to take from others to unless you don't like them.Then why do you want to take from the rich and give to your personal causes?he's trying to fix an overall economy. you are worried about a few who MAY be impacted by this and 9gnoring the people who are.Name the people doing that.
Trump.
Trump has ramped up calls for negative interest rates. Here's what they are and why they matter. | Markets Insider
Wall Street.
Voices: Is Pimco right that negative yields make sense?
They say it will be good for people to have their money taken from them.
you seem to pride yourself on strawmaning up a helpless victim so you can prance around and shout for their defense.
I was asked a question. I supplied the answer. It would be cool if others would do the same when asked.
I thought it was wrong to take from some to give to others?
Check mate.
Why is it that everyone shouldn't share in the Feds Socialist policies?
The markets should keep all of that for themselves AND steal from those who don't want to participate?
No you didn't.
Oh yes I did, and back then, it was not uncommon for other people as well. At one point, I was working three jobs seven days a week.
Of course back then, we didn't blow money on recreational products like we do today. We had one house phone, one family car, McDonald's was not a weekly part of your diet, it was a huge treat. We had a color television and an 8-track player and stereo. You got three channels on your television, and all summer they only played reruns.
My father laughs today when he tells us he's paying more for his monthly cell phone bill than he did the mortgage on the house we grew up in. And yes, during the construction season, my father worked night and day, and usually Saturday and Sunday.
He's paying more for his cell phone because shareholders demand ever increasing returns. Despite cell carriers making money left and right, ask the guy at the mall trying to sell these services what he is making.
That's not the point. The point is, we spend a hell of a lot of money on convenience and entertainment than we did many years ago. However even in the most dire position, we won't give any of it up in desperate times, even if you are living paycheck to paycheck.
Look in the paper sometime for cars. The purchase price is not highlighted, the lease price is, because many people lease their car instead of buying it. Do you really need the internet? Well, for some things you probably do, but the internet is mostly for entertainment. You don't have to have it as libraries offer it for free. Cell phones? Yes, it's good to have one just in case of an emergency, but people don't stop there. They need unlimited access to the internet, smart phones, unlimited calls, and many today (like myself) don't even have a landline phone. My cousin told me his plan for him and his family was over $235.00 a month. Mine is $150.00 a month just for me and my mother.
A lot of people are not buying homes any longer. They rent. Good for me being a landlord, but rental prices have skyrocketed the last ten years due to supply and demand from coast to coast. Younger people today simply don't want to deal with the problems and work involved with home ownership. Some states like California talked about rent price controls.
You apply for jobs now with your cell phone and internet. No, people can not just give it up.
And you can't go to the library to do that?
see what I mean? we go from it's wrong to take from others to unless you don't like them.Then why do you want to take from the rich and give to your personal causes?he's trying to fix an overall economy. you are worried about a few who MAY be impacted by this and 9gnoring the people who are.Trump.
Trump has ramped up calls for negative interest rates. Here's what they are and why they matter. | Markets Insider
Wall Street.
Voices: Is Pimco right that negative yields make sense?
They say it will be good for people to have their money taken from them.
you seem to pride yourself on strawmaning up a helpless victim so you can prance around and shout for their defense.
I was asked a question. I supplied the answer. It would be cool if others would do the same when asked.
I thought it was wrong to take from some to give to others?
Check mate.
Why is it that everyone shouldn't share in the Feds Socialist policies?
The markets should keep all of that for themselves AND steal from those who don't want to participate?
what have i misrepresented?see what I mean? we go from it's wrong to take from others to unless you don't like them.Then why do you want to take from the rich and give to your personal causes?he's trying to fix an overall economy. you are worried about a few who MAY be impacted by this and 9gnoring the people who are.
you seem to pride yourself on strawmaning up a helpless victim so you can prance around and shout for their defense.
I was asked a question. I supplied the answer. It would be cool if others would do the same when asked.
I thought it was wrong to take from some to give to others?
Check mate.
Why is it that everyone shouldn't share in the Feds Socialist policies?
The markets should keep all of that for themselves AND steal from those who don't want to participate?
You can misrepresent what I say if you wish. It's all you have.
what have i misrepresented?see what I mean? we go from it's wrong to take from others to unless you don't like them.Then why do you want to take from the rich and give to your personal causes?I was asked a question. I supplied the answer. It would be cool if others would do the same when asked.
I thought it was wrong to take from some to give to others?
Check mate.
Why is it that everyone shouldn't share in the Feds Socialist policies?
The markets should keep all of that for themselves AND steal from those who don't want to participate?
You can misrepresent what I say if you wish. It's all you have.
i tell you this is how things work and you're going nuts trying to defend the extreme example
you go off and make up your extreme examples
i ask you to tell me how people are stealing
you show me articles on how the market works
i say this is normal
you say it's wrong to take from some to give to others
i ask you why it's ok to do that to those who have money
you now what to generisize the theft by making it "fed policy" so you can take from one to give to another
OF WHICH you just said was wrong.
so at this point, go fuck yourself.
it works for most people. you just don't like it and take up the windmill / the cause of the few it doesn't work for and cry the system is unfair.what have i misrepresented?see what I mean? we go from it's wrong to take from others to unless you don't like them.Then why do you want to take from the rich and give to your personal causes?
Check mate.
Why is it that everyone shouldn't share in the Feds Socialist policies?
The markets should keep all of that for themselves AND steal from those who don't want to participate?
You can misrepresent what I say if you wish. It's all you have.
i tell you this is how things work and you're going nuts trying to defend the extreme example
you go off and make up your extreme examples
i ask you to tell me how people are stealing
you show me articles on how the market works
i say this is normal
you say it's wrong to take from some to give to others
i ask you why it's ok to do that to those who have money
you now what to generisize the theft by making it "fed policy" so you can take from one to give to another
OF WHICH you just said was wrong.
so at this point, go fuck yourself.
