Palin has children. Children fuck up. Ok lets talk everybodys children.

[Two Thumbs]

Part of the leftist obsession with her extends to her family.

they made sp rich beyond her dreams with hate and are trying to make the rest of the family rich as well.

We are way passed creepy at this point

No.

But you wingers keep resurrecting her and her dysfunctional family

Not our fault.

yea, it is

sp is just another person to support trump

but 90% of the threads on this were started by leftist

are you surprised that wacky sawah supported him. they deserve each other.

your candidate still sleeves the majority of voters. so good luck with that.

Yes I was surprised, but managed to not care.

My candidate? I support Bernie and he's nipping at that lying filth's heals as we speak.

you support bernie? why? because you think he's easier to beat?

serious question, btw.

He's as close to an honest pol that I've ever seen. Not many leftist have the balls to admit they are utter socialist.
obamas ideals were so bad that Americans, pissed at the loss of liberty took over a building.
berns ideals are far far worse, he has no way to pay for what he wants, all his ideas = a loss of freedom and liberty and will turn America from a Democratic Republic into a socialist hell hole.

He's so bad that I think he will cause Americans to rise up against the government so we can start over with all our freedoms returned.

plz don't ask me, again, what freedoms we have lost b/c I've given you a list already.


(R)(D) are taking our freedoms slowly, tiny cuts, that we accept over time, bern will hit so hard, that people will see (I hope) how bad leftist ideals are.

 

[Two Thumbs]

I don't care for Palin, but have always felt it was unfair to blame the parents for how their child turned out. Of course there are situations where they are to blame, but I don't see that in Bristol's case. Hell, my mother raised five children, and one turned out to be a piece of shit. Four out of five ain't bad. Sometimes your children stray from how you teach them.

So you are the piece of shit? I feel for your parents.

that's not funny

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Why does track Palin still live with his mom and dad? When I was his age we had already bought our first home and had a mortgage.

i don't believe he's employed

None of them are. The Palin's are pimping Sarah to keep them in drugs, guns and alcohol

My husband had to explain it to me. Mean bitches from hell. I don't understand this. You are just horrible.

Your husband has to explain things to you? That explains everything.

 

[Papageorgio]

I don't care for Palin, but have always felt it was unfair to blame the parents for how their child turned out. Of course there are situations where they are to blame, but I don't see that in Bristol's case. Hell, my mother raised five children, and one turned out to be a piece of shit. Four out of five ain't bad. Sometimes your children stray from how you teach them.

So you are the piece of shit? I feel for your parents.

that's not funny

Only joking on Aaron's level.

 

[aaronleland]

I don't care for Palin, but have always felt it was unfair to blame the parents for how their child turned out. Of course there are situations where they are to blame, but I don't see that in Bristol's case. Hell, my mother raised five children, and one turned out to be a piece of shit. Four out of five ain't bad. Sometimes your children stray from how you teach them.

So you are the piece of shit? I feel for your parents.

 

[Two Thumbs]

I don't care for Palin, but have always felt it was unfair to blame the parents for how their child turned out. Of course there are situations where they are to blame, but I don't see that in Bristol's case. Hell, my mother raised five children, and one turned out to be a piece of shit. Four out of five ain't bad. Sometimes your children stray from how you teach them.

So you are the piece of shit? I feel for your parents.

that's not funny

Only joking on Aaron's level.

never saw aaron mention anyones family but his own

 

[Papageorgio]

I don't care for Palin, but have always felt it was unfair to blame the parents for how their child turned out. Of course there are situations where they are to blame, but I don't see that in Bristol's case. Hell, my mother raised five children, and one turned out to be a piece of shit. Four out of five ain't bad. Sometimes your children stray from how you teach them.

So you are the piece of shit? I feel for your parents.

that's not funny

Only joking on Aaron's level.

never saw aaron mention anyones family but his own

Right, and he said one of his family members was a piece of shit. So I jokingly said,it was him. Good grief, sorry you didn't understand it.

 

[jillian]

No.

But you wingers keep resurrecting her and her dysfunctional family

Not our fault.

yea, it is

sp is just another person to support trump

but 90% of the threads on this were started by leftist

are you surprised that wacky sawah supported him. they deserve each other.

your candidate still sleeves the majority of voters. so good luck with that.

Yes I was surprised, but managed to not care.

My candidate? I support Bernie and he's nipping at that lying filth's heals as we speak.

you support bernie? why? because you think he's easier to beat?

serious question, btw.

He's as close to an honest pol that I've ever seen. Not many leftist have the balls to admit they are utter socialist.
obamas ideals were so bad that Americans, pissed at the loss of liberty took over a building.
berns ideals are far far worse, he has no way to pay for what he wants, all his ideas = a loss of freedom and liberty and will turn America from a Democratic Republic into a socialist hell hole.

