🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Palin suing NYT for their BS claim that she caused the Giffords massacre YAY!

It's about time these SOB's in the media that lie get bitch slapped into another galaxy. You go Sarah!

GettyImages-521220066-e1481550669886.jpg


Sarah Palin Suing New York Times For Defamation

To sue, one must prove the defendant had a duty to the plaintiff, abridged that duty, and created a tort (some harm came to the plaintiff).

An editorial is an opinion, and others hold that opinion too***. First of all the truth is a defense for culumny, and the burden in a civil matter is on the plaintiff to prove the shooting had nothing to do with Palin's map. Good luck with that.

Remember when a comedian held up a cartoon of Trump's head, and the hysterical right wing had a fit? Palin will lose, and so will the foolish hypocrites who demanded Kathy Griffin be fired for a bad joke.


***
images

photo of map with bullseyes made by palin - Google Search:
 
For some reason, a reasonably attractive mother who is successful and tough is perceived as a huge threat to the loon squad.
 
It's about time these SOB's in the media that lie get bitch slapped into another galaxy. You go Sarah!

GettyImages-521220066-e1481550669886.jpg


Sarah Palin Suing New York Times For Defamation

To sue, one must prove the defendant had a duty to the plaintiff, abridged that duty, and created a tort (some harm came to the plaintiff).

An editorial is an opinion, and others hold that opinion too***. First of all the truth is a defense for culumny, and the burden in a civil matter is on the plaintiff to prove the shooting had nothing to do with Palin's map. Good luck with that.

Remember when a comedian held up a cartoon of Trump's head, and the hysterical right wing had a fit? Palin will lose, and so will the foolish hypocrites who demanded Kathy Griffin be fired for a bad joke.


***
images

photo of map with bullseyes made by palin - Google Search:

She has already sued.

And everybody agrees she has a good chance of winning.

Winning is all we ever do anymore, on my side. It's great.
 
Politifact Truth-O-Meter is wrong. The hateful, ugly, degenerate, speeches made by Pailin added to and incited the atmosphere that influenced an assassin to commit murder for the Tea Party and now trump ideologies and perverted anti-American ideas. The evil drunken witch Palin was responsible for that massacre.

Put down the bong Camp. Even the WP cleared her.
 
This is how the white trash hill billy is trying to make money now

Sarah Palin’s political brand has been reduced to a clickbait farm

These brief declarations have been accompanied by links to sarahpalin.com, where visitors to the homepage are greeted by a full-screen black-and-white photo of the former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate. The banner reads, “Sarah Palin Building America’s Future,” :badgrin:

piece of white trash garbage

I think her being pissed off at being blamed once again for the deaths of 6 people is cause enough for the lawsuit.
Well, she was the one trying to incite violence talking about second amendment solutions and putting crosshairs on people. Ask Gabby Giffords and the families of the people killed in Arizona how they feel about caribou Barbie and her second amendment solutions.



Theres a pic of Palins map. It targets voting districts. Do you see peoples faces in the crosshairs?
The shooter had previous contact with Giffords which is why the news media trying to go after Palin is
politically motivated news and is why they are going to be sued and lose.


upload_2017-6-28_14-37-13.png
 
This is how the white trash hill billy is trying to make money now

Sarah Palin’s political brand has been reduced to a clickbait farm

These brief declarations have been accompanied by links to sarahpalin.com, where visitors to the homepage are greeted by a full-screen black-and-white photo of the former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate. The banner reads, “Sarah Palin Building America’s Future,” :badgrin:

piece of white trash garbage

I think her being pissed off at being blamed once again for the deaths of 6 people is cause enough for the lawsuit.
Well, she was the one trying to incite violence talking about second amendment solutions and putting crosshairs on people. Ask Gabby Giffords and the families of the people killed in Arizona how they feel about caribou Barbie and her second amendment solutions.



Theres a pic of Palins map. It targets voting districts. Do you see peoples faces in the crosshairs?
The shooter had previous contact with Giffords which is why the news media trying to go after Palin is
politically motivated news and is why they are going to be sued and lose.


View attachment 136063

If they're going to pretend that presents a threat, then so do bullets...

You know, like

* 1
* 2
* 3

fucking morons.
 
This is how the white trash hill billy is trying to make money now

Sarah Palin’s political brand has been reduced to a clickbait farm

These brief declarations have been accompanied by links to sarahpalin.com, where visitors to the homepage are greeted by a full-screen black-and-white photo of the former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate. The banner reads, “Sarah Palin Building America’s Future,” :badgrin:

piece of white trash garbage

I think her being pissed off at being blamed once again for the deaths of 6 people is cause enough for the lawsuit.
Well, she was the one trying to incite violence talking about second amendment solutions and putting crosshairs on people. Ask Gabby Giffords and the families of the people killed in Arizona how they feel about caribou Barbie and her second amendment solutions.