How it works is the problem. We have massive Federal socialist programs to boost the markets but when someone wants to spread that around to more than a few you (and others) yell, SOCIALISM.
Never mind that the programs the few are benefitting from are socialist programs.
And even then the ones who get the most benefit aren't happy. They want to steal from others.
it works for most people. you just don't like it and take up the windmill / the cause of the few it doesn't work for and cry the system is unfair.what have i misrepresented?see what I mean? we go from it's wrong to take from others to unless you don't like them.Why is it that everyone shouldn't share in the Feds Socialist policies?
The markets should keep all of that for themselves AND steal from those who don't want to participate?
You can misrepresent what I say if you wish. It's all you have.
i tell you this is how things work and you're going nuts trying to defend the extreme example
you go off and make up your extreme examples
i ask you to tell me how people are stealing
you show me articles on how the market works
i say this is normal
you say it's wrong to take from some to give to others
i ask you why it's ok to do that to those who have money
you now what to generisize the theft by making it "fed policy" so you can take from one to give to another
OF WHICH you just said was wrong.
so at this point, go fuck yourself.
How it works is the problem. We have massive Federal socialist programs to boost the markets but when someone wants to spread that around to more than a few you (and others) yell, SOCIALISM.
Never mind that the programs the few are benefitting from are socialist programs.
And even then the ones who get the most benefit aren't happy. They want to steal from others.
you say you can't take from one to give to another then turn right the fuck around and do it for your benefit.
same bullshit, different river it flows down.
but by definition there will ALWAYS be those few.it works for most people. you just don't like it and take up the windmill / the cause of the few it doesn't work for and cry the system is unfair.what have i misrepresented?see what I mean? we go from it's wrong to take from others to unless you don't like them.
You can misrepresent what I say if you wish. It's all you have.
i tell you this is how things work and you're going nuts trying to defend the extreme example
you go off and make up your extreme examples
i ask you to tell me how people are stealing
you show me articles on how the market works
i say this is normal
you say it's wrong to take from some to give to others
i ask you why it's ok to do that to those who have money
you now what to generisize the theft by making it "fed policy" so you can take from one to give to another
OF WHICH you just said was wrong.
so at this point, go fuck yourself.
How it works is the problem. We have massive Federal socialist programs to boost the markets but when someone wants to spread that around to more than a few you (and others) yell, SOCIALISM.
Never mind that the programs the few are benefitting from are socialist programs.
And even then the ones who get the most benefit aren't happy. They want to steal from others.
you say you can't take from one to give to another then turn right the fuck around and do it for your benefit.
same bullshit, different river it flows down.
It works in large part for the few.
Oh yes I did, and back then, it was not uncommon for other people as well. At one point, I was working three jobs seven days a week.
Of course back then, we didn't blow money on recreational products like we do today. We had one house phone, one family car, McDonald's was not a weekly part of your diet, it was a huge treat. We had a color television and an 8-track player and stereo. You got three channels on your television, and all summer they only played reruns.
My father laughs today when he tells us he's paying more for his monthly cell phone bill than he did the mortgage on the house we grew up in. And yes, during the construction season, my father worked night and day, and usually Saturday and Sunday.
He's paying more for his cell phone because shareholders demand ever increasing returns. Despite cell carriers making money left and right, ask the guy at the mall trying to sell these services what he is making.
That's not the point. The point is, we spend a hell of a lot of money on convenience and entertainment than we did many years ago. However even in the most dire position, we won't give any of it up in desperate times, even if you are living paycheck to paycheck.
Look in the paper sometime for cars. The purchase price is not highlighted, the lease price is, because many people lease their car instead of buying it. Do you really need the internet? Well, for some things you probably do, but the internet is mostly for entertainment. You don't have to have it as libraries offer it for free. Cell phones? Yes, it's good to have one just in case of an emergency, but people don't stop there. They need unlimited access to the internet, smart phones, unlimited calls, and many today (like myself) don't even have a landline phone. My cousin told me his plan for him and his family was over $235.00 a month. Mine is $150.00 a month just for me and my mother.
A lot of people are not buying homes any longer. They rent. Good for me being a landlord, but rental prices have skyrocketed the last ten years due to supply and demand from coast to coast. Younger people today simply don't want to deal with the problems and work involved with home ownership. Some states like California talked about rent price controls.
You apply for jobs now with your cell phone and internet. No, people can not just give it up.
And you can't go to the library to do that?
No, no you can't. For one right now they are closed. People trying to get a better job should ask for time off to go to the library to check on their job applications?
but by definition there will ALWAYS be those few.it works for most people. you just don't like it and take up the windmill / the cause of the few it doesn't work for and cry the system is unfair.what have i misrepresented?You can misrepresent what I say if you wish. It's all you have.
i tell you this is how things work and you're going nuts trying to defend the extreme example
you go off and make up your extreme examples
i ask you to tell me how people are stealing
you show me articles on how the market works
i say this is normal
you say it's wrong to take from some to give to others
i ask you why it's ok to do that to those who have money
you now what to generisize the theft by making it "fed policy" so you can take from one to give to another
OF WHICH you just said was wrong.
so at this point, go fuck yourself.
How it works is the problem. We have massive Federal socialist programs to boost the markets but when someone wants to spread that around to more than a few you (and others) yell, SOCIALISM.
Never mind that the programs the few are benefitting from are socialist programs.
And even then the ones who get the most benefit aren't happy. They want to steal from others.
you say you can't take from one to give to another then turn right the fuck around and do it for your benefit.
same bullshit, different river it flows down.
It works in large part for the few.
you're asking the many to give up for your chosen few.
good luck with that.