He's so bad that I think he will cause Americans to rise up against the government so we can start over with all our freedoms returned.

plz don't ask me, again, what freedoms we have lost b/c I've given you a list already.


(R)(D) are taking our freedoms slowly, tiny cuts, that we accept over time, bern will hit so hard, that people will see (I hope) how bad leftist ideals are.

most LIBERALS (not "leftists") are not socialist but believe in a combination of capitalism and socialism because one encourages effort and the other protects workers from the dickensian effects of unfettered capitalism.

as for this president... his "ideas" haven't been bad. the right has been insane since he was elected. it didn't matter what he did and he's far more centrist than the extremists on the right would like to admit.

as for wanting a president because you think it will explode the country, well that's as bizarre as anything i've ever heard.

p.s. you don't care about *my* freedom. you care about the things that matter to you.

 

[Mac1958]

Mac's completely unsolicited ground rules for politicians' kids:

• If they're under 18, off limits, period
• If they're under 18 and their parents use them for props, the parents are fair game for doing so
• If they're over 18, haven't done or said anything political but the parents use them for props, they're still off limits but the parents are fair game for doing so (this appears to be one of those cases)
  
• If they're over 18 and get political, they're fair game

Unfortunately, being "fair game" also means subject to lies, personal insults and name-calling, but that's where we are. Sadly.
.

What lie was told about palin's kids?

If they're under 18, it doesn't matter, they should be off limits.

As I said.
.

 

[jillian]

Mac's completely unsolicited ground rules for politicians' kids:

• If they're under 18, off limits, period
• If they're under 18 and their parents use them for props, the parents are fair game for doing so
• If they're over 18, haven't done or said anything political but the parents use them for props, they're still off limits but the parents are fair game for doing so (this appears to be one of those cases)
  
• If they're over 18 and get political, they're fair game

Unfortunately, being "fair game" also means subject to lies, personal insults and name-calling, but that's where we are. Sadly.
.

What lie was told about palin's kids?

If they're under 18, it doesn't matter, they should be off limits.

As I said.
.

i'm pretty sure bristol was over 18 when she shilled herself out as a spokesperson for abstinence only. and if i'm petty sure no-one ever criticized sarah's baby... only her misuse of him.

and if your teenagers are out getting drunk like bush's girls did, they're going to be commented on....even if they're under age.

other than that, i don't much care if people trot their kids out. it's part of the process. and i'm not one of the people who called chelsea clinton ugly when she was a kid. but republicans sure did.

to the credit of the obamas their daughters haven't been noteworthy. and to the credit of the right, they've left the girls alone.

 

[Mac1958]

Mac's completely unsolicited ground rules for politicians' kids:

• If they're under 18, off limits, period
• If they're under 18 and their parents use them for props, the parents are fair game for doing so
• If they're over 18, haven't done or said anything political but the parents use them for props, they're still off limits but the parents are fair game for doing so (this appears to be one of those cases)
  
• If they're over 18 and get political, they're fair game

Unfortunately, being "fair game" also means subject to lies, personal insults and name-calling, but that's where we are. Sadly.
.

What lie was told about palin's kids?

If they're under 18, it doesn't matter, they should be off limits.

As I said.
.

i'm pretty sure bristol was over 18 when she shilled herself out as a spokesperson for abstinence only. and if i'm petty sure no-one ever criticized sarah's baby... only her misuse of him.

other than that, i don't much care if people trot their kids out. it's part of the process. and i'm not one of the people who called chelsea clinton ugly when she was a kid. but republicans sure did.

If they're over 18 and they willingly inject themselves into politics, they're fair game.

And I remember the Chelsea insults when she was a kid. Nasty and pathetic.
.

 

[jillian]

Mac's completely unsolicited ground rules for politicians' kids:

• If they're under 18, off limits, period
• If they're under 18 and their parents use them for props, the parents are fair game for doing so
• If they're over 18, haven't done or said anything political but the parents use them for props, they're still off limits but the parents are fair game for doing so (this appears to be one of those cases)
  
• If they're over 18 and get political, they're fair game

Unfortunately, being "fair game" also means subject to lies, personal insults and name-calling, but that's where we are. Sadly.
.

What lie was told about palin's kids?

If they're under 18, it doesn't matter, they should be off limits.

As I said.
.

i'm pretty sure bristol was over 18 when she shilled herself out as a spokesperson for abstinence only. and if i'm petty sure no-one ever criticized sarah's baby... only her misuse of him.

other than that, i don't much care if people trot their kids out. it's part of the process. and i'm not one of the people who called chelsea clinton ugly when she was a kid. but republicans sure did.

