ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
She wont sue...whenever they say they are going to do something in the future you can bet they wont do and haven't done anything
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Highly doubtful she needs the money. She wants the fake lying media held accountable and she is 100% correct. Wouldn't you sue someone for slandering you?Palin to Sue NY Times Over 'Political Incitement' Editorial
LMAO! Love it. She has a great case! I hope she ends that miserable failing newspapers life!
She must need money. Taking a clue from T. Hope she loses.
So you still believe CNN after they were caught on tape ADMITTING it was fake news? Democrats never seem to amaze me with their stupidityT and his press secretaries are fake news. They do not want you to know the truth.
She wont sue...whenever they say they are going to do something in the future you can bet they wont do and haven't done anything
Sarah Palin is someone who is so starved for attention that she will do anything for attention. She is a flake and a diva and nothing more. I used to be a supporter of her until I realized how lazy she is. She is someone who has abandoned principle. Her conduct at the WH in front of Clinton's picture was what I would expect from a 5 year old child and extremely hateful. I hope she gets booted out of court all the way back to Alaska.Sarah Palin is someone who is so starved for attention that she will do anything for attention. She is a flake and a diva and nothing more.
Sounds like Hillary
Highly doubtful she needs the money. She wants the fake lying media held accountable and she is 100% correct. Wouldn't you sue someone for slandering you?Palin to Sue NY Times Over 'Political Incitement' Editorial
LMAO! Love it. She has a great case! I hope she ends that miserable failing newspapers life!
She must need money. Taking a clue from T. Hope she loses.
People on this forum don't reach MILLIONS of people. NYT does.Highly doubtful she needs the money. She wants the fake lying media held accountable and she is 100% correct. Wouldn't you sue someone for slandering you?Palin to Sue NY Times Over 'Political Incitement' Editorial
LMAO! Love it. She has a great case! I hope she ends that miserable failing newspapers life!
She must need money. Taking a clue from T. Hope she loses.
She doesn't have a leg to stand on. The fact is that many on this board are doing the same thing that the NY Times did. How many posts have taken what a Democrat says and tried to say that they are responsible for the shootings of Republicans. Palin can throw heat but it seems that she can't take it. The NY Times has a right to say it even if it is wrong. They are not defaming anyone.
Seems like a pretty obvious link. She roused her rabble, painted targets on her opponents, and one of her demented followers took her up on it. Maybe you don't see it that way, but if someone went around talking about murder and circulated pictures of me or my family in crosshairs, I'd take it as a death threat.Well, she was the one trying to incite violence talking about second amendment solutions and putting crosshairs on people. Ask Gabby Giffords and the families of the people killed in Arizona how they feel about caribou Barbie and her second amendment solutions.This is how the white trash hill billy is trying to make money now
Sarah Palin’s political brand has been reduced to a clickbait farm
These brief declarations have been accompanied by links to sarahpalin.com, where visitors to the homepage are greeted by a full-screen black-and-white photo of the former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate. The banner reads, “Sarah Palin Building America’s Future,”
piece of white trash garbage
I think her being pissed off at being blamed once again for the deaths of 6 people is cause enough for the lawsuit.
I don't give a flying rats ass about how Giffords feels about the 2nd. Palin had nothing nada to do with those deaths in Arizona. Flat out lies and I for one am glad that she's going for the throat now to end this bullshit.
Even in their pathetic correction the New York Times said that no connection whatsoever . Go argue with them that this was Palin's fault.
“An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that a link existed between political incitement and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords,” the note reads in its entirety.
“In fact, no such link was established.”
NYT issues correction to editorial linking Giffords shooting to Palin
I can just imagine the judge in that courtroom.
"So, let me get this straight Mrs. Palin...during your campaign, you created an image depicting crosshairs over districts you needed to flip, and now you're here suing for defamation? Get the fuck out of my courtroom with this frivolous bullshit and stop wasting everyone's time."
I can just imagine the judge in that courtroom.
"So, let me get this straight Mrs. Palin...during your campaign, you created an image depicting crosshairs over districts you needed to flip, and now you're here suing for defamation? Get the fuck out of my courtroom with this frivolous bullshit and stop wasting everyone's time."
Districts are not people, moron.
Crosshairs are used in a target sense, and targeting a district during elections is not the same as calling people to kill individuals.
But you have to be someone other than a lefty to know that. You retards are just guns waiting to be aimed.
also smarter than you.Nice try, Will. Unfortunately for Sarah, judges are smarter than people like you.