Palestine Today

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

U.S. Funding Fatah in Gaza Hard Coup

 

[P F Tinmore]

Haidar Eid, Never Again for Anyone.

 

[USAF 2023]

Maybe the Palestinians should stop using them as Human Shields.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The only offensive activity by the Israelis should be in response to Arab Palestinian violations punishable by either Israel Domestic Law or Article 68 of the Geneva Convention dealing with "Protected persons who commit an offense which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power."

Every counter-attack by the Israelis again the attacking Arab Palestinians are recognized as defensive under Article 2 and Article 51 of the UN Charter.

How about any attacks by the Palestinians against the attacking Israelis are recognized as defensive under Article 2 and Article 51 of the UN Charter?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians (in fact anyone) may file a criminal complaint against any Israeli Governmental misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance → or file criminal complaints in the case of excessive use of force by law enforcement in the maintenance of Article 43 of the Hague Regulation dealing with matters of public order and safety. Such complaints may be filed at any one of the 38 West Bank Isreali Police Stations in Area "C" or any of the more than 20 Palestinian Civil Police Stations in Area "B." Most Israeli Police Patrols (walking Posts and mobile Patrols) are able to accept complaints of a criminal nature as a function of normal police duties; but often, complex complaints might require a visit to a Police Station.

Recognition as defensive action under Article 2 and Article 51 of the UN Charter does not apply to civil police activity under the Hague Regulation.

While the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism (1937) is now a historic International Agreement (it was applicable up and until the end of the Mandate Period), it is a key and fundamental source of what is considered the Customary Law (common law a legal precedent) in cases of terrorism. It was a very detail Law and each offense was treated as a separate offense.

The Permanent Court of International Justice, whose function is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted to it, shall apply:

a. international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting states ;
b. international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law;
c. the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations​

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

POET IN ANDALUCIA The poet: Nathalie Handal

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The only offensive activity by the Israelis should be in response to Arab Palestinian violations punishable by either Israel Domestic Law or Article 68 of the Geneva Convention dealing with "Protected persons who commit an offense which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power."

Every counter-attack by the Israelis again the attacking Arab Palestinians are recognized as defensive under Article 2 and Article 51 of the UN Charter.

How about any attacks by the Palestinians against the attacking Israelis are recognized as defensive under Article 2 and Article 51 of the UN Charter?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians (in fact anyone) may file a criminal complaint against any Israeli Governmental misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance → or file criminal complaints in the case of excessive use of force by law enforcement in the maintenance of Article 43 of the Hague Regulation dealing with matters of public order and safety. Such complaints may be filed at any one of the 38 West Bank Isreali Police Stations in Area "C" or any of the more than 20 Palestinian Civil Police Stations in Area "B." Most Israeli Police Patrols (walking Posts and mobile Patrols) are able to accept complaints of a criminal nature as a function of normal police duties; but often, complex complaints might require a visit to a Police Station.

Recognition as defensive action under Article 2 and Article 51 of the UN Charter does not apply to civil police activity under the Hague Regulation.

While the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism (1937) is now a historic International Agreement (it was applicable up and until the end of the Mandate Period), it is a key and fundamental source of what is considered the Customary Law (common law a legal precedent) in cases of terrorism. It was a very detail Law and each offense was treated as a separate offense.

The Permanent Court of International Justice, whose function is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted to it, shall apply:

a. international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting states ;
b. international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law;
c. the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations​

Most Respectfully,
R

None of that verbosity explains how the Palestinians can be the aggressors from their home.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

First, let me make this perfectly clear. The use of White Phosphorous is not "illegal." But it is not suppose to be used in built-up areas.

Israel's army said Thursday that it would soon halt its use of white phosphorus shells after years of international criticism for using the incendiary munitions in crowded Palestinian areas.
• SOURCE LINK •

(COMMENT)

The State of Israel is not a party to the ICC agreement. It is fully capable of investigating its allegations against the Israeli Defense Force.

The High Court of Justice on Sunday recommended the IDF cease all use of white phosphorus (WP) for creating smoke screens during military operations.
... ... ...
Based on that prediction, he said, it was “important for the High Court to prohibit white phosphorus now when things are relatively calm.”
• SOURCE LINK •

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hollie]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The only offensive activity by the Israelis should be in response to Arab Palestinian violations punishable by either Israel Domestic Law or Article 68 of the Geneva Convention dealing with "Protected persons who commit an offense which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power."

Every counter-attack by the Israelis again the attacking Arab Palestinians are recognized as defensive under Article 2 and Article 51 of the UN Charter.

How about any attacks by the Palestinians against the attacking Israelis are recognized as defensive under Article 2 and Article 51 of the UN Charter?

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians (in fact anyone) may file a criminal complaint against any Israeli Governmental misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance → or file criminal complaints in the case of excessive use of force by law enforcement in the maintenance of Article 43 of the Hague Regulation dealing with matters of public order and safety. Such complaints may be filed at any one of the 38 West Bank Isreali Police Stations in Area "C" or any of the more than 20 Palestinian Civil Police Stations in Area "B." Most Israeli Police Patrols (walking Posts and mobile Patrols) are able to accept complaints of a criminal nature as a function of normal police duties; but often, complex complaints might require a visit to a Police Station.

Recognition as defensive action under Article 2 and Article 51 of the UN Charter does not apply to civil police activity under the Hague Regulation.

While the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism (1937) is now a historic International Agreement (it was applicable up and until the end of the Mandate Period), it is a key and fundamental source of what is considered the Customary Law (common law a legal precedent) in cases of terrorism. It was a very detail Law and each offense was treated as a separate offense.

The Permanent Court of International Justice, whose function is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted to it, shall apply:

a. international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting states ;
b. international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law;
c. the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations​

Most Respectfully,
R

None of that verbosity explains how the Palestinians can be the aggressors from their home.

Acts of war by Arabs-Moslems is aggression.

Are you finding that complicated?

 

[Hollie]

IDF Resistance Against the islamic terrorists.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

That wasn't the question. I answered the question.

None of that verbosity explains how the Palestinians can be the aggressors from their home.

(COMMENT)

You are twisting the question around in some attempt to justify the attacks and individual assaults.

Your implications are a form of passive incitement, wherein you are trying to present the idea to others that it is perfectly legal for Protected Persons (Arab Palestinians) to commit offenses which are solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israelis). This "commentary" about they cannot be "aggressors from their home" is just subterfuge. YOU simply cannot make any attack or assault; just like you cannot attack or assault anyone in your locality.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[member]

they're all just sick, sick bastards...pure evil. watching them/listening to them -- surreal -- i find 'them' disturbingly fascinating.............and there's a whole gaggle of 'em out there......................