If they're over 18 and they willingly inject themselves into politics, they're fair game.

And I remember the Chelsea insults when she was a kid. Nasty and pathetic.
.

We're in agreement.

No doubt the people who think there's no such thing as a moderate would disagree.

 

[tinydancer]

Mac's completely unsolicited ground rules for politicians' kids:

• If they're under 18, off limits, period
• If they're under 18 and their parents use them for props, the parents are fair game for doing so
• If they're over 18, haven't done or said anything political but the parents use them for props, they're still off limits but the parents are fair game for doing so (this appears to be one of those cases)
  
• If they're over 18 and get political, they're fair game

Unfortunately, being "fair game" also means subject to lies, personal insults and name-calling, but that's where we are. Sadly.
.

What lie was told about palin's kids?

If they're under 18, it doesn't matter, they should be off limits.

As I said.
.

i'm pretty sure bristol was over 18 when she shilled herself out as a spokesperson for abstinence only. and if i'm petty sure no-one ever criticized sarah's baby... only her misuse of him.

and if your teenagers are out getting drunk like bush's girls did, they're going to be commented on....even if they're under age.

other than that, i don't much care if people trot their kids out. it's part of the process. and i'm not one of the people who called chelsea clinton ugly when she was a kid. but republicans sure did.

to the credit of the obamas their daughters haven't been noteworthy. and to the credit of the right, they've left the girls alone.

Wonkettes mocked Trig.

 

[jillian]

Mac's completely unsolicited ground rules for politicians' kids:

• If they're under 18, off limits, period
• If they're under 18 and their parents use them for props, the parents are fair game for doing so
• If they're over 18, haven't done or said anything political but the parents use them for props, they're still off limits but the parents are fair game for doing so (this appears to be one of those cases)
  
• If they're over 18 and get political, they're fair game

Unfortunately, being "fair game" also means subject to lies, personal insults and name-calling, but that's where we are. Sadly.
.

What lie was told about palin's kids?

If they're under 18, it doesn't matter, they should be off limits.

As I said.
.

i'm pretty sure bristol was over 18 when she shilled herself out as a spokesperson for abstinence only. and if i'm petty sure no-one ever criticized sarah's baby... only her misuse of him.

and if your teenagers are out getting drunk like bush's girls did, they're going to be commented on....even if they're under age.

other than that, i don't much care if people trot their kids out. it's part of the process. and i'm not one of the people who called chelsea clinton ugly when she was a kid. but republicans sure did.

to the credit of the obamas their daughters haven't been noteworthy. and to the credit of the right, they've left the girls alone.

Wonkettes mocked Trig.

No. They mocked Sarah's use if him. No doubt what you think passes for a "source" mischaracterized it. Because I'm pretty sure you aren't a reader of wonkette.

 

[strollingbones]

o look thread on obama's daughters....i want all of you conservatives to go object to that thread....

Obama's daughters living lavish lifestyle at tax payer expense.

 

[rightwinger]

Mac's completely unsolicited ground rules for politicians' kids:

• If they're under 18, off limits, period
• If they're under 18 and their parents use them for props, the parents are fair game for doing so
• If they're over 18, haven't done or said anything political but the parents use them for props, they're still off limits but the parents are fair game for doing so (this appears to be one of those cases)
  
• If they're over 18 and get political, they're fair game

Unfortunately, being "fair game" also means subject to lies, personal insults and name-calling, but that's where we are. Sadly.
.

What lie was told about palin's kids?

If they're under 18, it doesn't matter, they should be off limits.

As I said.
.

i'm pretty sure bristol was over 18 when she shilled herself out as a spokesperson for abstinence only. and if i'm petty sure no-one ever criticized sarah's baby... only her misuse of him.

other than that, i don't much care if people trot their kids out. it's part of the process. and i'm not one of the people who called chelsea clinton ugly when she was a kid. but republicans sure did.

If they're over 18 and they willingly inject themselves into politics, they're fair game.

And I remember the Chelsea insults when she was a kid. Nasty and pathetic.
.

If you thought Chelsea was bad, you should have seen what they said about Amy Carter

 

[Camp]

Mac's completely unsolicited ground rules for politicians' kids:

• If they're under 18, off limits, period
• If they're under 18 and their parents use them for props, the parents are fair game for doing so
• If they're over 18, haven't done or said anything political but the parents use them for props, they're still off limits but the parents are fair game for doing so (this appears to be one of those cases)
  
• If they're over 18 and get political, they're fair game

Unfortunately, being "fair game" also means subject to lies, personal insults and name-calling, but that's where we are. Sadly.
.

What lie was told about palin's kids?