Theres a pic of Palins map. It targets voting districts. Do you see peoples faces in the crosshairs?
The shooter had previous contact with Giffords which is why the news media trying to go after Palin is
politically motivated news and is why they are going to be sued and lose.


View attachment 136063
There are no faces, but there are names. Gabrielle Giffords is the fourth name on the list. So, your point is that because only her name was used and not her picture....what the heck is your point?
 
It's about time these SOB's in the media that lie get bitch slapped into another galaxy. You go Sarah!

GettyImages-521220066-e1481550669886.jpg


Sarah Palin Suing New York Times For Defamation

To sue, one must prove the defendant had a duty to the plaintiff, abridged that duty, and created a tort (some harm came to the plaintiff).

An editorial is an opinion, and others hold that opinion too***. First of all the truth is a defense for culumny, and the burden in a civil matter is on the plaintiff to prove the shooting had nothing to do with Palin's map. Good luck with that.

Remember when a comedian held up a cartoon of Trump's head, and the hysterical right wing had a fit? Palin will lose, and so will the foolish hypocrites who demanded Kathy Griffin be fired for a bad joke.


***
images

photo of map with bullseyes made by palin - Google Search:

Fact checkers including the WP said there are no links. Get a grip. Jake Tapper when he was with ABC cleared Palin in January 2011. Just because all you left wing loons have been running with the lie for years still doesn't make it true.

The NYT already put up a correction that there was no link so you might as well give it up that it's true. But nah. You left wing loons will keep lying about it for eternity.

"Jake Tapper‏Verified account @jaketapper


Replying to @EsotericCD


even way back in Jan 2011 we knew that Loughlin's obsession began 3 years before the Palin map."


I hope she takes them to the cleaners.



Jake Tapper on Twitter
 
It's about time these SOB's in the media that lie get bitch slapped into another galaxy. You go Sarah!

GettyImages-521220066-e1481550669886.jpg


Sarah Palin Suing New York Times For Defamation

To sue, one must prove the defendant had a duty to the plaintiff, abridged that duty, and created a tort (some harm came to the plaintiff).

An editorial is an opinion, and others hold that opinion too***. First of all the truth is a defense for culumny, and the burden in a civil matter is on the plaintiff to prove the shooting had nothing to do with Palin's map. Good luck with that.

Remember when a comedian held up a cartoon of Trump's head, and the hysterical right wing had a fit? Palin will lose, and so will the foolish hypocrites who demanded Kathy Griffin be fired for a bad joke.


***
images

photo of map with bullseyes made by palin - Google Search:

She has already sued.

And everybody agrees she has a good chance of winning.

Winning is all we ever do anymore, on my side. It's great.

Palin won, she has another 15 minutes of fame, and now can drift back to anonymity.
 
This is how the white trash hill billy is trying to make money now

Sarah Palin’s political brand has been reduced to a clickbait farm

These brief declarations have been accompanied by links to sarahpalin.com, where visitors to the homepage are greeted by a full-screen black-and-white photo of the former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate. The banner reads, “Sarah Palin Building America’s Future,” :badgrin:

piece of white trash garbage

I think her being pissed off at being blamed once again for the deaths of 6 people is cause enough for the lawsuit.
Well, she was the one trying to incite violence talking about second amendment solutions and putting crosshairs on people. Ask Gabby Giffords and the families of the people killed in Arizona how they feel about caribou Barbie and her second amendment solutions.



Theres a pic of Palins map. It targets voting districts. Do you see peoples faces in the crosshairs?
The shooter had previous contact with Giffords which is why the news media trying to go after Palin is
politically motivated news and is why they are going to be sued and lose.


View attachment 136063
There are no faces, but there are names. Gabrielle Giffords is the fourth name on the list. So, your point is that because only her name was used and not her picture....what the heck is your point?

Jared was fixated on Giffords three years before that Super Pac map came out. And did you miss the NYT's correction? Obviously. The Times said there was no link.
 
It's about time these SOB's in the media that lie get bitch slapped into another galaxy. You go Sarah!

GettyImages-521220066-e1481550669886.jpg


Sarah Palin Suing New York Times For Defamation

To sue, one must prove the defendant had a duty to the plaintiff, abridged that duty, and created a tort (some harm came to the plaintiff).

An editorial is an opinion, and others hold that opinion too***. First of all the truth is a defense for culumny, and the burden in a civil matter is on the plaintiff to prove the shooting had nothing to do with Palin's map. Good luck with that.