If they're under 18, it doesn't matter, they should be off limits.

As I said.
.

i'm pretty sure bristol was over 18 when she shilled herself out as a spokesperson for abstinence only. and if i'm petty sure no-one ever criticized sarah's baby... only her misuse of him.

and if your teenagers are out getting drunk like bush's girls did, they're going to be commented on....even if they're under age.

other than that, i don't much care if people trot their kids out. it's part of the process. and i'm not one of the people who called chelsea clinton ugly when she was a kid. but republicans sure did.

to the credit of the obamas their daughters haven't been noteworthy. and to the credit of the right, they've left the girls alone.

Wonkettes mocked Trig.

And there is a thread running today whining and bitching about the Obama girls living a life of luxury because of the cost of their private schooling, even though the Obama's pay for it with their personal funds and not taxpayer funds.

 

[tinydancer]

Mac's completely unsolicited ground rules for politicians' kids:

• If they're under 18, off limits, period
• If they're under 18 and their parents use them for props, the parents are fair game for doing so
• If they're over 18, haven't done or said anything political but the parents use them for props, they're still off limits but the parents are fair game for doing so (this appears to be one of those cases)
  
• If they're over 18 and get political, they're fair game

Unfortunately, being "fair game" also means subject to lies, personal insults and name-calling, but that's where we are. Sadly.
.

What lie was told about palin's kids?

If they're under 18, it doesn't matter, they should be off limits.

As I said.
.

i'm pretty sure bristol was over 18 when she shilled herself out as a spokesperson for abstinence only. and if i'm petty sure no-one ever criticized sarah's baby... only her misuse of him.

and if your teenagers are out getting drunk like bush's girls did, they're going to be commented on....even if they're under age.

other than that, i don't much care if people trot their kids out. it's part of the process. and i'm not one of the people who called chelsea clinton ugly when she was a kid. but republicans sure did.

to the credit of the obamas their daughters haven't been noteworthy. and to the credit of the right, they've left the girls alone.

Wonkettes mocked Trig.

No. They mocked Sarah's use if him. No doubt what you think passes for a "source" mischaracterized it. Because I'm pretty sure you aren't a reader of wonkette.

His first Halloween trick or treating with Willow?

And you know damn well if she left Trig at home on the campaign trail Palin would be accused of hiding her down syndrome child.

 

[Two Thumbs]

yea, it is

sp is just another person to support trump

but 90% of the threads on this were started by leftist

are you surprised that wacky sawah supported him. they deserve each other.

your candidate still sleeves the majority of voters. so good luck with that.

Yes I was surprised, but managed to not care.

My candidate? I support Bernie and he's nipping at that lying filth's heals as we speak.

you support bernie? why? because you think he's easier to beat?

serious question, btw.

He's as close to an honest pol that I've ever seen. Not many leftist have the balls to admit they are utter socialist.
obamas ideals were so bad that Americans, pissed at the loss of liberty took over a building.
berns ideals are far far worse, he has no way to pay for what he wants, all his ideas = a loss of freedom and liberty and will turn America from a Democratic Republic into a socialist hell hole.

He's so bad that I think he will cause Americans to rise up against the government so we can start over with all our freedoms returned.

plz don't ask me, again, what freedoms we have lost b/c I've given you a list already.


(R)(D) are taking our freedoms slowly, tiny cuts, that we accept over time, bern will hit so hard, that people will see (I hope) how bad leftist ideals are.

most LIBERALS (not "leftists") are not socialist but believe in a combination of capitalism and socialism because one encourages effort and the other protects workers from the dickensian effects of unfettered capitalism.

as for this president... his "ideas" haven't been bad. the right has been insane since he was elected. it didn't matter what he did and he's far more centrist than the extremists on the right would like to admit.

as for wanting a president because you think it will explode the country, well that's as bizarre as anything i've ever heard.

p.s. you don't care about *my* freedom. you care about the things that matter to you.

There's no such thing as a liberal anymore, you are all far to left to be called that.

I gave you a list, already, of obamas horrid anti-freedoms, so your retort is based on ignorance that you choose to have.


that ps is a fucking lie, I'm standing up for your freedoms while you are trying to get rid of them, and have.

turning America socialist is done the same way you boil a frog.

It's time you leftist figured out your in the pot

 

[boedicca]

Indeed. Let's talk about anything to distract the Small Folk from the Epic Fail of the Obama Era and hiLIARy's corruption.

No doubt, epic fail of the Obama Era. I want to go back to the Bush years. I'm sure everyone wants to lose half or more of their retirement funds. How stupid can you idiots get?

What a sad bit of Sophistry. You loons perpetually spin any criticism of Obama into praise of Bush.