Remember when a comedian held up a cartoon of Trump's head, and the hysterical right wing had a fit? Palin will lose, and so will the foolish hypocrites who demanded Kathy Griffin be fired for a bad joke.


***
images

photo of map with bullseyes made by palin - Google Search:

She has already sued.

And everybody agrees she has a good chance of winning.

Winning is all we ever do anymore, on my side. It's great.

Palin won, she has another 15 minutes of fame, and now can drift back to anonymity.

She wins every time you retards attack her. And you, not she, look ever more stupid.
 
Oh and the best part of this is the simple fact that the NYT's has pushed this bullshit for years so they can't claim it was a one time error. Go Sarah!
 
This is how the white trash hill billy is trying to make money now

Sarah Palin’s political brand has been reduced to a clickbait farm

These brief declarations have been accompanied by links to sarahpalin.com, where visitors to the homepage are greeted by a full-screen black-and-white photo of the former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate. The banner reads, “Sarah Palin Building America’s Future,” :badgrin:

piece of white trash garbage

I think her being pissed off at being blamed once again for the deaths of 6 people is cause enough for the lawsuit.
Well, she was the one trying to incite violence talking about second amendment solutions and putting crosshairs on people. Ask Gabby Giffords and the families of the people killed in Arizona how they feel about caribou Barbie and her second amendment solutions.



Theres a pic of Palins map. It targets voting districts. Do you see peoples faces in the crosshairs?
The shooter had previous contact with Giffords which is why the news media trying to go after Palin is
politically motivated news and is why they are going to be sued and lose.


View attachment 136063
There are no faces, but there are names. Gabrielle Giffords is the fourth name on the list. So, your point is that because only her name was used and not her picture....what the heck is your point?

Jared was fixated on Giffords three years before that Super Pac map came out. And did you miss the NYT's correction? Obviously. The Times said there was no link.
Palin elevated the sense of doom and crisis with her hate speeches and no one really knows what effect those hate speeches may have had on the mentally ill nutjob who committed the massacre.
 
This is how the white trash hill billy is trying to make money now

Sarah Palin’s political brand has been reduced to a clickbait farm

These brief declarations have been accompanied by links to sarahpalin.com, where visitors to the homepage are greeted by a full-screen black-and-white photo of the former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate. The banner reads, “Sarah Palin Building America’s Future,” :badgrin:

piece of white trash garbage

I think her being pissed off at being blamed once again for the deaths of 6 people is cause enough for the lawsuit.
Well, she was the one trying to incite violence talking about second amendment solutions and putting crosshairs on people. Ask Gabby Giffords and the families of the people killed in Arizona how they feel about caribou Barbie and her second amendment solutions.



Theres a pic of Palins map. It targets voting districts. Do you see peoples faces in the crosshairs?
The shooter had previous contact with Giffords which is why the news media trying to go after Palin is
politically motivated news and is why they are going to be sued and lose.


View attachment 136063
There are no faces, but there are names. Gabrielle Giffords is the fourth name on the list. So, your point is that because only her name was used and not her picture....what the heck is your point?


Hmm, yeah sure. So what other people were targeted besides Giffords? The target sites were not used in a violent way, such as putting a person in the sites. SO yes , it IS all BS. Palin's campaign was not the first to use this type of imagery in campaigning or politics. Democrats have also done it. This is the Left using their pre-existing hatred of Palin and guns to use a tradgedy for political gain. Of course, to a Democrat , a pop tart bitten into the shape of a gun is seen as a violent threat, so i can see where your coming from.
 
I think her being pissed off at being blamed once again for the deaths of 6 people is cause enough for the lawsuit.
Well, she was the one trying to incite violence talking about second amendment solutions and putting crosshairs on people. Ask Gabby Giffords and the families of the people killed in Arizona how they feel about caribou Barbie and her second amendment solutions.



Theres a pic of Palins map. It targets voting districts. Do you see peoples faces in the crosshairs?
The shooter had previous contact with Giffords which is why the news media trying to go after Palin is
politically motivated news and is why they are going to be sued and lose.


View attachment 136063
There are no faces, but there are names. Gabrielle Giffords is the fourth name on the list. So, your point is that because only her name was used and not her picture....what the heck is your point?

Jared was fixated on Giffords three years before that Super Pac map came out. And did you miss the NYT's correction? Obviously. The Times said there was no link.
Palin elevated the sense of doom and crisis with her hate speeches and no one really knows what effect those hate speeches may have had on the mentally ill nutjob who committed the massacre.


There's no link. He wasn't political. You need to stop lying.
 

Forum List

Back
Top